Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Proclaiming that consciousness is all means nothing if there is no understanding of what is going on with the consciousness that is here, is present. Making all kinds of comments addressed to the consciousness of " others " and what " they " are doing, just continues an attempt to divide consciousness as if it had separate locations for selves. Such activity is actually a contradiction to " consciousness as all, " because it is consciousness divided against itself. The only understanding of this activity possible, is to understand the activity as it occurs. Which is never " somewhere else, " never " someone else's problem. " Nisargadatta addressed understanding consciousness, and therefore being free of the attempt to reside in consciousness, or identify with a content of consciousness. He pointed to being this " nothing " that is not a manufacture of consciousness, not an arising. His words can serve as pointers. But pointers by themselves are of no avail, because they mean nothing unless the inquiry is here, now, and of the one who is present. Focusing on others, what " they " are doing, how to label " them, " is simply beside the point, a waste of time and energy, a pursuit of division in service of continuing a sense of separate self existence. Inquiry is of the sense of separate self existence, which is " me " against " you " and " me " against " that out there, " and " me " vs. " it. " Which is not " someone else's problem. " Which is the end of " me " defined against " you, " and " in here " defined against " out there. " - D - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Dear dan or b.b.b. do you think that in order to spread the glory of final truth explained by Nisargadatta and other real advaita teacher is necessary to talk in vulgar and crude style? Maharaj also used sometimes crude words, but it was useful in particular time and place and for special visitor - to help him understand, but you want always shock others by strong sentences - why? turn the list, try to tell others about your practice, about your meditation, tell others some story of life of some sage, just try... your so-called 2nd knowledge is worn out, so if you are Neo (chosen ones) - prove it in your contribution - not in your offence attitude.. jai guru p.s. do you know that Maharaj paid scholar fees (tuition) to one of his students? ____________ > Od: "dan330033" <dan330033 > Komu: Nisargadatta > Datum: 20.01.2010 20:48 > Předmět: "Consciousness" and "others" > Proclaiming that consciousness is all means nothing if there is no understanding of what is going on with the consciousness that is here, is present. Making all kinds of comments addressed to the consciousness of "others" and what "they" are doing, just continues an attempt to divide consciousness as if it had separate locations for selves. Such activity is actually a contradiction to "consciousness as all," because it is consciousness divided against itself. The only understanding of this activity possible, is to understand the activity as it occurs. Which is never "somewhere else," never "someone else's problem." Nisargadatta addressed understanding consciousness, and therefore being free of the attempt to reside in consciousness, or identify with a content of consciousness. He pointed to being this "nothing" that is not a manufacture of consciousness, not an arising. His words can serve as pointers. But pointers by themselves are of no avail, because they mean nothing unless the inquiry is here, now, and of the one who is present. Focusing on others, what "they" are doing, how to label "them," is simply beside the point, a waste of time and energy, a pursuit of division in service of continuing a sense of separate self existence. Inquiry is of the sense of separate self existence, which is "me" against "you" and "me" against "that out there," and "me" vs. "it." Which is not "someone else's problem." Which is the end of "me" defined against "you," and "in here" defined against "out there." - D - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Proclaiming that consciousness is all means nothing if there is no understanding of what is going on with the consciousness that is here, is present. > > Making all kinds of comments addressed to the consciousness of " others " and what " they " are doing, just continues an attempt to divide consciousness as if it had separate locations for selves. > > Such activity is actually a contradiction to " consciousness as all, " because it is consciousness divided against itself. > > The only understanding of this activity possible, is to understand the activity as it occurs. > > Which is never " somewhere else, " never " someone else's problem. " > > Nisargadatta addressed understanding consciousness, and therefore being free of the attempt to reside in consciousness, or identify with a content of consciousness. He pointed to being this " nothing " that is not a manufacture of consciousness, not an arising. > > His words can serve as pointers. > > But pointers by themselves are of no avail, because they mean nothing unless the inquiry is here, now, and of the one who is present. > > Focusing on others, what " they " are doing, how to label " them, " is simply beside the point, a waste of time and energy, a pursuit of division in service of continuing a sense of separate self existence. > > Inquiry is of the sense of separate self existence, which is " me " against " you " and " me " against " that out there, " and " me " vs. " it. " > > Which is not " someone else's problem. " > > Which is the end of " me " defined against " you, " and " in here " defined against " out there. " > > - D - now you're just being ridiculous. it's not as complicated as you try to make it out to be dabbo. you just like hearing yourself talk. and you stutter. chill. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2010 Report Share Posted January 20, 2010 hey you.. do you think anybody cares? what's a " real " Advaita " teacher " ? hahahahahaaaaaaa! no wait.. i shouldn't do that. it's not nice and you really haven't a clue what it is i just did. but i don't care about that either. i like playing with " others " . they aren't there. LOL! " teacher " !!!! OMG! that's a good one. i'll have to remember that ONE to tell myself when i need a laugh. :-) ..b b.b. ...............nothing new..only stupidity below....................... Nisargadatta , <alesadamek wrote: > > Dear dan or b.b.b. > > do you think that in order to spread the glory of final truth explained by Nisargadatta and other real advaita teacher is necessary to talk in vulgar and crude style? Maharaj also used sometimes crude words, but it was useful in particular time and place and for special visitor - to help him understand, > > but you want always shock others by strong sentences - why? > > turn the list, try to tell others about your practice, about your meditation, tell others some story of life of some sage, just try... > > your so-called 2nd knowledge is worn out, so if you are Neo (chosen ones) - prove it in your contribution - not in your offence attitude.. > > jai guru > > p.s. > > do you know that Maharaj paid scholar fees (tuition) to one of his students? > > > > ____________ > > Od: " dan330033 " > > Komu: Nisargadatta > > Datum: 20.01.2010 20:48 > > Předmět: " Consciousness " and " others " > > >  > > > > Proclaiming that consciousness is all means nothing if there is no understanding of what is going on with the consciousness that is here, is present. > > Making all kinds of comments addressed to the consciousness of " others " and what " they " are doing, just continues an attempt to divide consciousness as if it had separate locations for selves. > > Such activity is actually a contradiction to " consciousness as all, " because it is consciousness divided against itself. > > The only understanding of this activity possible, is to understand the activity as it occurs. > > Which is never " somewhere else, " never " someone else's problem. " > > Nisargadatta addressed understanding consciousness, and therefore being free of the attempt to reside in consciousness, or identify with a content of consciousness. He pointed to being this " nothing " that is not a manufacture of consciousness, not an arising. > > His words can serve as pointers. > > But pointers by themselves are of no avail, because they mean nothing unless the inquiry is here, now, and of the one who is present. > > Focusing on others, what " they " are doing, how to label " them, " is simply beside the point, a waste of time and energy, a pursuit of division in service of continuing a sense of separate self existence. > > Inquiry is of the sense of separate self existence, which is " me " against " you " and " me " against " that out there, " and " me " vs. " it. " > > Which is not " someone else's problem. " > > Which is the end of " me " defined against " you, " and " in here " defined against " out there. " > > - D - > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Nisargadatta , <alesadamek wrote: > > Dear dan or b.b.b. > > do you think that in order to spread the glory of final truth explained by Nisargadatta and other real advaita teacher is necessary to talk in vulgar and crude style? Maharaj also used sometimes crude words, but it was useful in particular time and place and for special visitor - to help him understand, > > but you want always shock others by strong sentences - why? i don't. i just do my best to talk the language of the person i communicate with, however that works out. > turn the list, try to tell others about your practice, about your meditation, tell others some story of life of some sage, just try... a vulgar story or a refined story, is nonetheless a story you won't arrive at the " actually so " from words, stories, exchanges on the internet, ideas, projections, or other ideations. some exchanges on this list serve to debunk myths about advaita talk and advaita ideas having some kind of special power to get someone to the truth, or a special power to dispel the false. no problem there. are you (as separable) going to see the falsehood of you because of something someone tells you, that you believe, which gets you to understand that you are false, or by some special practice or inquiry that (separable) you does? hardly. and this " hardly " is the inquiry. it has nothing whatsoever to do with making a special place in the mind for advaita, dvaita, what Nisargadatta said or didn't say, or any other second-hand machinations of " mind, " i.e., of " continuity of thought. " > your so-called 2nd knowledge is worn out, so if you are Neo (chosen ones) - prove it in your contribution - not in your offence attitude.. nothing to prove. do you have something to prove? > jai guru > > p.s. > > do you know that Maharaj paid scholar fees (tuition) to one of his students? nope, didn't know that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Proclaiming that consciousness is all means nothing if there is no understanding of what is going on with the consciousness that is here, is present. > > > > Making all kinds of comments addressed to the consciousness of " others " and what " they " are doing, just continues an attempt to divide consciousness as if it had separate locations for selves. > > > > Such activity is actually a contradiction to " consciousness as all, " because it is consciousness divided against itself. > > > > The only understanding of this activity possible, is to understand the activity as it occurs. > > > > Which is never " somewhere else, " never " someone else's problem. " > > > > Nisargadatta addressed understanding consciousness, and therefore being free of the attempt to reside in consciousness, or identify with a content of consciousness. He pointed to being this " nothing " that is not a manufacture of consciousness, not an arising. > > > > His words can serve as pointers. > > > > But pointers by themselves are of no avail, because they mean nothing unless the inquiry is here, now, and of the one who is present. > > > > Focusing on others, what " they " are doing, how to label " them, " is simply beside the point, a waste of time and energy, a pursuit of division in service of continuing a sense of separate self existence. > > > > Inquiry is of the sense of separate self existence, which is " me " against " you " and " me " against " that out there, " and " me " vs. " it. " > > > > Which is not " someone else's problem. " > > > > Which is the end of " me " defined against " you, " and " in here " defined against " out there. " > > > > - D - > > > now you're just being ridiculous. > > it's not as complicated as you try to make it out to be dabbo. > > you just like hearing yourself talk. > > and you stutter. > > chill. > > .b b.b. simplicity itself. - d - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > Proclaiming that consciousness is all means