Guest guest Posted July 24, 2009 Report Share Posted July 24, 2009 Nisargadatta , " duveyoung " <edg wrote: > > Dan, > > Your response, below, I'll be blunt, is a rather ordinary and typical post -- dime a dozenish -- many here can put out post after post that reveals that they think they are the incarnation of certainty when they resort to the hackney and trite methodology of derision with something like: " it's all non-dual -- hey, gang, lookit the 'tard trying to keep up with us giants of discrimination. " To > me, that's how you're presenting yourself here. Perhaps he's just speaking as he does, instead of attempting to present himself a certain way. Some are not interested in 'making an impression on others', particularly when it becomes clear that others form their impressions based on their own past memories, their own 'self-image', not on what they truly see in another. As a matter of fact, one cannot see anything in another. There is no other to look into. Peace... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.