Guest guest Posted August 1, 2009 Report Share Posted August 1, 2009 Let's change the focus for now. Let's transcend the silliness, transcend, transcend, transcend. Afterall, is this not what Nisargadatta did? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2009 Report Share Posted August 1, 2009 Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963 wrote: > > Let's change the focus for now. Let's transcend the silliness, transcend, transcend, transcend. Afterall, is this not what Nisargadatta did? > >And transcendence ultimately leads to immanence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2009 Report Share Posted August 1, 2009 Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963@> wrote: > > > > Let's change the focus for now. Let's transcend the silliness, transcend, transcend, transcend. Afterall, is this not what Nisargadatta did? > > > >And transcendence ultimately leads to immanence. > Transcendence especially is a New Age slogan. Transcend this or that and you will reach the promised land like immanence. But it is all nonsense. Why ? Who is the transcender ? Who should be that ? Werner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2009 Report Share Posted August 1, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963@> wrote: > > > > > > Let's change the focus for now. Let's transcend the silliness, transcend, transcend, transcend. Afterall, is this not what Nisargadatta did? > > > > > >And transcendence ultimately leads to immanence. > > > > > Transcendence especially is a New Age slogan. Transcend this or that and you will reach the promised land like immanence. > > But it is all nonsense. Why ? > > Who is the transcender ? Who should be that ? > > Werner > >Obviously words are in the realm of consciousness' concepts. What else could they be? Words and their concepts are all we have to communicate with in this forum. In meditation an attempt is made to transcend the word/conceptual mind. Any descriptions of that obviously cannot be captured with words/concepts. But in order to point toward, words may be used with their limitations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2009 Report Share Posted August 1, 2009 Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Let's change the focus for now. Let's transcend the silliness, transcend, transcend, transcend. Afterall, is this not what Nisargadatta did? > > > > > > > >And transcendence ultimately leads to immanence. > > > > > > > > > Transcendence especially is a New Age slogan. Transcend this or that and you will reach the promised land like immanence. > > > > But it is all nonsense. Why ? > > > > Who is the transcender ? Who should be that ? > > > > Werner > > > >Obviously words are in the realm of consciousness' concepts. What else could they be? Words and their concepts are all we have to communicate with in this forum. In meditation an attempt is made to transcend the word/conceptual mind. Nonsense again, Doug, Who is the meditator ? Who should be that ? You are hopping from one idea to the next, from one slogan to the next slogan. From transcendence to meditation and so on - gosh. Get your nose out of those Non-dual books, go into the garden and grow potatoes. That is much better than all that Advaita hype. Werner > Any descriptions of that obviously cannot be captured with words/concepts. But in order to point toward, words may be used with their limitations. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2009 Report Share Posted August 1, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Let's change the focus for now. Let's transcend the silliness, transcend, transcend, transcend. Afterall, is this not what Nisargadatta did? > > > > > > > > > >And transcendence ultimately leads to immanence. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Transcendence especially is a New Age slogan. Transcend this or that and you will reach the promised land like immanence. > > > > > > But it is all nonsense. Why ? > > > > > > Who is the transcender ? Who should be that ? > > > > > > Werner > > > > > >Obviously words are in the realm of consciousness' concepts. What else could they be? Words and their concepts are all we have to communicate with in this forum. In meditation an attempt is made to transcend the word/conceptual mind. > > > Nonsense again, Doug, > > Who is the meditator ? Who should be that ? > > You are hopping from one idea to the next, from one slogan to the next slogan. From transcendence to meditation and so on - gosh. > > Get your nose out of those Non-dual books, go into the garden and grow potatoes. > > That is much better than all that Advaita hype. > > Werner > > > > Any descriptions of that obviously cannot be captured with words/concepts. But in order to point toward, words may be used with their limitations. > > > > >You've made my point using different words because words are all we have to communicate with in this forum. Transcedence is " getting out of those Non-dual books " and immanence is " go into the garden and grow potatoes " . All hype here, too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963 wrote: > > Let's change the focus for now. Let's transcend the silliness, transcend, transcend, transcend. Afterall, is this not what Nisargadatta did? You mean, before he reincarnated as Bob? - D - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963@> wrote: > > > > Let's change the focus for now. Let's transcend the silliness, transcend, transcend, transcend. Afterall, is this not what Nisargadatta did? > > You mean, before he reincarnated as Bob? > > > - D - nothing has incarnated nor reincarnated. nothing is happening. nothing matters. or maybe not. