Guest guest Posted May 27, 2007 Report Share Posted May 27, 2007 Hello, Here's something that always boggled my mind. From some views I came across time begin at the moment of the big bang. However, before the " time " of the big bang, wasn't the universe shrinking? Therefore to me it seems to be possible to describe events and a time period before the actual big bang. So was there a beginning to time? If not, how did we arrive at this present point in time? Or is time perhaps actually an illusion? Thanks Laksamanh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2007 Report Share Posted May 27, 2007 it is an unending cycle? right? a.v.krshnan phap44 <phap44 wrote: Hello, Here's something that always boggled my mind. From some views I came across time begin at the moment of the big bang. However, before the " time " of the big bang, wasn't the universe shrinking? Therefore to me it seems to be possible to describe events and a time period before the actual big bang. So was there a beginning to time? If not, how did we arrive at this present point in time? Or is time perhaps actually an illusion? Thanks Laksamanh Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Tryit now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2007 Report Share Posted May 27, 2007 --- >As mentioned by some of the members of advaitin@ is there no time before big bang?Is there any begining (ADI)and ending (ANTAM)to this universe.?Big Bang is one of the event.All of us know that A.D.(after death of christ)is only a conventional Reckoning of Time only.This is all Relative.There is No Absolute " Time " .Perhaps Time is " BRAHMAN " . ANANTAM KHALVIDAM BRAHMA.There is no Absolute Time or Absolute SPACE. EINSTEIN also expressed the same view of TIME SPACE continum. sastry Hari OHm > > > > Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Tryit now. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2007 Report Share Posted May 27, 2007 Namaste all This question on the origin of time is as old as Time! May I reproduce below two paragraphs from my book " The Ten Commandments of Hinduism " on this topic?: Link of the word 'padma' with Time: In all of Sanskrit literature from Vedic times and Indian mathematics writings, single words have been used to denote the power of ten. The list as given in Lilavati goes up to the 16th power of ten. In this sequence mahApadma stands for the 12th power of ten and so is a trillion (million millions). A day of BrahmA is called a kalpa; it is 8.64 billion years.Each day of BrahmA has a name. This day of BrahmA in which we are living is called sveta-varAha-kalpa. The scriptures talk of only 25 or 30 such days of BrahmA with names. So the order of 100 days of BrahmA is probably as far as we can go even by scriptural imagination and loftiest vision of the Seers. This gives 864 billion years. The next bigger power of ten is the twelfth power of ten. This is maha-padma in the nomeclature listed. Thus the word 'padma' indicates the origin of time in the sense it goesas far back as 100 days of BrahmA. This link of 'padma' with the concept of time gives the following esoteric meaning of the word 'Padma-nAbha' which is one of the thousand names of the Almighty and is counted among the most important twelve names out of these. Esoteric meaning of 'Padma-nAbha': Since BrahmA the Creator springs from the Divine Navel ('nAbhi') and 'padma' stands for the concept of Time, the word Padma-nAbha symbolically states that the Transcendental Supreme is the ultimate source of Time. It is from that Ultimate Divinity that mAyA the Cosmic Delusion starts and that is thorigin of Time. There is no way by which we can pinpoint the origin of Time. The question itself is ill-posed, says Advaita.Time is an off-shoot of mAyA and being within mAyA we cannever get to understand the origin of Time. The word Padma- nAbha says that until we reach Him we cannot hope to comprehend the origin of Time. PraNAms to all advaitins. profvk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2007 Report Share Posted May 27, 2007 " Since BrahmA the Creator springs from the Divine Navel ('nAbhi') and 'padma' stands for the concept of Time, the word Padma-nAbha symbolically states that the Transcendental Supreme is the ultimate source of Time. It is from that Ultimate Divinity that mAyA the Cosmic Delusion starts and that is thorigin of Time. There is no way by which we can pinpoint the origin of Time. The question itself is ill-posed, says Advaita.Time is an off-shoot of mAyA and being within mAyA we cannever get to understand the origin of Time. The word Padma- nAbha says that until we reach Him we cannot hope to comprehend the origin of Time. " V. Krishnamurthy, This makes sense and I really appreciate your replies (and everyone's as well). I was thinking last night as well (by the way I don't know much at all about Advaita), if Brahman is pure awareness. And if the only thing that truly exists is this consciousness. That's means there's no distance, by this I mean one can't measure the physical dimensions of pure awareness. And without distance, time can't be calculated, or time can't exist without space. So time truly doesn't exist and is another illusion