Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Monday, July 13, 2009 8:30 AM > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > you're to " into " yourself to see anything BUT yourself. > > > > > > Naah, that's not true... Bobby sees nothing but " other " . His messages > > > are full of " you, you, you're this, you're that, you, you, you " . > > > > > > > that must be boring. > > > > > > Is it? How 'bout lonely, too? > > > > > > nope. > > > > timmy sees only himself seeing " others " who see " others'. > > > > talk about boring! > > > > but timmy's so into himself.. > > timmy... diapers... poo-poo. Pee-pee. Wee-wee. Waaaaahhhh! ;-). > -tim- > > You did not understand what he said. You are seeing others (seeing others). > -geo- P.S. I s'pose it wouldn't do any good to say yet again that I don't see anyone here as 'other' than myself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 - Tim G. Nisargadatta Monday, July 13, 2009 9:06 AM Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? P.S. Geo Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Monday, July 13, 2009 8:30 AM > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > you're to " into " yourself to see anything BUT yourself. > > > > > > Naah, that's not true... Bobby sees nothing but " other " . His messages > > > are full of " you, you, you're this, you're that, you, you, you " . > > > > > > > that must be boring. > > > > > > Is it? How 'bout lonely, too? > > > > > > nope. > > > > timmy sees only himself seeing " others " who see " others'. > > > > talk about boring! > > > > but timmy's so into himself.. > > timmy... diapers... poo-poo. Pee-pee. Wee-wee. Waaaaahhhh! ;-). > -tim- > > You did not understand what he said. You are seeing others (seeing > others). > -geo- P.S. I s'pose it wouldn't do any good to say yet again that I don't see anyone here as 'other' than myself. -tim- Are you seeing others that are yourself seeing others? Sounds like i am playing words but that is the only way I found to say it. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > P.S. I s'pose it wouldn't do any good to say yet again that I don't see > anyone here as 'other' than myself. > -tim- > > Are you seeing others that are yourself seeing others? Sounds like i > am > playing words but that is the only way I found to say it. > -geo- It prob'ly sounds like an excuse, but words don't do any justice to it. It can't be put into words. The closest I can put it is that nothing is separate. There is not a 'self' here and 'others out there' (or 'other selves out there'). It's just an absence of a sense of 'me here' and 'you there'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 - geo Nisargadatta Monday, July 13, 2009 9:13 AM Re: Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? P.S. Geo - Tim G.Nisargadatta Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 9:06 AM Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? P.S. GeoNisargadatta , "geo" <inandor wrote:>>> - > Tim G.> Nisargadatta > Monday, July 13, 2009 8:30 AM> Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry?>>>>>> Nisargadatta , "roberibus111" <Roberibus111@>> wrote:> >> > Nisargadatta , "Tim G." <fewtch@> wrote:> > >> > > Nisargadatta , "roberibus111" <Roberibus111@>> > > wrote:> > > >> > > > you're to "into" yourself to see anything BUT yourself.> > >> > > Naah, that's not true... Bobby sees nothing but "other". His messages> > > are full of "you, you, you're this, you're that, you, you, you".> > >> > > > that must be boring.> > >> > > Is it? How 'bout lonely, too?> >> >> > nope.> >> > timmy sees only himself seeing "others" who see "others'.> >> > talk about boring!> >> > but timmy's so into himself..>> timmy... diapers... poo-poo. Pee-pee. Wee-wee. Waaaaahhhh! ;-).> -tim->> You did not understand what he said. You are seeing others (seeing > others).> -geo-P.S. I s'pose it wouldn't do any good to say yet again that I don't see anyone here as 'other' than myself.-tim-Are you seeing others that are yourself seeing others? Sounds like i am playing words but that is the only way I found to say it. Please explain the meaning of "myself" in the context above. I would say everything, everyone is the world or consciousness.-geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 - Tim G. Nisargadatta Monday, July 13, 2009 9:17 AM Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? P.S. Geo Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > P.S. I s'pose it wouldn't do any good to say yet again that I don't see > anyone here as 'other' than myself. > -tim- > > Are you seeing others that are yourself seeing others? Sounds like i > am > playing words but that is the only way I found to say it. > -geo- It prob'ly sounds like an excuse, but words don't do any justice to it. It can't be put into words. The closest I can put it is that nothing is separate. There is not a 'self' here and 'others out there' (or 'other selves out there'). It's just an absence of a sense of 'me here' and 'you there'. -tim- That is the way I see it also. But our particular minds have different contents. Some have a weird mechanism that makes them behave as if they where separate. