Guest guest Posted January 18, 2010 Report Share Posted January 18, 2010 - geo Nisargadatta Monday, January 18, 2010 9:43 AM Re: Re: Was JK stuck? /Lene - Lene Nisargadatta Monday, January 18, 2010 8:03 AM Re: Was JK stuck? /Lene Since I am going nowhere with Geo today because he is not Pete and him I already have been everywhere with I might just swell have a go at you - and we will see - if K was stuck or not Before read your message would like to say, that the teachings is a sort of unsolved mystery to me - I am not quite sure what is the idea with them, although I have had many a conversation with the dead man himself about " the rest of it " I may be totally wrong but as I see his philosophy it is about a transformation of the mind, which is a spitting out flawless humbees (human beings) of the tube. They go in filthy and full of self-contradiction, living in conflict - and come out clean at the end of the day. The transformation does not come about thru striving for to be come - a flawless humbee - only through understanding that one is not a such -- and the premise is of course that we all want to be flawless human beings, living in peace and harmony until the neverending story - but is that anticipation in accordance with the truth? My answer is yes and no. (I have not planned to say any of this aforehand.) But then he preached in the hippie flower-power days where all the little, idiot hypocrites in the West, this is to say would -be-lovers, would-live-in-harmoniers, all the little wannabees buzzed off to the East to find the light cannot be blown out. And in the East things were not much better; they were lost in religion and poverty and beliefs aso, just like the Westenders. (I misspell English on purpose and play around with it because I do not speak the language; there is also quite a lot of bear in it which is the lingo spoken inbetween bears and goldilock) So - do I understand the man? Bingo! Was he stuck? No. What he correct in stating we're hypocrites and corrupt " and the rest of it " ? Yes. Has he been succesful & had us all transformed via the truth? Course not. Guess most of the world's population has not even heard of him. So. Is it even true that understanding one is full of flaws has a transformation of the mind come about? Unless its true his house falls like one made o cards and the teachings may be dumped and forgotten about. Because of all these questions unanswered have I come to this group to at least have a good laugh - Krishnamurtians are not good laughs - in general. One has to be on ones tip-toes when around them; never knows from which direction the next attack will come - if ever - it is a very tricky affair to be around K-ites -- I have seen much and heard much - and said much too and because I have realised that existance is empty of content and find it sort of a waste to keep discussing K and his teachings in detail, and yet I keep close to my K-friends - would not be without out them. I wonder, was/is it the way K helped me negate everything that he called the false - which had me realise that I do not exist - that existance is a phantom - no content whatsoever - was it the negation-trick that did it for me? If yes - I cannot thank him enough for doing me that favour. But the thing is I do not know what did it -- I do not even know if it is done. It could be my own words - own thinking - own -- finding out that there is no own -- no owner -- only stuff happening - by itself - on its own (ROFLOL) accord. And now I will read your message - finally -Lene LOL LOL LOL Does it matter? First...last...before...after....all end up in the same. PS - Let us not confuse K-ians (a pain in the a...) with the non-message K left. The problem I see with K-ians is that they focus completely upon the false, analyse it, strech it, shrink it, twist it, make love with it.....so its not surprising they cant get rid of it....LOL -geo- Well..since you told us some stuff about yourself, and bbb gave us even the address the cemetery he is buried in, I will tell you something related to K(partly repetition). At the age of 6 I was walking down a path to meet some friends near the lake. Suddenly I had to freeze. I had just " seen " that I was the only being in the universe that was inside a body - for all other where seen (by me) from outside. AS I did not know how to read, did not have any religious upbringing (both parents atheists), the episode did not cause any severe repercussion to my personality except that I knew that the " I " was something absolutely unique...but a natural event of nature. Of course at that time my " seeing " was incomplete because