Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

More on concepts

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the concepts,

including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have collected in this

world are totally useless. Understand that the entire manifestation is the

child of a barren woman. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the concepts,

including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have collected in this

world are totally useless. Understand that the entire manifestation is the

child of a barren woman. "

 

 

not even that.

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

douglasmitch1963

Nisargadatta

Monday, July 20, 2009 9:46 AM

More on concepts

 

 

Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the

concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have collected

in this world are totally useless. Understand that the entire manifestation

is the child of a barren woman. "

-nis-

 

Beig concept free...then what is.... is not concept.

-geo-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the concepts,

including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have collected in this

world are totally useless. Understand that the entire manifestation is the

child of a barren woman. "

 

 

so are the notions of " big egos " ...

 

wouldn't " you " think?

 

LOL!

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963@>

wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the

concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have collected in

this world are totally useless. Understand that the entire manifestation is the

child of a barren woman. "

>

>

> so are the notions of " big egos " ...

>

> wouldn't " you " think?

>

> LOL!

>

> .b b.b.

 

 

and..

 

who's the " you " that:

 

1.... " collects " the concepts..

 

2..... " puts " the ax to " anything " ..

 

3.....believes this bullshit?

 

ROFLMAO!

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

At 07:46 AM 7/20/2009, you wrote:

Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the

concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have

collected in this world are totally useless. Understand that the entire

manifestation is the child of a barren woman. "

Edg: Inquiring minds want to know: is that woman a

" hot chick " or " a skag? " If she's a magician

who can conjure up the Emperor's New Kids On The Block, mmmmm, I'm

thinking dinner and a movie with the babe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

roberibus111

Nisargadatta

Monday, July 20, 2009 10:21 AM

Re: More on concepts

 

 

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 "

> <douglasmitch1963@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the

> > concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have

> > collected in this world are totally useless. Understand that the entire

> > manifestation is the child of a barren woman. "

>

>

> so are the notions of " big egos " ...

>

> wouldn't " you " think?

>

> LOL!

>

> .b b.b.

 

and..

 

who's the " you " that:

 

1.... " collects " the concepts..

 

2..... " puts " the ax to " anything " ..

 

3.....believes this bullshit?

 

ROFLMAO!

 

..b b.b.

 

If there is complete freedom from concepts there is the seeing of a totaly

" new " world - without the observer

-geo-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Re: More on concepts

 

At 07:46 AM 7/20/2009, you wrote:

>

>

> Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the concepts,

including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have collected in this world

are totally useless. Understand that the entire manifestation is the child of a

barren woman. "

 

Edg: Inquiring minds want to know: is that woman a " hot chick " or " a skag? " If

she's a magician who can conjure up the Emperor's New Kids On The Block, mmmmm,

I'm thinking dinner and a movie with the babe.

 

 

don't forget to fuck her.

 

no kids no child support.

 

she'd be a fun night out no doubt.

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 20, 2009 10:21 AM

> Re: More on concepts

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 "

> > <douglasmitch1963@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the

> > > concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have

> > > collected in this world are totally useless. Understand that the entire

> > > manifestation is the child of a barren woman. "

> >

> >

> > so are the notions of " big egos " ...

> >

> > wouldn't " you " think?

> >

> > LOL!

> >

> > .b b.b.

>

> and..

>

> who's the " you " that:

>

> 1.... " collects " the concepts..

>

> 2..... " puts " the ax to " anything " ..

>

> 3.....believes this bullshit?

>

> ROFLMAO!

>

> .b b.b.

>

> If there is complete freedom from concepts there is the seeing of a totaly

> " new " world - without the observer

> -geo-

 

 

that's as good a speculation as any surmisal can be.

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

roberibus111

Nisargadatta

Monday, July 20, 2009 10:49 AM

Re: More on concepts

 

 

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 20, 2009 10:21 AM

> Re: More on concepts

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 "

> > <douglasmitch1963@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the

> > > concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have

> > > collected in this world are totally useless. Understand that the

> > > entire

> > > manifestation is the child of a barren woman. "

> >

> >

> > so are the notions of " big egos " ...

> >

> > wouldn't " you " think?

> >

> > LOL!

> >

> > .b b.b.

