Guest guest Posted April 8, 2007 Report Share Posted April 8, 2007 'cit' is the knowing light of consciousness, found in each person's mind. In everyone's experience, it is a subjective knowing that illuminates whatever may appear or disappear. As time proceeds in any mind, perceptions, thoughts and feelings come and go. But consciousness continues as their knowing principle. It stays present always, illuminating all appearances and disappearances. It is a common principle of knowing, found always present in all states of experience, beneath their changes and their differences. Found as a knowing principle, consciousness is called 'praj~nAna'. It's that which is prior (pra-) to all different instances of knowledge (j~nAna). Where different things are told apart, we speak of a discerning knowledge called 'vij~nAna', with the prefix 'vi-' implying differentiation. Where different things are put together, we speak of an associating knowledge called 'saMj~nAna', with the prefix 'saM-' implying mixture or inclusion. But consciousness itself is neither differentiating nor associating. Its knowing is no action that tells things apart or puts them together. Its knowing is no act that it starts doing at some point of time or stops doing later on. Instead, its knowing is just what it is. Its very being is to know, to shine with knowing light. That light shines by itself, by its mere presence in all changing states that show a differentiated world. All differences appear through changing acts of perception, thought and feeling in our bodies and minds. It is these changing acts that produce the different things we perceive or think or feel. And it is again these changing acts that put things together, in our constructed pictures and stories that describe a differentiated world. All telling things apart and putting them together are thus personal acts, which are performed by our minds and our bodies in the world. How then can we come to a true knowledge of reality, which is shown in common by our differing descriptions of it? How can we interpret our constructed pictures and stories, so that we may know more clearly and more truly what they show? This investigation is pursued in the j~nAna mArga or the way of knowledge. Here, truth is approached by questioning belief. Our descriptions are examined to uncover the assumptions that we make in them, so as to remove confusions and mistakes of unquestioned belief. In the tradition of Hindu texts, the j~nAna mArga first shows up in some philosophical chants from the Vedic Samhitas. It is further shown in various passages from the Upanishads, which raise basic questions about the Vedic world view. But in the Upanishads, the questions are raised through some rather condensed and cryptic statements, without much explanation or systematic treatment of the questioning. The systematic treatment is put forward in the darshanas or schools of philosophy, which have developed a variety of differing world views. The differences have naturally given rise to philosophical debates, through which the various schools have developed their theoretical systems, in relation to each other. However, such debates are institutional and theoretical. Debate is what pandits or scholars do, as they construct and establish the competing views of their various different schools. This is a theoretical activity, in which each school sets out its own system of thought, in competition with other schools. This construction of world views is not the actual practice of philosophy. It cannot be more than a theoretical preliminary, which serves to prepare a student for reflective questioning. The actual practice of philosophy does not begin till reason is reflected back from built-up ideas, so as to question the very basis of assumptions upon which the ideas have been built. So long as reason is applied to question someone else's beliefs, then that is just a theoretical debate, which is used largely to prevent the questioner's beliefs from being opened up to question. But when the questioning turns round reflectively, upon one's own assumptions, then one's own understanding is at stake. And if such a questioning is genuine, it then amounts to an investigating experiment, in which one looks to see what clearer understanding it may lead towards. The results of such a questioning are then inherently practical, for the new understanding gets inherently expressed in further feelings, thoughts, perceptions and actions that arise from it. It's through such questioning that we get educated, as we learn in practice from the process of experience. The actual practice of philosophy is just that turned back questioning. It takes place within all schools: as each student learns received ideas and gets to question what they mean, for herself or himself. Debate and enquiry have thus two different functions. Debate is used institutionally, to set out a systematic view of world that represents a school of thought to those who see it from outside. Enquiry serves individually, for each student of a school to learn its ideas and to investigate their meaning from within. An inner education is here sought through an individual questioning, under the guidance