Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Without Attributes - From I Am That

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

The sweetness is the nature of sugar;

but that sweetness is there only so long as the sugar is present. Once the sugar

has been consumed or thrown away, there is no more sweetness. So this knowledge

" I am, " this consciousness, this feeling or sense of Being, is the quintessence

of the body. And if that body essence is gone, this feeling, the sense of Being,

will also have gone. This sense of Being cannot remeain without the body, just

as sweetness cannot remain without the material, which is sugar.

 

Visitor: What remains then?

 

Maharaj: What remains is the Original, which is unconditioned, without

attributes, and without identity: that on which this temporary state of the

consciousness and the three states and the three gunas have come and gone. It is

called Parabrahman, the Absolute.

 

This is my basic teaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

dan330033

Nisargadatta

Thursday, July 02, 2009 4:35 PM

Re: Without Attributes - From " I Am That "

 

 

 

 

 

The sweetness is the nature of sugar;

but that sweetness is there only so long as the sugar is present. Once the

sugar has been consumed or thrown away, there is no more sweetness. So this

knowledge " I am, " this consciousness, this feeling or sense of Being, is the

quintessence of the body. And if that body essence is gone, this feeling,

the sense of Being, will also have gone. This sense of Being cannot remeain

without the body, just as sweetness cannot remain without the material,

which is sugar.

 

Visitor: What remains then?

 

Maharaj: What remains is the Original, which is unconditioned, without

attributes, and without identity: that on which this temporary state of the

consciousness and the three states and the three gunas have come and gone.

It is called Parabrahman, the Absolute.

 

This is my basic teaching.

===

It is really simple, but the quantum leap is the grasping of the

unconditioned, qualitiless, is-ness. Though, concepts, the senses,

rationality, logic...alla those seem to " stand in the way " of real

understanding. They can take one to the border....then...silence.

-ego-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.

Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009

Tested on: 2/7/2009 16:41:14

avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

dan330033

Nisargadatta

Thursday, July 02, 2009 4:35 PM

Re: Without Attributes - From " I Am That "

 

 

 

 

 

The sweetness is the nature of sugar;

but that sweetness is there only so long as the sugar is present. Once the

sugar has been consumed or thrown away, there is no more sweetness. So this

knowledge " I am, " this consciousness, this feeling or sense of Being, is the

quintessence of the body. And if that body essence is gone, this feeling,

the sense of Being, will also have gone. This sense of Being cannot remeain

without the body, just as sweetness cannot remain without the material,

which is sugar.

 

Visitor: What remains then?

 

Maharaj: What remains is the Original, which is unconditioned, without

attributes, and without identity: that on which this temporary state of the

consciousness and the three states and the three gunas have come and gone.

It is called Parabrahman, the Absolute.

 

This is my basic teaching.

===

....and without the sugar even the taster of sweetness is non-graspable.

Paradoxicaly the sugar is needed in order to the taster of sugar to

be....grasped?...revealed?...be-ed?....it-ed?.....

-egg-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.

Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009

Tested on: 2/7/2009 16:41:14

avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

geo

Nisargadatta

Thursday, July 02, 2009 4:49 PM

Re: Re: Without Attributes - From " I Am That "

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

dan330033

Nisargadatta

Thursday, July 02, 2009 4:35 PM

Re: Without Attributes - From " I Am That "

 

The sweetness is the nature of sugar;

but that sweetness is there only so long as the sugar is present. Once the

sugar has been consumed or thrown away, there is no more sweetness. So this

knowledge " I am, " this consciousness, this feeling or sense of Being, is the

quintessence of the body. And if that body essence is gone, this feeling,

the sense of Being, will also have gone. This sense of Being cannot remeain

without the body, just as sweetness cannot remain without the material,

which is sugar.

 

Visitor: What remains then?

 

Maharaj: What remains is the Original, which is unconditioned, without

attributes, and without identity: that on which this temporary state of the

consciousness and the three states and the three gunas have come and gone.

It is called Parabrahman, the Absolute.

 

This is my basic teaching.

===

It is really simple, but the quantum leap is the grasping of the

unconditioned, qualitiless, is-ness. Though, concepts, the senses,

rationality, logic...alla those seem to " stand in the way " of real

understanding. They can take one to the border....then...silence.

 

Thought, not though (correction)

-ego-

 

avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.

Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009

Tested on: 2/7/2009 16:41:14

avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.

Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009

Tested on: 2/7/2009 16:54:42

avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> dan330033

> Nisargadatta

> Thursday, July 02, 2009 4:35 PM

> Re: Without Attributes - From " I Am That "

>

>

>

>

>

> The sweetness is the nature of sugar;

> but that sweetness is there only so long as the sugar is present. Once the

> sugar has been consumed or thrown away, there is no more sweetness. So this

> knowledge " I am, " this consciousness, this feeling or sense of Being, is the

> quintessence of the body. And if that body essence is gone, this feeling,

> the sense of Being, will also have gone. This sense of Being cannot remeain

> without the body, just as sweetness cannot remain without the material,

> which is sugar.

