Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

where the i thought rises -- tim

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > you are just giving me words that represent ideas that you believe.

> > > > >

> > > > > these beliefs don't exist separate from you, the believer.

> > > > >

> > > > > it is your awareness that gives these beliefs whatever life they seem

to have.

> > > > > -d-

> > > > >

> > > > > Your? Your awareness? I would not add that " your " in there.

> > > > > -geo-

> > > >

> > > > It's just colloquial speech, Geo.

> > > >

> > > > What are you, the advaita word police?

> > > >

> > > > (I would not sign " geo " to my post ...)

> > > >

> > > > > it doesn't matter that they are beliefs that negate awareness and

assume separately existing things, like neurons, that supposedly produce

awareness.

> > > > >

> > > > > because awareness is right there, now, as you notice these beliefs,

which are thoughts, which are only there as you are aware of them.

> > > > > -d-

> > > > >

> > > > > The same. If you say " you are aware of them " then there is a split as

some you and some awareness. Then it becomes similar to

> > > > > the popular way awareness is used: some by-product of the brain.

> > > > > -geo-

> > > >

> > > > Nonsense. Are you so taken in by words?

> > > >

> > > > Constantly in these messages words like " you " and " I " are used.

> > > >

> > > > Are you scared of them?

> > > >

> > > > Do they disturb your reality?

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > - D -

> > > >

> > > > (nnb)

> > > >

> > >

> > > He said something like " the addiction to words must go " (paraphrased) on

the Nondualfuel list.

> > >

> > > Words can make one feel as though there are " others " (or not), if one's

reality is being defined by words.

> > >

> > > Obviously, there's no verbal formula or suggestion possible about how this

could change.

> > >

> >

> >

> > Nonsense,

> >

> > we are social beings and we communicate via words like for example here on

this list.

> >

>

> I'm not a social being.

>

> What's funny is that I was never able to socialize sanely and freely until

realizing this.

>

 

because we the intellectual path travellers live in our own heads. on the other

hand this online stuff is something we can control better, don't have to go out

and socialize with real people and face our real fears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > >

> > > you are just giving me words that represent ideas that you believe.

> > >

> > > these beliefs don't exist separate from you, the believer.

> > >

> > > it is your awareness that gives these beliefs whatever life they seem to

have.

> > > -d-

> > >

> > > Your? Your awareness? I would not add that " your " in there.

> > > -geo-

> >

> > It's just colloquial speech, Geo.

> >

> > What are you, the advaita word police?

> >

> > (I would not sign " geo " to my post ...)

> >

> > > it doesn't matter that they are beliefs that negate awareness and assume

separately existing things, like neurons, that supposedly produce awareness.

> > >

> > > because awareness is right there, now, as you notice these beliefs, which

are thoughts, which are only there as you are aware of them.

> > > -d-

> > >

> > > The same. If you say " you are aware of them " then there is a split as some

you and some awareness. Then it becomes similar to

> > > the popular way awareness is used: some by-product of the brain.

> > > -geo-

> >

> > Nonsense. Are you so taken in by words?

> >

> > Constantly in these messages words like " you " and " I " are used.

> >

> > Are you scared of them?

> >

> > Do they disturb your reality?

> >

> >

> > - D -

> >

> > (nnb)

> >

>

> He said something like " the addiction to words must go " (paraphrased) on the

Nondualfuel list.

>

> Words can make one feel as though there are " others " (or not), if one's

reality is being defined by words.

>

> Obviously, there's no verbal formula or suggestion possible about how this

could change.

 

Nah - agreed.

 

Silence speaks what words can't say.

 

One needs to listen. Preoccupation with self, words, thoughts, memories -

interferes with listening.

 

- D -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > you are just giving me words that represent ideas that you believe.

> > > >

> > > > these beliefs don't exist separate from you, the believer.

> > > >

> > > > it is your awareness that gives these beliefs whatever life they seem to

have.

> > > > -d-

> > > >

> > > > Your? Your awareness? I would not add that " your " in there.

> > > > -geo-

> > >

> > > It's just colloquial speech, Geo.

> > >

> > > What are you, the advaita word police?

> > >

> > > (I would not sign " geo " to my post ...)

> > >

> > > > it doesn't matter that they are beliefs that negate awareness and assume

separately existing things, like neurons, that supposedly produce awareness.

> > > >

> > > > because awareness is right there, now, as you notice these beliefs,

which are thoughts, which are only there as you are aware of them.

