Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Question: "... is the tell tale sign of whether there is a recognition". Tell-tale sign to whom? Who is looking for signs?"... and don't necessarily reveal that stories have been seen through."Don't necessarily reveal to whom?Others?Saying something like this suggests to me that it's very important to be seen as one who as seen through stories, or to see oneself as one who has seen through stories. Does it look like a 'spiritual self-image'? -tim- To whom are you asking or telling this? -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > Question: " ... is the tell tale sign of whether there is a recognition " . > > Tell-tale sign to whom? Who is looking for signs? > > " ... and don't necessarily reveal that stories have been seen through. " > > Don't necessarily reveal to whom? > > Others? > > Saying something like this suggests to me that it's very important to be seen as one who as seen through stories, or to see oneself as one who has seen through stories. Does it look like a 'spiritual self-image'? > -tim- > > To whom are you asking or telling this? > -geo- > Yes, a Neo-Advaitist telling that there is nothing to reveal and no one to reveal to is only trustworthy if he totally stops any communication. But the contrary is the case, Neo-Advaitists are as eager to spread their message to non-exsisting people as politicians, priests or missionaries are eager to bring their message to existing people. Werner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > wwoehr > Nisargadatta > Friday, January 29, 2010 10:00 AM > Re: Others > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > Question: " ... is the tell tale sign of whether there is a recognition " . > > > > Tell-tale sign to whom? Who is looking for signs? > > > > " ... and don't necessarily reveal that stories have been seen through. " > > > > Don't necessarily reveal to whom? > > > > Others? > > > > Saying something like this suggests to me that it's very important to be > > seen as one who as seen through stories, or to see oneself as one who has > > seen through stories. Does it look like a 'spiritual self-image'? > > -tim- > > > > To whom are you asking or telling this? > > -geo- > > > > Yes, a Neo-Advaitist telling that there is nothing to reveal and no one to > anything reveal to is only truthworthy if he totally stops any > communication. > > But the contrary is the case, Neo-Advaitists are as eager to spread their > message to non-exsisting people as politicians, priests or missionaries are > eager to bring their message to existing people. > > Werner > > There is no such thing as neo-advaitist. That is stamp to label people - it > is meaningless. What happens is that we all are many different " things " when > we are not attend. > -geo- > haha, Geo, To be strict, there are not only no Neo-Advaitists but also no Talibans, no Christaians, no Muslims, no philosophers, no polititians, no dentists, no soldiers, no pilots and all those other professions. And there also is no Tim you were replying to because Tim is just a name. And making such a statement you already are a Neo-Advaitist. Werner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 - wwoehr Nisargadatta Friday, January 29, 2010 10:27 AM Re: Others Nisargadatta, " geo " <inandor > wrote: > > > - > wwoehr > Nisargadatta > Friday, January 29, 2010 10:00 AM > Re: Others > > > > > > Nisargadatta, " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > Question: " ... is the tell tale sign of whether there is a recognition " . > > > > Tell-tale sign to whom? Who is looking for signs? > > > > " ... and don't necessarily reveal that stories have been seen through. " > > > > Don't necessarily reveal to whom? > > > > Others? > > > > Saying something like this suggests to me that it's very important to be > > seen as one who as seen through stories, or to see oneself as one who > > has > > seen through stories. Does it look like a 'spiritual self-image'? > > -tim- > > > > To whom are you asking or telling this? > > -geo- > > > > Yes, a Neo-Advaitist telling that there is nothing to reveal and no one to > anything reveal to is only truthworthy if he totally stops any > communication. > > But the contrary is the case, Neo-Advaitists are as eager to spread their > message to non-exsisting people as politicians, priests or missionaries > are > eager to bring their message to existing people. > > Werner > > There is no such thing as neo-advaitist. That is stamp to label people - > it > is meaningless. What happens is that we all are many different " things " > when > we are not attend. > -geo- > haha, Geo, To be strict, there are not only no Neo-Advaitists but also no Talibans, no Christaians, no Muslims, no philosophers, no polititians, no dentists, no soldiers, no pilots and all those other professions. And there also is no Tim you were replying to because Tim is just a name. And making such a statement you already are a Neo-Advaitist. Werner Must you send all you posts twice?? -geo- one time is for non-existing neos one time is for himself eh, i mean for bbb and/or marc etc .... or some other who think he/she is(n't) this & that .