Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

today's Nisargadatta

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , Marc <dennis_travis33@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > All is a play in consciousness. All divisions are illusory. You can

know the false only. The true you must yourself *be*.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -- from " I Am That "

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > wherever there is a content ...like the One of neo " Tim " as for

example....

> > > > > >

> > > > > > " who " is mixed up with other appearent contents of same

kind...means, of illusion only...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > there is a restless mind/consciousness running because of

illusion/ignorance

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > the only One content who is responsible for such meaningless

attitudes is content " Tim " ....nobody else

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ;)

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > content " Marc "

> > > > >

> > > > > Hey again, Marc.

> > > > >

> > > > > Contents don't do anything, see anything, be responsible or

irresponsible - nor interact with other contents.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thus, consciousness is its contents, and vice versa.

> > > > >

> > > > > - D -

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > it's the most romantic song ever sung:

> > > >

> > > > " Baby I Want To F*ck You So Bad I Could Shit "

> > > >

> > > > yodeled solo a cappella by a deaf mute.

> > > >

> > > > .b b.b.

> > >

> > > And the echo returned:

> > >

> > > " Momma, I needed to sh*t so bad, I couldn't f*ck "

> > >

> > > snorted in chorus by a dancing line of legless decapitated h*rsemen.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > deaf mutes create no sounds which can go forth to create echos dabbo.

> >

> > exactly what universe do you dwell in?

> >

> > .b b.b.

>

> the universe where you just heard about an echo, and wrote back.

>

> - d -

 

 

that's not my universe.

 

it's your multiverse dabbo.

 

where anything you want to make believe will come true.

 

Jiminy Cricket dabbo..

 

" wrote back " ????

 

are you a reader then?

 

hahahahahahahaaaaaaaaa!

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , Marc <dennis_travis33@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta, Marc <dennis_travis33@ ...>

wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > All is a play in consciousness. All divisions are illusory. You can

know the false only. The true you must yourself *be*.

> > > > >

> > > > > -- from " I Am That "

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > wherever there is a content ...like the One of neo " Tim " as for

example....

> > > > >

> > > > > " who " is mixed up with other appearent contents of same kind...means,

of illusion only...

> > > > >

> > > > > there is a restless mind/consciousness running because of

illusion/ignorance

> > > > >

> > > > > ...

> > > > >

> > > > > the only One content who is responsible for such meaningless attitudes

is content " Tim " ....nobody else

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ;)

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > content " Marc "

> > > >

> > > > Hey again, Marc.

> > > >

> > > > Contents don't do anything, see anything, be responsible or

irresponsible - nor interact with other contents.

> > > >

> > > > Thus, consciousness is its contents, and vice versa.

> > > >

> > > > - D -

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > content Dan don't do anything....don't see anything and isn't

responsible for anything?...

> > > >

> > > > yes, this make you a perfect real nobody!

> > > >

> > > > one of this neo freaks who behave like somebody talking during sleep...

> > > >

> > > > ...

> > > >

> > > > up to content Dan...

> > > >

> > > > to this your fantastic " consciousness " ...

> > > >

> > > > to finally get into real Nothingness

> > > >

> > > > ...

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > :)

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Marc

> > >

> > > Your imagination runs wild.

> > >

> > > - D -

> >

> >

> > yours runs tame and lame dabbo.

> >

> > .b b.b.

>

> so you imagine.

>

> - d -

 

 

thanks for proving the point.

 

you didn't have to but you always do.

 

that's nice of you but also very stupid.

 

that's our dabbo!

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , Marc <dennis_travis33@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Hey again, Marc.

> > > > >

> > > > > Contents don't do anything, see anything, be responsible or

irresponsible - nor interact with other contents.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thus, consciousness is its contents, and vice versa.

> > > > >

> > > > > - D -

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > In a way, contents interact with other contents.

> > > >

> > > > " Language fooling language " , 'member? ;-).

> > > >

> > > > Bodies interact with other bodies, as well.

> > > >

> > > > One could say 'things act on things'.

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta said that, fwiw :-p.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > no no...

> > > >

> > > > Timmy only interact by/with/for/from/because of....Timmy

> > > >

> > > > ...

> > > >

> > > > without knwing about

> > > >

> > > > ...

> > > >

> > > > and this!, again....makes you a real nobody

> > > >

> > > > ...

> > > >

> > > > one of this neo loosers

> > > >

> > > > ...

> > > >

> > > > lol

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Marc

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Ps: i interact with emptyness in here....real emptyness.....means,

Nothingness

> > > >

> > > > :)

> > >

> > > yes, you are a looser all right.

> > >

> > > - d -

> >

> >

> > looser than what loser?

> >

> > dabbo you're the best when it comes to faux pas.

> >

> > LOL!

> >

> > .b b.b.

>

> let it loose.

>

> - d -

 

 

no problem loser.

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , Marc <dennis_travis33@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > All is a play in consciousness. All divisions are illusory. You can

know the false only. The true you must yourself *be*.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -- from " I Am That "

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > wherever there is a content ...like the One of neo " Tim " as for

example....

> > > > > >

> > > > > > " who " is mixed up with other appearent contents of same

kind...means, of illusion only...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > there is a restless mind/consciousness running because of

illusion/ignorance

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > the only One content who is responsible for such meaningless

attitudes is content " Tim " ....nobody else

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ;)

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > content " Marc "

> > > > >

> > > > > Hey again, Marc.

> > > > >

> > > > > Contents don't do anything, see anything, be responsible or

irresponsible - nor interact with other contents.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thus, consciousness is its contents, and vice versa.

> > > > >

> > > > > - D -

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > In a way, contents interact with other contents.

> > > >

> > > > " Language fooling language " , 'member? ;-).

> > > >

> > > > Bodies interact with other bodies, as well.

> > > >

> > > > One could say 'things act on things'.

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta said that, fwiw :-p.

> > >

> > > Only in imagination.

> > >

> > > - D -

> >

> >

> > you're imagining that dabbo.

> >

> > .b b.b.

>

> you're imagining that dabbo, babbo.

>

> - d -

 

 

oh you're so clever.

 

nah not really.

 

i just wanted you to think back to what your mom evidently told you.

 

she was wrong of course.

 

or maybe she was just a good mom.

 

but it's time for you to understand that she was just being kind.

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...