>

> and..

>

> who's the " you " that:

>

> 1.... " collects " the concepts..

>

> 2..... " puts " the ax to " anything " ..

>

> 3.....believes this bullshit?

>

> ROFLMAO!

>

> .b b.b.

>

> If there is complete freedom from concepts there is the seeing of a totaly

> " new " world - without the observer

> -geo-

 

that's as good a speculation as any surmisal can be.

 

..b b.b.

 

Why do you question seeing w/o observer?

-geo-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

geo

Nisargadatta

Monday, July 20, 2009 10:55 AM

Re: Re: More on concepts

 

 

 

-

roberibus111

Nisargadatta

Monday, July 20, 2009 10:49 AM

Re: More on concepts

 

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 20, 2009 10:21 AM

> Re: More on concepts

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 "

> > <douglasmitch1963@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the

> > > concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have

> > > collected in this world are totally useless. Understand that the

> > > entire

> > > manifestation is the child of a barren woman. "

> >

> >

> > so are the notions of " big egos " ...

> >

> > wouldn't " you " think?

> >

> > LOL!

> >

> > .b b.b.

>

> and..

>

> who's the " you " that:

>

> 1.... " collects " the concepts..

>

> 2..... " puts " the ax to " anything " ..

>

> 3.....believes this bullshit?

>

> ROFLMAO!

>

> .b b.b.

>

> If there is complete freedom from concepts there is the seeing of a totaly

> " new " world - without the observer

> -geo-

 

that's as good a speculation as any surmisal can be.

 

..b b.b.

 

Why do you question seeing w/o observer?

If consciousness is absolutely still, no concepts running in the mind as

noise, this luminous apearance IS by itself. The seeing and the being of it

are the same.

-geo-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> geo

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 20, 2009 10:55 AM

> Re: Re: More on concepts

>

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 20, 2009 10:49 AM

> Re: More on concepts

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > roberibus111

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:21 AM

> > Re: More on concepts

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 "

> > > <douglasmitch1963@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the

> > > > concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have

> > > > collected in this world are totally useless. Understand that the

> > > > entire

> > > > manifestation is the child of a barren woman. "

> > >

> > >

> > > so are the notions of " big egos " ...

> > >

> > > wouldn't " you " think?

> > >

> > > LOL!

> > >

> > > .b b.b.

> >

> > and..

> >

> > who's the " you " that:

> >

> > 1.... " collects " the concepts..

> >

> > 2..... " puts " the ax to " anything " ..

> >

> > 3.....believes this bullshit?

> >

> > ROFLMAO!

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

> > If there is complete freedom from concepts there is the seeing of a totaly

> > " new " world - without the observer

> > -geo-

>

> that's as good a speculation as any surmisal can be.

>

> .b b.b.

>

> Why do you question seeing w/o observer?

> If consciousness is absolutely still, no concepts running in the mind as

> noise, this luminous apearance IS by itself. The seeing and the being of it

> are the same.

> -geo-

>

Edg: Geo, are you saying that the Absolute isn't a witness?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 20, 2009 10:49 AM

> Re: More on concepts

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > roberibus111

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:21 AM

> > Re: More on concepts

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 "

> > > <douglasmitch1963@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the

> > > > concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have

> > > > collected in this world are totally useless. Understand that the

> > > > entire

> > > > manifestation is the child of a barren woman. "

> > >

> > >

> > > so are the notions of " big egos " ...

> > >

> > > wouldn't " you " think?

> > >

> > > LOL!

> > >

> > > .b b.b.

> >

> > and..

> >

> > who's the " you " that:

> >

> > 1.... " collects " the concepts..

> >

> > 2..... " puts " the ax to " anything " ..

> >

> > 3.....believes this bullshit?

> >

> > ROFLMAO!

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

> > If there is complete freedom from concepts there is the seeing of a totaly

> > " new " world - without the observer

> > -geo-

>

> that's as good a speculation as any surmisal can be.

>

> .b b.b.

>

> Why do you question seeing w/o observer?

> -geo-

 

 

i don't question anything.

 

there are no answers.

