Guest guest Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " anna " <kailashana@> wrote: > > > > Oh.. in case you didn't see it at nondualsalon: > > > > http://celebrity.aol.co.uk/2009/08/28/you-think-britains-got-talent-check-out-th\ e-ukraine-winner/ > > > > > > See, you don't have to understand the language when compassion is understood. > > > > Your spiritual mama, > > > > ~A > > Bless you, oh Great One... > > I understand nothing of compassion, or love, or life. > > You are Great, Wise and all-Powerful. > > I await Your further Blessings. > > Thank You for helping little me. D: One question that rarely seems to arise in inquiry: How am I investing in a self/other division, in order to have a feeling of relating? Without any self or other, what is being? What is being ... now? - D - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " anna " <kailashana@> wrote: > > > > > > Oh.. in case you didn't see it at nondualsalon: > > > > > > http://celebrity.aol.co.uk/2009/08/28/you-think-britains-got-talent-check-out-th\ e-ukraine-winner/ > > > > > > > > > See, you don't have to understand the language when compassion is understood. > > > > > > Your spiritual mama, > > > > > > ~A > > > > Bless you, oh Great One... > > > > I understand nothing of compassion, or love, or life. > > > > You are Great, Wise and all-Powerful. > > > > I await Your further Blessings. > > > > Thank You for helping little me. > > P.S. funny how the words " I " and " me " apply always to the reader, eh? > > I bet it felt funny to read the sentence " I understand nothing of compassion, or love, or life " , even though " somebody else " supposedly wrote it. > > Is there anyone else? ;-). D: I am informing you about how I felt when you did what you did to someone else. And when you said what you said, I felt this way about you, and I need to tell you how I feel about you, and what you did to someone else. And if there were no " you " to inform about how I feel about what you did and said, and no someone else that you said and did things to ... Then what would all this be? What would this world be, with all its manipulations, greed, deviousness, killings, stealings, image-promotions? And celebrations, victory-dances, achievements, and accomplishments? What would this be if it weren't selves and others existing and doing these things to others and receiving things from others? - D - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " fewtch " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Where there is no other, there is no self, either. > > > > > > > > That doesn't mean one can't talk to 'others'. > > > > > > > > But the " scenery " is a little bit different, viewed in quite a different light. > > > > -tim- > > > > > > > > Toomba questions god for deep inside he still has doubts. > > > > Tim questions the existence of others for deep inside he is still in > doubt. > > > > -geo- > > > > > > Tim doesn't question the existence of others, Geo. > > > > > > Nor is there a " deep inside " in which doubt can exist, or not exist. > > > > > > Would Geo like it if Tim were in doubt, and questioning? Maybe Tim > would be more like Geo, if it were so? > > > > P.S. it's perfectly possible to talk to others, when there are no others. > > > > People do it all the time, and there are no others for anybody. > > Conceptually speaking, of course, there are others, and there is " myself " . > > Obviously, this is why folks remain " stuck " in the conceptual realm, why it has become an emotional addiction. > > Because, beyond thought/concept (imagination), there is no self and there are no others. > > And people want there to be others, and want there to be a self. > > Including those who claim to be seeking the self's riddance. Perhaps, especially those claiming to be seeking its riddance. D: Oh yes. And those claiming to be rid of it, as well. I want to convince you to be rid of self. And I want to convince you that I am rid of self. And how many gurus have required that line of nonsense? And if there never were a self to be rid of? Then what would this be? And what would this communicating be, now, with no selves ever having been involved in it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.