Who's the owner of this ? A New Film on Nisargadatta TATVAMASI

[Guest guest]

Dear Most Respectable and Noble Edg Person:

 

Please accept my most humble apologies for having suggested that your link was

spam. For it was not, to my genuine thinking. I viewed it and enjoyed. I was

glad you posted it. I am glad I viewed it! HONEST!

 

With all due respect: I was kidding. I'm so sorry that I failed to make this

clear to you.

 

Most Sincerely

Sky

 

 

PS: Your condemnation of me and of this was most scathing. Most

scathing. Ie, delightful! Thank you. I hope you enjoyed writing it as much as

I enjoyed reading it.

 

Most scathing, indeed! I couldn't have done a better job! I, myself, couldn't

have said it better! I agree with EVERY WORD! Kudos to you, my fine feathered

friend!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

> I would rather have spam of this nature than the daily onslaught of " spam " of

folks who are only interested in promoting an image of themselves here as some

sort of enlightened Advaitic geniuses.

>

> So many here come off as dropouts from the Wayne Liquorman School Of Advaita

-- and their only ability is to come up with quasi-Advaitic put-downs like they

were Ram Tzu. As if.

>

> And to come here day after day and only find, well, childishness that would

drive away almost any newbie from all-things-Nisargadatta, is a sad thing

indeed. The energy of the dialog here is a besmirching of the knowledge. To

me, even seekers should early on in their search at least attempt to protect the

knowledge -- even if they are not yet clear about that body of concepts. But let

a newbie come here and bang, bang, bang the newbie's ego will be jeered and

trounced. It's tawdry. It's sick. It's dead wrong. It's fucked.

>

> Here -- a place called " Nisargadatta " -- we find a spiritual old west saloon

where even the rinky-tinking piano cannot drown out the catcalled squawkings

that are poised as if newly cognized sutras from the Vedas.

>

> If anyone gets offended about the above criticism, hey, bingo, there's your

proof that you're part of the problem.

>

> You won't miss me if I go, and I won't let the door hit my ass on my way out,

but geeze, surely this criticism of this group has been posted many times before

my own rendition.

>

> I'll get back to you -- gotta think about this -- I'm going to dwell on the

issue of whether or not my integrity requires that I no longer participate

herein and thus be part of problem.

>

> This place now seems to me to be as if a bombed out church that is inhabited

by a few derelicts who pretend it is the Vatican and each one of them the Pope,

but in reality, all that's left out of the 1300+ folks who signed up here are

spiritually ratty squatters shitting on the good name of Nisargadatta by being

insane on purpose instead of wise, loving, caring, etc.

>

> Where's the sense of responsibility for others who come here for support, for

a first lecture about Advaita, for guidance?

>

> Who's the owner of this group? Hur? I'm calling you out. The name

" Nisargadatta " requires that you defend why you've allowed this place to become

such a travesty.

>

> Edg

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963@>

wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 " <kailashana@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > -

> > > > > geo

> > > > > Nisargadatta

> > > > > Monday, July 27, 2009 8:32 AM

> > > > > Re: Re: A New Film on Nisargadatta " TATVAMASI "

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > -

> > > > > geo

> > > > > Nisargadatta

> > > > > Monday, July 27, 2009 8:15 AM

> > > > > Re: Re: A New Film on Nisargadatta " TATVAMASI "

> > > > >

> > > > > -

> > > > > geo

> > > > > Nisargadatta

> > > > > Monday, July 27, 2009 8:05 AM

> > > > > Re: Re: A New Film on Nisargadatta " TATVAMASI "

> > > > >

> > > > > -

> > > > > Tim G.

> > > > > Nisargadatta

> > > > > Monday, July 27, 2009 6:35 AM

> > > > > Re: A New Film on Nisargadatta " TATVAMASI "

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " Advaita " <abideinself@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > You can watch

> > > > >

> > > > > You?

> > > > > -tim-

> > > > >

> > > > > You so aroused/cought by this me-you stuff that is so simple. All is

> > > > > consciousness...and all is on the same side....the mes and yous and

> > > > > theys....are all part of the same it.

> > > > > tim2: You are telling me this and I am telling it to you.

> > > > >

> > > > > It is only when you are not looking at consciousness as a whole is

when you

> > > > > get confused and try to solve an apparent ridlle of you-me-they-us.

Instead,

> > > > > when you are looking, all those are just part of it - just as space,

time,

> > > > > materiality, planets and stars...all part of the same one diversity.

> > > > >

> > > > > tim2: Me telling you

> > > > >

> > > > > Besides...why are yourself telling yourself that you are yourself so

> > > > > insistently? Dont you yourself know it already?

> > > > > tim2: Me telling me.

> > > > >

> > > > > Why am I telling myself that I am myself so insistently?

> > > > >

> > > > > -ego-

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Geeze guys, you buried a pretty good post of mine. ;-(

> > > >

> > > Why take personal pride in a posting. LOL.

> > >

> >

> > Yeah. I ask same:

> >

> > And why not take personal pride in a posting?

> >

> > Why not take any kind of pride in anything?

> >

> >

> > Why not take impersonal pride?

> >

> > Why not take no pride at all?

> >

> >

> > And LOL, her too.. just because

> >

> > Funny be the funny

> >

> > Proud be the proud

> >

> > Why not ask why?

> >

> > Egotistical be the egotistical.

> >

> >

> > I mean I don't mean

> >

> > And I don't mean I do mean

> >

> >

> > So what?

> >

> >

> > Are we trying to be consistent here?

> >

> > Why be consistent?

> >

> > Why not be consistent?

> >

> > Why ask why?

> >

> > Why not ask why?

> >

> >

> > The diversion is endlessly diverse

> >

> > And that's final!

> >

>