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 - wwoehr Nisargadatta Friday, January 29, 2010 10:00 AM Re: Others Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > Question: " ... is the tell tale sign of whether there is a recognition " . > > Tell-tale sign to whom? Who is looking for signs? > > " ... and don't necessarily reveal that stories have been seen through. " > > Don't necessarily reveal to whom? > > Others? > > Saying something like this suggests to me that it's very important to be > seen as one who as seen through stories, or to see oneself as one who has > seen through stories. Does it look like a 'spiritual self-image'? > -tim- > > To whom are you asking or telling this? > -geo- > Yes, a Neo-Advaitist telling that there is nothing to reveal and no one to anything reveal to is only truthworthy if he totally stops any communication. But the contrary is the case, Neo-Advaitists are as eager to spread their message to non-exsisting people as politicians, priests or missionaries are eager to bring their message to existing people. Werner There is no such thing as neo-advaitist. That is stamp to label people - it is meaningless. What happens is that we all are many different " things " when we are not attend. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 - wwoehr Nisargadatta Friday, January 29, 2010 10:20 AM Re: Others Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > wwoehr > Nisargadatta > Friday, January 29, 2010 10:00 AM > Re: Others > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > Question: " ... is the tell tale sign of whether there is a recognition " . > > > > Tell-tale sign to whom? Who is looking for signs? > > > > " ... and don't necessarily reveal that stories have been seen through. " > > > > Don't necessarily reveal to whom? > > > > Others? > > > > Saying something like this suggests to me that it's very important to be > > seen as one who as seen through stories, or to see oneself as one who > > has > > seen through stories. Does it look like a 'spiritual self-image'? > > -tim- > > > > To whom are you asking or telling this? > > -geo- > > > > Yes, a Neo-Advaitist telling that there is nothing to reveal and no one to > anything reveal to is only truthworthy if he totally stops any > communication. > > But the contrary is the case, Neo-Advaitists are as eager to spread their > message to non-exsisting people as politicians, priests or missionaries > are > eager to bring their message to existing people. > > Werner > > There is no such thing as neo-advaitist. That is stamp to label people - > it > is meaningless. What happens is that we all are many different " things " > when > we are not attend. > -geo- > haha, Geo, To be strict, there are also no Talibans, no Christaians, no Muslims, no philosophers, no polititians, no dentists, no soldiers, no pilots and all those other professions. And making such a statement you already are a Neo-Advaitist. Werner And you, having seen this, are what? (quick, otherwise bbb will tell it) -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 - wwoehr Nisargadatta Friday, January 29, 2010 10:27 AM Re: Others Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > > - > wwoehr > Nisargadatta > Friday, January 29, 2010 10:00 AM > Re: Others > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > Question: " ... is the tell tale sign of whether there is a recognition " . > > > > Tell-tale sign to whom? Who is looking for signs? > > > > " ... and don't necessarily reveal that stories have been seen through. " > > > > Don't necessarily reveal to whom? > > > > Others? > > > > Saying something like this suggests to me that it's very important to be > > seen as one who as seen through stories, or to see oneself as one who > > has > > seen through stories. Does it look like a 'spiritual self-image'? > > -tim- > > > > To whom are you asking or telling this? > > -geo- > > > > Yes, a Neo-Advaitist telling that there is nothing to reveal and no one to > anything reveal to is only truthworthy if he totally stops any > communication. > > But the contrary is the case, Neo-Advaitists are as eager to spread their > message to non-exsisting people as politicians, priests or missionaries > are > eager to bring their message to existing people. > > Werner > > There is no such thing as neo-advaitist. That is stamp to label people - > it > is meaningless. What happens is that we all are many different " things " > when > we are not attend. > -geo- > haha, Geo, To be strict, there are not only no Neo-Advaitists but also no Talibans, no Christaians, no Muslims, no philosophers, no polititians, no dentists, no soldiers, no pilots and all those other professions. And there also is no Tim you were replying to because Tim is just a name. And making such a statement you already are a Neo-Advaitist. Werner Must you send all you posts twice?? -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 - Marc Nisargadatta Friday, January 29, 2010 10:52 AM Re: Re: Others - wwoehr Nisargadatta Friday, January 29, 2010 10:27 AM Re: Others Nisargadatta, " geo " <inandor > wrote: > > > - > wwoehr > Nisargadatta > Friday, January 29, 2010 10:00 AM > Re: Others > > > > > > Nisargadatta, " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > Question: " ... is the tell tale sign of whether there is a recognition " > > . > > > > Tell-tale sign to whom? Who is looking for signs? > > > > " ... and don't necessarily reveal that stories have been seen through. " > > > > Don't necessarily reveal to whom? > > > > Others? > > > > Saying something like this suggests to me that it's very important to be > > seen as one who as seen through stories, or to see oneself as one who > > has > > seen through stories. Does it look like a 'spiritual self-image'? > > -tim- > > > > To