Guest guest Posted September 6, 2007 Report Share Posted September 6, 2007 namaste " If you consider this as a 'literal end' of sri krishna, then even advaitins will not spare you. :-)) Because krishna is ishwara(even according to shankara). So without slightest doubt and with faith please say..... " I really dont understand why we are so much worried about krishna's body? as why cant we take Bhaskar jis words as which were referring to krishna's body than parabrahma tatva....? all names and forms must dissolve one day, only trikala, desha, abhaaditha sath is parabrahman, which is nirguna in nature, no words, no mind can enter there (yatho vacho nivarthate, apraapya manasa saha ...taittariyopanishat) by telling this, it should not be mistaken as we dont have any respect for devotion or respect towards to krishna, as in vyavahaarika, all these things carry real meaning, so our guru Shankara introduced panchayathana pooja vidhan.... only people who are very much concerned with name, form, world are bothered too much on this issue. let them be.... kindly correct me if i am wrong sri kirshnArpaNamasthu Narendra On 9/5/07, Vinayaka <vinayaka_ns wrote: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2007 Report Share Posted September 6, 2007 all names and forms must dissolve one day, only trikala, desha, abhaaditha sath is parabrahman, which is nirguna in nature, no words, no mind can enter there (yatho vacho nivarthate, apraapya manasa saha ...taittariyopanishat) praNAms Hare Krishna Yes, that is what exactly is the point I was trying to convey...why we should be after Krishna's body?? when mahAbhArata/bhAgavata itself saying Arjuna performed *last rites* on krishna's *pArthiva sharIra* in dvApara yug itself:-)) ?? When it comes to Krishna's *physical death*, I dont know why we should come up with all philosophical, superficial symbolical explanations for this event?? For that matter Krishna himself, during his life time (!!) did not stick to *one particular form* to conclude that this particular structure what *lord krishna* is and nothing else!! sometimes, he became gOpAla, cow, calf, sometime he assumed multiple same krishna form, sometime he shown he is vibhu ( showing whole vishwa in his mouth, showing *vishvarUpa* etc.), he also appeared as kOdaNdapANi rAma to satisfy his trEta yuga devotee jaMbavaNta who was fighting with dvApara yuga's krishna's form :-)) . More importantly, according to the most authentic biography of krishna, the bhAgavata, he strictly passed all the stages of bAlya, koumArya, yauvana etc..he got married (highly influenced by polygamy system :-)) & got sons too...Finally, giving up his mortal coil as per *naisargika dharma*(irrespecitve of the cause behind it) ....So, as far as Krishna's physical form & its activities are concerned, there ends krishna's story!!! but for us, *krishnatva* which is ajara, amara is nitya nUtana & never ever undergo any change...But the question is can we realize this *krishnatva* without holding the *krishna* in a physical form?? Yes, I think, it would be possible when we realized the *truth* behind this nAma & rUpa... I hope, atleast advaitins would spare me if I hold these view points :-)) Hari Hari Hari Bol!!! bhaskar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.