Guest guest Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Namaste (Continued from Part 1. See #35268) There is another kind of classification. Mind and the five senses of perception only are together counted as six. In the Gita the Lord says 'I am the mind amongst the senses' (X -22). More specifically, he says in XV - 7, 'the six senses including the mind'. There are contexts where the Acharya also has the same opinion. For instance, the indriyas are sometimes called 'karaNas' (instruments); because, it is the instrument which implements the actions that fulfill the will of the jIva. On the other hand, the actions of thinking, planning, enjoying happiness and sorrow -- these are done by the mind which is within. So mind is called 'antaH-karaNaM'. Along with the five 'karaNas' that do work outside, the Acharya visualises that sextad as a bee and uses the metaphor beautifully in Soundaryalahari (#90) The bee has six feet and so the JIva with its six indriyas ('karaNas') is taken as a bee. All movement is with the help of the legs. In life, all the movements of the jIva take place because of these six 'karaNas'; so they are as good as 'legs' for the jIva-bee! This is the 'karaNa charaNa' of the shloka. The creature with six legs is the bee. The bee immerses itself in the lotus flower and remains there in enchanted forgetfulness. So also the plea of the devotee is to be immersed in the lotus feet of Mother Goddess forgetful of itself like a bee inside the lotus flower. That is when the mind and the pair of five indriyas are calmed down and the JIva with shama and dama achieved, is immersed in the Absolute. Mother Goddess (ambaaL) has in Her hands a sugarcane bow and five arrows; the bow is to help us with 'shama' for mind-control and the arrows are to vanquish the five senses thus helping us achieve 'dama'. In short, both mind-control and sense-control have to go hand in hand, complementary to each other. In fact all the parts of SAdhanA have to move in one wavefront and so are to be practised as such in mixed fashion. I already told you they are not supposed to follow one after the other in isolation. I have to emphasize this further in the case of 'shama' and 'dama'. Sometimes the senses do act involuntarily; maybe we can say those are the times when the mind has nothing to do with them. But generally almost all the time, the stopping of the actions of the indriyas or of the mind, does need the sanction and prompting of the mind from within. The movement of the indriyas are in fact the deliberate prompts of the mind which tries to fulfill its desires through them. Of course there may be a little involuntary movement of the indriyas on their own. Movement, maybe, but never the stoppage of movement. It is the mind that has to stop the movement of the senses. Thus, not only is shama, the control of the mind, but dama, the control of the senses, also is the responsibility of the mind. Therefore it is that we also have to contend with shama and dama together. Lord Krishna at one place talks of 'dama' as the work of mind: " indriyANi manasA niyamya " says He in III - 7. The same structure of expression occurs in VI - 24 where he says " manasaivendriya-grAmaM viniyamya " - that is, the gang of senses has to be controlled properly by the mind itself. 'By the mind itself' - 'not by oneself' is what is underscored by the words " manasaiva " ( = manasA eva). Thus controlling, gradually and slowly (*shanaiH shanaiH uparamet*) one should calm down, says he. In fact 'uparati' is the next in *shhaTka-sampatti* starting from shama and dama. 'uparamet' means 'one should reach 'uparati', namely the calming down of everything. The Lord usually talks about shama and dama both together. *sarva-dvArANi samyamya mano hRRidi nirudhya ca* (VIII - 12) : Here 'sarva-dvArANi samyamya' (damming all gates) is 'dama'; 'mano hRRidi nirudhya' (fixing the mind in the heart) is 'shama'. The dvAras are the gates; these gates are the indriyas, namely, ears, nose and mouth - in which the gates are visible and explicit; and the skin, in which the gates are not visible, but we know every hair on the skin is only a gate-like equipment, though invisible; and finally the eyes, which we know is just a fixture in one of the openings of the skull and further light passes through the eyes and creates all the images that we see. So the controlling of these five gates is nothing but the dama that controls the senses. And the process of controlling the mind and stabilising it in the Atman is the shama described in " mano hRRidi nirudhya " . All the different attitudes of the beings emanate from Me, says the Lord. And then He gives a list of the highest among them: (X - 4, 5) Intellect, wisdom, non-delusion, forgiveness, truth, self-restraint (dama) , calmness (shama), ... . And when he makes a list of all divine qualities in the 16th chapter, he includes both dama and shama in " dAnaM damashca " and " tyAgaH shAntiH " (XVI - 1, 2) . As I have already mentioned, what is obtained by shama is shAnti (Peace) and what is obtained by dama is 'dAnti'. A sannyasi is called 'yati'. The Tamil name 'Ethiraj' is only a mutilated version of 'Yatiraja'. 