of a living teacher. That inward and individual emphasis lies at the heart of the j~nAna mArga. In the Katha Upanishad 5.15, the 'cit' aspect is described as that light which does not shine from sun or moon or stars, nor indeed from any object in the world. It shines instead subjectively, as self that knows itself within. That shining is just what it is, with all the world found shining after it, as its mere reflection. The passage is appended below (with a somewhat free translation). Ananda Na tatra sUryo bhAti na candra-tArakam nema vidyuto bhAnti kuto 'yam agniH [in that, the sun does not shine, nor do the moon and stars, nor these flashes of lightning. How, then, this fire here?] tam eva bhAntaM anubhAti sarvaM tasya bhAsA sarvam idaM vibhAti [That shines itself. Everything shines after it. All of this world reflects its light.] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 8, 2007 Report Share Posted April 8, 2007 Namaste Ananda-ji I think you should be writing all the definitions for the 'Weekly Definitions' because yours is so much precise, to the point, and brings the essential core to the front. In particular, in the present definition, in addition to emphasizing that the whole write-up on the definition of Consciousness is one more gem for the postings on our list, I would like to highlight the following paragraphs: " Found as a knowing principle, consciousness is called 'praj~nAna'. > It's that which is prior (pra-) to all different instances of > knowledge (j~nAna). Where different things are told apart, we speak > of a discerning knowledge called 'vij~nAna', with the prefix 'vi-' > implying differentiation. Where different things are put together, > we speak of an associating knowledge called 'saMj~nAna', with the > prefix 'saM-' implying mixture or inclusion. " > " This construction of world views is not the actual practice of > philosophy. It cannot be more than a theoretical preliminary, which > serves to prepare a student for reflective questioning. The actual > practice of philosophy does not begin till reason is reflected back > from built-up ideas, so as to question the very basis of assumptions > upon which the ideas have been built. " " Debate and enquiry have thus two different functions. Debate is used > institutionally, to set out a systematic view of world that > represents a school of thought to those who see it from outside. > > Enquiry serves individually, for each student of a school to learn > its ideas and to investigate their meaning from within. An inner > education is here sought through an individual questioning, under > the guidance of a living teacher. That inward and individual > emphasis lies at the heart of the j~nAna mArga. " And, incidentally, the Kathopanishad quote: " na tatra sUryo bhAti .. " is my own favourite! Thank you. May God bless you! PraNAms to all advaitins. profvk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 8, 2007 Report Share Posted April 8, 2007 I would like to second the view of Sri ProfVK. Anandaji-s definitions read with the lucid clarity of his teacher, Atmananada Krishna Menon. Were he to continue providing these definitions, one could easily compile them into a book for the benefit of seekers everywhere. Thank you! Dennis advaitin [advaitin ] On Behalf Of V. Krishnamurthy 08 April 2007 14:21 advaitin Re: Weekly definition - 'cit' or 'consciousness' .. <http://geo./serv?s=97359714/grpId=15939/grpspId=1705075991/msgId=3 5584/stime=1176038483/nc1=4507179/nc2=3848553/nc3=3848567> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 8, 2007 Report Share Posted April 8, 2007 well, it was little me (Dhyanasaraswati or Adi_shakthi16 - the rose smells sweeter by any other name) who had all along maintained that Ananadaji is veritably a true leader of this satsangha - his posts are non-controversial. Not only that , there is not a trace of false ego or ahamkara in his messages . Rather , he speaks from atma anubhava (personal experience) and presents the teachings of his great teacher Atmaananda in a very lucid and eloquent style - a truly great sisya of a great teacher ! now , it is heartening to see both profeesorji and dennisji echoeing my sentiments ! only a njweller knows the know the the value of a jewel! Anandaji is truly a 10 carat diamond! For his posts are soulful and divine ! May his tribe increase! May i please be allowed todedicate the following lines from William wordsworth to Anandaji - my Atma Guru! BEAUTY EXALTED, WILLIAM WORDSWORTH What we have loved, Others will love, and we will teach them how; Instruct them how the mind of man becomes A thousand times more beautiful than the earth On which he dwells, above this frame of things (Which, 'mid all revolution in the hopes And fears of men, doth still remain unchanged) In beauty exalted, as it is itself Of quality and fabric more divine. with love and regards advaitin , " Dennis Waite " <dwaite wrote: > > I would like to second the view of Sri ProfVK. Anandaji-s definitions read > with the lucid clarity of his teacher, Atmananada Krishna Menon. Were he to > continue providing these definitions, one could easily compile them into a > book for the benefit of seekers everywhere. > > Thank