> > > > -d-

> > > >

> > > > The same. If you say " you are aware of them " then there is a split as

some you and some awareness. Then it becomes similar to

> > > > the popular way awareness is used: some by-product of the brain.

> > > > -geo-

> > >

> > > Nonsense. Are you so taken in by words?

> > >

> > > Constantly in these messages words like " you " and " I " are used.

> > >

> > > Are you scared of them?

> > >

> > > Do they disturb your reality?

> > >

> > >

> > > - D -

> > >

> > > (nnb)

> > >

> >

> > He said something like " the addiction to words must go " (paraphrased) on the

Nondualfuel list.

> >

> > Words can make one feel as though there are " others " (or not), if one's

reality is being defined by words.

> >

> > Obviously, there's no verbal formula or suggestion possible about how this

could change.

>

> Nah - agreed.

>

> Silence speaks what words can't say.

>

 

 

Yes, just as:

 

Feet walk what ears can't walk,

nose smells what arms can't smell,

 

Comparing silence with words is like comparin potatoes with shell fish.

 

But silence is silence and words are words. They both have their own place but

they cannot get compared.

 

Werner

 

 

> One needs to listen. Preoccupation with self, words, thoughts, memories -

interferes with listening.

>

> - D -

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

dan330033

Nisargadatta

Thursday, March 25, 2010 12:31 PM

Re: where the " i thought " rises -- tim

 

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > >

> > > you are just giving me words that represent ideas that you believe.

> > >

> > > these beliefs don't exist separate from you, the believer.

> > >

> > > it is your awareness that gives these beliefs whatever life they seem

> > > to have.

> > > -d-

> > >

> > > Your? Your awareness? I would not add that " your " in there.

> > > -geo-

> >

> > It's just colloquial speech, Geo.

> >

> > What are you, the advaita word police?

> >

> > (I would not sign " geo " to my post ...)

> >

> > > it doesn't matter that they are beliefs that negate awareness and

> > > assume separately existing things, like neurons, that supposedly

> > > produce awareness.

> > >

> > > because awareness is right there, now, as you notice these beliefs,

> > > which are thoughts, which are only there as you are aware of them.

> > > -d-

> > >

> > > The same. If you say " you are aware of them " then there is a split as

> > > some you and some awareness. Then it becomes similar to

> > > the popular way awareness is used: some by-product of the brain.

> > > -geo-

> >

> > Nonsense. Are you so taken in by words?

> >

> > Constantly in these messages words like " you " and " I " are used.

> >

> > Are you scared of them?

> >

> > Do they disturb your reality?

> >

> >

> > - D -

> >

> > (nnb)

> >

>

> He said something like " the addiction to words must go " (paraphrased) on

> the Nondualfuel list.

>

> Words can make one feel as though there are " others " (or not), if one's

> reality is being defined by words.

>

> Obviously, there's no verbal formula or suggestion possible about how this

> could change.

 

Nah - agreed.

 

Silence speaks what words can't say.

 

One needs to listen. Preoccupation with self, words, thoughts, memories -

interferes with listening.

 

- D -

 

Yea -Agreed.

Why are you two so preoccupied with geo's words?

-geo-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > you are just giving me words that represent ideas that you believe.

> > > > >

> > > > > these beliefs don't exist separate from you, the believer.

> > > > >

> > > > > it is your awareness that gives these beliefs whatever life they seem

to have.

> > > > > -d-

> > > > >

> > > > > Your? Your awareness? I would not add that " your " in there.

> > > > > -geo-

> > > >

> > > > It's just colloquial speech, Geo.

> > > >

> > > > What are you, the advaita word police?

> > > >

> > > > (I would not sign " geo " to my post ...)

> > > >

> > > > > it doesn't matter that they are beliefs that negate awareness and

assume separately existing things, like neurons, that supposedly produce

awareness.

> > > > >

> > > > > because awareness is right there, now, as you notice these beliefs,

which are thoughts, which are only there as you are aware of them.

> > > > > -d-

> > > > >

> > > > > The same. If you say " you are aware of them " then there is a split as

some you and some awareness. Then it becomes similar to

> > > > > the popular way awareness is used: some by-product of the brain.

> > > > > -geo-

> > > >

> > > > Nonsense. Are you so taken in by words?

> > > >

> > > > Constantly in these messages words like " you " and " I " are used.

> > > >

> > > > Are you scared of them?

> > > >

> > > > Do they disturb your reality?

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > - D -

> > > >

> > > > (nnb)

> > > >

> > >

> > > He said something like " the addiction to words must go " (paraphrased) on

the Nondualfuel list.

