Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg wrote: > > ac, i agree with you. i know bob is offending but think about it...what's most shocking than non-duality for the dualist mind? it's scandalous. among the most shocking people of all, nondualists fans, bob is elementary. it's all tolerated here to a certain extent. yes, hur, it's a shock to the system that was structuring its activity based on having a " knower " situated in the system, and a conceit of self-existence built into the system. and with no attempt to have a position in the system, in the structure, there's no shock. just being as it is. - d - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > ac, i agree with you. i know bob is offending but think about it...what's most shocking than non-duality for the dualist mind? it's scandalous. among the most shocking people of all, nondualists fans, bob is elementary. it's all tolerated here to a certain extent. > > yes, hur, it's a shock to the system that was structuring its activity based on having a " knower " situated in the system, and a conceit of self-existence built into the system. > > and with no attempt to have a position in the system, in the structure, there's no shock. > > just being as it is. > > - d - you don't know what you're saying dabbo. i've consistently said that i don't know anything. wherein here is a " knower " ? is this difficult for you? just being as it is and all. :-) ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > ac, i agree with you. i know bob is offending but think about it...what's most shocking than non-duality for the dualist mind? it's scandalous. among the most shocking people of all, nondualists fans, bob is elementary. it's all tolerated here to a certain extent. > > yes, hur, it's a shock to the system that was structuring its activity based on having a " knower " situated in the system, and a conceit of self-existence built into the system. > > and with no attempt to have a position in the system, in the structure, there's no shock. > > just being as it is. > > - d - > it's hard for me to comprehend the nondual tech talk sometimes. i have to read it a few times. then i think maybe i got it intellectually. my reasoning is based on tradition. i think i heard a saying once or someone made up: among the mystics madness is allowed. dan, you're interested in being the co-moderator you can deal with all this craziness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > > > ac, i agree with you. i know bob is offending but think about it...what's most shocking than non-duality for the dualist mind? it's scandalous. among the most shocking people of all, nondualists fans, bob is elementary. it's all tolerated here to a certain extent. > > > > yes, hur, it's a shock to the system that was structuring its activity based on having a " knower " situated in the system, and a conceit of self-existence built into the system. > > > > and with no attempt to have a position in the system, in the structure, there's no shock. > > > > just being as it is. > > > > - d - > > > > it's hard for me to comprehend the nondual tech talk sometimes. i have to read it a few times. then i think maybe i got it intellectually. my reasoning is based on tradition. i think i heard a saying once or someone made up: among the mystics madness is allowed. > dan, you're interested in being the co-moderator you can deal with all this craziness. > i meant IF you are interested... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote: > > > > > > ac, i agree with you. i know bob is offending but think about it...what's most shocking than non-duality for the dualist mind? it's scandalous. among the most shocking people of all, nondualists fans, bob is elementary. it's all tolerated here to a certain extent. > > > > yes, hur, it's a shock to the system that was structuring its activity based on having a " knower " situated in the system, and a conceit of self-existence built into the system. > > > > and with no attempt to have a position in the system, in the structure, there's no shock. > > > > just being as it is. > > > > - d - > > > > it's hard for me to comprehend the nondual tech talk sometimes. i have to read it a few times. then i think maybe i got it intellectually. my reasoning is based on tradition. i think i heard a saying once or someone made up: among the mystics madness is allowed. > dan, you're interested in being the co-moderator you can deal with all this craziness. ah, well - it's just a matter of what makes a structure to be structured, that's all. A self-structure, a body-mind structure, a world-structure, a memory-structure, an experience-structure. Well, never mind. As for the craziness, i perfer dealing with it for myself - and not for " others. " being a moderator can be hell, huh? and hell has no place for heroes. well, let's just say in a crazy reality, it's insane to insist on sanity, and it's sane to be crazy. smiles, dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.