'Yati' means a Sannyasi. The direct meaning of the word is one who has the quality of control or one who has controlled. Shri Ramanuja is usually known also as 'Yatiraja'. The words 'yama' and 'yata' both indicate 'control' or 'discipline'. The divine Yama is one who controls every one by fear. He takes them to his locale where they are controlled and punished; so his locale is called 'samyamanI'. That matter of Yama pertains to control of others. But the matter of 'Yati' is control of the self. So the Shastras such as the Gita talk of such a 'yati' as 'yatAtmA' or 'samyatAtmA'. The forced controls take place in the city of SamyamanI whereas the Sannyasi who has strict self-control is called 'samyatAtmA' or 'samyamI'. Here the control is of the mind and of the senses. In other words he who has acquired 'shama' and 'dama' is the 'yati' or 'sannyAsi'. The Lord says (IV - 39) *shraddhAvAn labhate jnAnaM tatparaH samyatendriyaH* -- the one who has, with shraddhA (faith and dedication), controlled all the senses and thus is a 'samyatendriya', attains JnAna. Actually He has symbiotically combined here shraddhA, shama and dama , all three occurring in SAdhanA-chatushhTayaM! In describing the attributes of a sthita-prajna, He says: " Just as a tortoise draws its head into the shell whenever there is danger, a human being should withdraw his senses from the sense objects into himself " and thus emphasizes the need for sense-control, by giving this beautiful analogy. Whenever the senses go outward helter-skelter on their own, it is danger time for the human. The tortoise has to draw its head into the shell only when it smells danger; but the human has always to do this withdrawal. The Lord underscores this fact by using a simple additional word, almost innocuously as it were, namely, the word *sarvashaH* in that verse II - 58. *sarvashaH* means 'always and by all means' ! : In Brihadaranyaka Upanishad the entire divine community gets the advice: (V - 2 - 1) *dAmyata*, meaning, 'Keep your senses under control'. The story goes as follows: Not only the Divines, but the Humans as well as the Asuras - all three species went to PrajApati, their Creator to get advice. They were told by BrahmA only a single letter " da " and were also asked whether they had understood it. Generally every one knows one's own weakness. So if somebody tells him a message in a disguised way and asks him to understand what he needed to understand, they will get the message in the way they think it was applicable to them. To understand something oneself this way has also a greater value. It will stick. One will not find fault with the fault-finder, for the curiosity to decipher the message will win! That is how, in the story of Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, the single letter 'da' was conveyed by BrahmA to all the three species (divines, asuras and humans) at the same time but each one of them understood it to mean differently. They understood it to stand for the first letter of a message specially intended for them. The divines took it to stand for 'dAmyata', that is, 'control your senses'. The Creator agreed with their interpretation of the message. The humans took it to mean 'datta' that is, 'Give: Do acts of charity; be charitable'. This also was approved by the Creator. The asuras took it to mean 'dayadhvaM', that is, 'Be compassionate'. Again the Creator gave his approval of this interpretation. The Acharya in his Bhashya has commented on this that the three categories of people - divines, humans and asuras - are all of them in the human kingdom itself. People who are generally known to be good, but still do not have their senses in control are the 'divines'. People who have no charitable disposition and are greedy are the 'humans' in the classification, because man's greatest weakness is greed and the consequent absence of a charitable disposition. People who have not even an iota of compassion in their hearts are classified as 'asuras'. In other words, all the three messages of advice are for humanity. The moral of all this is that even those who have many good qualities do lack the quality of self-control. This is because the attractions of sense-objects have power to draw man into the vortex of MAyA. So the process of getting out of those attractions can be very difficult. 