Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " aoclery " <aoclery@> wrote: > > > > > > http://www.oprah.com/community/message/510849 > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Tony, > > > > Nice article. Especially that part about the Neo-Advaita Shellgame let me smile. > > > > With its help one easily was able to identify at least three members here of this list which that passage perfectly was reflecting and describing. > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > For Wernie, everything is consciousness. > > He likes to play a game where he divides his consciousness up. > > He makes one part of his consciousness describe the other parts. > > That way, his consciousness accomplishes something. > > In his consciousness. > > Which is everything. > > - D - > > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness'. But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. Werner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " aoclery " <aoclery@> wrote: > > > > > > > > http://www.oprah.com/community/message/510849 > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Tony, > > > > > > Nice article. Especially that part about the Neo-Advaita Shellgame let me > smile. > > > > > > With its help one easily was able to identify at least three members here of > this list which that passage perfectly was reflecting and describing. > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > For Wernie, everything is consciousness. > > > > He likes to play a game where he divides his consciousness up. > > > > He makes one part of his consciousness describe the other parts. > > > > That way, his consciousness accomplishes something. > > > > In his consciousness. > > > > Which is everything. > > > > - D - > > > > > > > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness'. > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > Werner wernerina girl! there is no difference in what you said.. and what was said of what you said. you silly shithead. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness' .. > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > Werner wernerina girl! there is no difference in what you said.. and what was said of what you said. you silly shithead. LOL! ..b b.b. it seem that there is indeed absolutly no difference between the consciousness of a silly shithead...and Werner lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Nisargadatta , Marc <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness' . > > > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > > > Werner > > wernerina girl! > > there is no difference in what you said.. > > and what was said of what you said. > > you silly shithead. > > LOL! > > .b b.b. > > > it seem that there is indeed absolutly no difference between the consciousness of a silly shithead...and Werner > > lol LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 b.b.b. this means big bang bullshit? in alphabet ´B´ is 2nd. so everything what goes from b.b.b. is second hand, it is not his own realization. please - you all there - be careful, don´t be manipulated - Nisargadatta saif in ´I Am That´that these people are most dangerous. maybe we will see change of b.b.b. to a.a.a. (amazing advaita Absolute but sadhana is needed:) jai guru ales ____________ > Od: "Marc" <dennis_travis33 > Komu: Nisargadatta > Datum: 20.01.2010 12:34 > PÅ™edmÄ›t: Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness' . > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > Werner wernerina girl! there is no difference in what you said.. and what was said of what you said. you silly shithead. LOL! ..b b.b. it seem that there is indeed absolutly no difference between the consciousness of a silly shithead...and Werner lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 b.b.b. this means big bang bullshit? in alphabet ´B´ is 2nd. so everything what goes from b.b.b. is second hand, it is not his own realization. please - you all there - be careful, don´t be manipulated - Nisargadatta saif in ´I Am That´that these people are most dangerous. maybe we will see change of b.b.b. to a.a.a. (amazing advaita Absolute but sadhana is needed:) jai guru ales look like your knowledge is second hand for sure....yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Marc, this yourÅ› ´for sure´ can not be never verbally used - because only ´thing´ by which you can be sure is your Self and there is no others to tell them about it. so be careful to use correct terms. jai guru ales ____________ > Od: "Marc" <dennis_travis33 > Komu: Nisargadatta > Datum: 20.01.2010 17:17 > PÅ™edmÄ›t: Re: Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar > b.b.b. this means big bang bullshit? in alphabet ´B´ is 2nd. so everything what goes from b.b.b. is second hand, it is not his own realization. please - you all there - be careful, don´t be manipulated - Nisargadatta saif in ´I Am That´that these people are most dangerous. maybe we will see change of b.b.b. to a.a.a. (amazing advaita Absolute but sadhana is needed:) jai guru ales look like your knowledge is second hand for sure....yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " aoclery " <aoclery@> wrote: > > > > > > > > http://www.oprah.com/community/message/510849 > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Tony, > > > > > > Nice article. Especially that part about the Neo-Advaita Shellgame let me > smile. > > > > > > With its help one easily was able to identify at least three members here of > this list which that passage perfectly was reflecting and describing. > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > For Wernie, everything is consciousness. > > > > He likes to play a game where he divides his consciousness up. > > > > He makes one part of his consciousness describe the other parts. > > > > That way, his consciousness accomplishes something. > > > > In his consciousness. > > > > Which is everything. > > > > - D - > > > > > > > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness'. > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > Werner Apparently, for you, there's a big difference between " everything " and " all there is. " So, by making sure everyone knows how different those terms are, you've really cleared up the difference between the shit you write and the shit I write. And it doesn't change anything about what you're doing. You're pitting one content of consciousness against another content of consciousness, as if that could happen. " In the mind of Werner. " Very adamant about it, too. Very self-righteous. And really, really silly. Missing the mark. - Dan - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " aoclery " <aoclery@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.oprah.com/community/message/510849 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Tony, > > > > > > > > Nice article. Especially that part about the Neo-Advaita Shellgame let me > > smile. > > > > > > > > With its help one easily was able to identify at least three members here of > > this list which that passage perfectly was reflecting and describing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For Wernie, everything is consciousness. > > > > > > He likes to play a game where he divides his consciousness up. > > > > > > He makes one part of his consciousness describe the other parts. > > > > > > That way, his consciousness accomplishes something. > > > > > > In his consciousness. > > > > > > Which is everything. > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness'. > > > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > > > Werner > > > wernerina girl! > > there is no difference in what you said.. > > and what was said of what you said. > > you silly shithead. > > LOL! > > .b b.b. this list really is good for a few laughs, from time to time. - d - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " aoclery " <aoclery@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.oprah.com/community/message/510849 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Tony, > > > > > > > > Nice article. Especially that part about the Neo-Advaita Shellgame let me > > smile. > > > > > > > > With its help one easily was able to identify at least three members here of > > this list which that passage perfectly was reflecting and describing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For Wernie, everything is consciousness. > > > > > > He likes to play a game where he divides his consciousness up. > > > > > > He makes one part of his consciousness describe the other parts. > > > > > > That way, his consciousness accomplishes something. > > > > > > In his consciousness. > > > > > > Which is everything. > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness'. > > > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > > > Werner > > Apparently, for you, there's a big difference between " everything " and " all there is. " > > So, by making sure everyone knows how different those terms are, you've really cleared up the difference between the shit you write and the shit I write. > > And it doesn't change anything about what you're doing. > > You're pitting one content of consciousness against another content of consciousness, as if that could happen. > > " In the mind of Werner. " > > Very adamant about it, too. > > Very self-righteous. > > And really, really silly. > > Missing the mark. > > - Dan - > Hahaha, Dan, Your reaction is no surprise. Just spitting offending platitudes ... Werner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " aoclery " <aoclery@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.oprah.com/community/message/510849 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Tony, > > > > > > > > > > Nice article. Especially that part about the Neo-Advaita Shellgame let me > > > smile. > > > > > > > > > > With its help one easily was able to identify at least three members here of > > > this list which that passage perfectly was reflecting and describing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For Wernie, everything is consciousness. > > > > > > > > He likes to play a game where he divides his consciousness up. > > > > > > > > He makes one part of his consciousness describe the other parts. > > > > > > > > That way, his consciousness accomplishes something. > > > > > > > > In his consciousness. > > > > > > > > Which is everything. > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > > > > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness'. > > > > > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > > > > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > > > > > Werner > > > > Apparently, for you, there's a big difference between " everything " and " all there is. " > > > > So, by making sure everyone knows how different those terms are, you've really cleared up the difference between the shit you write and the shit I write. > > > > And it doesn't change anything about what you're doing. > > > > You're pitting one content of consciousness against another content of consciousness, as if that could happen. > > > > " In the mind of Werner. " > > > > Very adamant about it, too. > > > > Very self-righteous. > > > > And really, really silly. > > > > Missing the mark. > > > > - Dan - > > > > > Hahaha, Dan, > > Your reaction is no surprise. Just spitting offending platitudes ... > > Werner Werner - Consider the possibility of looking at what Werner is doing. What is first-hand. Not " what is going on with others, out there. " What is going on in the mind of Werner, here. How one content seeks to label another content, one content strives to confront another content, and then proclaim " consciousness is all. " Energy is involved in confronting the other, labelling what the other is doing. And without that - No Werner. No Dan. Just communication. But that is not wanted. That is for " Neo-Advaitins " " out there. " Confrontation continues. And thus, the confronter continues. Its silly, deadly, unrecognized game. - D - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Marc, this yourś ´for sure´ can not be never verbally used - because only ´thing´ by which you can be sure is your Self and there is no others to tell them about it. so be careful to use correct terms. jai guru ales ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _____ i should be careful with this your second hand knowledge?.... ..