Guest guest Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg wrote: > > > > > > > If you don't have time, maybe, you should temporarily make someone else moderator and your problem will be likely solved. > > > > > > > > > With much respect, > > > ac > > > > > I don't mind if a respected member becomes the co-moderator. I always admired Dan's non-stick style. If Dan is interested and if people are not violently opposed to it...we can give it a try. What do you all think? > Dear Hur Jee: If Dan Jee is willing; I see no harm in him acting as moderator. Pete can be another excellent choice, if Dan is not willing. Pete already moderates two forums and might be able to moderate this one. You can remain the owner and this way you still be able to oversee/change, if you need to. I think you have put lot of effort behind this forum and you have been a very gracious host. Nothing that I say should take away from that fact. This forum has many member and many of whom are quite excellent. With warm regards, ac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg wrote: > > > > > > > If you don't have time, maybe, you should temporarily make someone else moderator and your problem will be likely solved. > > > > > > > > > With much respect, > > > ac > > > > > I don't mind if a respected member becomes the co-moderator. I always admired Dan's non-stick style. If Dan is interested and if people are not violently opposed to it...we can give it a try. What do you all think? well i would just love to help.. but i don't think. i found it a bit of a waste of time. but for whom it was a waste exactly i really can't say. i never found out and i quit looking long ago. perhaps All still thinks and can give good solid answer. baba has no answer no time no thought no one no all. often causing a violent reaction that's a sight to see. who sees is the question without answer or cause. maybe it's just a number. an elementary one at that. of course if it is one it's elementary. at least i'd think if i thought at all. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > If you don't have time, maybe, you should temporarily make someone else moderator and your problem will be likely solved. > > > > > > > > > > > > With much respect, > > > > ac > > > > > > > > I don't mind if a respected member becomes the co-moderator. I always admired Dan's non-stick style. If Dan is interested and if people are not violently opposed to it...we can give it a try. What do you all think? > > > > > Dear Hur Jee: > > If Dan Jee is willing; I see no harm in him acting as moderator. Pete can be another excellent choice, if Dan is not willing. Pete already moderates two forums and might be able to moderate this one. You can remain the owner and this way you still be able to oversee/change, if you need to. > > I think you have put lot of effort behind this forum and you have been a very gracious host. Nothing that I say should take away from that fact. This forum has many member and many of whom are quite excellent. > > With warm regards, > ac oh and what ac thinks is so very very important. because ac thinks he's important. this equation goes together beautifully. unfortunately.. it's falsity is easily shown. but that would just piss off the little duffer. wun you siwwy wabbit.....wun! elmer fuddy dudd. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 Thanks, Hur. I appreciate hearing how you view my presence here. I enjoy your presence here as well. I once moderated one of these groups, a long time ago. And guess what? Personality clashes that occurred on the group led me to find that it was taking time and energy to deal with the projections, accusations and antagonisms going on. And there were accusations against me as moderator because I didn't " intervene sufficiently " in " abusive personal comments " being made by " one member " (someone who does not post on Nisargadatta list). Sound familiar? LOL! So, I dissolved the group - too much drama, and an expectation that people had of me that I would " straighten things out " by providing responses to abusive comments, or " kick someone out " because " they deserved to be kicked out " (even though I didn't see it that way). Hilarious. I like your style, and I appreciate the explanations you've offered recently. I appreciate very much hearing your voice here - it's great! As for this group - wouldn't change a thing. Keep on keepin' on. You know, when your voice is heard, that affects the group. Have you noticed? I agree with what you say about nonduality being a shock to the dualistic frame of reference (or " mind " ). Also, I agree that one of the possible benefits of an internet group is that it can have a lot of leeway for ways to express - as compared with a face-to-face meeting in " real time. " Of course, that depends on how the members are understanding the communications on the list - if they don't " suspend judgmentalness " they are likely to be " plenty insulted. " Things are said that might lead people to experience that they are engaged in a traumatic confrontation, if it were a face-to-face meeting. Of course, a person can be triggered into a sense of trauma from words read on a screen, as well. It depends on the memories of experience they bring to the reading, and whether words that are read serve as a " trigger. " It is possible to get reactions posted that suggest