Guest guest Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > geo> The show is running alright...meaning some-no-thing is outside > > > > of it. > > > > > > Nothing inside, so nothing outside -- and vice-versa. > > > > > > No outer, no inner. > > > > > > but oh that middle ground! > > > > what is inner or outer if there be no dividing line? > > > > thus distinction is born. > > > > then all " things " and " talk of " things " BOTH " inner and outer " .. > > > > " come to be " .. > > > > and yet.. > > > > it is as it never was. > > > > just so. > > > > .b b.b. > > > Makes the most sense when vulgarism is not employed!! most likely.. but not as much fun! :-) ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.