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> geo

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 20, 2009 10:55 AM

> Re: Re: More on concepts

>

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 20, 2009 10:49 AM

> Re: More on concepts

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > roberibus111

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:21 AM

> > Re: More on concepts

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 "

> > > <douglasmitch1963@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the

> > > > concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have

> > > > collected in this world are totally useless. Understand that the

> > > > entire

> > > > manifestation is the child of a barren woman. "

> > >

> > >

> > > so are the notions of " big egos " ...

> > >

> > > wouldn't " you " think?

> > >

> > > LOL!

> > >

> > > .b b.b.

> >

> > and..

> >

> > who's the " you " that:

> >

> > 1.... " collects " the concepts..

> >

> > 2..... " puts " the ax to " anything " ..

> >

> > 3.....believes this bullshit?

> >

> > ROFLMAO!

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

> > If there is complete freedom from concepts there is the seeing of a totaly

> > " new " world - without the observer

> > -geo-

>

> that's as good a speculation as any surmisal can be.

>

> .b b.b.

>

> Why do you question seeing w/o observer?

> If consciousness is absolutely still, no concepts running in the mind as

> noise, this luminous apearance IS by itself. The seeing and the being of it

> are the same.

> -geo-

 

 

all talk is cheap.

 

it may not be ill-conceived but it all amounts to nothing.

 

no way can the " No Way " be known or talked about.

 

" Being " ... as understood... is a lie.

 

lie's can only lie.

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

duveyoung

Nisargadatta

Monday, July 20, 2009 11:16 AM

Re: More on concepts

 

 

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> geo

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 20, 2009 10:55 AM

> Re: Re: More on concepts

>

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 20, 2009 10:49 AM

> Re: More on concepts

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > roberibus111

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:21 AM

> > Re: More on concepts

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 "

> > > <douglasmitch1963@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the

> > > > concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have

> > > > collected in this world are totally useless. Understand that the

> > > > entire

> > > > manifestation is the child of a barren woman. "

> > >

> > >

> > > so are the notions of " big egos " ...

> > >

> > > wouldn't " you " think?

> > >

> > > LOL!

> > >

> > > .b b.b.

> >

> > and..

> >

> > who's the " you " that:

> >

> > 1.... " collects " the concepts..

> >

> > 2..... " puts " the ax to " anything " ..

> >

> > 3.....believes this bullshit?

> >

> > ROFLMAO!

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

> > If there is complete freedom from concepts there is the seeing of a

> > totaly

> > " new " world - without the observer

> > -geo-

>

> that's as good a speculation as any surmisal can be.

>

> .b b.b.

>

> Why do you question seeing w/o observer?

> If consciousness is absolutely still, no concepts running in the mind as

> noise, this luminous apearance IS by itself. The seeing and the being of

> it

> are the same.

> -geo-

>

Edg: Geo, are you saying that the Absolute isn't a witness?

 

geo> The world, consciousness, is not " other " to the absolute. How could

anything be other to it? It is being it. The seeing is the being.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

roberibus111

Nisargadatta

Monday, July 20, 2009 11:25 AM

Re: More on concepts

 

 

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> geo

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 20, 2009 10:55 AM

> Re: Re: More on concepts

>

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 20, 2009 10:49 AM

> Re: More on concepts

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > roberibus111

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:21 AM

> > Re: More on concepts

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 "

> > > <douglasmitch1963@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the

> > > > concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have

> > > > collected in this world are totally useless. Understand that the

> > > > entire

> > > > manifestation is the child of a barren woman. "

> > >

> > >

> > > so are the notions of " big egos " ...

> > >

> > > wouldn't " you " think?

> > >

> > > LOL!

> > >

> > > .b b.b.

> >

> > and..

> >

> > who's the " you " that:

> >

> > 1.... " collects " the concepts..

> >

> > 2..... " puts " the ax to " anything " ..

> >

> > 3.....believes this bullshit?

> >

> > ROFLMAO!

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

> > If there is complete freedom from concepts there is the seeing of a

> > totaly

> > " new " world - without the observer

> > -geo-

>

> that's as good a speculation as any surmisal can be.

>

> .b b.b.

>

> Why do you question seeing w/o observer?

> If consciousness is absolutely still, no concepts running in the mind as

> noise, this luminous apearance IS by itself. The seeing and the being of

> it

> are the same.

