Awareness, the Reconciliation Bill, Amendments Accepted

[Guest guest]

P.S. At the moment the assumption of dividedness drops,

sensing, awareness, and non-centered being are

the same - there won't be any problem understanding

that being aware doesn't constitute a " me " as an

add-on, nor a " body-mind object " as an add-on,

because there is only sensing. Empty sensing.

Nothing sensed.

 

P: Continuing my efforts to make you peel off

the last obscuring specks of meat from the

shiny bone of awareness let me note that the

last two phrases of the above paragraph negate

what you wrote before them. There can not be

only sensing, if sensing is qualified as empty vs.

distinguishing sensing with content.

 

The fact is, that even the deluded experience only

sensing, and qualification about content is an

utilitarian afterthought, such as, " there is a

big pothole ahead, so I better avoid it. "

 

The last phrase, " nothing sensed " could be taken

as a reiteration of empty sensing, or as an assertion

that when all divisions drop, nothingness is sensed

as the unknown, which is both awareness, and not aware

at all. So, which one did you mean?

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6 wrote:

>

> P.S. At the moment the assumption of dividedness drops,

> sensing, awareness, and non-centered being are

> the same - there won't be any problem understanding

> that being aware doesn't constitute a " me " as an

> add-on, nor a " body-mind object " as an add-on,

> because there is only sensing. Empty sensing.

> Nothing sensed.

>

> P: Continuing my efforts to make you peel off

> the last obscuring specks of meat from the

> shiny bone of awareness let me note that the

> last two phrases of the above paragraph negate

> what you wrote before them. There can not be

> only sensing, if sensing is qualified as empty vs.

> distinguishing sensing with content.

>

> The fact is, that even the deluded experience only

> sensing, and qualification about content is an

> utilitarian afterthought, such as, " there is a

> big pothole ahead, so I better avoid it. "

>

> The last phrase, " nothing sensed " could be taken

> as a reiteration of empty sensing, or as an assertion

> that when all divisions drop, nothingness is sensed

> as the unknown, which is both awareness, and not aware

> at all. So, which one did you mean?

 

There are no " deludeds " and " in-the-knows. "

 

Just stop living in make-believe.

 

(Regarding your question: I meant that there is no separable object being sensed

- it is not like there is something called " nothingness " and this

" nothingness-object " is being sensed.)

 

- D -