> > >

> > > Words can make one feel as though there are " others " (or not), if one's

reality is being defined by words.

> > >

> > > Obviously, there's no verbal formula or suggestion possible about how this

could change.

> >

> > Nah - agreed.

> >

> > Silence speaks what words can't say.

> >

>

>

> Yes, just as:

>

> Feet walk what ears can't walk,

> nose smells what arms can't smell,

>

> Comparing silence with words is like comparin potatoes with shell fish.

>

 

hmmm.. i'm sure we'll have some desert afterwards... sprinkle it with the ever

present sweet " awareness "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> dan330033

> Nisargadatta

> Thursday, March 25, 2010 12:31 PM

> Re: where the " i thought " rises -- tim

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > you are just giving me words that represent ideas that you believe.

> > > >

> > > > these beliefs don't exist separate from you, the believer.

> > > >

> > > > it is your awareness that gives these beliefs whatever life they seem

> > > > to have.

> > > > -d-

> > > >

> > > > Your? Your awareness? I would not add that " your " in there.

> > > > -geo-

> > >

> > > It's just colloquial speech, Geo.

> > >

> > > What are you, the advaita word police?

> > >

> > > (I would not sign " geo " to my post ...)

> > >

> > > > it doesn't matter that they are beliefs that negate awareness and

> > > > assume separately existing things, like neurons, that supposedly

> > > > produce awareness.

> > > >

> > > > because awareness is right there, now, as you notice these beliefs,

> > > > which are thoughts, which are only there as you are aware of them.

> > > > -d-

> > > >

> > > > The same. If you say " you are aware of them " then there is a split as

> > > > some you and some awareness. Then it becomes similar to

> > > > the popular way awareness is used: some by-product of the brain.

> > > > -geo-

> > >

> > > Nonsense. Are you so taken in by words?

> > >

> > > Constantly in these messages words like " you " and " I " are used.

> > >

> > > Are you scared of them?

> > >

> > > Do they disturb your reality?

> > >

> > >

> > > - D -

> > >

> > > (nnb)

> > >

> >

> > He said something like " the addiction to words must go " (paraphrased) on

> > the Nondualfuel list.

> >

> > Words can make one feel as though there are " others " (or not), if one's

> > reality is being defined by words.

> >

> > Obviously, there's no verbal formula or suggestion possible about how this

> > could change.

>

> Nah - agreed.

>

> Silence speaks what words can't say.

>

> One needs to listen. Preoccupation with self, words, thoughts, memories -

> interferes with listening.

>

> - D -

>

> Yea -Agreed.

> Why are you two so preoccupied with geo's words?

> -geo-

 

Because hell just froze over.

 

- deo -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > you are just giving me words that represent ideas that you believe.

> > > >

> > > > these beliefs don't exist separate from you, the believer.

> > > >

> > > > it is your awareness that gives these beliefs whatever life they seem to

have.

> > > > -d-

> > > >

> > > > Your? Your awareness? I would not add that " your " in there.

> > > > -geo-

> > >

> > > It's just colloquial speech, Geo.

> > >

> > > What are you, the advaita word police?

> > >

> > > (I would not sign " geo " to my post ...)

> > >

> > > > it doesn't matter that they are beliefs that negate awareness and assume

separately existing things, like neurons, that supposedly produce awareness.

> > > >

> > > > because awareness is right there, now, as you notice these beliefs,

which are thoughts, which are only there as you are aware of them.

> > > > -d-

> > > >

> > > > The same. If you say " you are aware of them " then there is a split as

some you and some awareness. Then it becomes similar to

> > > > the popular way awareness is used: some by-product of the brain.

> > > > -geo-

> > >

> > > Nonsense. Are you so taken in by words?

> > >

> > > Constantly in these messages words like " you " and " I " are used.

> > >

> > > Are you scared of them?

> > >

> > > Do they disturb your reality?

> > >

> > >

> > > - D -

> > >

> > > (nnb)

> > >

> >

> > He said something like " the addiction to words must go " (paraphrased) on the

Nondualfuel list.

> >

> > Words can make one feel as though there are " others " (or not), if one's

reality is being defined by words.

> >

> > Obviously, there's no verbal formula or suggestion possible about how this

could change.

>

> Nah - agreed.

>

> Silence speaks what words can't say.

>

> One needs to listen. Preoccupation with self, words, thoughts, memories -

interferes with listening.

>

> - D -

 

 

you're saying that you never listen then right?