> -geo-

 

all talk is cheap.

 

it may not be ill-conceived but it all amounts to nothing.

 

no way can the " No Way " be known or talked about.

 

" Being " ... as understood... is a lie.

 

lie's can only lie.

 

..b b.b.

 

Nah....you sleep like any other. Sometimes you wake up - sometimes. Words

can wake you up - or not.

-geo-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> duveyoung

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 20, 2009 11:16 AM

> Re: More on concepts

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > geo

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:55 AM

> > Re: Re: More on concepts

> >

> >

> >

> > -

> > roberibus111

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:49 AM

> > Re: More on concepts

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > -

> > > roberibus111

> > > Nisargadatta

> > > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:21 AM

> > > Re: More on concepts

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 "

> > > > <douglasmitch1963@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the

> > > > > concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have

> > > > > collected in this world are totally useless. Understand that the

> > > > > entire

> > > > > manifestation is the child of a barren woman. "

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > so are the notions of " big egos " ...

> > > >

> > > > wouldn't " you " think?

> > > >

> > > > LOL!

> > > >

> > > > .b b.b.

> > >

> > > and..

> > >

> > > who's the " you " that:

> > >

> > > 1.... " collects " the concepts..

> > >

> > > 2..... " puts " the ax to " anything " ..

> > >

> > > 3.....believes this bullshit?

> > >

> > > ROFLMAO!

> > >

> > > .b b.b.

> > >

> > > If there is complete freedom from concepts there is the seeing of a

> > > totaly

> > > " new " world - without the observer

> > > -geo-

> >

> > that's as good a speculation as any surmisal can be.

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

> > Why do you question seeing w/o observer?

> > If consciousness is absolutely still, no concepts running in the mind as

> > noise, this luminous apearance IS by itself. The seeing and the being of

> > it

> > are the same.

> > -geo-

> >

> Edg: Geo, are you saying that the Absolute isn't a witness?

>

> geo> The world, consciousness, is not " other " to the absolute. How could

> anything be other to it? It is being it. The seeing is the being.

>

 

Edg: I'm not getting ya. Is there a ghost in the machine? Is there an image

in a mirror? Does the Pope shit in the woods? Do we all agree that awareness

is a seer-seeing-seen processing? Is awareness the " seer " or is awareness " the

Absolute? " Or whaaaa?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

duveyoung

Nisargadatta

Monday, July 20, 2009 11:34 AM

Re: More on concepts

 

 

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> duveyoung

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 20, 2009 11:16 AM

> Re: More on concepts

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > geo

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:55 AM

> > Re: Re: More on concepts

> >

> >

> >

> > -

> > roberibus111

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:49 AM

> > Re: More on concepts

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > -

> > > roberibus111

> > > Nisargadatta

> > > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:21 AM

> > > Re: More on concepts

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 "

> > > > <douglasmitch1963@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to

> > > > > the

> > > > > concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have

> > > > > collected in this world are totally useless. Understand that the

> > > > > entire

> > > > > manifestation is the child of a barren woman. "

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > so are the notions of " big egos " ...

> > > >

> > > > wouldn't " you " think?

> > > >

> > > > LOL!

> > > >

> > > > .b b.b.

> > >

> > > and..

> > >

> > > who's the " you " that:

> > >

> > > 1.... " collects " the concepts..

> > >

> > > 2..... " puts " the ax to " anything " ..

> > >

> > > 3.....believes this bullshit?

> > >

> > > ROFLMAO!

> > >

> > > .b b.b.

> > >

> > > If there is complete freedom from concepts there is the seeing of a

> > > totaly

> > > " new " world - without the observer

> > > -geo-

> >

> > that's as good a speculation as any surmisal can be.

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

> > Why do you question seeing w/o observer?

> > If consciousness is absolutely still, no concepts running in the mind as

> > noise, this luminous apearance IS by itself. The seeing and the being of

> > it

> > are the same.

> > -geo-

> >

> Edg: Geo, are you saying that the Absolute isn't a witness?

>

> geo> The world, consciousness, is not " other " to the absolute. How could

> anything be other to it? It is being it. The seeing is the being.