whom are you asking or telling this? > > -geo- > > > > Yes, a Neo-Advaitist telling that there is nothing to reveal and no one to > anything reveal to is only truthworthy if he totally stops any > communication. > > But the contrary is the case, Neo-Advaitists are as eager to spread their > message to non-exsisting people as politicians, priests or missionaries > are > eager to bring their message to existing people. > > Werner > > There is no such thing as neo-advaitist. That is stamp to label people - > it > is meaningless. What happens is that we all are many different " things " > when > we are not attend. > -geo- > haha, Geo, To be strict, there are not only no Neo-Advaitists but also no Talibans, no Christaians, no Muslims, no philosophers, no polititians, no dentists, no soldiers, no pilots and all those other professions. And there also is no Tim you were replying to because Tim is just a name. And making such a statement you already are a Neo-Advaitist. Werner Must you send all you posts twice?? -geo- one time is for non-existing neos one time is for himself eh, i mean for bbb and/or marc etc .... or some other who think he/she is(n't) this & that .... Must/mustn't you write/say everything/nothing/anything with/w/o these/those/ thing/things/signs ?/? Are/is you/they tyring/not trying to show/not show how smart/clever/creative you/they/none are/aren't?/? -geo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > Question: " ... is the tell tale sign of whether there is a recognition " . > > > > Tell-tale sign to whom? Who is looking for signs? > > > > " ... and don't necessarily reveal that stories have been seen through. " > > > > Don't necessarily reveal to whom? > > > > Others? > > > > Saying something like this suggests to me that it's very important to be seen as one who as seen through stories, or to see oneself as one who has seen through stories. Does it look like a 'spiritual self-image'? > > -tim- > > > > To whom are you asking or telling this? > > -geo- > > > > > Yes, a Neo-Advaitist telling that there is nothing to reveal and no one to reveal to is only trustworthy if he totally stops any communication. > > But the contrary is the case, Neo-Advaitists are as eager to spread their message to non-exsisting people as politicians, priests or missionaries are eager to bring their message to existing people. > > Werner " They " ... What " they " are doing ... I know what " they " are up to. And I'm eager to spread the message about " them " and what " they are doing " ... to you. But all is consciousness. And consciousness is its contents. So, one of its contents is reporting to another content what some of the other contents are doing. As if a content could know what another content is up to. Truly a very funny situation. Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2010 Report Share Posted February 1, 2010 Yes, a Neo-Advaitist telling that there is nothing to reveal and no one to reveal to is only trustworthy if he totally stops any communication. > > But the contrary is the case, Neo-Advaitists are as eager to spread their message to non-exsisting people as politicians, priests or missionaries are eager to bring their message to existing people. > > Werner " They " ... What " they " are doing ... I know what " they " are up to. And I'm eager to spread the message about " them " and what " they are doing " ... to you. But all is consciousness. And consciousness is its contents. So, one of its contents is reporting to another content what some of the other contents are doing. As if a content could know what another content is up to. Truly a very funny situation. Dan yes, content " Dan " , content " Dan " can never know what another content is up to .... So, no reason trying to even understand other contents... .... So, why do you try hard to spread this your neo thing to contents you just can't/don't know...? .... The only conclusion and message could be.... .... All contents are equal at their nature to each .... Means, they all are appearent real contents.....flowing through this their worlds.....by this thier great and fantastic consciousness .... Until there is silence .... Means no more content anymore who/which could see other contents Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , Marc <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Yes, a Neo-Advaitist telling that there is nothing to reveal and no one to reveal to is only trustworthy if he totally stops any communication. > > > > But the contrary is the case, Neo-Advaitists are as eager to spread their message to non-exsisting people as politicians, priests or missionaries are eager to bring their message to existing people. > > > > Werner > > " They " ... > > What " they " are doing ... > > I know what " they " are up to. > > And I'm eager to spread the message about " them " and what " they are doing " ... to you. > > But all is consciousness. > > And consciousness is its contents. > > So, one of its contents is reporting to another content what some of the other contents are doing. > > As if a content could know what another content is up to. > > Truly a very funny situation. > > Dan > > > > yes, content " Dan " , > > content " Dan " can never know what another content is up to > > ... > > So, no reason trying to even understand other contents... > > ... > > So, why do you try hard to spread this your neo thing to contents you just can't/don't know...? > > ... > > The only conclusion and message