Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Posted February 14, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg wrote: > > ac, i agree with you. i know bob is offending but think about it...what's most shocking than non-duality for the dualist mind? it's scandalous. among the most shocking people of all, nondualists fans, bob is elementary. it's all tolerated here to a certain extent. yes, hur, it's a shock to the system that was structuring its activity based on having a " knower " situated in the system, and a conceit of self-existence built into the system. and with no attempt to have a position in the system, in the structure, there's no shock. just being as it is. - d - Quote
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Posted February 14, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > ac, i agree with you. i know bob is offending but think about it...what's most shocking than non-duality for the dualist mind? it's scandalous. among the most shocking people of all, nondualists fans, bob is elementary. it's all tolerated here to a certain extent. > > yes, hur, it's a shock to the system that was structuring its activity based on having a " knower " situated in the system, and a conceit of self-existence built into the system. > > and with no attempt to have a position in the system, in the structure, there's no shock. > > just being as it is. > > - d - you don't know what you're saying dabbo. i've consistently said that i don't know anything. wherein here is a " knower " ? is this difficult for you? just being as it is and all. :-) ..b b.b. Quote
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Posted February 14, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > ac, i agree with you. i know bob is offending but think about it...what's most shocking than non-duality for the dualist mind? it's scandalous. among the most shocking people of all, nondualists fans, bob is elementary. it's all tolerated here to a certain extent. > > yes, hur, it's a shock to the system that was structuring its activity based on having a " knower " situated in the system, and a conceit of self-existence built into the system. > > and with no attempt to have a position in the system, in the structure, there's no shock. > > just being as it is. > > - d - > it's hard for me to comprehend the nondual tech talk sometimes. i have to read it a few times. then i think maybe i got it intellectually. my reasoning is based on tradition. i think i heard a saying once or someone made up: among the mystics madness is allowed. dan, you're interested in being the co-moderator you can deal with all this craziness. Quote
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Posted February 14, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > > > ac, i agree with you. i know bob is offending but think about it...what's most shocking than non-duality for the dualist mind? it's scandalous. among the most shocking people of all, nondualists fans, bob is elementary. it's all tolerated here to a certain extent. > > > > yes, hur, it's a shock to the system that was structuring its activity based on having a " knower " situated in the system, and a conceit of self-existence built into the system. > > > > and with no attempt to have a position in the system, in the structure, there's no shock. > > > > just being as it is. > > > > - d - > > > > it's hard for me to comprehend the nondual tech talk sometimes. i have to read it a few times. then i think maybe i got it intellectually. my reasoning is based on tradition. i think i heard a saying once or someone made up: among the mystics madness is allowed. > dan, you're interested in being the co-moderator you can deal with all this craziness. > i meant IF you are interested... Quote
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Posted February 14, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > > > ac, i agree with you. i know bob is offending but think about it...what's most shocking than non-duality for the dualist mind? it's scandalous. among the most shocking people of all, nondualists fans, bob is elementary. it's all tolerated here to a certain extent. > > > > yes, hur, it's a shock to the system that was structuring its activity based on having a " knower " situated in the system, and a conceit of self-existence built into the system. > > > > and with no attempt to have a position in the system, in the structure, there's no shock. > > > > just being as it is. > > > > - d - > > > > it's hard for me to comprehend the nondual tech talk sometimes. i have to read it a few times. then i think maybe i got it intellectually. my reasoning is based on tradition. i think i heard a saying once or someone made up: among the mystics madness is allowed. > dan, you're interested in being the co-moderator you can deal with all this craziness. ah, well - it's just a matter of what makes a structure to be structured, that's all. A self-structure, a body-mind structure, a world-structure, a memory-structure, an experience-structure. Well, never mind. As for the craziness, i perfer dealing with it for myself - and not for " others. " being a moderator can be hell, huh? and hell has no place for heroes. well, let's just say in a crazy reality, it's insane to insist on sanity, and it's sane to be crazy. smiles, dan Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.