Guest guest Posted December 17, 2009 Report Share Posted December 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Lene " <lschwabe@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is nothing looking out from any eyes. > > > > > > > > That which is looking is the environment, is the seen - using those eyes to see whatever happens to be seen. > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > P: Haha! How is that different from what I said, > > > > > > The show observes itself, and appears of > > > itself, by itself, and for itself. > > > > > > > > Yes, of course. > > > > So - what is it then, the doer who imagines it does stuff? > > > > You know - if what you say is correct and I am sure it is, > > at times I even know it is - then the appearence of the > > doer (a seer who sees the seen) also appears of itself, by > > itself, and for itself. > > > > You follow? Of course you do. > > > > -Lene > > P: doers, observers, entities such as " I " and Geo's > favorite final entity, the so called Absolute, are > language mirages. P.S. " the brain " is as much an objectified entity as " I " and " the Absolute " . It's a language mirage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2009 Report Share Posted December 17, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Lene " <lschwabe@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is nothing looking out from any eyes. > > > > > > > > > > That which is looking is the environment, is the seen - using those eyes to see whatever happens to be seen. > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > P: Haha! How is that different from what I said, > > > > > > > > The show observes itself, and appears of > > > > itself, by itself, and for itself. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, of course. > > > > > > So - what is it then, the doer who imagines it does stuff? > > > > > > You know - if what you say is correct and I am sure it is, > > > at times I even know it is - then the appearence of the > > > doer (a seer who sees the seen) also appears of itself, by > > > itself, and for itself. > > > > > > You follow? Of course you do. > > > > > > -Lene > > > > P: doers, observers, entities such as " I " and Geo's > > favorite final entity, the so called Absolute, are > > language mirages. > > P.S. " the brain " is as much an objectified entity as " I " and " the Absolute " . It's a language mirage. how do you know that? how do you know if you are in your right mind? one way or the other.. you seem identified with the bullshit.. of trying to pin the tail on a donkey you don't even see. here's your new tail: " language mirage " ! your new biff phrase for today. puleeeeze! LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.