I did not understand the non-dual nature of what IS. I just understood that the " I " was absolutely intransferible and totally unmoving. I found something that seemed fixed: the " I " . (in a way there is some truth in it) In fact what happened at that time, now I know, is that a peace of the roof cracked and I saw some light creeping in. Very well. A decade or more later I found a little book I don't remember where...from K. I started reading it and the man was saying that there is no " I " !!!! What???!!! I thought. What is going on here? The problem was that by the time I arrived at the chapter he said that (no I) I was already hooked to his intelligence, his reasoning, and mostly to his insights. So I just could not drop him...and kept reading him trying to find out where the flaw was.. (no I)...... -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2010 Report Share Posted January 18, 2010 - BobN Nisargadatta Monday, January 18, 2010 9:16 AM Re: Was JK stuck? Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > geo > Nisargadatta > Monday, January 18, 2010 9:43 AM > Re: Re: Was JK stuck? /Lene > > > > > - > Lene > Nisargadatta > Monday, January 18, 2010 8:03 AM > Re: Was JK stuck? /Lene > > Since I am going nowhere with Geo today because he is not Pete > and him I already have been everywhere with I might just swell > have a go at you - and we will see - if K was stuck or not > > Before read your message would like to say, that the teachings > is a sort of unsolved mystery to me - I am not quite sure what > is the idea with them, although I have had many a conversation > with the dead man himself about " the rest of it " > > I may be totally wrong but as I see his philosophy it is about > a transformation of the mind, which is a spitting out flawless > humbees (human beings) of the tube. They go in filthy and full > of self-contradiction, living in conflict - and come out clean > at the end of the day. > > The transformation does not come about thru striving for to be > come - a flawless humbee - only through understanding that one > is not a such -- and the premise is of course that we all want > to be flawless human beings, living in peace and harmony until > the neverending story - but is that anticipation in accordance > with the truth? My answer is yes and no. > > (I have not planned to say any of this aforehand.) > > But then he preached in the hippie flower-power days where all > the little, idiot hypocrites in the West, this is to say would > -be-lovers, would-live-in-harmoniers, all the little wannabees > buzzed off to the East to find the light cannot be blown out. > > And in the East things were not much better; they were lost in > religion and poverty and beliefs aso, just like the Westenders. > > (I misspell English on purpose and play around with it because > I do not speak the language; there is also quite a lot of bear > in it which is the lingo spoken inbetween bears and goldilock) > > So - do I understand the man? Bingo! > > Was he stuck? No. What he correct in stating we're hypocrites > and corrupt " and the rest of it " ? Yes. > > Has he been succesful & had us all transformed via the truth? > Course not. Guess most of the world's population has not even > heard of him. So. > > Is it even true that understanding one is full of flaws has a > transformation of the mind come about? > > Unless its true his house falls like one made o cards and the > teachings may be dumped and forgotten about. > > Because of all these questions unanswered have I come to this > group to at least have a good laugh - Krishnamurtians are not > good laughs - in general. One has to be on ones tip-toes when > around them; never knows from which direction the next attack > will come - if ever - it is a very tricky affair to be around > K-ites -- I have seen much and heard much - and said much too > > and > > because I have realised that existance is empty of content and > find it sort of a waste to keep discussing K and his teachings > in detail, and yet I keep close to my K-friends - would not be > without out them. > > I wonder, was/is it the way K helped me negate everything that > he called the false - which had me realise that I do not exist > - that existance is a phantom - no content whatsoever - was it > the negation-trick that did it for me? If yes - I cannot thank > him enough for doing me that favour. But the thing is I do not > know what did it -- I do not even know if it is done. It could > be my own words - own thinking - own -- finding out that there > is no own -- no owner -- only stuff happening - by itself - on > its own (ROFLOL) accord. > > And