>

> Visitor: What remains then?

>

> Maharaj: What remains is the Original, which is unconditioned, without

> attributes, and without identity: that on which this temporary state of the

> consciousness and the three states and the three gunas have come and gone.

> It is called Parabrahman, the Absolute.

>

> This is my basic teaching.

> ===

> It is really simple, but the quantum leap is the grasping of the

> unconditioned, qualitiless, is-ness. Though, concepts, the senses,

> rationality, logic...alla those seem to " stand in the way " of real

> understanding. They can take one to the border....then...silence.

> -ego-

 

Yes, one comes to a boundary, a limit.

 

The " barrier that is no barrier " is the term in Zen.

 

Not even is-ness.

 

Quality-less.

 

Dimensionless.

 

Nothing for thought to grasp, or even to sense.

 

Where reality turns inside out.

 

And yet, day to day life is as it is.

 

-- D --

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

dan330033

Nisargadatta

Thursday, July 02, 2009 5:05 PM

Re: Without Attributes - From " I Am That "

 

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> dan330033

> Nisargadatta

> Thursday, July 02, 2009 4:35 PM

> Re: Without Attributes - From " I Am That "

>

>

>

>

>

> The sweetness is the nature of sugar;

> but that sweetness is there only so long as the sugar is present. Once the

> sugar has been consumed or thrown away, there is no more sweetness. So

> this

> knowledge " I am, " this consciousness, this feeling or sense of Being, is

> the

> quintessence of the body. And if that body essence is gone, this feeling,

> the sense of Being, will also have gone. This sense of Being cannot

> remeain

> without the body, just as sweetness cannot remain without the material,

> which is sugar.

>

> Visitor: What remains then?

>

> Maharaj: What remains is the Original, which is unconditioned, without

> attributes, and without identity: that on which this temporary state of

> the

> consciousness and the three states and the three gunas have come and gone.

> It is called Parabrahman, the Absolute.

>

> This is my basic teaching.

> ===

> It is really simple, but the quantum leap is the grasping of the

> unconditioned, qualitiless, is-ness. Though, concepts, the senses,

> rationality, logic...alla those seem to " stand in the way " of real

> understanding. They can take one to the border....then...silence.

> -ego-

 

Yes, one comes to a boundary, a limit.

 

The " barrier that is no barrier " is the term in Zen.

 

Not even is-ness.

 

Quality-less.

 

Dimensionless.

 

Nothing for thought to grasp, or even to sense.

 

Where reality turns inside out.

 

And yet, day to day life is as it is.

 

-- D --

 

Not to leave this " grasping " too...esoteric... and I have werner in mind

here, there seems to be a need to see the difference between

" total-no-existence-at-all " and the

" ground-of-all-possible-existence-per-se " . On a physical level: space

without a plane to stand on....and....space with a virtual non-material

plane to stand on. ...but, these are all ridiculous analogies...

-geo-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.

Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009

Tested on: 2/7/2009 17:09:35

avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> dan330033

> Nisargadatta

> Thursday, July 02, 2009 4:35 PM

> Re: Without Attributes - From " I Am That "

>

>

>

>

>

> The sweetness is the nature of sugar;

> but that sweetness is there only so long as the sugar is present. Once the

> sugar has been consumed or thrown away, there is no more sweetness. So this

> knowledge " I am, " this consciousness, this feeling or sense of Being, is the

> quintessence of the body. And if that body essence is gone, this feeling,

> the sense of Being, will also have gone. This sense of Being cannot remeain

> without the body, just as sweetness cannot remain without the material,

> which is sugar.

>

> Visitor: What remains then?

>

> Maharaj: What remains is the Original, which is unconditioned, without

> attributes, and without identity: that on which this temporary state of the

> consciousness and the three states and the three gunas have come and gone.

> It is called Parabrahman, the Absolute.

>

> This is my basic teaching.

> ===

> ...and without the sugar even the taster of sweetness is non-graspable.

> Paradoxicaly the sugar is needed in order to the taster of sugar to

> be....grasped?...revealed?...be-ed?....it-ed?.....

> -egg-

 

Yes, the taster arises nonvolitionally with the tasting and the sugar being

tasted.

 

We have a habit of referring to " I " as an ongoing entity that chooses things.

 

" I am going to buy some sugar, because I want to taste something sweet. "

 

This has common-sense utility. It is obvious why this kind of reference is

used. It is useful for thought, in planning a trip to the grocery store, making

sure there is enough money, a way to get to the store. So, the " I " isn't bad or

to be gotten rid of. It is seen through.

 

As awareness is immediate, discontinuous, the taster arises with the tasting

with the sugar.

