Guest guest Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 omkaradatta , " omkara " <fewtch wrote: omkaradatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > omkaradatta , " omkara " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > omkaradatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > omkaradatta , " omkara " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > omkaradatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > omkaradatta , " omkara " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > " In space, no one can hear you scream " > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this the issue? > > > > > > > > > > > > Nobody wants 'space', eh? > > > > > > > > > > On a related note, nobody wants not knowing. > > > > > > > > > > There is nothing to know. > > > > > > > > > > The past is not, and cannot be known. > > > > > > > > > > The future is not, and cannot be known. > > > > > > > > > > One can not detach from what is present, to know anything > > > > > objectively about it. > > > > > > > > Well said... I liked this also as posted in a different message on Nisargadatta. Thanks for posting it here, too. > > > > > > You're welcome. > > > > > > Like you said, this has been said in a million ways, and it makes > > > no difference how many times or ways it's said - one only hears if > one has ears to hear. > > > > ... and if one has ears to hear, one really need not hear. > > well, that's just it. > > if one has ears to hear one is really listening. > > and then, it doesn't matter what is said. > > - d - In-deed ('in actual actions/reality, not just words'). One reading this might refer back to the Upanishadic statement, " The One without a Second " . Where might this " one " be located? One knows, doesn't one? ;-). --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.