a reader has " perceived trauma " due to words they read. So, thanks for the offer - but no thanks. I vote to keep you as moderator. But please don't make a poll about it. It doesn't need a poll. By the way - as mentioned by ac there are lists that have more moderation, such as Nonduality Salon or GuruRatings. Also, there is OpenAwareness, which is highly moderated. And an OAStudy Group and an OADiscussion Group. And Pete runs at leat three groups which he moderates according to the brain of Pete. So, there are alternatives, and no need for every site to be the same. I guess there are all kinds of arrogance - different versions of it. One version might be to come on someone's list and tell them how they should moderate their list. I've been called arrogant at times, including on this list. I suppose it depends on who is saying it and why. It might be a badge of honor, depending on who is calling me arrogant and why they are saying that. LOL. Enjoying your list, as always - and glad to hear from you! - Dan - Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg wrote: > > > > > > > If you don't have time, maybe, you should temporarily make someone else moderator and your problem will be likely solved. > > > > > > > > > With much respect, > > > ac > > > > > I don't mind if a respected member becomes the co-moderator. I always admired Dan's non-stick style. If Dan is interested and if people are not violently opposed to it...we can give it a try. What do you all think? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > If you don't have time, maybe, you should temporarily make someone else moderator and your problem will be likely solved. > > > > > > > > > > > > With much respect, > > > > ac > > > > > > > > I don't mind if a respected member becomes the co-moderator. I always admired Dan's non-stick style. If Dan is interested and if people are not violently opposed to it...we can give it a try. What do you all think? > > > > > Dear Hur Jee: > > If Dan Jee is willing; I see no harm in him acting as moderator. Pete can be another excellent choice, if Dan is not willing. Pete already moderates two forums and might be able to moderate this one. You can remain the owner and this way you still be able to oversee/change, if you need to. > > I think you have put lot of effort behind this forum and you have been a very gracious host. Nothing that I say should take away from that fact. This forum has many member and many of whom are quite excellent. > > With warm regards, > ac Thanks ac and Hur - but no thanks -- Pete already moderates three " nondual philosophy " type lists - he doesn't need another. If you like his style, join one of those lists. He also has another list in Spanish, I believe. For all I know, he may have others (lol). Dan does not need the role of moderating a list - if he did, he would have kept " The Room of This " going ... or he would start one now. But then, I would probably have to close it down again - and who wants to go through that again - the people who ask you to please keep it open, who you have to make explanations to -- the good-byes that have to be said ... nah ... Dan for now prefers being as the wind, which bloweth where it listeth. Or is that lispeth? I doth forgeteth. - Dan - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 Dear Dan Ji: Thanks a lot for your detailed message. Your message below amply illustrates... " what could happen " ... when, a sensible and reasonable action is not taken in time. Having a functional, useful, popular, useful list closed down because of the antics of one mentally deranged member is not the outcome I am looking forward to. I would rather have that deranged member removed to maintain the sanity of the group. There is a reason that serial child molesters* are removed from the rest of the society. I prefer that over having to close down the school. The policy of " I will never remove someone " or " I will never interfere " can result into disastrous and avoidable results. Hur ji likely doesn't to that 'never interfere. I say that because he has moderated, removed Bob ji in the past. As he himself has said, moderating takes too much time and removing too might take time if the person keeps joining again and again... as Bob ji might have done. Banning the email ID and thus, preventing the offender from ever joining again, might be next logical step, if needed. Both you and Hur ji are/were lucky that you have/had only one deranged member who was the reason behind the vast majority of the problems and the solution was as simple as removing that member. Having a popular and useful list go down because of one emotionally unstable member wouldn't be wise in my view. Your list was a good one. It had many excellent members. Many members liked interacting there and many professed to benefit tremendously from it. And, it seems you put lot of energy and effort behind it. I am not sure having to close down such a good list because of the mental instability of one member was the wisest thing to do. Had you heed the advice of the concerned members (, most of whom were quite good and really cared for the list,), and removed the source of problem early, perhaps, that excellent list might have been still functional and benefiting its grateful members. I would not want similar fate to come to this list. This list has been functional for a