Guest guest Posted August 9, 2007 Report Share Posted August 9, 2007 --- bhaskar.yr wrote: > praNAms > Hare Krishna > > Since we are talking about *shankara saMpradAya* > with regard to concept of > Ishwara, I am tempted to share my view points.sorry > to butt-in..According > to shankara bhagavadpAda, the concept of Ishwara & > his *ishitavya* holds > good only in vyavahAra..From the pAramArthika view > point, there is no > Lordship/hood in absolute non-dual brahman. If we > accept *Ishvaratva* in > absolute sense, then it leads to duality i.e. > distinction between ruler & > the ruled. But in vyavahAra, we do accept the > existence of omnipotent, > omniscient Lord who is karmAdhyaksha & > karmaphaladAta. > > Hari Hari Hari Bol!!! > bhaskar > Sri Bhaskar-ji, Your comment reminds of a comment by Sri Srinivasa Chari in his beautiful book on Vaishnavism (i.e. VA). He ~ says that this conception of Brahman as absolute non-dual, transcendental, etc. has no relevance to the jiva who essentially is the one seeking knowledge, etc. Of course, Sri Chari wants to undermine Advaita as abstract nonsense and elsewhere as philosophical incoherence. I don't want to argue on that here; but would advertise this book to orthodox Advaitins as a trend setter: it would be great to have such a concise and organized representation of both the philosophy and the religion, showing the unity of the sampradaya. Then people like me will not have to run against the various versions of theory and practice. thollmelukaalkizhu ______________________________\ ____ Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Games. http://sims./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.