Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6 wrote: > > Geo is a master of simplistic mystification and > misunderstanding. That we are only aware of > perception neither negates, nor affirm external > objects. It simply means we can not say they > exist, we can not say the don't, we cannot even > say that they neither exist, nor not exist. P.S. actually, we can indeed say objects " neither exist nor do not exist " . To say so is to negate words altogether as describing the situation accurately, which (from here) is an accurate assessment. > Nothing > can be say about their existence, except that > pragmatically speaking they do appear to exist. The word " exist " also appears to exist. See the issue? What exactly does " exist " mean, anyway? According to the dictionary, it says " that which is actual " . Look up the word actual, and it says " that which exists " . Surely this points out the uselessness of words. What is, is as it is, and words are merely an overlay on the situation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.