 

:-)

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

dan330033

Nisargadatta

Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:31 PM

Re: where the " i thought " rises -- tim

 

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> dan330033

> Nisargadatta

> Thursday, March 25, 2010 12:31 PM

> Re: where the " i thought " rises -- tim

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > you are just giving me words that represent ideas that you believe.

> > > >

> > > > these beliefs don't exist separate from you, the believer.

> > > >

> > > > it is your awareness that gives these beliefs whatever life they

> > > > seem

> > > > to have.

> > > > -d-

> > > >

> > > > Your? Your awareness? I would not add that " your " in there.

> > > > -geo-

> > >

> > > It's just colloquial speech, Geo.

> > >

> > > What are you, the advaita word police?

> > >

> > > (I would not sign " geo " to my post ...)

> > >

> > > > it doesn't matter that they are beliefs that negate awareness and

> > > > assume separately existing things, like neurons, that supposedly

> > > > produce awareness.

> > > >

> > > > because awareness is right there, now, as you notice these beliefs,

> > > > which are thoughts, which are only there as you are aware of them.

> > > > -d-

> > > >

> > > > The same. If you say " you are aware of them " then there is a split

> > > > as

> > > > some you and some awareness. Then it becomes similar to

> > > > the popular way awareness is used: some by-product of the brain.

> > > > -geo-

> > >

> > > Nonsense. Are you so taken in by words?

> > >

> > > Constantly in these messages words like " you " and " I " are used.

> > >

> > > Are you scared of them?

> > >

> > > Do they disturb your reality?

> > >

> > >

> > > - D -

> > >

> > > (nnb)

> > >

> >

> > He said something like " the addiction to words must go " (paraphrased) on

> > the Nondualfuel list.

> >

> > Words can make one feel as though there are " others " (or not), if one's

> > reality is being defined by words.

> >

> > Obviously, there's no verbal formula or suggestion possible about how

> > this

> > could change.

>

> Nah - agreed.

>

> Silence speaks what words can't say.

>

> One needs to listen. Preoccupation with self, words, thoughts, memories -

> interferes with listening.

>

> - D -

>

> Yea -Agreed.

> Why are you two so preoccupied with geo's words?

> -geo-

 

Because hell just froze over.

 

- deo -

 

Dont blame hell. Its just you.

-geo-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote:

>

>

> -

> dan330033

> Nisargadatta

> Thursday, March 25, 2010 12:31 PM

> Re: where the " i thought " rises -- tim

>

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > you are just giving me words that represent ideas that you believe.

> > > >

> > > > these beliefs don't exist separate from you, the believer.

> > > >

> > > > it is your awareness that gives these beliefs whatever life they seem

> > > > to have.

> > > > -d-

> > > >

> > > > Your? Your awareness? I would not add that " your " in there.

> > > > -geo-

> > >

> > > It's just colloquial speech, Geo.

> > >

> > > What are you, the advaita word police?

> > >

> > > (I would not sign " geo " to my post ...)

> > >

> > > > it doesn't matter that they are beliefs that negate awareness and

> > > > assume separately existing things, like neurons, that supposedly

> > > > produce awareness.

> > > >

> > > > because awareness is right there, now, as you notice these beliefs,

> > > > which are thoughts, which are only there as you are aware of them.

> > > > -d-

> > > >

> > > > The same. If you say " you are aware of them " then there is a split as

> > > > some you and some awareness. Then it becomes similar to

> > > > the popular way awareness is used: some by-product of the brain.

> > > > -geo-

> > >

> > > Nonsense. Are you so taken in by words?

> > >

> > > Constantly in these messages words like " you " and " I " are used.

> > >

> > > Are you scared of them?

> > >

> > > Do they disturb your reality?

> > >

> > >

> > > - D -

> > >

> > > (nnb)

> > >

> >

> > He said something like " the addiction to words must go " (paraphrased) on

> > the Nondualfuel list.

> >

> > Words can make one feel as though there are " others " (or not), if one's

> > reality is being defined by words.

> >

> > Obviously, there's no verbal formula or suggestion possible about how this

> > could change.

>

> Nah - agreed.

>

> Silence speaks what words can't say.

>

> One needs to listen. Preoccupation with self, words, thoughts, memories -

> interferes with listening.

>

> - D -

>

> Yea -Agreed.

> Why are you two so preoccupied with geo's words?

> -geo-

 

 

maybe they want into your new..

 

" out of the closet..into the open air " club geoparado.

 

boys will be boys and all that.

 

:-)

 

..b b.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...