'dama and shama' -- it is not necessary to separate them as two things; even for the divines the control of both the mind and the senses was what was advised - this control is what should be achieved with great effort. One should not leave off the efforts after a few failed attempts. One should not have a feeling of let-down by defeats in this effort. Trust in God and persistently make the efforts. Keep the practice without losing heart. Even when the objects in the outside world though perceptible to the ears, the eyes, and the tongue, are not within the reach of these senses, the mind may be thinking all the time about the experiences pertaining to those objects. The control of these thoughts is what is called control of the mind. It is not at all easy to be achieved. What is to be successfuly attempted at first is, even though the desires in the mind do not vanish, at least in the outer world of activity the indriyas may be restricted not to graze around - in other words, dama (control of the senses of action). A vrata, a fast, a starving of the eyes from objectionable sights, avoidance of sense-pleasures on certain days - such are the efforts that must be practised with some persistence. This will lead to the mind being trained for the paractice of shama and becoming a little more mature. When the sense objects are not around, it may be possible to control the mind from thinking about the experiences with them and the mind may remain at rest; but once we come out from that solitude to the outside world, immediately the ears will long for movie music from the radio and the tongue will yearn for that tasty coffee or other drink it used to have. Thus each indriya, without even the prompting of the mind, will run after its old vAsanA. Independent of the reins the horses now are ready to run! Now again the 'weapon' of 'dama' has to be used. Thus controlling the indriyas from running after the external objects, inspite of their availability around, the other weapon of 'shama' of the mind has to be applied so that the mind also does not run after them. Thus the processes of 'dama' and 'shama' have to be used alternately as well as simultaneously until one is really sure that one has achieved the needed control of both kinds. The finishing line is of course the total peace that one obtains at the fulfillment of 'shama'. Thus what can be somehow accomplished is the process of 'dama'. In the Mahanarayana Upanishad, with great sympathy, it prescribes 'dama' regimen for a Brahmachari and a 'shama' regimen for the renunciate muni who has renounced everything. " The Brahmacharis hold that 'dama' is supreme, and revel in the implementation of that; whereas the dwellers in the forests (the munis) hold that 'shama' is supreme and revel in the implementation of that " (Narayanopanishad: 78 - 3,4). The intended meaning is that both 'dama' and 'shama' are to be started right from the Brahmachari stage so that when one gets to the stage of sannyAsa, one can attain the total fulfillment of 'shama'. Where the mind finally calms down and settles, that is the Atman. When the mind stops, the Atman shines. Even in the previous stage, the senses would have stopped running involuntarily and the mind would have of its own volition controlled the senses. Thereafter the residual vAsanAs of the mind would be the ones still to be eradicated. This eradication happens when 'shama' is totally achieved. Such a complete cessation of the mind will generate the realisation of the Atman. Thus it is that 'shama' is the final calming down. That is why we say " shAntiH shAntiH shAntiH " and also refer to it as " Atma-shAntiH " . The word 'dAnti' (controlled mind and senses) is also of the same kind. The controlling action implies a force, whereas what follows is 'shAntiH'. In other words it is not 'control, then shAnti' but 'control, that itself is shAnti'. All the great people pray mostly for the controlled calm of the mind. Lord Krishna also advises us in (VI - 26) By whatever prompting this wavering and unsteady mind runs outward towards objects, from each such prompting shall the mind be pulled back and drawn into the confines of the Atman, says the Lord. The use of two words 'chanchalaM' (wavering) and 'asthiraM' (unsteady) to describe the turbulent nature of the mind is significant. PraNAms to the Kanchi Mahaswamigal. PraNAms to all advaitins. profvk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.