could be.... > > ... > > All contents are equal at their nature to each > > ... > > Means, they all are appearent real contents.....flowing through this their worlds.....by this thier great and fantastic consciousness > > ... > > Until there is silence > > ... > > Means no more content anymore who/which could see other contents > > > > Marc Hey Marc - No " until. " Silence is. - D - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , Marc <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > Yes, a Neo-Advaitist telling that there is nothing to reveal and no one to reveal to is only trustworthy if he totally stops any communication. > > > > > > But the contrary is the case, Neo-Advaitists are as eager to spread their message to non-exsisting people as politicians, priests or missionaries are eager to bring their message to existing people. > > > > > > Werner > > > > " They " ... > > > > What " they " are doing ... > > > > I know what " they " are up to. > > > > And I'm eager to spread the message about " them " and what " they are doing " .... to you. > > > > But all is consciousness. > > > > And consciousness is its contents. > > > > So, one of its contents is reporting to another content what some of the other contents are doing. > > > > As if a content could know what another content is up to. > > > > Truly a very funny situation. > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > yes, content " Dan " , > > > > content " Dan " can never know what another content is up to > > > > ... > > > > So, no reason trying to even understand other contents... > > > > ... > > > > So, why do you try hard to spread this your neo thing to contents you just can't/don't know...? > > > > ... > > > > The only conclusion and message could be.... > > > > ... > > > > All contents are equal at their nature to each > > > > ... > > > > Means, they all are appearent real contents.....flowing through this their worlds.....by this thier great and fantastic consciousness > > > > ... > > > > Until there is silence > > > > ... > > > > Means no more content anymore who/which could see other contents > > > > > > > > Marc > > Hey Marc - > > No " until. " > > Silence is. > > - D - is it? is San Francisco near Strawberry Canyon? is there a midpoint between: L.A (and environs) and Strawberry Canyon and San Francisco? is timmy too far up north of Ca. too get to that Ca. mid point? is it possible we all meet and not say anything? is it probable we never have anyway? wouldn't it be nice? is there anything besides questions? can you advise without question? or would that be an answer? :-) ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 Yes, a Neo-Advaitist telling that there is nothing to reveal and no one to reveal to is only trustworthy if he totally stops any communication. > > > > But the contrary is the case, Neo-Advaitists are as eager to spread their message to non-exsisting people as politicians, priests or missionaries are eager to bring their message to existing people. > > > > Werner > > " They " ... > > What " they " are doing ... > > I know what " they " are up to. > > And I'm eager to spread the message about " them " and what " they are doing " ... to you. > > But all is consciousness. > > And consciousness is its contents. > > So, one of its contents is reporting to another content what some of the other contents are doing. > > As if a content could know what another content is up to. > > Truly a very funny situation. > > Dan > > > > yes, content " Dan " , > > content " Dan " can never know what another content is up to > > ... > > So, no reason trying to even understand other contents... > > ... > > So, why do you try hard to spread this your neo thing to contents you just can't/don't know...? > > ... > > The only conclusion and message could be.... > > ... > > All contents are equal at their nature to each > > ... > > Means, they all are appearent real contents.... .flowing through this their worlds.....by this thier great and fantastic consciousness > > ... > > Until there is silence > > ... > > Means no more content anymore who/which could see other contents > > > > Marc Hey Marc - No " until. " Silence is. - D - yes, content Dan... Silence has nothing in common with this bubbling content Dan .... Silence is .... and therefore there Are worlds filled up with bubbles of/by whatever contents .... Silence is .... nothing and nobody excluded .... Silence is .... and some real nobodies like Dan realy can't wait to tell it to some other real nobodies .... Marc Ps: real nobody = neo advaitin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 Hay, Marc - Here's a rake. Rake in all the hay that you are, until there's none 'out there' any more. Clean up ;-). but Timmy..... you are already a real nobody!....lol .... yes....get a Life! .... or not! .... up to Timmy .... to nobody else .... Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Marc <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > Yes, a Neo-Advaitist telling that there is nothing to reveal and no one to reveal to is only trustworthy if he totally stops any communication. > > > > > > > > But the contrary is the case, Neo-Advaitists are as eager to spread their message to non-exsisting people as politicians, priests or missionaries are eager to bring their message to existing people. > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > " They " ... > > > > > > What " they " are doing ... > > > > > > I know what " they " are up to. > > > > > > And I'm eager to spread the message about " them " and what " they are doing " .... to you. > > > > > > But all is consciousness. > > > > > > And consciousness is its contents. > > > > > > So, one of its contents is reporting to another content what some of the other contents are doing. > > > > > > As if a content could know what another content is up to. > > > > > > Truly a very funny situation. > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > yes, content " Dan " , > > > > > > content " Dan " can never know what another content is up to > > > > > > ... > > > > > > So, no reason trying to even understand other contents... > > > > > > ... > > > > > > So, why do you try hard to spread this your neo thing to contents you just can't/don't know...? > > > > > > ... > > > > > > The only conclusion and message could be.... > > > > > > ... > > > > > > All contents are equal at their nature to each > > > > > > ... > > > > > > Means, they all are appearent real contents.....flowing through this their worlds.....by this thier great and fantastic consciousness > > > > > > ... > > > > > > Until there is silence > > > > > > ... > > > > > > Means no more content anymore who/which could see other contents > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > Hey Marc - > > > > No " until. " > > > > Silence is. > > > > - D - > > > is it? > > is San Francisco near Strawberry Canyon? > > is there a midpoint between: > > L.A (and environs) and Strawberry Canyon and San Francisco? > > is timmy too far up north of Ca. too get to that Ca. mid point? > > is it possible we all meet and not say anything? > > is it probable we never have anyway? > > wouldn't it be nice? > > is there anything besides questions? > > can you advise without question? > > or would that be an answer? > > :-) > > .b b.b. hey, let's all meet at Club One in Fresno and play cards! lol, ..d d.d. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , Marc <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Yes, a Neo-Advaitist telling that there is nothing to reveal and no one to reveal to is only trustworthy if he totally stops any communication. > > > > > > But the contrary is the case, Neo-Advaitists are as eager to spread their message to non-exsisting people as politicians, priests or missionaries are eager to bring their message to existing people. > > > > > > Werner > > > > " They " ... > > > > What " they " are doing ... > > > > I know what " they " are up to. > > > > And I'm eager to spread the message about " them " and what " they are doing " .... to you. > > > > But all is consciousness. > > > > And consciousness is its contents. > > > > So, one of its contents is reporting to another content what some of the other contents are doing. > > > > As if a content could know what another content is up to. > > > > Truly a very funny situation. > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > yes, content " Dan " , > > > > content " Dan " can never know what another content is up to > > > > ... > > > > So, no reason trying to even understand other contents... > > > > ... > > > > So, why do you try hard to spread this your neo thing to contents you just can't/don't know...? > > > > ... > > > > The only conclusion and message could be.... > > > > ... > > > > All contents are equal at their nature to each > > > > ... > > > > Means, they all are appearent real contents.... .flowing through this their worlds.....by this thier great and fantastic consciousness > > > > ... > > > > Until there is silence > > > > ... > > > > Means no more content anymore who/which could see other contents > > > > > > > > Marc > > Hey Marc - > > No " until. " > > Silence is. > > - D - > > > yes, content Dan... > > Silence has nothing in common with this bubbling content Dan > > ... > > Silence is > > ... > > and therefore there Are worlds filled up with bubbles of/by whatever contents > > ... > > Silence is > > ... > > nothing and nobody excluded > > ... > > Silence is > > ... > > and some real nobodies like Dan realy can't wait to tell it to some other real nobodies > > ... > > > > Marc > > > > Ps: real nobody = neo advaitin > > P.S. There isn't any content. - D - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Marc <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes, a Neo-Advaitist telling that there is nothing to reveal and no one to reveal to is only trustworthy if he totally stops any communication. > > > > > > > > > > But the contrary is the case, Neo-Advaitists are as eager to spread their message to non-exsisting people as politicians, priests or missionaries are eager to bring their message to existing people. > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > " They " ... > > > > > > > > What " they " are doing ... > > > > > > > > I know what " they " are up to. > > > > > > > > And I'm eager to spread the message about " them " and what " they are doing " ... to you. > > > > > > > > But all is consciousness. > > > > > > > > And consciousness is its contents. > > > > > > > > So, one of its contents is reporting to another content what some of the other contents are doing. > > > > > > > > As if a content could know what another content is up to. > > > > > > > > Truly a very funny situation. > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes, content " Dan " , > > > > > > > > content " Dan " can never know what another content is up to > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > So, no reason trying to even understand