I AM THAT

[Guest guest]

-

Tim G.

Nisargadatta

Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:56 PM

Re: I AM THAT

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

 

> The patterning is clear when one isn't imaginarily " reaching out " outside

> of

> oneself to others (or to a 'world out there'), creating an imagined

> outside -- which, in turn, creates an imagined inside.

>

> It certainly isn't clear in the words, while an inner/outer is still

> attempted to be maintained.

>

> And so, such an attempt fails, as impossible, as contradictory.

>

> Then, all is clear.

> -tim-

>

> I don't digest well this idea around the insufficiency of words, for words

> are not different

> in their nature from other patterns. Lets face it... the ground is

> patterning as words, and as

> all and any patterns it can not be separated from the source. If one

> issues

> words that are

> inadequate and insufficient - that is what they are. I prefer the other

> way

> around.

> -geo-

>

 

Words can act as temporary, in-the-moment tools for opening.

 

That's all.

 

Otherwise, something is being remembered, something memorized, and it's the

same old, same old.

 

This has nothing to do with 'learning' something that is remembered, and

referred back to.

-tim-

 

Non referrable back to....non referreable in the present. Non reaferrable in

any way or mode.

Nonetheless there is nothing that is not referring to it. Strange....

-geo-

[Guest guest]

> I have always questioned everything for I knew I was present and also knew

> others where not.

 

Of course, others are present (when they're present, anyway).

 

They just aren't others.

-

No others

-geo-