now I will read your message - finally > > -Lene > > LOL LOL LOL > Does it matter? First...last...before...after....all end up in the same. > > PS - Let us not confuse K-ians (a pain in the a...) with the non-message K > left. The problem I see with K-ians is that they focus completely upon the > false, analyse it, strech it, shrink it, twist it, make love with > it.....so > its not surprising they cant get rid of it....LOL > -geo- > > Well..since you told us some stuff about yourself, and bbb gave us even > the > address the cemetery he is buried in, I will tell you something related to > K(partly repetition). > > At the age of 6 I was walking down a path to meet some friends near the > lake. Suddenly I had to freeze. I had just " seen " that I was the only > being > in the universe that was inside a body - for all other where seen (by me) > from outside. AS I did not know how to read, did not have any religious > upbringing (both parents atheists), the episode did not cause any severe > repercussion to my personality except that I knew that the " I " was > something > absolutely unique...but a natural event of nature. Of course at that time > my > " seeing " was incomplete because I did not understand the non-dual nature > of > what IS. I just understood that the " I " was absolutely intransferible and > totally unmoving. I found something that seemed fixed: the " I " . (in a way > there is some truth in it) > > In fact what happened at that time, now I know, is that a peace of the > roof > cracked and I saw some light creeping in. > > Very well. A decade or more later I found a little book I don't remember > where...from K. I started reading it and the man was saying that there is > no > " I " !!!! > What???!!! I thought. What is going on here? The problem was that by the > time I arrived at the chapter he said that (no I) I was already hooked to > his intelligence, his reasoning, and mostly to his insights. So I just > could > not drop him...and kept reading him trying to find out where the flaw > was.. > (no I)...... > -geo- " flaw " ! LOL! like every true dabbonite you feel there's a " right " and a 'wrong " . love it! :-) ..b b.b. You did not understand. There was no flaw at all. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2010 Report Share Posted January 18, 2010 - BobN Nisargadatta Monday, January 18, 2010 9:47 AM Re: Was JK stuck? Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > BobN > Nisargadatta > Monday, January 18, 2010 9:16 AM > Re: Was JK stuck? > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > geo > > Nisargadatta > > Monday, January 18, 2010 9:43 AM > > Re: Re: Was JK stuck? /Lene > > > > > > > > > > - > > Lene > > Nisargadatta > > Monday, January 18, 2010 8:03 AM > > Re: Was JK stuck? /Lene > > > > Since I am going nowhere with Geo today because he is not Pete > > and him I already have been everywhere with I might just swell > > have a go at you - and we will see - if K was stuck or not > > > > Before read your message would like to say, that the teachings > > is a sort of unsolved mystery to me - I am not quite sure what > > is the idea with them, although I have had many a conversation > > with the dead man himself about " the rest of it " > > > > I may be totally wrong but as I see his philosophy it is about > > a transformation of the mind, which is a spitting out flawless > > humbees (human beings) of the tube. They go in filthy and full > > of self-contradiction, living in conflict - and come out clean > > at the end of the day. > > > > The transformation does not come about thru striving for to be > > come - a flawless humbee - only through understanding that one > > is not a such -- and the premise is of course that we all want > > to be flawless human beings, living in peace and harmony until > > the neverending story - but is that anticipation in accordance > > with the truth? My answer is yes and no. > > > > (I have not planned to say any of this aforehand.) > > > > But then he preached in the hippie flower-power days where all > > the little, idiot hypocrites in the West, this is to say would > > -be-lovers, would-live-in-harmoniers, all the little wannabees > > buzzed off to the East to find the light cannot be blown out. > > > > And in the East things were not much better; they were lost in > > religion and poverty and beliefs aso, just like the Westenders. > > > > (I misspell English on purpose and play around with it because > > I do not speak the language; there is also quite a lot of bear > > in it which is the lingo spoken inbetween bears and goldilock) > > > > So - do I understand the man? Bingo! > > > > Was