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 got you goin' huh? LOL! well dufus that's what it's supposed to do. hahahahahahaaaaaaa! baba just loves it when a plan comes together. what a dumb ass. tell me more about how you're unaffected. LOL! love ya jackass: ..b b.b. p.s. do you and wernie poo have sleep overs? roflol! hey dummy.. right below is another sign off that may not be of interest to you: [.bx3] Nisargadatta , <alesadamek wrote: > > b.b.b. > > this means big bang bullshit? > > > in alphabet ´B´ is 2nd. so everything what goes from b.b.b. is second hand, it is not his own realization. please - you all there - be careful, don´t be manipulated - Nisargadatta saif in ´I Am That´that these people are most dangerous. > > maybe we will see change of b.b.b. to a.a.a. (amazing advaita Absolute > > but sadhana is needed:) > > jai guru > > ales > > > > ____________ > > Od: " Marc " > > Komu: Nisargadatta > > Datum: 20.01.2010 12:34 > > Předmět: Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar > > >  > > > > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness' . > > > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > > > Werner > > wernerina girl! > > there is no difference in what you said.. > > and what was said of what you said. > > you silly shithead. > > LOL! > > .b b.b. > > it seem that there is indeed absolutly no difference between the consciousness of a silly shithead...and Werner > > lol > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Nisargadatta , <alesadamek wrote: > > Marc, > > this yourś ´for sure´ can not be never verbally used - because only ´thing´ by which you can be sure is your Self and there is no others to tell them about it. > > > so be careful to use correct terms. > > jai guru > > ales oh my that's intelligent. yep.. well ok lets move on to something at least a little interesting. and maybe a tad less stupid. ok here we go then: have you ever noticed how easy it is to grab the attention of.. uncreative numb-skulls who can't come up with anything cogent? i have. welcome aboard ding-a-lingus. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " aoclery " <aoclery@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.oprah.com/community/message/510849 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Tony, > > > > > > > > Nice article. Especially that part about the Neo-Advaita Shellgame let me > > smile. > > > > > > > > With its help one easily was able to identify at least three members here of > > this list which that passage perfectly was reflecting and describing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For Wernie, everything is consciousness. > > > > > > He likes to play a game where he divides his consciousness up. > > > > > > He makes one part of his consciousness describe the other parts. > > > > > > That way, his consciousness accomplishes something. > > > > > > In his consciousness. > > > > > > Which is everything. > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness'. > > > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > > > Werner > > Apparently, for you, there's a big difference between " everything " and " all there is. " > > So, by making sure everyone knows how different those terms are, you've really cleared up the difference between the shit you write and the shit I write. > > And it doesn't change anything about what you're doing. > > You're pitting one content of consciousness against another content of consciousness, as if that could happen. > > " In the mind of Werner. " > > Very adamant about it, too. > > Very self-righteous. > > And really, really silly. > > Missing the mark. > > - Dan - you are compassionate holy child. you see yourself in him don't you? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " aoclery " <aoclery@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.oprah.com/community/message/510849 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Tony, > > > > > > > > > > Nice article. Especially that part about the Neo-Advaita Shellgame let me > > > smile. > > > > > > > > > > With its help one easily was able to identify at least three members here of > > > this list which that passage perfectly was reflecting and describing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For Wernie, everything is consciousness. > > > > > > > > He likes to play a game where he divides his consciousness up. > > > > > > > > He makes one part of his consciousness describe the other parts. > > > > > > > > That way, his consciousness accomplishes something. > > > > > > > > In his consciousness. > > > > > > > > Which is everything. > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > > > > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness'. > > > > > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > > > > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > wernerina girl! > > > > there is no difference in what you said.. > > > > and what was said of what you said. > > > > you silly shithead. > > > > LOL! > > > > .b b.b. > > this list really is good for a few laughs, from time to time. > > - d - you're so amiable and allowing. and smarmy and self righteous. you're so sweet and so full of bullshit. and so silly to believe that you'd be taken seriously too. try that out with mom. she'll believe you. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " aoclery " <aoclery@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.oprah.com/community/message/510849 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Tony, > > > > > > > > > > Nice article. Especially that part about the Neo-Advaita Shellgame let me > > > smile. > > > > > > > > > > With its help one easily was able to identify at least three members here of > > > this list which that passage perfectly was reflecting and describing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For Wernie, everything is consciousness. > > > > > > > > He likes to play a game where he divides his consciousness up. > > > > > > > > He makes one part of his consciousness describe the other parts. > > > > > > > > That way, his consciousness accomplishes something. > > > > > > > > In his consciousness. > > > > > > > > Which is everything. > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > > > > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness'. > > > > > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > > > > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > > > > > Werner > > > > Apparently, for you, there's a big difference between " everything " and " all there is. " > > > > So, by making sure everyone knows how different those terms are, you've really cleared up the difference between the shit you write and the shit I write. > > > > And it doesn't change anything about what you're doing. > > > > You're pitting one content of consciousness against another content of consciousness, as if that could happen. > > > > " In the mind of Werner. " > > > > Very adamant about it, too. > > > > Very self-righteous. > > > > And really, really silly. > > > > Missing the mark. > > > > - Dan - > > > > > Hahaha, Dan, > > Your reaction is no surprise. Just spitting offending platitudes ... > > Werner wernerina.. we're also not surprised that you continually crank out inanities. HUR! do we need a member like wernie poo-pants here? even though he's not really a member anyway? LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " aoclery " <aoclery@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.oprah.com/community/message/510849 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Tony, > > > > > > > > > > > > Nice article. Especially that part about the Neo-Advaita Shellgame let me > > > > smile. > > > > > > > > > > > > With its help one easily was able to identify at least three members here of > > > > this list which that passage perfectly was reflecting and describing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For Wernie, everything is consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > He likes to play a game where he divides his consciousness up. > > > > > > > > > > He makes one part of his consciousness describe the other parts. > > > > > > > > > > That way, his consciousness accomplishes something. > > > > > > > > > > In his consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > Which is everything. > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > > > > > > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness'. > > > > > > > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > > > > > > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > Apparently, for you, there's a big difference between " everything " and " all there is. " > > > > > > So, by making sure everyone knows how different those terms are, you've really cleared up the difference between the shit you write and the shit I write. > > > > > > And it doesn't change anything about what you're doing. > > > > > > You're pitting one content of consciousness against another content of consciousness, as if that could happen. > > > > > > " In the mind of Werner. " > > > > > > Very adamant about it, too. > > > > > > Very self-righteous. > > > > > > And really, really silly. > > > > > > Missing the mark. > > > > > > - Dan - > > > > > > > > > Hahaha, Dan, > > > > Your reaction is no surprise. Just spitting offending platitudes ... > > > > Werner > > Werner - > > Consider the possibility of looking at what Werner is doing. > > What is first-hand. > > Not " what is going on with others, out there. " > > What is going on in the mind of Werner, here. > > How one content seeks to label another content, one content strives to confront another content, and then proclaim " consciousness is all. " > > Energy is involved in confronting the other, labelling what the other is doing. > > And without that - > > No Werner. > > No Dan. > > Just communication. > > But that is not wanted. > > That is for " Neo-Advaitins " " out there. " > > Confrontation continues. > > And thus, the confronter continues. > > Its silly, deadly, unrecognized game. > > - D - oh for Christ sake dan! for " who " is it " deadly " goddamnit all you like being dramatic. and about as non-dual as the Twin Towers were. Bullshitness. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Nisargadatta , Marc <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Marc, > > this yourś ´for sure´ can not be never verbally used - because only ´thing´ by which you can be sure is your Self and there is no others to tell them about it. > > > so be careful to use correct terms. > > jai guru > > ales > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _____ > > > i should be careful with this your second hand knowledge?.... > > .... > > don't you know how important and significant " terms " are marc? ROFLMAO! where do these pipsqueaks come from anyway? i love it though. :-) ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " aoclery " <aoclery@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.oprah.com/community/message/510849 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Tony, > > > > > > > > > > Nice article. Especially that part about the Neo-Advaita Shellgame let me > > > smile. > > > > > > > > > > With its help one easily was able to identify at least three members here of > > > this list which that passage perfectly was reflecting and describing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For Wernie, everything is consciousness. > > > > > > > > He likes to play