long time, it has many members, some of whom are quite excellent and if Bob ji is unable to function in an orderly way and needs to removed, I think it should be done. If removing him becomes time-consuming because he keeps joining again and again, his email ID can be banned thereby, ending the problem. With warm regards and best wishes, ac *(I am not saying that Bobji to a serial child molester. I am using the above as an example of a disruptive conduct.) [NNB] Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Thanks, Hur. I appreciate hearing how you view my presence here. I enjoy your presence here as well. > > I once moderated one of these groups, a long time ago. > > And guess what? > > Personality clashes that occurred on the group led me to find that it was taking time and energy to deal with the projections, accusations and antagonisms going on. And there were accusations against me as moderator because I didn't " intervene sufficiently " in " abusive personal comments " being made by " one member " (someone who does not post on Nisargadatta list). Sound familiar? > > LOL! > > So, I dissolved the group - too much drama, and an expectation that people had of me that I would " straighten things out " by providing responses to abusive comments, or " kick someone out " because " they deserved to be kicked out " (even though I didn't see it that way). > > Hilarious. > > I like your style, and I appreciate the explanations you've offered recently. I appreciate very much hearing your voice here - it's great! > > As for this group - wouldn't change a thing. > > Keep on keepin' on. > > You know, when your voice is heard, that affects the group. Have you noticed? > > I agree with what you say about nonduality being a shock to the dualistic frame of reference (or " mind " ). > > Also, I agree that one of the possible benefits of an internet group is that it can have a lot of leeway for ways to express - as compared with a face-to-face meeting in " real time. " Of course, that depends on how the members are understanding the communications on the list - if they don't " suspend judgmentalness " they are likely to be " plenty insulted. " Things are said that might lead people to experience that they are engaged in a traumatic confrontation, if it were a face-to-face meeting. Of course, a person can be triggered into a sense of trauma from words read on a screen, as well. It depends on the memories of experience they bring to the reading, and whether words that are read serve as a " trigger. " It is possible to get reactions posted that suggest a reader has " perceived trauma " due to words they read. > > So, thanks for the offer - but no thanks. > > I vote to keep you as moderator. But please don't make a poll about it. It doesn't need a poll. > > By the way - as mentioned by ac there are lists that have more moderation, such as Nonduality Salon or GuruRatings. Also, there is OpenAwareness, which is highly moderated. And an OAStudy Group and an OADiscussion Group. And Pete runs at leat three groups which he moderates according to the brain of Pete. So, there are alternatives, and no need for every site to be the same. > > I guess there are all kinds of arrogance - different versions of it. One version might be to come on someone's list and tell them how they should moderate their list. I've been called arrogant at times, including on this list. I suppose it depends on who is saying it and why. It might be a badge of honor, depending on who is calling me arrogant and why they are saying that. > > LOL. > > Enjoying your list, as always - and glad to hear from you! > > - Dan - > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > If you don't have time, maybe, you should temporarily make someone else moderator and your problem will be likely solved. > > > > > > > > > > > > With much respect, > > > > ac > > > > > > > > I don't mind if a respected member becomes the co-moderator. I always admired Dan's non-stick style. If Dan is interested and if people are not violently opposed to it...we can give it a try. What do you all think? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 ac what IS your problem? you're obsessed and hysterical. get a new schtick kid. lately you've become un-orderly and foulmouthed. not that that's a bad thing. but you seem to think it is. you fight yourself ac. and that's where it;'s at with me. if you want to fight. start without me. but every time you continue this stupidity.. you cause me to laugh. and goddamn it though i appreciate that.. i won't stop responding because you don't like it. get it? hahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaa! i do! LOL! ..b b.b. Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote: > > > Dear Dan Ji: > > Thanks a lot for your detailed message. > > > Your message below amply illustrates... " what could happen " ... when, a sensible and reasonable action is not taken in time. > > > Having a functional, useful, popular, useful list closed down because of the antics of one mentally deranged member is not the outcome I am looking forward to. I would rather have that deranged member removed to maintain the sanity of the group. > > > There is a reason that serial child molesters* are removed from the rest of the society. I prefer that over having to close down the school. > > > The policy of " I will never remove someone " or " I will never interfere " can result into disastrous and avoidable results. Hur ji likely doesn't to that 'never interfere. I say that because he has moderated, removed Bob ji in the past. As he himself has said, moderating takes too much time and removing too might take time if the person keeps joining again and again... as Bob ji might have done. Banning the email ID and thus, preventing the offender from ever joining again, might be next logical step, if needed. > > > Both you and Hur ji are/were lucky that you have/had only one deranged member who was the reason behind the vast majority of the problems and the solution was as simple as removing that member. Having a popular and useful list go down because of one emotionally unstable member wouldn't be wise in my view. > > > > Your list was a good one. It had many excellent members. Many members liked interacting there and many professed to benefit tremendously from it. And, it seems you put lot of energy and effort behind it. I am not sure having to close down such a good list because of the mental instability of one member was the wisest thing to do. Had you heed the advice of the concerned members (, most of whom were quite good and really cared for the list,), and removed the source of problem early, perhaps, that excellent list might have been still functional and benefiting its grateful members. > > I would not want similar fate to come to this list. This list has been functional for a long time, it has many members, some of whom are quite excellent and if Bob ji is unable to function in an orderly way and needs to removed, I think it should be done. If removing him becomes time-consuming because he keeps joining again and again, his email ID can be banned thereby, ending the problem. > > With warm regards and best wishes, > ac > > > > *(I am not saying that Bobji to a serial child molester. I am using the above as an example of a disruptive conduct.) > > > [NNB] > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Thanks, Hur. I appreciate hearing how you view my presence here. I enjoy your presence here as well. > > > > I once moderated one of these groups, a long time ago. > > > > And guess what? > > > > Personality clashes that occurred on the group led me to find that it was taking time and energy to deal with the projections, accusations and antagonisms going on. And there were accusations against me as moderator because I didn't " intervene sufficiently " in " abusive personal comments " being made by " one member " (someone who does not post on Nisargadatta list). Sound familiar? > > > > LOL! > > > > So, I dissolved the group - too much drama, and an expectation that people had of me that I would " straighten things out " by providing responses to abusive comments, or " kick someone out " because " they deserved to be kicked out " (even though I didn't see it that way). > > > > Hilarious. > > > > I like your style, and I appreciate the explanations you've offered recently. I appreciate very much hearing your voice here - it's great! > > > > As for this group - wouldn't change a thing. > > > > Keep on keepin' on. > > > > You know, when your voice is heard, that affects the group. Have you noticed? > > > > I agree with what you say about nonduality being a shock to the dualistic frame of reference (or " mind " ). > > > > Also, I agree that one of the possible benefits of an internet group is that it can have a lot of leeway for ways to express - as compared with a face-to-face meeting in " real time. " Of course, that depends on how the members are understanding the communications on the list - if they don't " suspend judgmentalness " they are likely to be " plenty insulted. " Things are said that might lead people to experience that they are engaged in a traumatic confrontation, if it were a face-to-face meeting. Of course, a person can be triggered into a sense of trauma from words read on a screen, as well. It depends on the memories of experience they bring to the reading, and whether words that are read serve as a " trigger. " It is possible to get reactions posted that suggest a reader has " perceived trauma " due to words they read. > > > > So, thanks for the offer - but no thanks. > > > > I vote to keep you as moderator. But please don't make a poll about it. It doesn't need a poll. > > > > By the way - as mentioned by ac there are lists that have more moderation, such as Nonduality Salon or GuruRatings. Also, there is OpenAwareness, which is highly moderated. And an OAStudy Group and an OADiscussion Group. And Pete runs at leat three groups which he moderates according to the brain of Pete. So, there are alternatives, and no need for every site to be the same. > > > > I guess there are all kinds of arrogance - different versions of it. One version might be to come on someone's list and tell them how they should moderate their list. I've been called arrogant at times, including on this list. I suppose it depends on who is saying it and why. It might be a badge of honor, depending on who is calling me arrogant and why they are saying that. > > > > LOL. > > > > Enjoying your list, as always - and glad to hear from you! > > > > - Dan - > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you don't have time, maybe, you should temporarily make someone else moderator and your problem will be likely solved. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With much respect, > > > > > ac > > > > > > > > > > > I don't mind if a respected member becomes the co-moderator. I always admired Dan's non-stick style. If Dan is interested and if people are not violently opposed to it...we can give it a try. What do you all think? > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 15, 2010 Report Share Posted February 15, 2010 Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote: > > > Dear Dan Ji: > > Thanks a lot for your detailed message. > > > Your message below amply illustrates... " what could happen " ... when, a sensible and reasonable action is not taken in time. > > > Having a functional, useful, popular, useful list closed down because of the antics of one mentally deranged member is not the outcome I am looking forward to. I would rather have that deranged member removed to maintain the sanity of the group. > > > There is a reason that serial child molesters* are removed from the rest of the society. I prefer that over having to close down the school. > > > The policy of " I will never remove someone " or " I will never interfere " can result into disastrous and avoidable results. Hur ji likely doesn't to that 'never interfere. I say that because he has moderated, removed Bob ji in the past. As he himself has said, moderating takes too much time and removing too might take time if the person keeps joining again and again... as Bob ji might have done. Banning the email ID and thus, preventing the offender from ever joining again, might be next logical step, if needed. > > > Both you and Hur ji are/were lucky that you have/had only one deranged member who was the reason behind the vast majority of the problems and the solution was as simple as removing that member. D: That's not the case, AC. Consider that another member may not have liked that the first member would say things in a personal way. What the second member did " behind the scenes " to try to rectify everything may well have been even more disruptive. There was an issue with yet another member who was pretending to be someone else and trying to get attention in some unique ways. But that's enough said about that. > Having a popular and useful list go down because of one emotionally unstable member wouldn't be wise in my view. D: That's not what happened. But thanks for your interest. It got to be very consuming of time and energy, and at a certain point wasn't feasible anymore. I'm glad for the many members who participated respectfully and appeared to enjoy their time there, as long as it lasted. Of course, nothing just continues on and on forever. So, endings are as appropriate as beginnings (apparently). > Your list was a good one. It had many excellent members. Many members liked interacting there and many professed to benefit tremendously from it. And, it seems you put lot of energy and effort behind it. I am not sure having to close down such a good list because of the mental instability of one member was the wisest thing to do. Had you heed the advice of the concerned members (, most of whom were quite good and really cared for the list,), and removed the source of problem early, perhaps, that excellent list might have been still functional and benefiting its grateful members. D: From my observation, the ones who are self-righteously convinced that what they are doing is right, can actually wreak more havoc than the ones who enjoy putting other people down. Probably they all think that what they are doing is what makes sense to be doing. All aspects of the human circus. LOL. Thanks for your comments, AC - I enjoyed hearing what you've had to say and walking down memory lane for a moment. - Dan - (nothing new below) > I would not want similar fate to come to this list. This list has been functional for a long time, it has many members, some of whom are quite excellent and if Bob ji is unable to function in an orderly way and needs to removed, I think it should be done. If removing him becomes time-consuming because he keeps joining again and again, his email ID can be banned thereby, ending the problem. > > With warm regards and best wishes, > ac > > > > *(I am not saying that Bobji to a serial child molester. I am using the above as an example of a disruptive conduct.) > > > [NNB] > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Thanks, Hur. I appreciate hearing how you view my presence here. I enjoy your presence here as well. > > > > I once moderated one of these groups, a long time ago. > > > > And guess what? > > > > Personality clashes that occurred on the group led me to find that it was taking time and energy to deal with the projections, accusations and antagonisms going on. And there were accusations against me as moderator because I didn't " intervene sufficiently " in " abusive personal comments " being made by " one member " (someone who does not post on Nisargadatta list). Sound familiar? > > > > LOL! > > > > So, I dissolved the group - too much drama, and an expectation that people had of me that I would " straighten things out " by providing responses to abusive comments, or " kick someone out " because " they deserved to be kicked out " (even though I didn't see it that way). > > > > Hilarious. > > > > I like your style, and I appreciate the explanations you've offered recently. I appreciate very