he stuck? No. What he correct in stating we're hypocrites > > and corrupt " and the rest of it " ? Yes. > > > > Has he been succesful & had us all transformed via the truth? > > Course not. Guess most of the world's population has not even > > heard of him. So. > > > > Is it even true that understanding one is full of flaws has a > > transformation of the mind come about? > > > > Unless its true his house falls like one made o cards and the > > teachings may be dumped and forgotten about. > > > > Because of all these questions unanswered have I come to this > > group to at least have a good laugh - Krishnamurtians are not > > good laughs - in general. One has to be on ones tip-toes when > > around them; never knows from which direction the next attack > > will come - if ever - it is a very tricky affair to be around > > K-ites -- I have seen much and heard much - and said much too > > > > and > > > > because I have realised that existance is empty of content and > > find it sort of a waste to keep discussing K and his teachings > > in detail, and yet I keep close to my K-friends - would not be > > without out them. > > > > I wonder, was/is it the way K helped me negate everything that > > he called the false - which had me realise that I do not exist > > - that existance is a phantom - no content whatsoever - was it > > the negation-trick that did it for me? If yes - I cannot thank > > him enough for doing me that favour. But the thing is I do not > > know what did it -- I do not even know if it is done. It could > > be my own words - own thinking - own -- finding out that there > > is no own -- no owner -- only stuff happening - by itself - on > > its own (ROFLOL) accord. > > > > And now I will read your message - finally > > > > -Lene > > > > LOL LOL LOL > > Does it matter? First...last...before...after....all end up in the same. > > > > PS - Let us not confuse K-ians (a pain in the a...) with the non-message > > K > > left. The problem I see with K-ians is that they focus completely upon > > the > > false, analyse it, strech it, shrink it, twist it, make love with > > it.....so > > its not surprising they cant get rid of it....LOL > > -geo- > > > > Well..since you told us some stuff about yourself, and bbb gave us even > > the > > address the cemetery he is buried in, I will tell you something related > > to > > K(partly repetition). > > > > At the age of 6 I was walking down a path to meet some friends near the > > lake. Suddenly I had to freeze. I had just " seen " that I was the only > > being > > in the universe that was inside a body - for all other where seen (by > > me) > > from outside. AS I did not know how to read, did not have any religious > > upbringing (both parents atheists), the episode did not cause any severe > > repercussion to my personality except that I knew that the " I " was > > something > > absolutely unique...but a natural event of nature. Of course at that > > time > > my > > " seeing " was incomplete because I did not understand the non-dual nature > > of > > what IS. I just understood that the " I " was absolutely intransferible > > and > > totally unmoving. I found something that seemed fixed: the " I " . (in a > > way > > there is some truth in it) > > > > In fact what happened at that time, now I know, is that a peace of the > > roof > > cracked and I saw some light creeping in. > > > > Very well. A decade or more later I found a little book I don't remember > > where...from K. I started reading it and the man was saying that there > > is > > no > > " I " !!!! > > What???!!! I thought. What is going on here? The problem was that by the > > time I arrived at the chapter he said that (no I) I was already hooked > > to > > his intelligence, his reasoning, and mostly to his insights. So I just > > could > > not drop him...and kept reading him trying to find out where the flaw > > was.. > > (no I)...... > > -geo- > > " flaw " ! > > LOL! > > like every true dabbonite you feel there's a " right " and a 'wrong " . > > love it! > > :-) > > .b b.b. > > You did not understand. There was no flaw at all. > -geo- i understand. you don't. baba won't bother going over it again. you won't understand no matter how many times it's gone over. hint: you're still trying to be " right " . LOL! ..b b.b. Ahh....so that! True. OK, I understand. I'll try... -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2010 Report Share Posted January 18, 2010 > You did not understand. There was no flaw at all. > -geo- i understand. you don't. baba won't bother going over it again. you won't understand no matter how many times it's gone over. hint: you're still trying to be " right " . LOL! ..b b.b. Ahh....so that! True. OK, I understand. I'll try... But this discloses a practical issue. Suppose you say something I disagree with... and I say so. This could be erroneously interpreted by you as " righteousness " , does it not? -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2010 Report Share Posted January 18, 2010 - BobN Nisargadatta Monday, January 18, 2010 1:36 PM Re: Was JK stuck? Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > You did not understand. There was no flaw at all. > > -geo- > > i understand. > > you don't. > > baba won't bother going over it again. > > you won't understand no matter how many times it's gone over. > > hint: > > you're still trying to be " right " . > > LOL! > > .b b.b. > > Ahh....so that! True. OK, I understand. I'll try... > > But this discloses a practical issue. Suppose you say something I disagree > with... and I say so. This could be erroneously interpreted by you as > " righteousness " , does it not? > -geo- baba doesn't " interpret " . that's because and wouldn't by the way even some other type go. ..b b.b. I would say because anytime at someday without eyedrops could avoid becoming rigid admant reaction. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2010 Report Share Posted January 18, 2010 - BobN Nisargadatta Monday, January 18, 2010 1:33 PM Re: Was JK stuck? Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > BobN > Nisargadatta > Monday, January 18, 2010 9:47 AM > Re: Was JK stuck? > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > - > > BobN > > Nisargadatta > > Monday, January 18, 2010 9:16 AM > > Re: Was JK stuck? > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > - > > > geo > > > Nisargadatta > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 9:43 AM > > > Re: Re: Was JK stuck? /Lene > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > Lene > > > Nisargadatta > > > Monday, January 18, 2010 8:03 AM > > > Re: Was JK stuck? /Lene > > > > > > Since I am going nowhere with Geo today because he is not Pete > > > and him I already have been everywhere with I might just swell > > > have a go at you - and we will see - if K was stuck or not > > > > > > Before read your message would like to say, that the teachings > > > is a sort of unsolved mystery to me - I am not quite sure what > > > is the idea with them, although I have had many a conversation > > > with the dead man himself about " the rest of it " > > > > > > I may be totally wrong but as I see his philosophy it is about > > > a transformation of the mind, which is a spitting out flawless > > > humbees (human beings) of the tube. They go in filthy and full > > > of self-contradiction, living in conflict - and come out clean > > > at the end of the day. > > > > > > The transformation does not come about thru striving for to be > > > come - a flawless humbee - only through understanding that one > > > is not a such -- and the premise is of course that we all want > > > to be flawless human beings, living in peace and harmony until > > > the neverending story - but is that anticipation in accordance > > > with the truth? My answer is yes and no. > > > > > > (I have not planned to say any of this aforehand.) > > > > > > But then he preached in the hippie flower-power days where all > > > the little, idiot hypocrites in the West, this is to say would > > > -be-lovers, would-live-in-harmoniers, all the little wannabees > > > buzzed off to the East to find the light cannot be blown out. > > > > > > And in the East things were not much better; they were lost in > > > religion and poverty and beliefs aso, just like the Westenders. > > > > > > (I misspell English on purpose and play around with it because > > > I do not speak the language; there is also quite a lot of bear > > > in it which is the lingo spoken inbetween bears and goldilock) > > > > > > So - do I understand the man? Bingo! > > > > > > Was he stuck? No. What he correct in stating we're hypocrites > > > and corrupt " and the rest of it " ? Yes. > > > > > > Has he been succesful & had us all transformed via the truth? > > > Course not. Guess most of the world's population has not even > > > heard of him. So. > > > > > > Is it even true that understanding one is full of flaws has a > > > transformation of the mind come about? > > > > > > Unless its true his house falls like one made o cards and the > > > teachings may be dumped and forgotten about. > > > > > > Because of all these questions unanswered have I come to this > > > group to at least have a good laugh - Krishnamurtians are not > > > good laughs - in general. One has to be on