 

The thought for planning the trip to the store, also arose with the hand

reaching into the pocket to make sure the wallet was there, the hand that put

the key into the ignition of the car.

 

Momentary, immediate arisings, nondivided, consciousness/object of

consciousness.

 

All nonvolitional. No exceptions.

 

- d -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> dan330033

> Nisargadatta

> Thursday, July 02, 2009 5:05 PM

> Re: Without Attributes - From " I Am That "

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > dan330033

> > Nisargadatta

> > Thursday, July 02, 2009 4:35 PM

> > Re: Without Attributes - From " I Am That "

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > The sweetness is the nature of sugar;

> > but that sweetness is there only so long as the sugar is present. Once the

> > sugar has been consumed or thrown away, there is no more sweetness. So

> > this

> > knowledge " I am, " this consciousness, this feeling or sense of Being, is

> > the

> > quintessence of the body. And if that body essence is gone, this feeling,

> > the sense of Being, will also have gone. This sense of Being cannot

> > remeain

> > without the body, just as sweetness cannot remain without the material,

> > which is sugar.

> >

> > Visitor: What remains then?

> >

> > Maharaj: What remains is the Original, which is unconditioned, without

> > attributes, and without identity: that on which this temporary state of

> > the

> > consciousness and the three states and the three gunas have come and gone.

> > It is called Parabrahman, the Absolute.

> >

> > This is my basic teaching.

> > ===

> > It is really simple, but the quantum leap is the grasping of the

> > unconditioned, qualitiless, is-ness. Though, concepts, the senses,

> > rationality, logic...alla those seem to " stand in the way " of real

> > understanding. They can take one to the border....then...silence.

> > -ego-

>

> Yes, one comes to a boundary, a limit.

>

> The " barrier that is no barrier " is the term in Zen.

>

> Not even is-ness.

>

> Quality-less.

>

> Dimensionless.

>

> Nothing for thought to grasp, or even to sense.

>

> Where reality turns inside out.

>

> And yet, day to day life is as it is.

>

> -- D --

>

> Not to leave this " grasping " too...esoteric... and I have werner in mind

> here, there seems to be a need to see the difference between

> " total-no-existence-at-all " and the

> " ground-of-all-possible-existence-per-se " . On a physical level: space

> without a plane to stand on....and....space with a virtual non-material

> plane to stand on. ...but, these are all ridiculous analogies...

> -geo-

 

a metaphor i like is the black hole/white hole

 

the point prior to the big bang/after the collapse of the universe

 

infinity in/as a point

 

and prior to that point?

 

neither is nor is not apply

 

time doesn't apply

 

this point isn't a matter of before or after anything

 

" anything " is an imaginary reference point

 

" something " is an imaginary reference point

 

" i am " is an imaginary reference point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

dan330033

Nisargadatta

Thursday, July 02, 2009 5:51 PM

Re: Without Attributes - From " I Am That "

 

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> dan330033

> Nisargadatta

> Thursday, July 02, 2009 5:05 PM

> Re: Without Attributes - From " I Am That "

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > dan330033

> > Nisargadatta

> > Thursday, July 02, 2009 4:35 PM

> > Re: Without Attributes - From " I Am That "

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > The sweetness is the nature of sugar;

> > but that sweetness is there only so long as the sugar is present. Once

> > the

> > sugar has been consumed or thrown away, there is no more sweetness. So

> > this

> > knowledge " I am, " this consciousness, this feeling or sense of Being, is

> > the

> > quintessence of the body. And if that body essence is gone, this

> > feeling,

> > the sense of Being, will also have gone. This sense of Being cannot

> > remeain

> > without the body, just as sweetness cannot remain without the material,

> > which is sugar.

> >

> > Visitor: What remains then?

> >

> > Maharaj: What remains is the Original, which is unconditioned, without

> > attributes, and without identity: that on which this temporary state of

> > the

> > consciousness and the three states and the three gunas have come and

> > gone.

> > It is called Parabrahman, the Absolute.

> >

> > This is my basic teaching.

> > ===

> > It is really simple, but the quantum leap is the grasping of the

> > unconditioned, qualitiless, is-ness. Though, concepts, the senses,

> > rationality, logic...alla those seem to " stand in the way " of real

> > understanding. They can take one to the border....then...silence.

> > -ego-

>

> Yes, one comes to a boundary, a limit.

>

> The " barrier that is no barrier " is the term in Zen.

>

> Not even is-ness.

>

> Quality-less.

>

> Dimensionless.

>

> Nothing for thought to grasp, or even to sense.

>

> Where reality turns inside out.

>

> And yet, day to day life is as it is.