you! > > Dennis > > > > > advaitin [advaitin ] On Behalf > Of V. Krishnamurthy > 08 April 2007 14:21 > advaitin > Re: Weekly definition - 'cit' or 'consciousness' > > > . > > <http://geo./serv? s=97359714/grpId=15939/grpspId=1705075991/msgId=3 > 5584/stime=1176038483/nc1=4507179/nc2=3848553/nc3=3848567> > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 9, 2007 Report Share Posted April 9, 2007 advaitin , Ananda Wood <awood wrote: > > 'cit' is the knowing light of consciousness, found in each person's > mind. > > > [That shines itself. > Everything shines after it. > All of this world reflects its light.] Thank you Anandaji. I found your post very helpful, and worthy of reading and pondering again and again, a true pramana. Best wishes, Durga Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2007 Report Share Posted April 14, 2007 In order to set the mood and the tone for the next definition 'Ananda'in this three part series Sat-Chit-Ananda,may i please share this verse from Srimad Bhagwat Gita on 'Cit ' or Consciousness ? isvarah sarva-bhutanam hrd-dese 'rjuna tisthati bhramayan sarva-bhutani yantrarudhani mayaya(chapter 18:61) Swami Chinamayananaji's wonderful explanation : The Lord dwells in the hearts of all beings, O Arjuna, causing all beings, by His illusive power, to revolve, as if mounted on a machine. The advice given by the Lord is clear and beyond all shades of doubt. " Remember the Lord, " says the Geetaacharaya, " as the One who organises, controls and directs all things in the world and without Whose command nothing ever happens. In His 'presence' alone everything can happen --- therefore remember Him as Ishwara. " The steam functioning in the cylinder of the engine is the " Lord " of the engine, and without it the piston can never move. It is the steam which provides the locomotion and renders the train dynamic. Do not remember the Lord as merely a personified Power, as Shiva in Kailasha, as Vishnu in Vaikuntha, as the Father in Heaven etc., but recognise Him as one who dwells in the heart of EVERY CREATURE. Just as the address of a person is given, in order that the seeker of that person may locate the individual in a busy town, so also in order to seek, discover and identify with the Lord, His " Local address " is being provided here by Bhagawan Krishna! When we say that " THE LORD DWELLS IN THE HEART OF ALL LIVING BEINGS, " we do not mean the physical heart. In philosophy the use of the word " heart " is more figurative than literal. RESIDING THUS IN THE HEART --- meaning, in the mind of one who has cultivated the divine qualities such as love, kindness, patience, cheer, affection, tenderness, forgiveness, charity etc. The Lord lends His Power to all living creatures to act on. He energizes everyone. Everything revolves around Him --- like the unseen hand that manipulates the dolls in the marionette-play. The puppets have no existence, no vitality, no emotions of their own; they are only the expressions of the will and intention of the unseen hand behind them. It is not the matter in us that moves or becomes conscious of the world of transactions; or else the cucumber and the pumpkin, the corn and the tomato of which our bodies are made, will also have locomotion or Consciousness. When the same vegetables are consumed as food and are digested and assimilated to become part of our physical body, the matter, in contact with the Life-Principle in us becomes vibrant and dynamic, capable of perceiving, feeling and thinking. The Spark-of-Life presiding over the body, the Pure Eternal Consciousness, is that which, as it were, vitalises inert matter. Pure Consciousness in itself does not act; but in Its Presence the matter envelopments get vitalised, and then they SEEM to act. The Atman, conditioned by the body, mind and intellect, expresses dynamism and action, and creates what we recognise as the manifested individuality. " The Supreme functioning through the total bodies as the cause of all action " is called Ishwara. Life functioning in each one of us is the master, the controller, the director and the Lord of our individual activities. The essential Life in all of us is one and the same; therefore, the Total Life functions through and manifests as the entire universe, energising all existing equipments. Thus expressing through all activities, is the Lord of the Universe, Ishwara. With this understanding, if you read the stanza again, you will comprehend the metaphor employed herein. " Yes , after understanding Sat and Chit, WE COME TO ANANDA .... and how is 'Ananda' possible except through Surrender and Ishwara's Grace ? As Sri Ramana Bhagwan himself says " Sri Ramana Maharshi: There are two ways. One is looking into the source of `I' and merging into that source. The other is feeling `I am helpless by myself, God alone is all-powerful and except by throwing myself completely on Him, there is no other means of safety for me.' By this method one gradually develops the conviction that God alone exists and that the ego does not count. Both methods lead to the same goal. Complete surrender is another name for Jnana (knowledge) or liberation. " Om Tat Sat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.