Guest guest Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 " That which sees all this, and the nothing too, is the inner teacher. He alone is, all else only appears to be. He is your own self (swarupa), your hope and assurance of freedom; find him and cling to him and you will be saved and safe. " -- Nisargadatta Maharaj And so, if " Self-realization " is a fact, how to reconcile this with " there is no self? " This is actually simple, conceptually speaking, and even simpler non-conceptually. If there is only " Self " , it's like saying " there is only light " -- and if so, there is no such thing as darkness, and so there is no such thing as light either -- as there is nothing to compare or contrast " light " to, and never has been. This makes sense here logically, and hopefully makes sense to you, too. It is an easy reconciliation between " Self " or " self-only " and " no-self " . The 'trick' is realizing it directly, as the past keeps on asserting and reasserting, choicelessly, or it dissolves, as never having been anything alive or real. And so one is the " dead living " , or one is the " living dead " ... no two ways about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.