Who's the owner of this ? A New Film on Nisargadatta TATVAMASI

[Guest guest]

hey Edg..

 

talk about travesties..

 

well there you go right below.

 

don't send him any of your flowers or feathers.

 

he expects them though...

 

and for free.

 

that's the only stuff he really respects...

 

or understands.

 

just kidding...NOT.

 

..b b.b.

 

p.s.

 

god save us from some dippy-doodle poesy now.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords wrote:

>

> Dear Most Respectable and Noble Edg Person:

>

> Please accept my most humble apologies for having suggested that your link was

spam. For it was not, to my genuine thinking. I viewed it and enjoyed. I was

glad you posted it. I am glad I viewed it! HONEST!

>

> With all due respect: I was kidding. I'm so sorry that I failed to make this

clear to you.

>

> Most Sincerely

> Sky

>

>

> PS: Your condemnation of me and of this was most scathing. Most

scathing. Ie, delightful! Thank you. I hope you enjoyed writing it as much as

I enjoyed reading it.

>

> Most scathing, indeed! I couldn't have done a better job! I, myself,

couldn't have said it better! I agree with EVERY WORD! Kudos to you, my fine

feathered friend!

>

> I would rather have spam of this nature than the daily onslaught of " spam "

of folks who are only interested in promoting an image of themselves here as

some sort of enlightened Advaitic geniuses.

> >

> > So many here come off as dropouts from the Wayne Liquorman School Of Advaita

-- and their only ability is to come up with quasi-Advaitic put-downs like they

were Ram Tzu. As if.

> >

> > And to come here day after day and only find, well, childishness that would

drive away almost any newbie from all-things-Nisargadatta, is a sad thing

indeed. The energy of the dialog here is a besmirching of the knowledge. To

me, even seekers should early on in their search at least attempt to protect the

knowledge -- even if they are not yet clear about that body of concepts. But let

a newbie come here and bang, bang, bang the newbie's ego will be jeered and

trounced. It's tawdry. It's sick. It's dead wrong. It's fucked.

> >

> > Here -- a place called " Nisargadatta " -- we find a spiritual old west saloon

where even the rinky-tinking piano cannot drown out the catcalled squawkings

that are poised as if newly cognized sutras from the Vedas.

> >

> > If anyone gets offended about the above criticism, hey, bingo, there's your

proof that you're part of the problem.

> >

> > You won't miss me if I go, and I won't let the door hit my ass on my way

out, but geeze, surely this criticism of this group has been posted many times

before my own rendition.

> >

> > I'll get back to you -- gotta think about this -- I'm going to dwell on the

issue of whether or not my integrity requires that I no longer participate

herein and thus be part of problem.

> >

> > This place now seems to me to be as if a bombed out church that is inhabited

by a few derelicts who pretend it is the Vatican and each one of them the Pope,

but in reality, all that's left out of the 1300+ folks who signed up here are

spiritually ratty squatters shitting on the good name of Nisargadatta by being

insane on purpose instead of wise, loving, caring, etc.

> >

> > Where's the sense of responsibility for others who come here for support,

for a first lecture about Advaita, for guidance?

> >

> > Who's the owner of this group? Hur? I'm calling you out. The name

" Nisargadatta " requires that you defend why you've allowed this place to become

such a travesty.

> >

> > Edg

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 "

<douglasmitch1963@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 " <kailashana@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -

> > > > > > geo

> > > > > > Nisargadatta

> > > > > > Monday, July 27, 2009 8:32 AM

> > > > > > Re: Re: A New Film on Nisargadatta

" TATVAMASI "

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -

> > > > > > geo

> > > > > > Nisargadatta

> > > > > > Monday, July 27, 2009 8:15 AM

> > > > > > Re: Re: A New Film on Nisargadatta

" TATVAMASI "

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -

> > > > > > geo

> > > > > > Nisargadatta

> > > > > > Monday, July 27, 2009 8:05 AM

> > > > > > Re: Re: A New Film on Nisargadatta

" TATVAMASI "

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -

> > > > > > Tim G.

> > > > > > Nisargadatta

> > > > > > Monday, July 27, 2009 6:35 AM

> > > > > > Re: A New Film on Nisargadatta " TATVAMASI "

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Advaita " <abideinself@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > You can watch

> > > > > >

> > > > > > You?

> > > > > > -tim-

> > > > > >

> > > > > > You so aroused/cought by this me-you stuff that is so simple. All is

> > > > > > consciousness...and all is on the same side....the mes and yous and

> > > > > > theys....are all part of the same it.

> > > > > > tim2: You are telling me this and I am telling it to you.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > It is only when you are not looking at consciousness as a whole is

when you

> > > > > > get confused and try to solve an apparent ridlle of you-me-they-us.

Instead,

> > > > > > when you are looking, all those are just part of it - just as space,

time,

> > > > > > materiality, planets and stars...all part of the same one diversity.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > tim2: Me telling you

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Besides...why are yourself telling yourself that you are yourself so

> > > > > > insistently? Dont you yourself know it already?

> > > > > > tim2: Me telling me.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Why am I telling myself that I am myself so insistently?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -ego-

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Geeze guys, you buried a pretty good post of mine. ;-(

> > > > >

> > > > Why take personal pride in a posting. LOL.

> > > >

> > >

> > > Yeah. I ask same:

> > >

> > > And why not take personal pride in a posting?

> > >

> > > Why not take any kind of pride in anything?

> > >

> > >

> > > Why not take impersonal pride?

> > >

> > > Why not take no pride at all?

> > >

> > >

> > > And LOL, her too.. just because

> > >

> > > Funny be the funny

> > >

> > > Proud be the proud

> > >

> > > Why not ask why?

> > >

> > > Egotistical be the egotistical.

> > >

> > >

> > > I mean I don't mean

> > >

> > > And I don't mean I do mean

> > >

> > >

> > > So what?

> > >

> > >

> > > Are we trying to be consistent here?

> > >

> > > Why be consistent?

> > >

> > > Why not be consistent?

> > >

> > > Why ask why?

> > >

> > > Why not ask why?

> > >

> > >

> > > The diversion is endlessly diverse

> > >

> > > And that's final!

> > >

> >

>