living on light

[Guest guest]

Geo, you wrote that a thousand years ago and it is all in the

forget-book by now - this just to tell you, that the explains

below is exactly the kind of explains which I am tired of. So

I say it again -- better find out by oneself about everything.

Went to the library to find a dirty filthy perverse " book " on

soul-travelling - re-incarnation. It couldn't be dirty enough.

Know the greed? Like when you gotta have a cake, or something.

I found a book on living on light. Now that's real shit and I

am lovin it. It confirms the certainty that body is not solid

and that we live in a thought-world, and we eat like pigs and

drink like soil not because we have to to but because we want

to. I know I do. I am this earth-life - physicality - because

I love it. I can always feed on light when I am dead - I know

I am dead already so to me - the difference is the filth, the

dirty bloody filthy life, which is life in flesh and blood. I

am almost too honest, but then I am already dead - whether or

not I am double-dead, not sure Double dead. Wonderful shit.

 

-Lene

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

> Lene: why are we on this planet earth anyway?

>

> geo: When I read Gurdjieffa long time ago it became obvious to me - I bought

the fish.

> Mankind is on earth for two absolutely different reasons.

>

> 1- To fulfill the needs - on a cosmic level - of the absolute in order to

sustain the creation and maintainence of the universe.

> In this sense man, or organic life on earth as a whole, are needed in order to

keep the ray of creation working. But for this

> what is needed is a mankind just like it is: mechanical, conditioned, with a

sense of herd consciousness. It is as if the earth

> needed the wars and collective conflicts to fulfill some of its needs. To this

there is nothing " we " must do - just remain ignorant

> and sleeping as we are. that is what is needed in a cosmic scale.

>

> 2- For a few there is the opportunity to change. That is what we are

discussing in these forums (not entering in that now).

> This change is a turn inward. A " new " movement in its nature. This new

movement is only attainable through the realization of

> non-separation, of " existing " . It is not meant to the majority for that would

disturb the other needs of the universe (#1) - but for some

> it is possible and necessary for the universe.... in this case not the same

reasons as in #1.

>

> This can be read in Ouspensky's (G's student) book called - In Search Of The

Miraculous.

>

> NOTE: Those are very quick and not very carefully chosen words up there.

> -geo-

>

>

> ---

> avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.

> Virus Database (VPS): 100218-1, 18/02/2010

> Tested on: 23/2/2010 10:38:21

> avast! - copyright © 1988-2010 ALWIL Software.

> http://www.avast.com

>