>

 

Edg: I'm not getting ya. Is there a ghost in the machine? Is there an image

in a mirror? Does the Pope shit in the woods? Do we all agree that awareness

is a seer-seeing-seen processing? Is awareness the " seer " or is awareness

" the Absolute? " Or whaaaa?

 

geo> I am calling awareness and the absolute the same. The absolute or

awareness is the seer-seeing-seen processing.

Awareness is like subatomic substance in consciousness molecules. The world

is waves in awareness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 20, 2009 11:25 AM

> Re: More on concepts

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > geo

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:55 AM

> > Re: Re: More on concepts

> >

> >

> >

> > -

> > roberibus111

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:49 AM

> > Re: More on concepts

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > -

> > > roberibus111

> > > Nisargadatta

> > > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:21 AM

> > > Re: More on concepts

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 "

> > > > <douglasmitch1963@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the

> > > > > concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have

> > > > > collected in this world are totally useless. Understand that the

> > > > > entire

> > > > > manifestation is the child of a barren woman. "

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > so are the notions of " big egos " ...

> > > >

> > > > wouldn't " you " think?

> > > >

> > > > LOL!

> > > >

> > > > .b b.b.

> > >

> > > and..

> > >

> > > who's the " you " that:

> > >

> > > 1.... " collects " the concepts..

> > >

> > > 2..... " puts " the ax to " anything " ..

> > >

> > > 3.....believes this bullshit?

> > >

> > > ROFLMAO!

> > >

> > > .b b.b.

> > >

> > > If there is complete freedom from concepts there is the seeing of a

> > > totaly

> > > " new " world - without the observer

> > > -geo-

> >

> > that's as good a speculation as any surmisal can be.

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

> > Why do you question seeing w/o observer?

> > If consciousness is absolutely still, no concepts running in the mind as

> > noise, this luminous apearance IS by itself. The seeing and the being of

> > it

> > are the same.

> > -geo-

>

> all talk is cheap.

>

> it may not be ill-conceived but it all amounts to nothing.

>

> no way can the " No Way " be known or talked about.

>

> " Being " ... as understood... is a lie.

>

> lie's can only lie.

>

> .b b.b.

>

> Nah....you sleep like any other. Sometimes you wake up - sometimes. Words

> can wake you up - or not.

> -geo-

 

 

of course i sleep like any you.

 

in dreams of and by yous and mes.

 

there are no such things as yous nor mes.

 

nor dreams thereof.

 

this too is a lie.

 

both sleeping and waking " by " lies " are " lies...

 

don't be fooled.

 

" you " are believing in bullshit...

 

maybe you and me and them and those ARE the bullshit.

 

no one knows or can ever know.

 

that's for certain.

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " duveyoung " <edg wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > duveyoung

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 20, 2009 11:16 AM

> > Re: More on concepts

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > -

> > > geo

> > > Nisargadatta

> > > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:55 AM

> > > Re: Re: More on concepts

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > -

> > > roberibus111

> > > Nisargadatta

> > > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:49 AM

> > > Re: More on concepts

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > roberibus111

> > > > Nisargadatta

> > > > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:21 AM

> > > > Re: More on concepts

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 "

> > > > > <douglasmitch1963@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to the

> > > > > > concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have

> > > > > > collected in this world are totally useless. Understand that the

> > > > > > entire

> > > > > > manifestation is the child of a barren woman. "

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > so are the notions of " big egos " ...

> > > > >

> > > > > wouldn't " you " think?

> > > > >

> > > > > LOL!

> > > > >

> > > > > .b b.b.

> > > >

> > > > and..

> > > >

> > > > who's the " you " that:

> > > >

> > > > 1.... " collects " the concepts..

> > > >

> > > > 2..... " puts " the ax to " anything " ..

> > > >

> > > > 3.....believes this bullshit?

> > > >

> > > > ROFLMAO!

> > > >

> > > > .b b.b.

> > > >

> > > > If there is complete freedom from concepts there is the seeing of a

> > > > totaly

> > > > " new " world - without the observer

> > > > -geo-

> > >

> > > that's as good a speculation as any surmisal can be.

> > >

> > > .b b.b.

> > >

> > > Why do you question seeing w/o observer?