nothing if there is no understanding of what is going on with the consciousness that is here, is present. > > > > > > Making all kinds of comments addressed to the consciousness of " others " and what " they " are doing, just continues an attempt to divide consciousness as if it had separate locations for selves. > > > > > > Such activity is actually a contradiction to " consciousness as all, " because it is consciousness divided against itself. > > > > > > The only understanding of this activity possible, is to understand the activity as it occurs. > > > > > > Which is never " somewhere else, " never " someone else's problem. " > > > > > > Nisargadatta addressed understanding consciousness, and therefore being free of the attempt to reside in consciousness, or identify with a content of consciousness. He pointed to being this " nothing " that is not a manufacture of consciousness, not an arising. > > > > > > His words can serve as pointers. > > > > > > But pointers by themselves are of no avail, because they mean nothing unless the inquiry is here, now, and of the one who is present. > > > > > > Focusing on others, what " they " are doing, how to label " them, " is simply beside the point, a waste of time and energy, a pursuit of division in service of continuing a sense of separate self existence. > > > > > > Inquiry is of the sense of separate self existence, which is " me " against " you " and " me " against " that out there, " and " me " vs. " it. " > > > > > > Which is not " someone else's problem. " > > > > > > Which is the end of " me " defined against " you, " and " in here " defined against " out there. " > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > now you're just being ridiculous. > > > > it's not as complicated as you try to make it out to be dabbo. > > > > you just like hearing yourself talk. > > > > and you stutter. > > > > chill. > > > > .b b.b. > > > simplicity itself. > > - d - of course you have to now be brief.. or if you will..cut the bullshit. you've been " outed " . and now you want to come clean. you're acting phonier than you did in your first post. you just can't get your act together can you? and that's what you are dabbo.. a stupid act...all together " untogether " . LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Proclaiming that consciousness is all means nothing if there is no understanding of what is going on with the consciousness that is here, is present. > > > > > > > > Making all kinds of comments addressed to the consciousness of " others " and what " they " are doing, just continues an attempt to divide consciousness as if it had separate locations for selves. > > > > > > > > Such activity is actually a contradiction to " consciousness as all, " because it is consciousness divided against itself. > > > > > > > > The only understanding of this activity possible, is to understand the activity as it occurs. > > > > > > > > Which is never " somewhere else, " never " someone else's problem. " > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta addressed understanding consciousness, and therefore being free of the attempt to reside in consciousness, or identify with a content of consciousness. He pointed to being this " nothing " that is not a manufacture of consciousness, not an arising. > > > > > > > > His words can serve as pointers. > > > > > > > > But pointers by themselves are of no avail, because they mean nothing unless the inquiry is here, now, and of the one who is present. > > > > > > > > Focusing on others, what " they " are doing, how to label " them, " is simply beside the point, a waste of time and energy, a pursuit of division in service of continuing a sense of separate self existence. > > > > > > > > Inquiry is of the sense of separate self existence, which is " me " against " you " and " me " against " that out there, " and " me " vs. " it. " > > > > > > > > Which is not " someone else's problem. " > > > > > > > > Which is the end of " me " defined against " you, " and " in here " defined against " out there. " > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > now you're just being ridiculous. > > > > > > it's not as complicated as you try to make it out to be dabbo. > > > > > > you just like hearing yourself talk. > > > > > > and you stutter. > > > > > > chill. > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > simplicity itself. > > > > - d - > > > of course you have to now be brief.. > > or if you will..cut the bullshit. > > you've been " outed " . > > and now you want to come clean. > > you're acting phonier than you did in your first post. > > you just can't get your act together can you? > > and that's what you are dabbo.. > > a stupid act...all together " untogether " . > > LOL! > > .b b.b. nothing to get together. you may want more words from me, but this is all i have for you. and not even these. - d - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Proclaiming that consciousness is all means nothing if there is no understanding of what is going on with the consciousness that is here, is present. > > > > > > > > > > Making all kinds of comments addressed to the consciousness of " others " and what " they " are doing, just continues an attempt to divide consciousness as if it had separate locations for selves. > > > > > > > > > > Such activity is actually a contradiction to " consciousness as all, " because it is consciousness divided against itself. > > > > > > > > > > The only understanding of this activity possible, is to understand the activity as it occurs. > > > > > > > > > > Which is never " somewhere else, " never " someone else's problem. " > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta addressed understanding consciousness, and therefore being free of the attempt to reside in consciousness, or identify with a content of consciousness. He pointed to being this " nothing " that is not a manufacture of consciousness, not an arising. > > > > > > > > > > His words can serve as pointers. > > > > > > > > > > But pointers by themselves are of no avail, because they mean nothing unless the inquiry is here, now, and of the one who is present. > > > > > > > > > > Focusing on others, what " they " are doing, how to label " them, " is simply beside the point, a waste of time and energy, a pursuit of division in service of continuing a sense of separate self existence. > > > > > > > > > > Inquiry is of the sense of separate self existence, which is " me " against " you " and " me " against " that out there, " and " me " vs. " it. " > > > > > > > > > > Which is not " someone else's problem. " > > > > > > > > > > Which is the end of " me " defined against " you, " and " in here " defined against " out there. " > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > now you're just being ridiculous. > > > > > > > > it's not as complicated as you try to make it out to be dabbo. > > > > > > > > you just like hearing yourself talk. > > > > > > > > and you stutter. > > > > > > > > chill. > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > simplicity itself. > > > > > > - d - > > > > > > of course you have to now be brief.. > > > > or if you will..cut the bullshit. > > > > you've been " outed " . > > > > and now you want to come clean. > > > > you're acting phonier than you did in your first post. > > > > you just can't get your act together can you? > > > > and that's what you are dabbo.. > > > > a stupid act...all together " untogether " . > > > > LOL! > > > > .b b.b. > > > nothing to get together. > > you may want more words from me, > > but this is all i have for you. > > and not even these. > > - d - but you just have to keep on posting them... you MUST.. to save face. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , <alesadamek@> wrote: > > > > Dear dan or b.b.b. > > > > do you think that in order to spread the glory of final truth explained by Nisargadatta and other real advaita teacher is necessary to talk in vulgar and crude style? Maharaj also used sometimes crude words, but it was useful in particular time and place and for special visitor - to help him understand, > > > > but you want always shock others by strong sentences - why? > > i don't. > > i just do my best to talk the language of the person i communicate with, however that works out. ROFLOL Good luck with that, Dan Ho ho ho -Ly Ghost Nota Nomenclatur Benedictus (Aamen!): If I were you I would stop rather sooner than later to try and have dialogues with people and first and foremost I would stop immediately! to explain myself. Just go! Move - move - move - make your own stuff; create your own stories - and deliver - and know it matters not an iota if anybody buys it or not - or if you buy their stuff. I for one is not here to spread " the glory of final truth " and let this be clear: spread is something I put on bread Shit - I am going to spend yet an other day in hell but then I am getting used to it, and after all it's only every other day. So By the way its not as hot as they say, quite chilly actuallay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Lene " <lschwabe wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , <alesadamek@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear dan or b.b.b. > > > > > > do you think that in order to spread the glory of final truth explained by Nisargadatta and other real advaita teacher is necessary to talk in vulgar and crude style? Maharaj also used sometimes crude words, but it was useful in particular time and place and for special visitor - to help him understand, > > > > > > but you want always shock others by strong sentences - why? > > > > i don't. > > > > i just do my best to talk the language of the person i communicate with, however that works out. > > > > ROFLOL > > Good luck with that, Dan > > Ho ho ho > > -Ly Ghost > > Nota Nomenclatur Benedictus (Aamen!): > If I were you I would stop rather sooner than later to try and > have dialogues with people and first and foremost I would stop > immediately! to explain myself. > > Just go! Move - move - move - make your own stuff; create your > own stories - and deliver - and know it matters not an iota if > anybody buys it or not - or if you buy their stuff. > > I for one is not here to spread " the glory of final truth " and > let this be clear: > > spread is something > I put on bread > > Shit - I am going to spend yet an other day in hell but then I > am getting used to it, and after all it's only every other day. > So > > By the way its not as hot as they say, quite chilly actuallay. P: Well, hell, I do declare you enlightened next to AC. Yes, you're cool! The others ( they know who they are) has lost sight they are caught in a silly mud fight. They don't know how to stop. How silly can you get? If they could see themselves, maybe, they would laugh, and cry because it's ridiculously funny and very sad to see old men fighting over wisdom with mud pies. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Lene " <lschwabe@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , <alesadamek@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear dan or b.b.b. > > > > > > > > do you think that in order to spread the glory of final truth explained by Nisargadatta and other real advaita teacher is necessary to talk in vulgar and crude style? Maharaj also used sometimes crude words, but it was useful in particular time and place and for special visitor - to help him understand, > > > > > > > > but you want always shock others by strong sentences - why? > > > > > > i don't. > > > > > > i just do my best to talk the language of the person i communicate with, however that works out. > > > > > > > > ROFLOL > > > > Good luck with that, Dan > > > > Ho ho ho > > > > -Ly Ghost > > > > Nota Nomenclatur Benedictus (Aamen!): > > If I were you I would stop rather sooner than later to try and > > have dialogues with people and first and foremost I would stop > > immediately! to explain myself. > > > > Just go! Move - move - move - make your own stuff; create your > > own stories - and deliver - and know it matters not an iota if > > anybody buys it or not - or if you buy their stuff. > > > > I for one is not here to spread " the glory of final truth " and > > let this be clear: > > > > spread is something > > I put on bread > > > > Shit - I am going to spend yet an other day in hell but then I > > am getting used to it, and after all it's only every other day. > > So > > > > By the way its not as hot as they say, quite chilly actuallay. > > P: Well, hell, I do declare you enlightened next to AC. > Yes, you're cool! The others ( they know who they are) > has lost sight they are caught in a silly mud fight. They > don't know how to stop. > > How silly can you get? If they could see themselves, maybe, > they would laugh, and cry because it's ridiculously funny > and very sad to see old men fighting over wisdom with mud pies. if there is any self to see.. it's not of the enlightened kind. there is no such self. piss on those assholes fighting with un-wise mud pies. the sage thing to do is to fight with wise pies... the not so silly kind. then there is nothing ridiculous.. nothing sad.. but still a lot to laugh at. LOL! see? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 waste of time to be there with you, i have 2 possibilities- either to get headache if i would continue to read your vomits (b.b.b., dan, marc, ....) or just stop read it and instead of this read Maharaj talks, Bhausaheb talks, Siddharameshwar talks, Dasboad, Eknath, Amritanubhava, Yoga Visistha, or meditate, or contemplate, sing bhajans, or just Be happy or spend time with people which have open heart and are willing to share advaita teaching or experiences with others without jaws. jai guru ales ____________ > Od: "BobN" <Roberibus111 > Komu: Nisargadatta > Datum: 21.01.2010 19:44 > Předmět: Re: "Consciousness" and "others" > Nisargadatta , "cerosoul" <pedsie6 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , "Lene" <lschwabe@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , "dan330033" <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , <alesadamek@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear dan or b.b.b. > > > > > > > > do you think that in order to spread the glory of final truth explained by Nisargadatta and other real advaita teacher is necessary to talk in vulgar and crude style? Maharaj also used sometimes crude words, but it was useful in particular time and place and for special visitor - to help him understand, > > > > > > > > but you want always shock others by strong sentences - why? > > > > > > i don't. > > > > > > i just do my best to talk the language of the person i communicate with, however that works out. > > > > > > > > ROFLOL > > > > Good luck with that, Dan > > > > Ho ho ho > > > > -Ly Ghost > > > > Nota Nomenclatur Benedictus (Aamen!): > > If I were you I would stop rather sooner than later to try and > > have dialogues with people and first and foremost I would stop > > immediately! to explain myself. > > > > Just go! Move - move - move - make your own stuff; create your > > own stories - and deliver - and know it matters not an iota if > > anybody buys it or not - or if you buy their stuff. > > > > I for one is not here to spread "the glory of final truth" and > > let this be clear: > > > > spread is something > > I put on bread > > > > Shit - I am going to spend yet an other day in hell but then I > > am getting used to it, and after all it's only every other day. > > So > > > > By the way its not as hot as they say, quite chilly actuallay. > > P: Well, hell, I do declare you enlightened next to AC. > Yes, you're cool! The others ( they know who they are) > has lost sight they are caught in a silly mud fight. They > don't know how to stop. > > How silly can you get? If they could see themselves, maybe, > they would laugh, and cry because it's ridiculously funny > and very sad to see old men fighting over wisdom with mud pies. if there is any self to see.. it's not of the enlightened kind. there is no such self. piss on those assholes fighting with un-wise mud pies. the sage thing to do is to fight with wise pies... the not so silly kind. then there is nothing ridiculous.. nothing sad.. but still a lot to laugh at. LOL! see? ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 TWO possibilities you say. ok let's check this out: 1. " ..get headache if i would continue to read your vomits " ...etc. " 2. " just stop read it (sic!).. and instead of this read Maharaj talks " ..etc. with more bullshit. 3. " ..OR meditate, or contemplate, sing bhajans " ..etc.etc. 4. " ..OR just Be happy " ..with no etc. at all 5. " ..OR spend time with people.. which have open heart " ..etc with lots and lots more bullshit. hmmm? now either you can't count very well.. or you are barking up the wrong trees.. or you are just very confused. well ales.. it's probably better for you.. to just pick one of the several of your 2 options. i don't think you can handle the straight stuff. go in peace and try learning how to count. and please take your vomit with you. don't waste it like you say you do with your time. there's a good sport! :-) ..b b.b. ***************nothing new below...only ales's whining**************** Nisargadatta , <alesadamek wrote: > > waste of time to be there with you, > > i have 2 possibilities- > > either to get headache if i would continue to read your vomits (b.b.b., dan, marc, ....) > > or just stop read it and instead of this read Maharaj talks, Bhausaheb talks, Siddharameshwar talks, Dasboad, Eknath, Amritanubhava, Yoga Visistha, or meditate, or contemplate, sing bhajans, or just Be happy or spend time with people which have open heart and are willing to share advaita teaching or experiences with others without jaws. > > jai guru > > ales > > > > ____________ > > Od: " BobN " > > Komu: Nisargadatta > > Datum: 21.01.2010 19:44 > > Předmět: Re: " Consciousness " and " others " > > >  > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Lene " wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear dan or b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > do you think that in order to spread the glory of final truth explained by Nisargadatta and other real advaita teacher is necessary to talk in vulgar and crude style? Maharaj also used sometimes crude words, but it was useful in particular time and place and for special visitor - to help him understand, > > > > > > > > > > but you want always shock others by strong sentences - why? > > > > > > > > i don't. > > > > > > > > i just do my best to talk the language of the person i communicate with, however that works out. > > > > > > > > > > > > ROFLOL > > > > > > Good luck with that, Dan > > > > > > Ho ho ho > > > > > > -Ly Ghost > > > > > > Nota Nomenclatur Benedictus (Aamen!): > > > If I were you I would stop rather sooner than later to try and > > > have dialogues with people and first and foremost I would stop > > > immediately! to explain myself. > > > > > > Just go! Move - move - move - make your own stuff; create your > > > own stories - and deliver - and know it matters not an iota if > > > anybody buys it or not - or if you buy their stuff. > > > > > > I for one is not here to spread " the glory of final truth " and > > > let this be clear: > > > > > > spread is something > > > I put on bread > > > > > > Shit - I am going to spend yet an other day in hell but then I > > > am getting used to it, and after all it's only every other day. > > > So > > > > > > By the way its not as hot as they say, quite chilly actuallay. > > > > P: Well, hell, I do declare you enlightened next to AC. > > Yes, you're cool! The others ( they know who they are) > > has lost sight they are caught in a silly mud fight. They > > don't know how to stop. > > > > How silly can you get? If they could see themselves, maybe, > > they would laugh, and cry because it's ridiculously funny > > and very sad to see old men fighting over wisdom with mud pies. > > if there is any self to see.. > > it's not of the enlightened kind. > > there is no such self. > > piss on those assholes fighting with un-wise mud pies. > > the sage thing to do is to fight with wise pies... > > the not so silly kind. > > then there is nothing ridiculous.. > > nothing sad.. > > but still a lot to laugh at. > > LOL! > > see? > > .b b.b. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 hi all just to say hello this list is not quite what i expected it to be.........., but there you go (smile, wink) peace gunther Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > TWO possibilities you say. > > ok let's check this out: > > 1. " ..get headache if i would continue to read your vomits " > > ..etc. " > > 2. " just stop read it (sic!).. > > and instead of this read Maharaj talks " ..etc. with more bullshit. > > 3. " ..OR meditate, or contemplate, sing bhajans " ..etc.etc. > > 4. " ..OR just Be happy " ..with no etc. at all > > 5. " ..OR spend time with people.. > > which have open heart " ..etc with lots and lots more bullshit. > > hmmm? > > now either you can't count very well.. > > or you are barking up the wrong trees.. > > or you are just very confused. > > well ales.. > > it's probably better for you.. > > to just pick one of the several of your 2 options. > > i don't think you can handle the straight stuff. > > go in peace and try learning how to count. > > and please take your vomit with you. > > don't waste it like you say you do with your time. > > there's a good sport! > > :-) > > .b b.b. > > > > > ***************nothing new below...only ales's whining**************** > > > > > Nisargadatta , <alesadamek@> wrote: > > > > waste of time to be there with you, > > > > i have 2 possibilities- > > > > either to get headache if i would continue to read your vomits (b.b.b., dan, marc, ....) > > > > or just stop read it and instead of this read Maharaj talks, Bhausaheb talks, Siddharameshwar talks, Dasboad, Eknath, Amritanubhava, Yoga Visistha, or meditate, or contemplate, sing bhajans, or just Be happy or spend time with people which have open heart and are willing to share advaita teaching or experiences with others without jaws. > > > > jai guru > > > > ales > > > > > > > > ____________ > > > Od: " BobN " > > > Komu: Nisargadatta > > > Datum: 21.01.2010 19:44 > > > Předmět: Re: " Consciousness " and " others " > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Lene " wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear dan or b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > > > do you think that in order to spread the glory of final truth explained by Nisargadatta and other real advaita teacher is necessary to talk in vulgar and crude style? Maharaj also used sometimes crude words, but it was useful in particular time and place and for special visitor - to help him understand, > > > > > > > > > > > > but you want always shock others by strong sentences - why? > > > > > > > > > > i don't. > > > > > > > > > > i just do my best to talk the language of the person i communicate with, however that works out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ROFLOL > > > > > > > > Good luck with that, Dan > > > > > > > > Ho ho ho > > > > > > > > -Ly Ghost > > > > > > > > Nota Nomenclatur Benedictus (Aamen!): > > > > If I were you I would stop rather sooner than later to try and > > > > have dialogues with people and first and foremost I would stop > > > > immediately! to explain myself. > > > > > > > > Just go! Move - move - move - make your own stuff; create your > > > > own stories - and deliver - and know it matters not an iota if > > > > anybody buys it or not - or if you buy their stuff. > > > > > > > > I for one is not here to spread " the glory of final truth " and > > > > let this be clear: > > > > > > > > spread is something > > > > I put on bread > > > > > > > > Shit - I am going to spend yet an other day in hell but then I > > > > am getting used to it, and after all it's only every other day. > > > > So > > > > > > > > By the way its not as hot as they say, quite chilly actuallay. > > > > > > P: Well, hell, I do declare you enlightened next to AC. > > > Yes, you're cool! The others ( they know who they are) > > > has lost sight they are caught in a silly mud fight. They > > > don't know how to stop. > > > > > > How silly can you get? If they could see themselves, maybe, > > > they would laugh, and cry because it's ridiculously funny > > > and very sad to see old men fighting over wisdom with mud pies. > > > > if there is any self to see.. > > > > it's not of the enlightened kind. > > > > there is no such self. > > > > piss on those assholes fighting with un-wise mud pies. > > > > the sage thing to do is to fight with wise pies... > > > > the not so silly kind. > > > > then there is nothing ridiculous.. > > > > nothing sad.. > > > > but still a lot to laugh at. > > > > LOL! > > > > see? > > > > .b b.b. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 big bang bullshit or b.b.b. or vomit man i choosed two possibilities - 1. continue read your bullhit kidding which has nothing common with real advaita teaching or 2. stop it - and do another activities as meditate, read spiritual books, sing bhajans etc.... so I choosed this part and say you good bay and have nice time during masturbation before your pc. Jai guru ales ____________ > Od: "BobN" <Roberibus111 > Komu: Nisargadatta > Datum: 21.01.2010 20:25 > PÅ™edmÄ›t: Re: "Consciousness" and "others" > TWO possibilities you say. ok let's check this out: 1."..get headache if i would continue to read your vomits" ...etc." 2."just stop read it (sic!).. and instead of this read Maharaj talks"..etc. with more bullshit. 