much hearing your voice here - it's great! > > > > As for this group - wouldn't change a thing. > > > > Keep on keepin' on. > > > > You know, when your voice is heard, that affects the group. Have you noticed? > > > > I agree with what you say about nonduality being a shock to the dualistic frame of reference (or " mind " ). > > > > Also, I agree that one of the possible benefits of an internet group is that it can have a lot of leeway for ways to express - as compared with a face-to-face meeting in " real time. " Of course, that depends on how the members are understanding the communications on the list - if they don't " suspend judgmentalness " they are likely to be " plenty insulted. " Things are said that might lead people to experience that they are engaged in a traumatic confrontation, if it were a face-to-face meeting. Of course, a person can be triggered into a sense of trauma from words read on a screen, as well. It depends on the memories of experience they bring to the reading, and whether words that are read serve as a " trigger. " It is possible to get reactions posted that suggest a reader has " perceived trauma " due to words they read. > > > > So, thanks for the offer - but no thanks. > > > > I vote to keep you as moderator. But please don't make a poll about it. It doesn't need a poll. > > > > By the way - as mentioned by ac there are lists that have more moderation, such as Nonduality Salon or GuruRatings. Also, there is OpenAwareness, which is highly moderated. And an OAStudy Group and an OADiscussion Group. And Pete runs at leat three groups which he moderates according to the brain of Pete. So, there are alternatives, and no need for every site to be the same. > > > > I guess there are all kinds of arrogance - different versions of it. One version might be to come on someone's list and tell them how they should moderate their list. I've been called arrogant at times, including on this list. I suppose it depends on who is saying it and why. It might be a badge of honor, depending on who is calling me arrogant and why they are saying that. > > > > LOL. > > > > Enjoying your list, as always - and glad to hear from you! > > > > - Dan - > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you don't have time, maybe, you should temporarily make someone else moderator and your problem will be likely solved. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With much respect, > > > > > ac > > > > > > > > > > > I don't mind if a respected member becomes the co-moderator. I always admired Dan's non-stick style. If Dan is interested and if people are not violently opposed to it...we can give it a try. What do you all think? > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 Marc...go have some rest. You have nothing more to say. -geo- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 [...] > > i won't stop responding because you don't like it. > > get it? Keep responding Bobji until Hur ji decides to remove you. Whether you respond to my posts or not is not my #1 concern. I would love to see this group function in a normal way where members can post and read without bombarded with excessive, unwarranted insults from you. My focus is geared towards that. My current focus is on you because you see you as clog blocking normal flow of communication on this forum. This group has a long history and has been functional without you. Because you have already become such clog through your excessive, abusive, aggressive postings, you might need to be removed so that the communication can flow normally again. This group has many excellent members and many like Werner, Dan, Pete are quite confrontational without ever having to make the list so dysfunctional that people become afraid to post or stop doing in order to save themselves from the effort of dealing with the barrage of unwarranted, meaningless insults. You might need this list, Bob. This list has been functional for a long time without you. ac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2010 Report Share Posted February 16, 2010 Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote: > > [...] > > > > > i won't stop responding because you don't like it. > > > > get it? > > > Keep responding Bobji until Hur ji decides to remove you. Whether you respond to my posts or not is not my #1 concern. I would love to see this group function in a normal way where members can post and read without bombarded with excessive, unwarranted insults from you. My focus is geared towards that. My current focus is on you because you see you as clog blocking normal flow of communication on this forum. > > > This group has a long history and has been functional without you. Because you have already become such clog through your excessive, abusive, aggressive postings, you might need to be removed so that the communication can flow normally again. > > This group has many excellent members and many like Werner, Dan, Pete are quite confrontational without ever having to make the list so dysfunctional that people become afraid to post or stop doing in order to save themselves from the effort of dealing with the barrage of unwarranted, meaningless insults. > > You might need this list, Bob. This list has been functional for a long time without you. > > ac bwa-ha ha ha ha ha ha! boo! :-) ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.