> > > If consciousness is absolutely still, no concepts running in the mind as

> > > noise, this luminous apearance IS by itself. The seeing and the being of

> > > it

> > > are the same.

> > > -geo-

> > >

> > Edg: Geo, are you saying that the Absolute isn't a witness?

> >

> > geo> The world, consciousness, is not " other " to the absolute. How could

> > anything be other to it? It is being it. The seeing is the being.

> >

>

> Edg: I'm not getting ya. Is there a ghost in the machine? Is there an image

in a mirror? Does the Pope shit in the woods? Do we all agree that awareness

is a seer-seeing-seen processing? Is awareness the " seer " or is awareness " the

Absolute? " Or whaaaa?

 

 

maybe the Pope shits in the woods..

 

when the Bear sits on the throne.

 

just a thought.

 

:-)

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> Edg: I'm not getting ya. Is there a ghost in the machine? Is there an image

> in a mirror? Does the Pope shit in the woods? Do we all agree that awareness

> is a seer-seeing-seen processing? Is awareness the " seer " or is awareness

> " the Absolute? " Or whaaaa?

>

> geo> I am calling awareness and the absolute the same. The absolute or

> awareness is the seer-seeing-seen processing.

> Awareness is like subatomic substance in consciousness molecules. The world

> is waves in awareness.

 

Edg: I'm not satisfied. Not that it's your job, but seems to me that

awareness' trinity has to be entirely " in the relative. " The " seer " " portion "

of the trinity seems to be a brain function -- not a non-physical entity

observing " somewhere " from the stance of " not-a-where. " Language is a brutal

torture, eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

roberibus111

Nisargadatta

Monday, July 20, 2009 11:50 AM

Re: More on concepts

 

 

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 20, 2009 11:25 AM

> Re: More on concepts

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > geo

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:55 AM

> > Re: Re: More on concepts

> >

> >

> >

> > -

> > roberibus111

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:49 AM

> > Re: More on concepts

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > -

> > > roberibus111

> > > Nisargadatta

> > > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:21 AM

> > > Re: More on concepts

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 "

> > > > <douglasmitch1963@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to

> > > > > the

> > > > > concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have

> > > > > collected in this world are totally useless. Understand that the

> > > > > entire

> > > > > manifestation is the child of a barren woman. "

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > so are the notions of " big egos " ...

> > > >

> > > > wouldn't " you " think?

> > > >

> > > > LOL!

> > > >

> > > > .b b.b.

> > >

> > > and..

> > >

> > > who's the " you " that:

> > >

> > > 1.... " collects " the concepts..

> > >

> > > 2..... " puts " the ax to " anything " ..

> > >

> > > 3.....believes this bullshit?

> > >

> > > ROFLMAO!

> > >

> > > .b b.b.

> > >

> > > If there is complete freedom from concepts there is the seeing of a

> > > totaly

> > > " new " world - without the observer

> > > -geo-

> >

> > that's as good a speculation as any surmisal can be.

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

> > Why do you question seeing w/o observer?

> > If consciousness is absolutely still, no concepts running in the mind as

> > noise, this luminous apearance IS by itself. The seeing and the being of

> > it

> > are the same.

> > -geo-

>

> all talk is cheap.

>

> it may not be ill-conceived but it all amounts to nothing.

>

> no way can the " No Way " be known or talked about.

>

> " Being " ... as understood... is a lie.

>

> lie's can only lie.

>

> .b b.b.

>

> Nah....you sleep like any other. Sometimes you wake up - sometimes. Words

> can wake you up - or not.

> -geo-

 

of course i sleep like any you.

 

in dreams of and by yous and mes.

 

there are no such things as yous nor mes.

 

nor dreams thereof.

 

this too is a lie.

 

both sleeping and waking " by " lies " are " lies...

 

don't be fooled.

 

" you " are believing in bullshit...

 

maybe you and me and them and those ARE the bullshit.

 

no one knows or can ever know.

 

that's for certain.

 

..b b.b.

 

 

 

You wrote:

 

" don't enjoy ANY freedom.

 

when however i have been gotten out of the way..

 

as the " subjective moment " that ever resists..

 

Freedom Flows without question or wonderment or presence. " -bbb-

 

geo>.... " when however i have been gotten out of the way " - or sometimes.