ones tip-toes when > > > around them; never knows from which direction the next attack > > > will come - if ever - it is a very tricky affair to be around > > > K-ites -- I have seen much and heard much - and said much too > > > > > > and > > > > > > because I have realised that existance is empty of content and > > > find it sort of a waste to keep discussing K and his teachings > > > in detail, and yet I keep close to my K-friends - would not be > > > without out them. > > > > > > I wonder, was/is it the way K helped me negate everything that > > > he called the false - which had me realise that I do not exist > > > - that existance is a phantom - no content whatsoever - was it > > > the negation-trick that did it for me? If yes - I cannot thank > > > him enough for doing me that favour. But the thing is I do not > > > know what did it -- I do not even know if it is done. It could > > > be my own words - own thinking - own -- finding out that there > > > is no own -- no owner -- only stuff happening - by itself - on > > > its own (ROFLOL) accord. > > > > > > And now I will read your message - finally > > > > > > -Lene > > > > > > LOL LOL LOL > > > Does it matter? First...last...before...after....all end up in the > > > same. > > > > > > PS - Let us not confuse K-ians (a pain in the a...) with the > > > non-message > > > K > > > left. The problem I see with K-ians is that they focus completely upon > > > the > > > false, analyse it, strech it, shrink it, twist it, make love with > > > it.....so > > > its not surprising they cant get rid of it....LOL > > > -geo- > > > > > > Well..since you told us some stuff about yourself, and bbb gave us > > > even > > > the > > > address the cemetery he is buried in, I will tell you something > > > related > > > to > > > K(partly repetition). > > > > > > At the age of 6 I was walking down a path to meet some friends near > > > the > > > lake. Suddenly I had to freeze. I had just " seen " that I was the only > > > being > > > in the universe that was inside a body - for all other where seen (by > > > me) > > > from outside. AS I did not know how to read, did not have any > > > religious > > > upbringing (both parents atheists), the episode did not cause any > > > severe > > > repercussion to my personality except that I knew that the " I " was > > > something > > > absolutely unique...but a natural event of nature. Of course at that > > > time > > > my > > > " seeing " was incomplete because I did not understand the non-dual > > > nature > > > of > > > what IS. I just understood that the " I " was absolutely intransferible > > > and > > > totally unmoving. I found something that seemed fixed: the " I " . (in a > > > way > > > there is some truth in it) > > > > > > In fact what happened at that time, now I know, is that a peace of the > > > roof > > > cracked and I saw some light creeping in. > > > > > > Very well. A decade or more later I found a little book I don't > > > remember > > > where...from K. I started reading it and the man was saying that there > > > is > > > no > > > " I " !!!! > > > What???!!! I thought. What is going on here? The problem was that by > > > the > > > time I arrived at the chapter he said that (no I) I was already hooked > > > to > > > his intelligence, his reasoning, and mostly to his insights. So I just > > > could > > > not drop him...and kept reading him trying to find out where the flaw > > > was.. > > > (no I)...... > > > -geo- > > > > " flaw " ! > > > > LOL! > > > > like every true dabbonite you feel there's a " right " and a 'wrong " . > > > > love it! > > > > :-) > > > > .b b.b. > > > > You did not understand. There was no flaw at all. > > -geo- > > i understand. > > you don't. > > baba won't bother going over it again. > > you won't understand no matter how many times it's gone over. > > hint: > > you're still trying to be " right " . > > LOL! > > .b b.b. > > Ahh....so that! True. OK, I understand. I'll try... > -geo- just do it...don't just try. here's your " secret mantra for Transcendental Meditation.. (don't tell it to anyone): " Err...ahamm..what is TM? " keep repeating that and soon you'll be FLYING! LOL! ..b b.b. You see.... I am not in any overdone religious, over-read philosophy hangover trip. So stuff like Transcendental Meditation, mantras, just FLY by me and I don't even notice. I was not raised in a catholic nun Scholl, like you - if I am not mistaken. I have not read almost anything about religion, very little of philosophy....so to me that is not funny...it just doesn't tickle.. not even a bit. What can I do? Must I laugh? -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.