Guest guest Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 the relevant is irrelevant. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > the relevant is irrelevant. > > .b b.b. > Irrelevant is irrelevant. .......and you shouldn't ever try to keep one as a pet! toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > the relevant is irrelevant. > > > > .b b.b. > Irrelevant is irrelevant. > > ......and you shouldn't ever try to keep one as a pet! > > > > > > toombaru irregardless? but.. irregardless is his name. being petted is his game. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 - toombaru2006 Nisargadatta Friday, June 26, 2009 6:08 PM Re: how it is. Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > the relevant is irrelevant. > > .b b.b. > Irrelevant is irrelevant. .......and you shouldn't ever try to keep one as a pet! toombaru The relevant is relevant, the irrevelant is revelant...show me the irrelevant that is irrevelant. -ego- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > toombaru2006 > Nisargadatta > Friday, June 26, 2009 6:08 PM > Re: how it is. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > the relevant is irrelevant. > > > > .b b.b. > > > > Irrelevant is irrelevant. > > ......and you shouldn't ever try to keep one as a pet! > > toombaru > > The relevant is relevant, the irrevelant is revelant...show me the > irrelevant that is irrevelant. > -ego- the irrelevant that can be shown or named.. is not the real irrelevant. that would be too relevant. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > toombaru2006 > Nisargadatta > Friday, June 26, 2009 6:08 PM > Re: how it is. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > the relevant is irrelevant. > > > > .b b.b. > > > > Irrelevant is irrelevant. > > ......and you shouldn't ever try to keep one as a pet! > > toombaru > > The relevant is relevant, the irrevelant is revelant...show me the > irrelevant that is irrevelant. > -ego- > Without a conceptual-psychological center.......everything is irrelevant.....including irrelevancy. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > the relevant is irrelevant. > > > > .b b.b. > Irrelevant is irrelevant. > > ......and you shouldn't ever try to keep one as a pet! > > > > > > toombaru irregardless? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > toombaru2006 > Nisargadatta > Friday, June 26, 2009 6:08 PM > Re: how it is. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > the relevant is irrelevant. > > > > .b b.b. > > > > Irrelevant is irrelevant. > > ......and you shouldn't ever try to keep one as a pet! > > toombaru > > The relevant is relevant, the irrevelant is revelant...show me the > irrelevant that is irrevelant. > -ego- > Without a conceptual-psychological center.......everything is irrelevant.....including irrelevancy. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > toombaru2006 > > Nisargadatta > > Friday, June 26, 2009 6:08 PM > > Re: how it is. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > the relevant is irrelevant. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > Irrelevant is irrelevant. > > > > ......and you shouldn't ever try to keep one as a pet! > > > > toombaru > > > > The relevant is relevant, the irrevelant is revelant...show me the > > irrelevant that is irrevelant. > > -ego- > > > > > > Without a conceptual-psychological center.......everything is irrelevant.....including irrelevancy. > > > > > > toombaru is that relevant? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 - toombaru2006 Nisargadatta Friday, June 26, 2009 6:35 PM Re: how it is. Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > toombaru2006 > Nisargadatta > Friday, June 26, 2009 6:08 PM > Re: how it is. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > the relevant is irrelevant. > > > > .b b.b. > > > > Irrelevant is irrelevant. > > ......and you shouldn't ever try to keep one as a pet! > > toombaru > > The relevant is relevant, the irrevelant is revelant...show me the > irrelevant that is irrevelant. > -ego- > Without a conceptual-psychological center.......everything is irrelevant.....including irrelevancy. toombaru Relevant and irrelevant once named have the same relevance -ego- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2009 Report Share Posted June 26, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > toombaru2006 > Nisargadatta > Friday, June 26, 2009 6:35 PM > Re: how it is. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > toombaru2006 > > Nisargadatta > > Friday, June 26, 2009 6:08 PM > > Re: how it is. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > the relevant is irrelevant. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > Irrelevant is irrelevant. > > > > ......and you shouldn't ever try to keep one as a pet! > > > > toombaru > > > > The relevant is relevant, the irrevelant is revelant...show me the > > irrelevant that is irrevelant. > > -ego- > > > > Without a conceptual-psychological center.......everything is > irrelevant.....including irrelevancy. > > toombaru > > Relevant and irrelevant once named have the same relevance > -ego- to what? don't say themselves. that's not germane to the gist of the question. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 27, 2009 Report Share Posted June 27, 2009 - roberibus111 Nisargadatta Friday, June 26, 2009 6:57 PM Re: how it is. Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > toombaru2006 > Nisargadatta > Friday, June 26, 2009 6:35 PM > Re: how it is. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > toombaru2006 > > Nisargadatta > > Friday, June 26, 2009 6:08 PM > > Re: how it is. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > the relevant is irrelevant. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > Irrelevant is irrelevant. > > > > ......and you shouldn't ever try to keep one as a pet! > > > > toombaru > > > > The relevant is relevant, the irrevelant is revelant...show me the > > irrelevant that is irrevelant. > > -ego- > > > > Without a conceptual-psychological center.......everything is > irrelevant.....including irrelevancy. > > toombaru > > Relevant and irrelevant once named have the same relevance > -ego- to what? don't say themselves. that's not germane to the gist of the question. ..b b.b. To the one naming, none else... -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 27, 2009 Report Share Posted June 27, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > roberibus111 > Nisargadatta > Friday, June 26, 2009 6:57 PM > Re: how it is. > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > toombaru2006 > > Nisargadatta > > Friday, June 26, 2009 6:35 PM > > Re: how it is. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > - > > > toombaru2006 > > > Nisargadatta > > > Friday, June 26, 2009 6:08 PM > > > Re: how it is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > the relevant is irrelevant. > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > Irrelevant is irrelevant. > > > > > > ......and you shouldn't ever try to keep one as a pet! > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > The relevant is relevant, the irrevelant is revelant...show me the > > > irrelevant that is irrevelant. > > > -ego- > > > > > > > Without a conceptual-psychological center.......everything is > > irrelevant.....including irrelevancy. > > > > toombaru > > > > Relevant and irrelevant once named have the same relevance > > -ego- > > to what? > > don't say themselves. > > that's not germane to the gist of the question. > > .b b.b. > > To the one naming, none else... > -geo- that's irrelevant. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.