 

and

 

" for some unknown reason and by some strange chemistry..

 

this intrinsic behavior and attitude..

 

of this 'persona " ..

 

has at " moments " opened floodgates of an Awareness..

 

for which terms like " doubt " or " uncertainty " no longer apply. " -bbb-

 

geo> some moments...moments..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> roberibus111

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, July 20, 2009 11:50 AM

> Re: More on concepts

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > -

> > roberibus111

> > Nisargadatta

> > Monday, July 20, 2009 11:25 AM

> > Re: More on concepts

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > -

> > > geo

> > > Nisargadatta

> > > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:55 AM

> > > Re: Re: More on concepts

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > -

> > > roberibus111

> > > Nisargadatta

> > > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:49 AM

> > > Re: More on concepts

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > roberibus111

> > > > Nisargadatta

> > > > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:21 AM

> > > > Re: More on concepts

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 "

> > > > > <douglasmitch1963@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you have

> > > > > > collected in this world are totally useless. Understand that the

> > > > > > entire

> > > > > > manifestation is the child of a barren woman. "

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > so are the notions of " big egos " ...

> > > > >

> > > > > wouldn't " you " think?

> > > > >

> > > > > LOL!

> > > > >

> > > > > .b b.b.

> > > >

> > > > and..

> > > >

> > > > who's the " you " that:

> > > >

> > > > 1.... " collects " the concepts..

> > > >

> > > > 2..... " puts " the ax to " anything " ..

> > > >

> > > > 3.....believes this bullshit?

> > > >

> > > > ROFLMAO!

> > > >

> > > > .b b.b.

> > > >

> > > > If there is complete freedom from concepts there is the seeing of a

> > > > totaly

> > > > " new " world - without the observer

> > > > -geo-

> > >

> > > that's as good a speculation as any surmisal can be.

> > >

> > > .b b.b.

> > >

> > > Why do you question seeing w/o observer?

> > > If consciousness is absolutely still, no concepts running in the mind as

> > > noise, this luminous apearance IS by itself. The seeing and the being of

> > > it

> > > are the same.

> > > -geo-

> >

> > all talk is cheap.

> >

> > it may not be ill-conceived but it all amounts to nothing.

> >

> > no way can the " No Way " be known or talked about.

> >

> > " Being " ... as understood... is a lie.

> >

> > lie's can only lie.

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

> > Nah....you sleep like any other. Sometimes you wake up - sometimes. Words

> > can wake you up - or not.

> > -geo-

>

> of course i sleep like any you.

>

> in dreams of and by yous and mes.

>

> there are no such things as yous nor mes.

>

> nor dreams thereof.

>

> this too is a lie.

>

> both sleeping and waking " by " lies " are " lies...

>

> don't be fooled.

>

> " you " are believing in bullshit...

>

> maybe you and me and them and those ARE the bullshit.

>

> no one knows or can ever know.

>

> that's for certain.

>

> .b b.b.

>

>

>

> You wrote:

>

> " don't enjoy ANY freedom.

>

> when however i have been gotten out of the way..

>

> as the " subjective moment " that ever resists..

>

> Freedom Flows without question or wonderment or presence. " -bbb-

>

> geo>.... " when however i have been gotten out of the way " - or sometimes.

>

> and

>

> " for some unknown reason and by some strange chemistry..

>

> this intrinsic behavior and attitude..

>

> of this 'persona " ..

>

> has at " moments " opened floodgates of an Awareness..

>

> for which terms like " doubt " or " uncertainty " no longer apply. " -bbb-

>

> geo> some moments...moments..

 

 

nah..

 

bullshit like everything else said or done.

 

don't be fooled.

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

duveyoung

Nisargadatta

Monday, July 20, 2009 12:04 PM

Re: More on concepts

 

 

 

> Edg: I'm not getting ya. Is there a ghost in the machine? Is there an

> image

> in a mirror? Does the Pope shit in the woods? Do we all agree that

> awareness

> is a seer-seeing-seen processing? Is awareness the " seer " or is awareness

> " the Absolute? " Or whaaaa?

>

> geo> I am calling awareness and the absolute the same. The absolute or

> awareness is the seer-seeing-seen processing.

