Guest guest Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 Dear Moderators and Members: The references to the nature of food as well what should be eaten (and the quantity to be eaten) are made in both the Upanishads and the Bhagavad Gita. Our sages knew exactly what they were saying. We can also take it for granted that they knew that only a few will understand fully what they are saying. Yet due to their overwhelming compassion, they have shared the experience of wisdom.....perhaps because one never knows when the power of words soaked in the truth of the primal being will ignite the spark in someone's heart. I am not a Vedantic scholar and will defer to others; but it seem that to say that the topic of food has nothing to do with Vedanta is not consistent with the actual words of Upanishads and Bhagavad Gita and every classic yogic text. It is more accurate to say that the topic of food/or any other topic including Vedanta has nothing to do with the Self. That is absolutely true. The Self is pure and free and ever new. It is its own food. But if we consider Vedanta to be a means to know the Self, then one can logically consider the topic of means to understand Vedanta to be useful. Purification of the mind due to practical application (of meditation, yoga, lifestyle, diet) falls in that category. Namaste and love to all Harsha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 Harsha-ji: You are right. There is a reference in the Srimad Bhagavad Gita to three kinds of Food - Sattwic , Rajasic and Tamasic Foods in chapter 17 verses 8 to 10 ! In the upanishads also , Food is considered as 'brahman' - in the Taittriya upanishad, there are many references to 'food' ... But you are wrong in interpreting the moderators message ! the exact words of the chief moderator are : " Would all members please note that this topic clearly falls outside the scope of this discussion group, as per the distributed guidelines. It is not reasonable to permit one topic that falls outside and disallow another. Only if *all* such topics are disallowed will it be possible to moderate the group fairly. Accordingly, I must request that discussion of this subject continue outside of the group. " You must be indeed grateful that moderators are magnanimous in allowing you to use this message board to 'advertise' YOUR blog on this web site ! In fact , we are all happy that you are willing to share the wisdom contained in your blog articles with the rest of us! However , we should not 8overextend the 8accorded to us because of the goodness of the moderator's heart! If you will notice, What started out as 'Vegetarian lifestyle ' soon strayed into another territory - that of Nutrition - then to USDA DIETARY REQUIREMENTS AND BEFORE WE KNOW IT IT WILL LEAD TO A DISCUSSION ON HOW CERTAIN TYPES OF FOOD CAUSES CANCER etc etc ..... Moderators in this group are not control freaks - we must be thankful there is virtually no censorship in this group ! don't you want to enjoy that privilege? Just imagine , only a week ago Binduji was awarded a yellow card for violating list policies ... We all are subject to the same rules and regulations that Binduji was subjected to! so , harsha-ji , in all fairness, let us be 'fair' .... I know you will understand ! love and regards advaitin , Harsha wrote: > > Dear Moderators and Members: > > The references to the nature of food as well what should be eaten (and > the quantity to be eaten) are made in both the Upanishads and the > Bhagavad Gita. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 OK. Thanks for the smiles! :-). Namaste and love to all Harsha dhyanasaraswati wrote: > Harsha-ji: > > You are right. There is a reference in the Srimad Bhagavad Gita to > three kinds of Food - Sattwic , Rajasic and Tamasic Foods in chapter > 17 verses 8 to 10 ! In the upanishads also , Food is considered > as 'brahman' - in the Taittriya upanishad, there are many references > to 'food' ... > > But you are wrong in interpreting the moderators message ! the > exact words of the chief moderator are : > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2007 Report Share Posted July 29, 2007 Harsha-ji: You are so 'divine' ! you took my comments in the right spirit ! The idea was not to 'insult you or hurt your feelings but just to bring home the truth that a moderator's job is not an easy one - no matter what he does he is in the unenviable position of displeasing someone! the yellow card system was instituted for only one purpose - with a view to warn members from committing repeat transgressions ... and i think, it is working very effectively than the other system where only some members posts were moderated! thanx for understanding! Your blog is great and i am delighted you are able to bring out the best from some learned members of the advaitin list ! More power unto you! Vegetarianism is a hot topic and i am glad you are presenting so many dfferent perspectives on it in your blog! " !If vegetarians eat vegetables, what do humanitarians eat? " should i eat my own words ? ( my earlier post) just some humor! love and much love to you advaitin , Harsha wrote: > > OK. Thanks for the smiles! :-). > > Namaste and love to all > Harsha > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.