3. "..OR meditate, or contemplate, sing bhajans"..etc.etc. 4. "..OR just Be happy"..with no etc. at all 5. "..OR spend time with people.. which have open heart" ..etc with lots and lots more bullshit. hmmm? now either you can't count very well.. or you are barking up the wrong trees.. or you are just very confused. well ales.. it's probably better for you.. to just pick one of the several of your 2 options. i don't think you can handle the straight stuff. go in peace and try learning how to count. and please take your vomit with you. don't waste it like you say you do with your time. there's a good sport! :-) ..b b.b. ***************nothing new below...only ales's whining**************** Nisargadatta , <alesadamek wrote: > > waste of time to be there with you, > > i have 2 possibilities- > > either to get headache if i would continue to read your vomits (b.b.b., dan, marc, ....) > > or just stop read it and instead of this read Maharaj talks, Bhausaheb talks, Siddharameshwar talks, Dasboad, Eknath, Amritanubhava, Yoga Visistha, or meditate, or contemplate, sing bhajans, or just Be happy or spend time with people which have open heart and are willing to share advaita teaching or experiences with others without jaws. > > jai guru > > ales > > > > ________ > > Od: "BobN" > > Komu: Nisargadatta > > Datum: 21.01.2010 19:44 > > PÅ™edmÄ›t: Re: "Consciousness" and "others" > > >  > > > > > > Nisargadatta , "cerosoul" wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , "Lene" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , "dan330033" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear dan or b.b.b. > > > > > > > > > > do you think that in order to spread the glory of final truth explained by Nisargadatta and other real advaita teacher is necessary to talk in vulgar and crude style? Maharaj also used sometimes crude words, but it was useful in particular time and place and for special visitor - to help him understand, > > > > > > > > > > but you want always shock others by strong sentences - why? > > > > > > > > i don't. > > > > > > > > i just do my best to talk the language of the person i communicate with, however that works out. > > > > > > > > > > > > ROFLOL > > > > > > Good luck with that, Dan > > > > > > Ho ho ho > > > > > > -Ly Ghost > > > > > > Nota Nomenclatur Benedictus (Aamen!): > > > If I were you I would stop rather sooner than later to try and > > > have dialogues with people and first and foremost I would stop > > > immediately! to explain myself. > > > > > > Just go! Move - move - move - make your own stuff; create your > > > own stories - and deliver - and know it matters not an iota if > > > anybody buys it or not - or if you buy their stuff. > > > > > > I for one is not here to spread "the glory of final truth" and > > > let this be clear: > > > > > > spread is something > > > I put on bread > > > > > > Shit - I am going to spend yet an other day in hell but then I > > > am getting used to it, and after all it's only every other day. > > > So > > > > > > By the way its not as hot as they say, quite chilly actuallay. > > > > P: Well, hell, I do declare you enlightened next to AC. > > Yes, you're cool! The others ( they know who they are) > > has lost sight they are caught in a silly mud fight. They > > don't know how to stop. > > > > How silly can you get? If they could see themselves, maybe, > > they would laugh, and cry because it's ridiculously funny > > and very sad to see old men fighting over wisdom with mud pies. > > if there is any self to see.. > > it's not of the enlightened kind. > > there is no such self. > > piss on those assholes fighting with un-wise mud pies. > > the sage thing to do is to fight with wise pies... > > the not so silly kind. > > then there is nothing ridiculous.. > > nothing sad.. > > but still a lot to laugh at. > > LOL! > > see? > > .b b.b. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 you " choosed " two huh? that's cute! scrappy liitle fellow aren't you? nice puppy. now you can go. :-) ..b b.b. *********************same crying bullshit below*********************** Nisargadatta , <alesadamek wrote: > > big bang bullshit or b.b.b. or vomit man > > i choosed two possibilities - > > 1. continue read your bullhit kidding which has nothing common with real advaita teaching > > or > 2. stop it - and do another activities as meditate, read spiritual books, sing bhajans etc.... > > so I choosed this part and say you good bay and have nice time during masturbation before your pc. > > Jai guru > > ales > > ____________ > > Od: " BobN " > > Komu: Nisargadatta > > Datum: 21.01.2010 20:25 > > Předmět: Re: " Consciousness " and " others " > > > ***************nothing new below...only ales's whining**************** > > Nisargadatta , wrote: > > > > waste of time to be there with you, > > > > i have 2 possibilities- > > > > either to get headache if i would continue to read your vomits (b.b.b., dan, marc, ....) > > > > or just stop read it and instead of this read Maharaj talks, Bhausaheb talks, Siddharameshwar talks, Dasboad, Eknath, Amritanubhava, Yoga Visistha, or meditate, or contemplate, sing bhajans, or just Be happy or spend time with people which have open heart and are willing to share advaita teaching or experiences with others without jaws. > > > > jai guru > > > > ale > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Lene " <lschwabe@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , <alesadamek@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear dan or b.b.b. > > > > > > > > do you think that in order to spread the glory of final truth explained by Nisargadatta and other real advaita teacher is necessary to talk in vulgar and crude style? Maharaj also used sometimes crude words, but it was useful in particular time and place and for special visitor - to help him understand, > > > > > > > > but you want always shock others by strong sentences - why? > > > > > > i don't. > > > > > > i just do my best to talk the language of the person i communicate with, however that works out. > > > > > > > > ROFLOL > > > > Good luck with that, Dan > > > > Ho ho ho > > > > -Ly Ghost > > > > Nota Nomenclatur Benedictus (Aamen!): > > If I were you I would stop rather sooner than later to try and > > have dialogues with people and first and foremost I would stop > > immediately! to explain myself. > > > > Just go! Move - move - move - make your own stuff; create your > > own stories - and deliver - and know it matters not an iota if > > anybody buys it or not - or if you buy their stuff. > > > > I for one is not here to spread " the glory of final truth " and > > let this be clear: > > > > spread is something > > I put on bread > > > > Shit - I am