Guest guest Posted April 10, 2010 Report Share Posted April 10, 2010 Nisargadatta , "geo" <inandor wrote: > geo: Ah but you are not adressing the point. *_* Our points do have the tendency to entertwine and blend into oblivion, it is true. Pete said:> "If you spot it, don't try to apprehend it. It is an armed and> dangerous serial killer of personas and "I's".> Well..... according to his logic it is better to apprehend it> and get done with the "I" and "persona". :>) *_* Yes, but I'm not very good with logic and when one of my personas evaporates, there is still this meaningless smoky haze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2010 Report Share Posted April 10, 2010 Nisargadatta , " seven_or_so " <onniko00 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > geo: Ah but you are not adressing the point. > > > > *_* Our points do have the tendency to entertwine and blend > > into oblivion, it is true. > > > > Pete said: > > " If you spot it, don't try to apprehend it. It is an armed and > > dangerous serial killer of personas and " I's " . > > Well..... according to his logic it is better to apprehend it > > and get done with the " I " and " persona " . :>) > > > *_* Yes, but I'm not very good with logic and when one of > > my personas evaporates, there is still this meaningless > > smoky haze. > > > [asmoke.jpg picture by whatappears] with the Annihilation of " me " .. who's anything meaningless or meaningful to? wherefore a smoky haze? neither yes nor no..both or none...self or other. it's a real mutha. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2010 Report Share Posted April 10, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " seven_or_so " <onniko00@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > geo: Ah but you are not adressing the point. > > > > > > > > *_* Our points do have the tendency to entertwine and blend > > > > into oblivion, it is true. > > > > > > > > Pete said: > > > " If you spot it, don't try to apprehend it. It is an armed and > > > dangerous serial killer of personas and " I's " . > > > Well..... according to his logic it is better to apprehend it > > > and get done with the " I " and " persona " . :>) > > > > > > *_* Yes, but I'm not very good with logic and when one of > > > > my personas evaporates, there is still this meaningless > > > > smoky haze. > > > > > > [asmoke.jpg picture by whatappears] > > > > > with the Annihilation of " me " .. > > who's anything meaningless or meaningful to? > > wherefore a smoky haze? > > neither yes nor no..both or none...self or other. > > it's a real mutha. > > .b b.b. who just asked that? who is wondering? what does " who " mean? why i think i could have a V8. and if i don't have a V8.. i would then have to say i could've had a V8.. but didn't. this stuff is right up there with the Marchings of the Caesers. it really is. ..b b.b. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2010 Report Share Posted April 10, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " seven_or_so " <onniko00@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > geo: Ah but you are not adressing the point. > > > > > > > > *_* Our points do have the tendency to entertwine and blend > > > > into oblivion, it is true. > > > > > > > > Pete said: > > > " If you spot it, don't try to apprehend it. It is an armed and > > > dangerous serial killer of personas and " I's " . > > > Well..... according to his logic it is better to apprehend it > > > and get done with the " I " and " persona " . :>) > > > > > > *_* Yes, but I'm not very good with logic and when one of > > > > my personas evaporates, there is still this meaningless > > > > smoky haze. > > > > > > [asmoke.jpg picture by whatappears] > > > > > with the Annihilation of " me " .. > > who's anything meaningless or meaningful to? > > wherefore a smoky haze? > > neither yes nor no..both or none...self or other. > > it's a real mutha. > > .b b.b. P: You, evil one, it's a real mukta. LOL > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2010 Report Share Posted April 10, 2010 Nisargadatta , " seven_or_so " <onniko00 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > geo: Ah but you are not adressing the point. > > > > *_* Our points do have the tendency to entertwine and blend > > into oblivion, it is true. > > > > Pete said: > > " If you spot it, don't try to apprehend it. It is an armed and > > dangerous serial killer of personas and " I's " . > > Well..... according to his logic it is better to apprehend it > > and get done with the " I " and " persona " . :>) > > > *_* Yes, but I'm not very good with logic and when one of > > my personas evaporates, there is still this meaningless > > smoky haze. P: Lord! You are the best! Can I kiss your feet? I can't go to Florida, but could you send at least one foot by UPS? " Can you spare a foot, sister? " This strange request, a feet fetish vagrant, directed to a young woman walking by in sandals so reveling that they were like feet tongs. Wow! I thought, here is another desperate seeker in search of a guru's foot to kiss. ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2010 Report Share Posted April 10, 2010 Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6 wrote: > > > Wow! I thought, here is another desperate > seeker in search of a guru's foot to kiss. ) > that's why humans can't always fool me. ramana would tell them for the millionth time that " you are the self, " and as soon as he'd turn around there would be a group of them on their knees worshipping him. it's not discussed much in the neo-advaita circles but according to a historical theory, advaita was hindus response (especially the champion shankara) to the clever arguments of buddhists in order to stop the buddhist expansion in the indian sub continent. regardless of what impersonal theist arguments buddha or shankara or ramana would talk about, the devotional followers want to worship...it's part of the human nature for some. personally speaking i can't worship a personal god anymore since that belief left me. nowadays the only thing i worship is beauty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.