>

> -- D --

>

> Not to leave this " grasping " too...esoteric... and I have werner in mind

> here, there seems to be a need to see the difference between

> " total-no-existence-at-all " and the

> " ground-of-all-possible-existence-per-se " . On a physical level: space

> without a plane to stand on....and....space with a virtual non-material

> plane to stand on. ...but, these are all ridiculous analogies...

> -geo-

 

a metaphor i like is the black hole/white hole

 

the point prior to the big bang/after the collapse of the universe

 

infinity in/as a point

 

and prior to that point?

 

neither is nor is not apply

 

time doesn't apply

 

this point isn't a matter of before or after anything

 

" anything " is an imaginary reference point

 

" something " is an imaginary reference point

 

" i am " is an imaginary reference point

==

Funny...the text that werner submited from a dialogue between K and pupul

says it all...but he understood the opposite. Unfortunately that text is non

copiable so I cant bring it here peace-by-peace.

-geo-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.

Virus Database (VPS): 090526-0, 26/05/2009

Tested on: 2/7/2009 17:56:11

avast! - copyright © 1988-2009 ALWIL Software.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> dan330033

> Nisargadatta

> Thursday, July 02, 2009 5:51 PM

> Re: Without Attributes - From " I Am That "

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > dan330033

> > Nisargadatta

> > Thursday, July 02, 2009 5:05 PM

> > Re: Without Attributes - From " I Am That "

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > -

> > > dan330033

> > > Nisargadatta

> > > Thursday, July 02, 2009 4:35 PM

> > > Re: Without Attributes - From " I Am That "

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > The sweetness is the nature of sugar;

> > > but that sweetness is there only so long as the sugar is present. Once

> > > the

> > > sugar has been consumed or thrown away, there is no more sweetness. So

> > > this

> > > knowledge " I am, " this consciousness, this feeling or sense of Being, is

> > > the

> > > quintessence of the body. And if that body essence is gone, this

> > > feeling,

> > > the sense of Being, will also have gone. This sense of Being cannot

> > > remeain

> > > without the body, just as sweetness cannot remain without the material,

> > > which is sugar.

> > >

> > > Visitor: What remains then?

> > >

> > > Maharaj: What remains is the Original, which is unconditioned, without

> > > attributes, and without identity: that on which this temporary state of

> > > the

> > > consciousness and the three states and the three gunas have come and

> > > gone.

> > > It is called Parabrahman, the Absolute.

> > >

> > > This is my basic teaching.

> > > ===

> > > It is really simple, but the quantum leap is the grasping of the

> > > unconditioned, qualitiless, is-ness. Though, concepts, the senses,

> > > rationality, logic...alla those seem to " stand in the way " of real

> > > understanding. They can take one to the border....then...silence.

> > > -ego-

> >

> > Yes, one comes to a boundary, a limit.

> >

> > The " barrier that is no barrier " is the term in Zen.

> >

> > Not even is-ness.

> >

> > Quality-less.

> >

> > Dimensionless.

> >

> > Nothing for thought to grasp, or even to sense.

> >

> > Where reality turns inside out.

> >

> > And yet, day to day life is as it is.

> >

> > -- D --

> >

> > Not to leave this " grasping " too...esoteric... and I have werner in mind

> > here, there seems to be a need to see the difference between

> > " total-no-existence-at-all " and the

> > " ground-of-all-possible-existence-per-se " . On a physical level: space

> > without a plane to stand on....and....space with a virtual non-material

> > plane to stand on. ...but, these are all ridiculous analogies...

> > -geo-

>

> a metaphor i like is the black hole/white hole

>

> the point prior to the big bang/after the collapse of the universe

>

> infinity in/as a point

>

> and prior to that point?

>

> neither is nor is not apply

>

> time doesn't apply

>

> this point isn't a matter of before or after anything

>

> " anything " is an imaginary reference point

>

> " something " is an imaginary reference point

>

> " i am " is an imaginary reference point

> ==

> Funny...the text that werner submited from a dialogue between K and pupul

> says it all...but he understood the opposite. Unfortunately that text is non

> copiable so I cant bring it here peace-by-peace.

> -geo-

 

Yes.

 

I read it.

 

It does seem to emphasize the ending of the known, of memory, of thought's

domain.

 

He uses the word " nothingness. "

 

He indicates, I believe, that one can't choose this or force this - that would

be the " me. "

 

No matter how emphatic he is in his teaching, the teaching necessarily involves

ideation - as any teaching must.

 

He strives to use ideation to bring the listener to the point of not relying on

ideation.

 

So, this depends on the readiness of the listener.

 

I like at the end of the dialogue, where he talks about listening without having

to hear anything.

 

This seems on-target to me.

 

So, it's a matter of readiness to listen without holding onto anything telling

you what you will hear (memory), without any plan (thought), without hearing

anything - no inference, no commentary, no reaction to someone or something.

 

Yes, this says a lot about what can't be said!

 

Good stuff!

 

- D -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...