Guest guest Posted July 14, 2009 Report Share Posted July 14, 2009 Tim, you know the prevailing atmosphere here in the list. We pick, bicker and question each other. But me, you and others have decided to stay and write and play the game. So... a straight forward question to you: do you think you are the only one here, or there are others who can "grasp" the impersonal one-ness that you eventualy do grasp? In other words... through the words you read in the forum do you feel there might be others who are non-fragmented in this present adimensional field? As for myself...judging the words I read I know there are others who do have the same insight I have into IT. But it is a "sometimes" issue. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2009 Report Share Posted July 14, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > Tim, you know the prevailing atmosphere here in the list. Actually, I don't. From here, it seems to vary quite a bit. > We pick, bicker and question each other. But me, you and others > have decided to stay and write and play the game. For now, yes. Anything that happens is only happening now. > So... a straight forward question to you: do you think you are the > only one here, or there are others who can " grasp " the impersonal > one-ness that you eventualy do grasp? I'm not grasping anything. This is non-grasping. And of course, " non-grasping " is immediately available to everyone, anytime, any place. > In other words... through the words you read in the forum do you > feel there might be others who are non-fragmented in this present > adimensional field? I haven't the vaguest clue. Dan and " Phil meta " ('souldreamone') are the only two I'm aware of who seem to speak with a great deal of clarity most of the time, but there could be others. Who am I to judge anyone else, tho? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2009 Report Share Posted July 14, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > Tim, you know the prevailing atmosphere here in the list. > > Actually, I don't. From here, it seems to vary quite a bit. > > > We pick, bicker and question each other. But me, you and others > > have decided to stay and write and play the game. > > For now, yes. Anything that happens is only happening now. > > > So... a straight forward question to you: do you think you are the > only one here, or there are others who can " grasp " the impersonal > > one-ness that you eventualy do grasp? > > I'm not grasping anything. This is non-grasping. And of course, " non-grasping " is immediately available to everyone, anytime, any place. > > > In other words... through the words you read in the forum do you > > feel there might be others who are non-fragmented in this present > > adimensional field? > > I haven't the vaguest clue. Dan and " Phil meta " ('souldreamone') are the only two I'm aware of who seem to speak with a great deal of clarity most of the time, but there could be others. Who am I to judge anyone else, tho? LOL! well hell.. now i know what the fuck's wrong with you. mickey mouse and goofy speaks more clarity than those two losers. and you find them cogent? hahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!! well that's comic books. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2009 Report Share Posted July 14, 2009 - Tim G. Nisargadatta Tuesday, July 14, 2009 4:13 PM Re: Comets and asteroids Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > Tim, you know the prevailing atmosphere here in the list. Actually, I don't. From here, it seems to vary quite a bit. > We pick, bicker and question each other. But me, you and others > have decided to stay and write and play the game. For now, yes. Anything that happens is only happening now. > So... a straight forward question to you: do you think you are the > only > one here, or there are others who can " grasp " the impersonal > one-ness that you eventualy do grasp? I'm not grasping anything. This is non-grasping. And of course, " non-grasping " is immediately available to everyone, anytime, any place. > In other words... through the words you read in the forum do you > feel there might be others who are non-fragmented in this present > adimensional field? I haven't the vaguest clue. Dan and " Phil meta " ('souldreamone') are the only two I'm aware of who seem to speak with a great deal of clarity most of the time, but there could be others. Who am I to judge anyone else, tho? -tim- Well, actualy I was not asking for names... -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.