of maya? I don't know though, I would like to hear everyone's thoughts. By the way thanks for everyone's replies earlier about how Advaita has benefited your life. There are big changes happening in my life recently and I'm under some stress and many times worrying about so many different things. The phrase shared by Krishnamurthy, " this too shall pass, " I find has helped as well when I'm feeling overwhelmed. Also thanks for your review on 5000 Years of Advaita, of all the books I decided to purchase this one to learn more about Advaita Vedanta. Thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2007 Report Share Posted May 27, 2007 Laks, One guy's thoughts. Not original with me, I assure you. Right this minute, can I find where the past ended and the " present " began?. I'm looking for it now, can't seem to find it. Oh, there it is! Nope, too late. Okay. If I can't find where the present began and the past ended, maybe I can find where the present ends and the " future " starts. Okay, looking for it now. Hmmm. Can't find it either. Well...so much for the past and future. The only " place " I can even think about them is now. Any event from the " past " that I can recall is being recalled now and since the event happened " now " , when it apparently " occured " and I'm remembering it now, where is the past??? Same with the " future " . Any thoughts/images about the future can only " happen " now. When I get to the future, which is impossible, I'll still be now. Ha! Ha! Ha! What a grand joke! If only " I " could live this! Actually, I'm living it all the time " I " just don't always know it! Ain't this all a bunch of down-home fun?? Best wishes to y'all from Texas!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2007 Report Share Posted May 27, 2007 hey Steve : your post brings to mind the following Zen Koan : Every Day Is a Good Day Unmon said: " I do not ask you about fifteen days ago. But what about fifteen days hence? Come, say a word about this! " Since none of the monks answered, he answered for them: " Every day is a good day. " love advaitin , " otnac6 " <otnac6 wrote: > > Laks, > > One guy's thoughts. Not original with me, I assure you. > > Right this minute, can I find where the past ended and the " present " > began?. I'm looking for it now, can't seem to find it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 28, 2007 Report Share Posted May 28, 2007 I read or heard from some source this joke: time was created so everything wouldn't happen all at once! As good an explanation as any, I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2007 Report Share Posted May 29, 2007 Prof.V.K ji's divine interpretation of Sri Vishnu's divine namavali Padmanabha : " Since BrahmA the Creator springs from the Divine Navel ('nAbhi') and 'padma' stands for the concept of Time, the word Padma-nAbha symbolically states that the Transcendental Supreme is the ultimate source of Time. It is from that Ultimate Divinity that mAyA the Cosmic Delusion starts and that is thorigin of Time. There is no way by which we can pinpoint the origin of Time. The question itself is ill-posed, says Advaita.Time is an off-shoot of mAyA and being within mAyA we cannever get to understand the origin of Time. The word Padma- nAbha says that until we reach Him we cannot hope to comprehend the origin of Time. " Dear dear Professor-ji , your post also brought to my mind the following verse from Sri Vishnu Sahsaranama ! Bhuta-bhavya-bhavat-prabhuh: The one who is the master and beyond the past, present and the future. In this context , may i also recall verse number 12 , chapter 2 from the Srimad Bhagavat Gita ? na tv evaham jatu nasam na tvam neme janadhipah na caiva na bhavisyamah sarve vayam atah param ( ch 2 , verse 12) Swami Chinmayananda's wonderful explanation : It is not that at any time (in the past) , indeed, was I not, nor were you, nor these rulers of men. Nor, verily, shall we all ever cease to be hereafter. Krishna here declares, in unequivocal terms, that the embodied Self in every one is set on a great pilgrimage in which It comes to identify itself with varied forms, temporarily to gain a limited but determined, set of experiences. He says that neither He Himself nor Arjuna nor the great kings of the age that have assembled in both the armies, are mere accidental happenings. They do not come from nowhere and, at their death, do not become mere non-existent nothingness. Correct philosophical thinking guides man's intellect to the apprehension of a continuity from the past --- through the present --- to the endless future. The Spirit remaining the same, It gets seemingly conditioned by different body-equipments and comes to live through its self-ordained environments. It is this conclusion of the Hindu philosophers that has given them the most satisfactory THEORY OF REINCARNATION. ((((snip snipsnip)))))) Hence , we Say Krishna is purnah suddho nitya-muktah. Name is full. As Krishna is full, complete, similarly, Krishna's name is also full, complete. Suddha. It is not material things. Purnah suddhah nityah muktah ! Krishna is full, pure and eternal ! Krishnam Vande Jagadgurum ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.