> Awareness is like subatomic substance in consciousness molecules. The

> world

> is waves in awareness.

 

Edg: I'm not satisfied. Not that it's your job, but seems to me that

awareness' trinity has to be entirely " in the relative. " The " seer "

" portion " of the trinity seems to be a brain function -- not a non-physical

entity observing " somewhere " from the stance of " not-a-where. " Language is a

brutal torture, eh?

 

geo> This is not a language problem at all. You brought in a " trinity " and I

dont know what you mean. But...the seer portion is absolutely NOT a brain

function. The seeing, the eyes per-se see nothing without the absulute. The

physical seeing is just an addition of quality. All and any events are

patterns - empty patternings - in awareness/absolute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " mstrdmmlbrn " <mstrdmmlbrn wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " duveyoung " <edg@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > duveyoung

> > > > Nisargadatta

> > > > Monday, July 20, 2009 11:16 AM

> > > > Re: More on concepts

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > -

> > > > > geo

> > > > > Nisargadatta

> > > > > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:55 AM

> > > > > Re: Re: More on concepts

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > -

> > > > > roberibus111

> > > > > Nisargadatta

> > > > > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:49 AM

> > > > > Re: More on concepts

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -

> > > > > > roberibus111

> > > > > > Nisargadatta

> > > > > > Monday, July 20, 2009 10:21 AM

> > > > > > Re: More on concepts

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 "

> > > > > > > <douglasmitch1963@> wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Nisargadatta said, " You must become concept free. Put the ax to

the

> > > > > > > > concepts, including the concept 'I Am'. Whatever concepts you

have

> > > > > > > > collected in this world are totally useless. Understand that the

> > > > > > > > entire

> > > > > > > > manifestation is the child of a barren woman. "

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > so are the notions of " big egos " ...

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > wouldn't " you " think?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > LOL!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > .b b.b.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > and..

> > > > > >

> > > > > > who's the " you " that:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 1.... " collects " the concepts..

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 2..... " puts " the ax to " anything " ..

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 3.....believes this bullshit?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ROFLMAO!

> > > > > >

> > > > > > .b b.b.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > If there is complete freedom from concepts there is the seeing of a

> > > > > > totaly

> > > > > > " new " world - without the observer

> > > > > > -geo-

> > > > >

> > > > > that's as good a speculation as any surmisal can be.

> > > > >

> > > > > .b b.b.

> > > > >

> > > > > Why do you question seeing w/o observer?

> > > > > If consciousness is absolutely still, no concepts running in the mind

as

> > > > > noise, this luminous apearance IS by itself. The seeing and the being

of

> > > > > it

> > > > > are the same.

> > > > > -geo-

> > > > >

> > > > Edg: Geo, are you saying that the Absolute isn't a witness?

> > > >

> > > > geo> The world, consciousness, is not " other " to the absolute. How could

> > > > anything be other to it? It is being it. The seeing is the being.

> > > >

> > >

> > > Edg: I'm not getting ya. Is there a ghost in the machine? Is there an

image in a mirror? Does the Pope shit in the woods? Do we all agree that

awareness is a seer-seeing-seen processing? Is awareness the " seer " or is

awareness " the Absolute? " Or whaaaa?

> >

> >

> > maybe the Pope shits in the woods..

> >

> > when the Bear sits on the throne.

> >

> > just a thought.

>

>

>

>

> That's fine Lttl Mn, I know you're trying hard.

>

> LOL!!

>

>

> > :-)

> >

> > .b b.b.

 

 

 

well of course you can't even understand a joke.

 

it's apparent you can't understand anything except begging.

 

you are so fucking obsessed with me shithead it's unbelievable.

 

you're in love with me.

 

you read everything i post..

 

including little dots.

 

what the fuck do you want me to send you for free this time?

 

robert amory (assumed name) is a little wetback penis breath wannabe.

 

and what you wannabe.... you'll never attain.

 

you want to belong.

 

never is that gonna happen asshole.

 

not with me..not with charlie..

 

not with anybody living above ground.

 

go back into your lonely hole asshole.

 

you smell...like yourself.

 

ain't nothin' worse than that.

 

ROFLMAO!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...