a game where he divides his consciousness up. > > > > > > > > He makes one part of his consciousness describe the other parts. > > > > > > > > That way, his consciousness accomplishes something. > > > > > > > > In his consciousness. > > > > > > > > Which is everything. > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > > > > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness'. > > > > > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > > > > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > > > > > Werner > > > > Apparently, for you, there's a big difference between " everything " and " all there is. " > > > > So, by making sure everyone knows how different those terms are, you've really cleared up the difference between the shit you write and the shit I write. > > > > And it doesn't change anything about what you're doing. > > > > You're pitting one content of consciousness against another content of consciousness, as if that could happen. > > > > " In the mind of Werner. " > > > > Very adamant about it, too. > > > > Very self-righteous. > > > > And really, really silly. > > > > Missing the mark. > > > > - Dan - > > > you are compassionate holy child. > > you see yourself in him don't you? > > .b b.b. naturally. as there isn't any " other " to be seen, nor a " me " to see it. - d - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " aoclery " <aoclery@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.oprah.com/community/message/510849 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Tony, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nice article. Especially that part about the Neo-Advaita Shellgame let me > > > > > smile. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With its help one easily was able to identify at least three members here of > > > > > this list which that passage perfectly was reflecting and describing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For Wernie, everything is consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > > > He likes to play a game where he divides his consciousness up. > > > > > > > > > > > > He makes one part of his consciousness describe the other parts. > > > > > > > > > > > > That way, his consciousness accomplishes something. > > > > > > > > > > > > In his consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > > > Which is everything. > > > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > > > > > > > > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness'. > > > > > > > > > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > Apparently, for you, there's a big difference between " everything " and " all there is. " > > > > > > > > So, by making sure everyone knows how different those terms are, you've really cleared up the difference between the shit you write and the shit I write. > > > > > > > > And it doesn't change anything about what you're doing. > > > > > > > > You're pitting one content of consciousness against another content of consciousness, as if that could happen. > > > > > > > > " In the mind of Werner. " > > > > > > > > Very adamant about it, too. > > > > > > > > Very self-righteous. > > > > > > > > And really, really silly. > > > > > > > > Missing the mark. > > > > > > > > - Dan - > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hahaha, Dan, > > > > > > Your reaction is no surprise. Just spitting offending platitudes ... > > > > > > Werner > > > > Werner - > > > > Consider the possibility of looking at what Werner is doing. > > > > What is first-hand. > > > > Not " what is going on with others, out there. " > > > > What is going on in the mind of Werner, here. > > > > How one content seeks to label another content, one content strives to confront another content, and then proclaim " consciousness is all. " > > > > Energy is involved in confronting the other, labelling what the other is doing. > > > > And without that - > > > > No Werner. > > > > No Dan. > > > > Just communication. > > > > But that is not wanted. > > > > That is for " Neo-Advaitins " " out there. " > > > > Confrontation continues. > > > > And thus, the confronter continues. > > > > Its silly, deadly, unrecognized game. > > > > - D - > > > oh for Christ sake dan! > > for " who " is it " deadly " > > goddamnit all you like being dramatic. > > and about as non-dual as the Twin Towers were. > > Bullshitness. > > LOL! > > .b b.b. it's deadly for the one identifying with it. in other words, it is deadening. - d - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " aoclery " <aoclery@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.oprah.com/community/message/510849 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Tony, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nice article. Especially that part about the Neo-Advaita Shellgame let me > > > > > > smile. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With its help one easily was able to identify at least three members here of > > > > > > this list which that passage perfectly was reflecting and describing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For Wernie, everything is consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He likes to play a game where he divides his consciousness up. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He makes one part of his consciousness describe the other parts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That way, his consciousness accomplishes something. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In his consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which is everything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > > > > > > > > > > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness'. > > > > > > > > > > > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > Apparently, for you, there's a big difference between " everything " and " all there is. " > > > > > > > > > > So, by making sure everyone knows how different those terms are, you've really cleared up the difference between the shit you write and the shit I write. > > > > > > > > > > And it doesn't change anything about what you're doing. > > > > > > > > > > You're pitting one content of consciousness against another content of consciousness, as if that could happen. > > > > > > > > > > " In the mind of Werner. " > > > > > > > > > > Very adamant about it, too. > > > > > > > > > > Very self-righteous. > > > > > > > > > > And really, really silly. > > > > > > > > > > Missing the mark. > > > > > > > > > > - Dan - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hahaha, Dan, > > > > > > > > Your reaction is no surprise. Just spitting offending platitudes ... > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > Werner - > > > > > > Consider the possibility of looking at what Werner is doing. > > > > > > What is first-hand. > > > > > > Not " what is going on with others, out there. " > > > > > > What is going on in the mind of Werner, here. > > > > > > How one content seeks to label another content, one content strives to confront another content, and then proclaim " consciousness is all. " > > > > > > Energy is involved in confronting the other, labelling what the other is doing. > > > > > > And without that - > > > > > > No Werner. > > > > > > No Dan. > > > > > > Just communication. > > > > > > But that is not wanted. > > > > > > That is for " Neo-Advaitins " " out there. " > > > > > > Confrontation continues. > > > > > > And thus, the confronter continues. > > > > > > Its silly, deadly, unrecognized game. > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > oh for Christ sake dan! > > > > for " who " is it " deadly " > > > > goddamnit all you like being dramatic. > > > > and about as non-dual as the Twin Towers were. > > > > Bullshitness. > > > > LOL! > > > > .b b.b. > > > it's deadly for the one identifying with it. > > in other words, it is deadening. > > - d - there is no one to identify with anything. there is no " it " to identify with that nothing that isn't anything. you are so lost my child. are you secretly looking for a Jehovah? i bet you'd like a Jehovah kind of love.. and a worshiping congregation too. ain't going to happen dabbo. not on my watch kid. i'll straighten you out at every one of your lame attempts. :-) ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " aoclery " <aoclery@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.oprah.com/community/message/510849 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Tony, > > > > > > > > > > > > Nice article. Especially that part about the Neo-Advaita Shellgame let me > > > > smile. > > > > > > > > > > > > With its help one easily was able to identify at least three members here of > > > > this list which that passage perfectly was reflecting and describing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For Wernie, everything is consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > He likes to play a game where he divides his consciousness up. > > > > > > > > > > He makes one part of his consciousness describe the other parts. > > > > > > > > > > That way, his consciousness accomplishes something. > > > > > > > > > > In his consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > Which is everything. > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > > > > > > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness'. > > > > > > > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > > > > > > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > Apparently, for you, there's a big difference between " everything " and " all there is. " > > > > > > So, by making sure everyone knows how different those terms are, you've really cleared up the difference between the shit you write and the shit I write. > > > > > > And it doesn't change anything about what you're doing. > > > > > > You're pitting one content of consciousness against another content of consciousness, as if that could happen. > > > > > > " In the mind of Werner. " > > > > > > Very adamant about it, too. > > > > > > Very self-righteous. > > > > > > And really, really silly. > > > > > > Missing the mark. > > > > > > - Dan - > > > > > > you are compassionate holy child. > > > > you see yourself in him don't you? > > > > .b b.b. > > > naturally. > > as there isn't any " other " to be seen, nor a " me " to see it. > > - d - well as long as you say so. holy moly i thought you were there a second ago! and now you're not. and neither are those words up there. what did the not you not say again? i forgot. man you try. but it just doesn't work out for you does it. the you that isn't there of course. what bullshit! do you really believe your own crap. i mean.. does the you that isn't believe the you that's talking? LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " aoclery " <aoclery@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.oprah.com/community/message/510849 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Tony, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nice article. Especially that part about the Neo-Advaita Shellgame let me > > > > > > > smile. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With its help one easily was able to identify at least three members here of > > > > > > > this list which that passage perfectly was reflecting and describing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For Wernie, everything is consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He likes to play a game where he divides his consciousness up. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He makes one part of his consciousness describe the other parts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That way, his consciousness accomplishes something. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In his consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which is everything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > Apparently, for you, there's a big difference between " everything " and " all there is. " > > > > > > > > > > > > So, by making sure everyone knows how different those terms are, you've really cleared up the difference between the shit you write and the shit I write. > > > > > > > > > > > > And it doesn't change anything about what you're doing. > > > > > > > > > > > > You're pitting one content of consciousness against another content of consciousness, as if that could happen. > > > > > > > > > > > > " In the mind of Werner. " > > > > > > > > > > > > Very adamant about it, too. > > > > > > > > > > > > Very self-righteous. > > > > > > > > > > > > And really, really silly. > > > > > > > > > > > > Missing the mark. > > > > > > > > > > > > - Dan - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hahaha, Dan, > > > > > > > > > > Your reaction is no surprise. Just spitting offending platitudes ... > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > Werner - > > > > > > > > Consider the possibility of looking at what Werner is doing. > > > > > > > > What is first-hand. > > > > > > > > Not " what is going on with others, out there. " > > > > > > > > What is going on in the mind of Werner, here. > > > > > > > > How one content seeks to label another content, one content strives to confront another content, and then proclaim " consciousness is all. " > > > > > > > > Energy is involved in confronting the other, labelling what the other is doing. > > > > > > > > And without that - > > > > > > > > No Werner. > > > > > > > > No Dan. > > > > > > > > Just communication. > > > > > > > > But that is not wanted. > > > > > > > > That is for " Neo-Advaitins " " out there. " > > > > > > > > Confrontation continues. > > > > > > > > And thus, the confronter continues. > > > > > > > > Its silly, deadly, unrecognized game. > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > oh for Christ sake dan! > > > > > > for " who " is it " deadly " > > > > > > goddamnit all you like being dramatic. > > > > > > and about as non-dual as the Twin Towers were. > > > > > > Bullshitness. > > > > > > LOL! > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > it's deadly for the one identifying with it. > > > > in other words, it is deadening. > > > > - d - > > > there is no one to identify with anything. correct. > there is no " it " to identify with that nothing that isn't anything. again, on target. there is just the attempt. a glitch in the program, a scratch in the cd. > you are so lost my child. > > are you secretly looking for a Jehovah? > > i bet you'd like a Jehovah kind of love.. > > and a worshiping congregation too. > > ain't going to happen dabbo. darn. > not on my watch kid. sounds good to me. > i'll straighten you out at every one of your lame attempts. always fun. - d - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Re: From Oprah on neo advaitins - Dan the Liar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " aoclery " <aoclery@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.oprah.com/community/message/510849 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Tony, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nice article. Especially that part about the Neo-Advaita Shellgame let me > > > > > smile. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With its help one easily was able to identify at least three members here of > > > > > this list which that passage perfectly was reflecting and describing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For Wernie, everything is consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > > > He likes to play a game where he divides his consciousness up. > > > > > > > > > > > > He makes one part of his consciousness describe the other parts. > > > > > > > > > > > > That way, his consciousness accomplishes something. > > > > > > > > > > > > In his consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > > > Which is everything. > > > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, either you can't read or you are a damn liar. > > > > > > > > > > I NEVER ! a single time wrote or mentioned that 'everything is consciousness'. > > > > > > > > > > But I again and again wrote that 'Consciousness is all there is'. And I also explained that consciousness is it's content - no content, no consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > And that has a total different meaning than that shit you labled as written by me. > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > Apparently, for you, there's a big difference between " everything " and " all there is. " > > > > > > > > So, by making sure everyone knows how different those terms are, you've really cleared up the difference between the shit you write and the shit I write. > > > > > > > > And it doesn't change anything about what you're doing. > > > > > > > > You're pitting one content of consciousness against another content of consciousness, as if that could happen. > > > > > > > > " In the mind of Werner. " > > > > > > > > Very adamant about it, too. > > > > > > > > Very self-righteous. > > > > > > > > And really, really silly. > > > > > > > > Missing the mark. > > > > > > > > - Dan - > > > > > > > > > you are compassionate holy child. > > > > > > you see yourself in him don't you? > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > naturally. > > > > as there isn't any " other " to be seen, nor a " me " to see it. > > > > - d - > > > well as long as you say so. > > holy moly i thought you were there a second ago! > > and now you're not. > > and neither are those words up there. > > what did the not you not say again? > > i forgot. > > man you try. > > but it just doesn't work out for you does it. > > the you that isn't there of course. > > what bullshit! > > do you really believe your own crap. > > i mean.. > > does the you that isn't believe the you that's talking? > > LOL! > > .b b.b. no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.