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Monday, July 13, 2009 9:17 AM > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? P.S. Geo > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > P.S. I s'pose it wouldn't do any good to say yet again that I don't see > > anyone here as 'other' than myself. > > -tim- > > > > Are you seeing others that are yourself seeing others? Sounds like i > am > > playing words but that is the only way I found to say it. > > -geo- > > It prob'ly sounds like an excuse, but words don't do any justice to it. It > can't be put into words. > > The closest I can put it is that nothing is separate. There is not a 'self' > here and 'others out there' (or 'other selves out there'). It's just an > absence of a sense of 'me here' and 'you there'. > -tim- > > That is the way I see it also. But our particular minds have different > contents. Some have a weird mechanism that makes them behave as if they > where separate. > -geo- That's fairly similar to how I would describe it too, except I don't really even feel there are particular minds. It's like whatever is read on the forum is something I might have typed into " Notepad " or something myself at one point and just forgotten I did (or something like that). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > Tim G. > > Nisargadatta > > Monday, July 13, 2009 8:30 AM > > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > you're to " into " yourself to see anything BUT yourself. > > > > > > > > Naah, that's not true... Bobby sees nothing but " other " . His messages > > > > are full of " you, you, you're this, you're that, you, you, you " . > > > > > > > > > that must be boring. > > > > > > > > Is it? How 'bout lonely, too? > > > > > > > > > nope. > > > > > > timmy sees only himself seeing " others " who see " others'. > > > > > > talk about boring! > > > > > > but timmy's so into himself.. > > > > timmy... diapers... poo-poo. Pee-pee. Wee-wee. Waaaaahhhh! ;-). > > -tim- > > > > You did not understand what he said. You are seeing others (seeing others). > > -geo- > > P.S. I s'pose it wouldn't do any good to say yet again that I don't see anyone here as 'other' than myself. why do you flame yourself? LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 - Tim G. Nisargadatta Monday, July 13, 2009 9:25 AM Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? P.S. Geo Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Monday, July 13, 2009 9:17 AM > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? P.S. Geo > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > P.S. I s'pose it wouldn't do any good to say yet again that I don't see > > anyone here as 'other' than myself. > > -tim- > > > > Are you seeing others that are yourself seeing others? Sounds like i > > > am > > playing words but that is the only way I found to say it. > > -geo- > > It prob'ly sounds like an excuse, but words don't do any justice to it. It > can't be put into words. > > The closest I can put it is that nothing is separate. There is not a > 'self' > here and 'others out there' (or 'other selves out there'). It's just an > absence of a sense of 'me here' and 'you there'. > -tim- > > That is the way I see it also. But our particular minds have different > contents. Some have a weird mechanism that makes them behave as if they > where separate. > -geo- That's fairly similar to how I would describe it too, except I don't really even feel there are particular minds. It's like whatever is read on the forum is something I might have typed into " Notepad " or something myself at one point and just forgotten I did (or something like that). -tim- Why " this forum " in particular? Read on... There is no fundamental difference between converstaion alive or in a forum. The only difference is that alive you receive more sensorial inputs coming from another organism. There isn o separation in the same way. Particular mind is like this: what is geo thinking now at 9:30 brazilian time? -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > Why " this forum " in particular? Read on... There is no fundamental > difference between converstaion alive or in a forum. The only difference is > that alive you receive more sensorial inputs coming from another organism. > There isn o separation in the same way. True... although without the body language, tone of voice, etc. on forums like this, there are a lot of misunderstandings that tend not to happen when one is talking 'in person'. > Particular mind is like this: what is geo thinking now at 9:30 brazilian > time? > -geo- Still doesn't feel like there are particular minds. Geo will have forgotten in 15 minutes anyway ;-). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > Why " this forum " in particular? Read on... There is no fundamental > > difference between converstaion alive or in a forum. The only difference is > > that alive you receive more sensorial inputs coming from another organism. > > There isn o separation in the same way. > > True... although without the body language, tone of voice, etc. on forums like this, there are a lot of misunderstandings that tend not to happen when one is talking 'in person'. > > > Particular mind is like this: what is geo thinking now at 9:30 brazilian > > time? > > -geo- > > Still doesn't feel like there are particular minds. Geo will have > forgotten in 15 minutes anyway ;-). P.S. I could have given a coy answer, like: Geo is thinking: " what is geo thinking now at 9:30 brazilian time? " ;-). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > - > > > Tim G. > > > Nisargadatta > > > Monday, July 13, 2009 8:30 AM > > > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > you're to " into " yourself to see anything BUT yourself. > > > > > > > > > > Naah, that's not true... Bobby sees nothing but " other " . His messages > > > > > are full of " you, you, you're this, you're that, you, you, you " . > > > > > > > > > > > that must be boring. > > > > > > > > > > Is it? How 'bout lonely, too? > > > > > > > > > > > > nope. > > > > > > > > timmy sees only himself seeing " others " who see " others'. > > > > > > > > talk about boring! > > > > > > > > but timmy's so into himself.. > > > > > > timmy... diapers... poo-poo. Pee-pee. Wee-wee. Waaaaahhhh! ;-). > > > -tim- > > > > > > You did not understand what he said. You are seeing others (seeing others). > > > -geo- > > > > P.S. I s'pose it wouldn't do any good to say yet again that I don't see anyone here as 'other' than myself. > > > why do you flame yourself? > > LOL! > > .b b.b. Just messin, with ya, Bob. No interest here in flaming anyone... just posting on a forum, enjoying the talk, messing around & all that good stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 - Tim G. Nisargadatta Monday, July 13, 2009 9:34 AM Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? P.S. Geo Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > Why " this forum " in particular? Read on... There is no fundamental > difference between converstaion alive or in a forum. The only difference > is > that alive you receive more sensorial inputs coming from another organism. > There isn o separation in the same way. True... although without the body language, tone of voice, etc. on forums like this, there are a lot of misunderstandings that tend not to happen when one is talking 'in person'. > Particular mind is like this: what is geo thinking now at 9:30 brazilian > time? > -geo- Still doesn't feel like there are particular minds. Geo will have forgotten in 15 minutes anyway ;-). -tim- But that is not the point is it? Although brains and minds are universal events, there are different contents in different brains at different times. Not that it is more or less relevant then anything else but denying this fact seems very ...er....irracional. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Why " this forum " in particular? Read on... There is no fundamental > > > difference between converstaion alive or in a forum. The only difference is > > > that alive you receive more sensorial inputs coming from another organism. > > > There isn o separation in the same way. > > > > True... although without the body language, tone of voice, etc. on forums like this, there are a lot of misunderstandings that tend not to happen when one is talking 'in person'. > > > > > Particular mind is like this: what is geo thinking now at 9:30 brazilian > > > time? > > > -geo- > > > > Still doesn't feel like there are particular minds. Geo will have > forgotten in 15 minutes anyway ;-). > > P.S. I could have given a coy answer, like: > > Geo is thinking: " what is geo thinking now at 9:30 brazilian time? " > > ;-). " I " ? " geo " ? " you " ? my my timmy... you seem to have confused yourself again. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > Tim G. > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > Monday, July 13, 2009 8:30 AM > > > > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you're to " into " yourself to see anything BUT yourself. > > > > > > > > > > > > Naah, that's not true... Bobby sees nothing but " other " . His messages > > > > > > are full of " you, you, you're this, you're that, you, you, you " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > that must be boring. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is it? How 'bout lonely, too? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nope. > > > > > > > > > > timmy sees only himself seeing " others " who see " others'. > > > > > > > > > > talk about boring! > > > > > > > > > > but timmy's so into himself.. > > > > > > > > timmy... diapers... poo-poo. Pee-pee. Wee-wee. Waaaaahhhh! ;-). > > > > -tim- > > > > > > > > You did not understand what he said. You are seeing others (seeing others). > > > > -geo- > > > > > > P.S. I s'pose it wouldn't do any good to say yet again that I don't see anyone here as 'other' than myself. > > > > > > why do you flame yourself? > > > > LOL! > > > > .b b.b. > > Just messin, with ya, Bob. No interest here in flaming anyone... just posting on a forum, enjoying the talk, messing around & all that good stuff. you are me. remember? or have you already forgotten your own bullshit again? enjoy. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > Good try :>) but there many things going on in brains at one time... > -geo- Well, you know more than I do, then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > But that is not the point is it? Although brains and minds are universal > events, there are different contents in different brains at different times. > Not that it is more or less relevant then anything else but denying this > fact seems very ...er....irracional. > -geo- Facts are what is here, now... what is happening now. Words are arising and getting typed, a screen is appearing, etc. That's it. From here, " all the rest " is surmisal, imagination, thoughts arising. Thoughts are not facts, they are thoughts. Memory. The fact that thoughts arise is a fact. Their content is imagination. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 - Tim G. Nisargadatta Monday, July 13, 2009 9:49 AM Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? P.S. Geo Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > Good try :>) but there many things going on in brains at one time... > -geo- Well, you know more than I do, then. -tim- Dont understant. Explain. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 - Tim G. Nisargadatta Monday, July 13, 2009 9:50 AM Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? P.S. Geo Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > But that is not the point is it? Although brains and minds are universal > events, there are different contents in different brains at different > times. > Not that it is more or less relevant then anything else but denying this > fact seems very ...er....irracional. > -geo- Facts are what is here, now... what is happening now. Words are arising and getting typed, a screen is appearing, etc. That's it. From here, " all the rest " is surmisal, imagination, thoughts arising. Thoughts are not facts, they are thoughts. Memory. The fact that thoughts arise is a fact. Their content is imagination. -tim- OK...then , the memory contents of one brain are not identical in all brains. The difference is what I amcalling particular brain. And...thoughts are no facts? And memory? And imagination? What are they? -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Monday, July 13, 2009 9:49 AM > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? P.S. Geo > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > Good try :>) but there many things going on in brains at one time... > > -geo- > > Well, you know more than I do, then. > -tim- > > Dont understant. Explain. > -geo- What's known here is only what's known directly, here and now. There is no 'experience' here of many things going on in many brains at once. This is a guess, a surmisal, a thought arising about " many things going on in many brains at once " . It is not 'knowledge' of the real kind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > OK...then , the memory contents of one brain are not identical in all > brains. The difference is what I amcalling particular brain. > And...thoughts are no facts? And memory? And imagination? What are they? > -geo- Memory's content is imaginary., obviously. It's imagined. A mental picture, an image or a word arises, ya know? Imagination. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Monday, July 13, 2009 9:49 AM > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? P.S. Geo > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > Good try :>) but there many things going on in brains at one time... > > -geo- > > Well, you know more than I do, then. > -tim- > > Dont understant. Explain. > -geo- > methinks he says: Agora a merda virou boné! or.. Que porra! but as for me.. i say: Nem fudendo! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 - roberibus111 Nisargadatta Monday, July 13, 2009 10:04 AM Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? P.S. Geo Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Monday, July 13, 2009 9:49 AM > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? P.S. Geo > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > Good try :>) but there many things going on in brains at one time... > > -geo- > > Well, you know more than I do, then. > -tim- > > Dont understant. Explain. > -geo- > methinks he says: Agora a merda virou boné! or.. Que porra! but as for me.. i say: Nem fudendo! ..b b.b. Mas vc fala portugues um pouco ou ela te ajuda em tudo? -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 - Tim G. Nisargadatta Monday, July 13, 2009 10:02 AM Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? P.S. Geo Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > OK...then , the memory contents of one brain are not identical in all > brains. The difference is what I amcalling particular brain. > And...thoughts are no facts? And memory? And imagination? What are they? > -geo- Memory's content is imaginary., obviously. It's imagined. A mental picture, an image or a word arises, ya know? Imagination. -tim- And why would imagination be less factual then a tree? -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Monday, July 13, 2009 10:02 AM > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? P.S. Geo > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > OK...then , the memory contents of one brain are not identical in all > > brains. The difference is what I amcalling particular brain. > > And...thoughts are no facts? And memory? And imagination? What are they? > > -geo- > > Memory's content is imaginary., obviously. It's imagined. A mental picture, > an image or a word arises, ya know? Imagination. > -tim- > > And why would imagination be less factual then a tree? > -geo- Oh, c'mon now... a mental picture of a tree is not a tree. A mental picture of a tree is thought. A tree is a tree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 - Tim G. Nisargadatta Monday, July 13, 2009 10:22 AM Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? P.S. Geo Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > Tim G. > Nisargadatta > Monday, July 13, 2009 10:02 AM > Re: Fwd: Why self-enquiry? P.S. Geo > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > OK...then , the memory contents of one brain are not identical in all > > brains. The difference is what I amcalling particular brain. > > And...thoughts are no facts? And memory? And imagination? What are they? > > -geo- > > Memory's content is imaginary., obviously. It's imagined. A mental > picture, > an image or a word arises, ya know? Imagination. > -tim- > > And why would imagination be less factual then a tree? > -geo- Oh, c'mon now... a mental picture of a tree is not a tree. A mental picture of a tree is thought. A tree is a tree. -tim- A tree is an event called tree, imaginaton is an event called imagination. Both are made of atoms and electrons. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.