going to spend yet an other day in hell but then I > > am getting used to it, and after all it's only every other day. > > So > > > > By the way its not as hot as they say, quite chilly actuallay. > > P: Well, hell, I do declare you enlightened next to AC. > Yes, you're cool! The others ( they know who they are) > has lost sight they are caught in a silly mud fight. They > don't know how to stop. > > How silly can you get? If they could see themselves, maybe, > they would laugh, and cry because it's ridiculously funny > and very sad to see old men fighting over wisdom with mud pies. D: He laughed, he cried, he found it ridiculously funny and then got very sad. He imagined old men having a fight with pies. " They don't know ... if only they could see themselves like I do ... " Ah, the wonders of internet lists, eh? -- D -- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2010 Report Share Posted January 23, 2010 -. > > > > P: Well, hell, I do declare you enlightened next to AC. > > Yes, you're cool! The others ( they know who they are) > > has lost sight they are caught in a silly mud fight. They > > don't know how to stop. > > > > How silly can you get? If they could see themselves, maybe, > > they would laugh, and cry because it's ridiculously funny > > and very sad to see old men fighting over wisdom with mud pies. > > D: He laughed, he cried, he found it ridiculously funny > and then got very sad. > > He imagined old men having a fight with pies. > > " They don't know ... if only they could see themselves > like I do ... " > > Ah, the wonders of internet lists, eh? P: Tralalalatarataralala! > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2010 Report Share Posted January 23, 2010 Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Lene " <lschwabe@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , <alesadamek@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear dan or b.b.b. > > > > > > > > do you think that in order to spread the glory of final truth explained by Nisargadatta and other real advaita teacher is necessary to talk in vulgar and crude style? Maharaj also used sometimes crude words, but it was useful in particular time and place and for special visitor - to help him understand, > > > > > > > > but you want always shock others by strong sentences - why? > > > > > > i don't. > > > > > > i just do my best to talk the language of the person i communicate with, however that works out. > > > > > > > > ROFLOL > > > > Good luck with that, Dan > > > > Ho ho ho > > > > -Ly Ghost > > > > Nota Nomenclatur Benedictus (Aamen!): > > If I were you I would stop rather sooner than later to try and > > have dialogues with people and first and foremost I would stop > > immediately! to explain myself. > > > > Just go! Move - move - move - make your own stuff; create your > > own stories - and deliver - and know it matters not an iota if > > anybody buys it or not - or if you buy their stuff. > > > > I for one is not here to spread " the glory of final truth " and > > let this be clear: > > > > spread is something > > I put on bread > > > > Shit - I am going to spend yet an other day in hell but then I > > am getting used to it, and after all it's only every other day. > > So > > > > By the way its not as hot as they say, quite chilly actuallay. > > P: Well, hell, I do declare you enlightened next to AC. > Yes, you're cool! The others ( they know who they are) > has lost sight they are caught in a silly mud fight. They > don't know how to stop. > > How silly can you get? If they could see themselves, maybe, > they would laugh, and cry because it's ridiculously funny > and very sad to see old men fighting over wisdom with mud pies. I only just read your msg here Pete. Glad to learn I am enlightened next to AC. What is AC? Antar Ctica? Arthur Coestler? No couldnt be as there is no C in Coestler. Ante Christopheros? No, I give up ;( Guess I am not enlightened after all - at least not till I find out whom I am sitting next to, heh heh. -Lene Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2010 Report Share Posted January 23, 2010 > > > > I only just read your msg here Pete. Glad to learn I am > enlightened next to AC. > > What is AC? Antar Ctica? Arthur Coestler? No couldnt be > as there is no C in Coestler. Ante Christopheros? No, I > give up ;( > > Guess I am not enlightened after all - at least not till > I find out whom I am sitting next to, heh heh. > > -Lene P: Lene, Arvind Singh AKA ac is the fellow who corresponded with you about JK a few days ago. He has this site: http://www.numii.net/word_press/ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2010 Report Share Posted January 23, 2010 Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I only just read your msg here Pete. Glad to learn I am > > enlightened next to AC. > > > > What is AC? Antar Ctica? Arthur Coestler? No couldnt be > > as there is no C in Coestler. Ante Christopheros? No, I > > give up ;( > > > > Guess I am not enlightened after all - at least not till > > I find out whom I am sitting next to, heh heh. > > > > -Lene > > P: Lene, Arvind Singh AKA ac is the fellow who corresponded > with you about JK a few days ago. He has this site: > http://www.numii.net/word_press/ IC Thank you -Lene Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Nisargadatta , " gunther.jerabek " <gunther.jerabek wrote: > > hi all > just to say hello > this list is not quite what i expected it to be.........., but there you go (smile, wink) > > peace > gunther > Whole life is not what you expected. Just welcome what comes and let go what leaves. Werner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 25, 2010 Report Share Posted January 25, 2010 Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " gunther.jerabek@ " <gunther.jerabek@> wrote: > > > > hi all > > just to say hello > > this list is not quite what i expected it to be.........., but there you go (smile, wink) > > > > peace > > gunther > > > > > Whole life is not what you expected. > > Just welcome what comes and let go what leaves. > > Werner better yet if you tire of throwing out what leaves.. cut down the what tree in your yard. and if a what comes by.. welcome it if you have no real whole life friends like wernie. he expected fiends and all he's got are whats. wernie complains about this all the time. he calls the people not with him stupid.. but every what he calls friend. so what. :-) ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.