other contents... > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > So, why do you try hard to spread this your neo thing to contents you just can't/don't know...? > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > The only conclusion and message could be.... > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > All contents are equal at their nature to each > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > Means, they all are appearent real contents.....flowing through this their worlds.....by this thier great and fantastic consciousness > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > Until there is silence > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > Means no more content anymore who/which could see other contents > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > Hey Marc - > > > > > > No " until. " > > > > > > Silence is. > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > is it? > > > > is San Francisco near Strawberry Canyon? > > > > is there a midpoint between: > > > > L.A (and environs) and Strawberry Canyon and San Francisco? > > > > is timmy too far up north of Ca. too get to that Ca. mid point? > > > > is it possible we all meet and not say anything? > > > > is it probable we never have anyway? > > > > wouldn't it be nice? > > > > is there anything besides questions? > > > > can you advise without question? > > > > or would that be an answer? > > > > :-) > > > > .b b.b. > > > hey, let's all meet at Club One in Fresno and play cards! > > lol, > > .d d.d. we don't have to play cards. we are cards already. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Marc <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Yes, a Neo-Advaitist telling that there is nothing to reveal and no one to reveal to is only trustworthy if he totally stops any communication. > > > > > > > > > > > > But the contrary is the case, Neo-Advaitists are as eager to spread their message to non-exsisting people as politicians, priests or missionaries are eager to bring their message to existing people. > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > " They " ... > > > > > > > > > > What " they " are doing ... > > > > > > > > > > I know what " they " are up to. > > > > > > > > > > And I'm eager to spread the message about " them " and what " they are doing " ... to you. > > > > > > > > > > But all is consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > And consciousness is its contents. > > > > > > > > > > So, one of its contents is reporting to another content what some of the other contents are doing. > > > > > > > > > > As if a content could know what another content is up to. > > > > > > > > > > Truly a very funny situation. > > > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes, content " Dan " , > > > > > > > > > > content " Dan " can never know what another content is up to > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > So, no reason trying to even understand other contents... > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > So, why do you try hard to spread this your neo thing to contents you just can't/don't know...? > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > The only conclusion and message could be.... > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > All contents are equal at their nature to each > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > Means, they all are appearent real contents.....flowing through this their worlds.....by this thier great and fantastic consciousness > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > Until there is silence > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > Means no more content anymore who/which could see other contents > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > Hey Marc - > > > > > > > > No " until. " > > > > > > > > Silence is. > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > is it? > > > > > > is San Francisco near Strawberry Canyon? > > > > > > is there a midpoint between: > > > > > > L.A (and environs) and Strawberry Canyon and San Francisco? > > > > > > is timmy too far up north of Ca. too get to that Ca. mid point? > > > > > > is it possible we all meet and not say anything? > > > > > > is it probable we never have anyway? > > > > > > wouldn't it be nice? > > > > > > is there anything besides questions? > > > > > > can you advise without question? > > > > > > or would that be an answer? > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > hey, let's all meet at Club One in Fresno and play cards! > > > > lol, > > > > .d d.d. > > > we don't have to play cards. > > we are cards already. > > .b b.b. u r such a card! - d - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Marc <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, a Neo-Advaitist telling that there is nothing to reveal and no one to reveal to is only trustworthy if he totally stops any communication. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But the contrary is the case, Neo-Advaitists are as eager to spread their message to non-exsisting people as politicians, priests or missionaries are eager to bring their message to existing people. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > > > " They " ... > > > > > > > > > > > > What " they " are doing ... > > > > > > > > > > > > I know what " they " are up to. > > > > > > > > > > > > And I'm eager to spread the message about " them " and what " they are doing " ... to you. > > > > > > > > > > > > But all is consciousness. > > > > > > > > > > > > And consciousness is its contents. > > > > > > > > > > > > So, one of its contents is reporting to another content what some of the other contents are doing. > > > > > > > > > > > > As if a content could know what another content is up to. > > > > > > > > > > > > Truly a very funny situation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes, content " Dan " , > > > > > > > > > > > > content " Dan " can never know what another content is up to > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > So, no reason trying to even understand other contents... > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > So, why do you try hard to spread this your neo thing to contents you just can't/don't know...? > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > The only conclusion and message could be.... > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > All contents are equal at their nature to each > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > Means, they all are appearent real contents.....flowing through this their worlds.....by this thier great and fantastic consciousness > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > Until there is silence > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > Means no more content anymore who/which could see other contents > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > Hey Marc - > > > > > > > > > > No " until. " > > > > > > > > > > Silence is. > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > is it? > > > > > > > > is San Francisco near Strawberry Canyon? > > > > > > > > is there a midpoint between: > > > > > > > > L.A (and environs) and Strawberry Canyon and San Francisco? > > > > > > > > is timmy too far up north of Ca. too get to that Ca. mid point? > > > > > > > > is it possible we all meet and not say anything? > > > > > > > > is it probable we never have anyway? > > > > > > > > wouldn't it be nice? > > > > > > > > is there anything besides questions? > > > > > > > > can you advise without question? > > > > > > > > or would that be an answer? > > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > > > > hey, let's all meet at Club One in Fresno and play cards! > > > > > > lol, > > > > > > .d d.d. > > > > > > we don't have to play cards. > > > > we are cards already. > > > > .b b.b. > > u r such a card! > > - d - nah. baba is just a mark in the hall. on the wall. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 Nisargadatta, Marc <dennis_travis33@ ...> wrote: > > Yes, a Neo-Advaitist telling that there is nothing to reveal and no one to reveal to is only trustworthy if he totally stops any communication. > > > > > > But the contrary is the case, Neo-Advaitists are as eager to spread their message to non-exsisting people as politicians, priests or missionaries are eager to bring their message to existing people. > > > > > > Werner > > > > " They " ... > > > > What " they " are doing ... > > > > I know what " they " are up to. > > > > And I'm eager to spread the message about " them " and what " they are doing " .... to you. > > > > But all is consciousness. > > > > And consciousness is its contents. > > > > So, one of its contents is reporting to another content what some of the other contents are doing. > > > > As if a content could know what another content is up to. > > > > Truly a very funny situation. > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > yes, content " Dan " , > > > > content " Dan " can never know what another content is up to > > > > ... > > > > So, no reason trying to even understand other contents... > > > > ... > > > > So, why do you try hard to spread this your neo thing to contents you just can't/don't know...? > > > > ... > > > > The only conclusion and message could be.... > > > > ... > > > > All contents are equal at their nature to each > > > > ... > > > > Means, they all are appearent real contents.... .flowing through this their worlds.....by this thier great and fantastic consciousness > > > > ... > > > > Until there is silence > > > > ... > > > > Means no more content anymore who/which could see other contents > > > > > > > > Marc > > Hey Marc - > > No " until. " > > Silence is. > > - D - > > > yes, content Dan... > > Silence has nothing in common with this bubbling content Dan > > ... > > Silence is > > ... > > and therefore there Are worlds filled up with bubbles of/by whatever contents > > ... > > Silence is > > ... > > nothing and nobody excluded > > ... > > Silence is > > ... > > and some real nobodies like Dan realy can't wait to tell it to some other real nobodies > > ... > > > > Marc > > > > Ps: real nobody = neo advaitin > > P.S. There isn't any content. - D - ohhh....seeing that Dan is sooo busy in here writing like a champion....in the number of messages.....like some other Freaks of same kind.... i doubt that there isn't " any content " behind..... there surely is some ignorance hiding somewhere.....giving Dan the energy to keep on busy active and writing..... .... go on, Danny boy... .... leave all this Your shit....of knowledge/unknown/unknowing/not knowing/consciousness/neo advaitin etc....business .... go on please... and play this your game of " (neo)enlightenment " ....like some other kids in here... .... who have nothing else in mind....but themself.... this little moving ego....filling up the content.... again and again and again .... lol Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.