Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " crowbarus1 " <crowbarus1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I beg to differ... > > > > > > > N's ..expose is wonderful,but...the latter part where one comes to the realization of the absolute(pure awareness) seems unattainable to me.. > > > > > > > If you say you have realized the absolute(pure awareness),that by definition imlpies and implicates a " you " ... > > > > > > > my point is,you can go as far,and realize your " consciousness " .. > > > > > > > but to go beyond...? who is it that is going beyond ??who is it that has taken notice of that " going beyond " ???.. > > > > > > > Pure awareness,is like gasoline,and consciousness is the gasoline that is in the tank of your car..you can only be aware of your consiounness thanks to " pure awareness " ... > > > > > > > The so called " realization " of pure awareness can only happen in > > > > > > > your consciousness,and not seperate from it. > > > > > > > realization of pure awareness is an impossible task... > > > > > > > when you are under anesthesia for 2 hrs,those two hours cn not be accounted for....in those 2 hrs there is neither consciousness nor awareness...once consciousness is gone ..so has awareness . > > > > > > > > > > > > you're just imagining that, in retrospect, because you thought process has inferred two hours past and you have no recollection of it. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thought is associating " memory " as " being aware. " > > > > > > > > > > > > A false equation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thought's contents have never been about what " awareness " actually is - only other thoughts supposed to be about " awareness. " > > > > > > > > > > > > But awareness as a concept, as a memory of something one is aware of, is not what awareness is. > > > > > > > > > > > > So, the word " nothing " gets used. > > > > > > > > > > > > " Nothing " = " awareness. " > > > > > > > > > > > > Such an equation hints at bringing down the house of cards constructed by memory through thought's contents and associations. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, one sees, only the seeing and the being of this nothing are not-two. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no word for this. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yet, words flow forth, and flow on ... > > > > > > > > > > > > The game of human discourse and thought's process being what it is .... > > > > > > > > > > > > and isn't ... > > > > > > > > > > > > - Dan - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hahahahahaaaa! > > > > > > > > > > are you on something? > > > > > > > > > > i bet you impress you huh? > > > > > > > > > > LOL! > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > impressive, and he's mild. > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > oh shit dabbo... > > > > > > you're full of it. > > > > > > full of the same shit as after the oh above. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > full of it. > > > > empty of it. > > > > full of it. > > > > empty of it. > > > > - d - > > > > Stop! You're going to scare him! :-p. > > (oh wait... you stopped ;-). you fellas sure have a lot of fun with each other. that's so sweet. and that wink to dabbo timmy is darn cute. you've adjusted to your new life together so well. long distance relationships in the electronic age need not be drab. and they can even " drag " on huh? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " crowbarus1 " <crowbarus1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I beg to differ... > > > > > > > > N's ..expose is wonderful,but...the latter part where one comes to the realization of the absolute(pure awareness) seems unattainable to me.. > > > > > > > > If you say you have realized the absolute(pure awareness),that by definition imlpies and implicates a " you " ... > > > > > > > > my point is,you can go as far,and realize your " consciousness " .. > > > > > > > > but to go beyond...? who is it that is going beyond ??who is it that has taken notice of that " going beyond " ???.. > > > > > > > > Pure awareness,is like gasoline,and consciousness is the gasoline that is in the tank of your car..you can only be aware of your consiounness thanks to " pure awareness " ... > > > > > > > > The so called " realization " of pure awareness can only happen in > > > > > > > > your consciousness,and not seperate from it. > > > > > > > > realization of pure awareness is an impossible task... > > > > > > > > when you are under anesthesia for 2 hrs,those two hours cn not be accounted for....in those 2 hrs there is neither consciousness nor awareness...once consciousness is gone ..so has awareness . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you're just imagining that, in retrospect, because you thought process has inferred two hours past and you have no recollection of it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thought is associating " memory " as " being aware. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A false equation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thought's contents have never been about what " awareness " actually is - only other thoughts supposed to be about " awareness. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But awareness as a concept, as a memory of something one is aware of, is not what awareness is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, the word " nothing " gets used. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Nothing " = " awareness. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Such an equation hints at bringing down the house of cards constructed by memory through thought's contents and associations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, one sees, only the seeing and the being of this nothing are not-two. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no word for this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yet, words flow forth, and flow on ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The game of human discourse and thought's process being what it is .... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and isn't ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Dan - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hahahahahaaaa! > > > > > > > > > > > > are you on something? > > > > > > > > > > > > i bet you impress you huh? > > > > > > > > > > > > LOL! > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > impressive, and he's mild. > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > oh shit dabbo... > > > > > > > > you're full of it. > > > > > > > > full of the same shit as after the oh above. > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > full of it. > > > > > > empty of it. > > > > > > full of it. > > > > > > empty of it. > > > > > > - d - > > > > > > > Stop! You're going to scare him! :-p. > > > > (oh wait... you stopped ;-). > > > > > you fellas sure have a lot of fun with each other. > > that's so sweet. > > and that wink to dabbo timmy is darn cute. > > you've adjusted to your new life together so well. > > long distance relationships in the electronic age need not be drab. > > and they can even " drag " on huh? > > .b b.b. i thought that you're the one who's tim. you said you're all one and stuff. - d - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " crowbarus1 " <crowbarus1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I beg to differ... > > > > > > > > > N's ..expose is wonderful,but...the latter part where one comes to the realization of the absolute(pure awareness) seems unattainable to me.. > > > > > > > > > If you say you have realized the absolute(pure awareness),that by definition imlpies and implicates a " you " ... > > > > > > > > > my point is,you can go as far,and realize your " consciousness " .. > > > > > > > > > but to go beyond...? who is it that is going beyond ??who is it that has taken notice of that " going beyond " ???.. > > > > > > > > > Pure awareness,is like gasoline,and consciousness is the gasoline that is in the tank of your car..you can only be aware of your consiounness thanks to " pure awareness " ... > > > > > > > > > The so called " realization " of pure awareness can only happen in > > > > > > > > > your consciousness,and not seperate from it. > > > > > > > > > realization of pure awareness is an impossible task... > > > > > > > > > when you are under anesthesia for 2 hrs,those two hours cn not be accounted for....in those 2 hrs there is neither consciousness nor awareness...once consciousness is gone ..so has awareness . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you're just imagining that, in retrospect, because you thought process has inferred two hours past and you have no recollection of it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thought is associating " memory " as " being aware. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A false equation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thought's contents have never been about what " awareness " actually is - only other thoughts supposed to be about " awareness. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But awareness as a concept, as a memory of something one is aware of, is not what awareness is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, the word " nothing " gets used. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Nothing " = " awareness. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Such an equation hints at bringing down the house of cards constructed by memory through thought's contents and associations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, one sees, only the seeing and the being of this nothing are not-two. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no word for this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yet, words flow forth, and flow on ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The game of human discourse and thought's process being what it is ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and isn't ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Dan - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hahahahahaaaa! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are you on something? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i bet you impress you huh? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LOL! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > impressive, and he's mild. > > > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > oh shit dabbo... > > > > > > > > > > you're full of it. > > > > > > > > > > full of the same shit as after the oh above. > > > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > full of it. > > > > > > > > empty of it. > > > > > > > > full of it. > > > > > > > > empty of it. > > > > > > > > - d - > > > > > > > > > > Stop! You're going to scare him! :-p. > > > > > > (oh wait... you stopped ;-). > > > > > > > > > > you fellas sure have a lot of fun with each other. > > > > that's so sweet. > > > > and that wink to dabbo timmy is darn cute. > > > > you've adjusted to your new life together so well. > > > > long distance relationships in the electronic age need not be drab. > > > > and they can even " drag " on huh? > > > > .b b.b. > > > i thought that you're the one who's tim. > > you said you're all one and stuff. > > - d - " all one AND stuff " ???? uh..er..uhm.. what exactly do you think One..or non-dual is about? never mind dabbo. i don't think you belong here. yet it's not " wrong " that you are. it's alright you say stupid stuff like that and don't belong here it's just as right as it's wrong which means it's neither and both. in other words it's ok you don't belong here.. and that you say stupid stuff like that because you are here saying stupid stuff... and that's the way it is. don't try to understand. you can't anyway. and that too little one is also ok. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.