Guest guest Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 geo> Toomba, I think you may have missunderstood maharchi's take on reality. D (questioner).: What is the nature of the Reality? Maharchi.: (a) Existence without beginning or end - eternal. (b) Existence everywhere, endless, infinite. © Existence underlying all forms, all changes, all forces, all matter and all spirit. The many change and pass away (phenomena), whereas the One always endures (noumenon). (d) The one displacing the triads, i.e., the knower, the knowledge and the known. The triads are only appearances in time and space, whereas the Reality lies beyond and behind them. They are like a mirage over the Reality. They are the result of delusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > geo> Toomba, I think you may have missunderstood maharchi's take on reality. > > > D (questioner).: What is the nature of the Reality? > > Maharchi.: (a) Existence without beginning or end - eternal. > (b) Existence everywhere, endless, infinite. > © Existence underlying all forms, all changes, all forces, all matter > and all spirit. > The many change and pass away (phenomena), whereas the One > always endures (noumenon). > (d) The one displacing the triads, i.e., the knower, the knowledge > and the known. The triads are only appearances in time and space, > whereas the Reality lies beyond and behind them. They are like a > mirage over the Reality. They are the result of delusion. > When traveling beyond the earth......there is no reason to bring a compass. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 - toombaru Nisargadatta Sunday, October 11, 2009 11:54 AM Re: Maharchi on reality Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > geo> Toomba, I think you may have missunderstood maharchi's take on > reality. > > > D (questioner).: What is the nature of the Reality? > > Maharchi.: (a) Existence without beginning or end - eternal. > (b) Existence everywhere, endless, infinite. > © Existence underlying all forms, all changes, all forces, all matter > and all spirit. > The many change and pass away (phenomena), whereas the One > always endures (noumenon). > (d) The one displacing the triads, i.e., the knower, the knowledge > and the known. The triads are only appearances in time and space, > whereas the Reality lies beyond and behind them. They are like a > mirage over the Reality. They are the result of delusion. > When traveling beyond the earth......there is no reason to bring a compass. toombaru Actually I think it was mahesh we where discussing the other day... and not maharshi. But yes....no references. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > toombaru > Nisargadatta > Sunday, October 11, 2009 11:54 AM > Re: Maharchi on reality > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > geo> Toomba, I think you may have missunderstood maharchi's take on > > reality. > > > > > > D (questioner).: What is the nature of the Reality? > > > > Maharchi.: (a) Existence without beginning or end - eternal. > > (b) Existence everywhere, endless, infinite. > > © Existence underlying all forms, all changes, all forces, all matter > > and all spirit. > > The many change and pass away (phenomena), whereas the One > > always endures (noumenon). > > (d) The one displacing the triads, i.e., the knower, the knowledge > > and the known. The triads are only appearances in time and space, > > whereas the Reality lies beyond and behind them. They are like a > > mirage over the Reality. They are the result of delusion. > > > > When traveling beyond the earth......there is no reason to bring a compass. > > toombaru > > Actually I think it was mahesh we where discussing the other day... and not > maharshi. > But yes....no references. > -geo- > The self is composed only of references. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2009 Report Share Posted October 14, 2009 toombaru wrote... > The self is composed only of references.Reminds me of looking up a defintion of a word in a dictionary. Each word is defined by other words which are defined by other words, etc in a never ending circular self-referencing fashion! :-)) Michael Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2009 Report Share Posted October 14, 2009 Nisargadatta , " toombaru " <lastrain wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > toombaru > > Nisargadatta > > Sunday, October 11, 2009 11:54 AM > > Re: Maharchi on reality > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > geo> Toomba, I think you may have missunderstood maharchi's take on > > > reality. > > > > > > > > > D (questioner).: What is the nature of the Reality? > > > > > > Maharchi.: (a) Existence without beginning or end - eternal. > > > (b) Existence everywhere, endless, infinite. > > > © Existence underlying all forms, all changes, all forces, all matter > > > and all spirit. > > > The many change and pass away (phenomena), whereas the One > > > always endures (noumenon). > > > (d) The one displacing the triads, i.e., the knower, the knowledge > > > and the known. The triads are only appearances in time and space, > > > whereas the Reality lies beyond and behind them. They are like a > > > mirage over the Reality. They are the result of delusion. > > > > > > > When traveling beyond the earth......there is no reason to bring a compass. > > > > toombaru > > > > Actually I think it was mahesh we where discussing the other day... and not > > maharshi. > > But yes....no references. > > -geo- > > > > > The self is composed only of references. > toombaru > And what is the difference between Toomb and the self ? None. Toomb is the self. Just see: The commentator about the self who wrote 'The self is composed only of references', is sperating himself from the comment and so believing to have a separate existence. But he has no separate existenc: The commentator is the comment. Werner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 15, 2009 Report Share Posted October 15, 2009 Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > - > > > toombaru > > > Nisargadatta > > > Sunday, October 11, 2009 11:54 AM > > > Re: Maharchi on reality > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > geo> Toomba, I think you may have missunderstood maharchi's take on > > > > reality. > > > > > > > > > > > > D (questioner).: What is the nature of the Reality? > > > > > > > > Maharchi.: (a) Existence without beginning or end - eternal. > > > > (b) Existence everywhere, endless, infinite. > > > > © Existence underlying all forms, all changes, all forces, all matter > > > > and all spirit. > > > > The many change and pass away (phenomena), whereas the One > > > > always endures (noumenon). > > > > (d) The one displacing the triads, i.e., the knower, the knowledge > > > > and the known. The triads are only appearances in time and space, > > > > whereas the Reality lies beyond and behind them. They are like a > > > > mirage over the Reality. They are the result of delusion. > > > > > > > > > > When traveling beyond the earth......there is no reason to bring a compass. > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > Actually I think it was mahesh we where discussing the other day... and not > > > maharshi. > > > But yes....no references. > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > The self is composed only of references. > > > toombaru > > > > > And what is the difference between Toomb and the self ? > > None. > > Toomb is the self. Just see: > > The commentator about the self who wrote 'The self is composed only of > references', is sperating himself from the comment and so believing to have a separate existence. But he has no separate existenc: > > The commentator is the comment. > > Werner > Indeed. And now *it* is *finished*? ;-) ~A Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.