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 - roberibus111 Nisargadatta Saturday, August 01, 2009 8:51 PM Re: Nisargadatta Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " > <douglasmitch1963@> wrote: > > > > Let's change the focus for now. Let's transcend the silliness, > > transcend, transcend, transcend. Afterall, is this not what Nisargadatta > > did? > > You mean, before he reincarnated as Bob? > > > - D - nothing has incarnated nor reincarnated. nothing is happening. nothing matters. or maybe not. ..b b.b. No-thing is indeed incarnated now/here. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963@> wrote: > > > > > > Let's change the focus for now. Let's transcend the silliness, transcend, transcend, transcend. Afterall, is this not what Nisargadatta did? > > > > > >And transcendence ultimately leads to immanence. > > > > > Transcendence especially is a New Age slogan. Transcend this or that and you will reach the promised land like immanence. > > But it is all nonsense. Why ? > > Who is the transcender ? Who should be that ? > > Werner The trance ender is here. No need to salute or bow. - D - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > roberibus111 > Nisargadatta > Saturday, August 01, 2009 8:51 PM > Re: Nisargadatta > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " > > <douglasmitch1963@> wrote: > > > > > > Let's change the focus for now. Let's transcend the silliness, > > > transcend, transcend, transcend. Afterall, is this not what Nisargadatta > > > did? > > > > You mean, before he reincarnated as Bob? > > > > > > - D - > > nothing has incarnated nor reincarnated. > > nothing is happening. > > nothing matters. > > or maybe not. > > .b b.b. > > No-thing is indeed incarnated now/here. > -geo- when nothing...matters... it's a big bang. there's all kinds of stuff. when nothing doesn't matter.. well there's just nothing. not even an empty black hole. here and now never came to be... nor not to be. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963@> wrote: > > > > > > Let's change the focus for now. Let's transcend the silliness, transcend, transcend, transcend. Afterall, is this not what Nisargadatta did? > > > > You mean, before he reincarnated as Bob? > > > > > > - D - > > > nothing has incarnated nor reincarnated. > > nothing is happening. > > nothing matters. > > or maybe not. > > .b b.b. i've been splattered. all over nirvana. or not. as the case may be. open the case, and I am there. throw the bottle on a stone, and I am there. in my underwear. your overlord, - d - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Let's change the focus for now. Let's transcend the silliness, transcend, transcend, transcend. Afterall, is this not what Nisargadatta did? > > > > > > You mean, before he reincarnated as Bob? > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > nothing has incarnated nor reincarnated. > > > > nothing is happening. > > > > nothing matters. > > > > or maybe not. > > > > .b b.b. > > i've been splattered. > > all over nirvana. > > or not. > > as the case may be. > > open the case, and I am there. > > throw the bottle on a stone, and I am there. > > in my underwear. > > your overlord, > > - d - no. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Let's change the focus for now. Let's transcend the silliness, transcend, transcend, transcend. Afterall, is this not what Nisargadatta did? > > > > > > > > You mean, before he reincarnated as Bob? > > > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > nothing has incarnated nor reincarnated. > > > > > > nothing is happening. > > > > > > nothing matters. > > > > > > or maybe not. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > i've been splattered. > > > > all over nirvana. > > > > or not. > > > > as the case may be. > > > > open the case, and I am there. > > > > throw the bottle on a stone, and I am there. > > > > in my underwear. > > > > your overlord, > > > > - d - > > > no. > > .b b.b. a second no is not necessary, really. your highness, -- d -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " douglasmitch1963 " <douglasmitch1963@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's change the focus for now. Let's transcend the silliness, transcend, transcend, transcend. Afterall, is this not what Nisargadatta did? > > > > > > > > > > You mean, before he reincarnated as Bob? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > nothing has incarnated nor reincarnated. > > > > > > > > nothing is happening. > > > > > > > > nothing matters. > > > > > > > > or maybe not. > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > i've been splattered. > > > > > > all over nirvana. > > > > > > or not. > > > > > > as the case may be. > > > > > > open the case, and I am there. > > > > > > throw the bottle on a stone, and I am there. > > > > > > in my underwear. > > > > > > your overlord, > > > > > > - d - > > > > > > no. > > > > .b b.b. > > > a second no is not necessary, really. > > your highness, > > -- d -- no? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.