Guest guest Posted September 13, 2007 Report Share Posted September 13, 2007 Namaste: As I have explained before, let me now add the commentary explanations from Swami Dayananda Saraswati (from his Gita Home-study Notes). I once again want to thank Swamiji and Arsha Vidhya Gurukulam for their permission to use it for group discussions. I want members to be aware that these materials should be used only for discussions and if you want it for other purposes, please contact Arsha Vidhya Gurukulam for their permission. The commentaries which are provided here from Swami Chinmayananda and Swami Gambirananda should be also treated in the same way. These sages have provided their permission only for discussion purposes and not necessarily for other purposes. Swamiji is a profound teacher of Vedanta and he brings out the Vedantarasam (the essence of Vedanta) from the Gita so that we can learn and enjoy. Swamiji provides a glimpse of the teacher-student relationship through his explanations. When the teacher (Lord Krishna) understands the sincerity and earnestness of the dedicated student (Arjuna) they go out of their way to please the student. The student wants to express his trust and faith on the teacher and what he/she already learnt from him. The choice of expressions used in these verses demonstrate the earnestness and Swamiji excels in bringing out the enthusiasm and curiosity of a sincere student. In subtle terms, the verses of Gita spells out the required qualifications of for both the teacher and the student. The commentaries of the Swamijis provide dramatic presentations of the dialog between Lord Krishna and Arjuna. Harih Om! Ram Chandran Verse 3 Just as you have been telling about yourself, 0 Lord, in the same manner as this I wish to see your form as the Lord, 0 Lord. " Just as you have been talking to me about yourself, 0 Lord, " tvam atmanam yatha attha. Paramesvara, paramah. not limited by time, space, or object, as well as Isvara, the one who is the cause, the Lord of everything. Parames'vara, 0 Lord! Yatha etat means " This very form (of yourself which you are talking to me about and which I totally accept as true.) " Sankara adds, not anything different. " I see that what you say is true and I accept it. I accept because I understand. " That is what is conveyed here. It is not that he validates Lord Krishna. " When you said of yourself, " I am this, I am that " etc. you told of your immanence. " Again Arjuna uses the vocative when he says, " Purusottama, " because he is imploring. He addresses Krishna as the one who is purusa and uttama, the most exalted of all beings. Krishna's form is also Bhagavan's form and so he says aisvaram rupam. Sankara says, " endowed with knowledge, over lordship, power, strength, creative power, and glory, jnana-aisvarya-sakti-bala-vlrya-tejobhih sampannah. This is another definition of Bhagavan in the tradition which Sankara uses here. This is aisvaram, what belongs to Isvara, the Lord's form. That I want to see, drastum icchami. Arjuna knows this is a good opportunity to ask Isvara, the Lord Krishna to show his cosmic form. But he is a little doubtful about whether Bhagavan will reveal it or not and that he tells in the next verse. Verse 4: If you think it is possible for me to see that (form of yours), oh Lord, Lord of the yogins, please show me your perennially eternal self. ..Arjuna wants to see, but then the choice of course, is left to Bhagavan. " When people know they are asking too much they always start with, " If it is not too much to ask... " It is a prelude to asking for a lot. So Arjuna says, " If you consider it is possible for me to see that (form), oh Lord, manyase yadi tat sakyam maya drastum iti prabho. He knows he is not qualified because the ordinary eyes he has are not enough. Some extra eye may be necessary to see the cosmic form and that is what Arjuna is implicitly requesting here. He addresses Krishna as prabho, the Lord who gives everything. You will find this chapter is full of the vocative case. Again he says yogesvara, the one who is Lord among the yogins. A yogin is one who has accomplished the end accomplished by the sannyasins, called moksa. The one who has that yoga is called yogah or yogin. There are many yogins and Krishna is called the Lord of all of them. He is the most exalted yogin, the one who keeps the yogamaya under his control, the mayavl, the Lord. Any yogin at the very least keeps his body under control. That is asana-siddhi. Then his health and senses etc. can be kept under control by yama-niyama pranayama pratyahara dharana dhyana samadhi. This astangayoga will help him to achieve self-mastery. As a person he is together. Then certain innate powers in the maya like anima garima, laghimaelc. can be kept under control for which there is a siddhi-prakarana in the yogasutras. Such people seem to have existed only in earlier times. But among those people who had a few things under control Lord Krishna is the one who has everything under control. He is mayavl, the one who yields the yoga-maya. He has said so himself - atmamayaya aham sambhavami, " With the help of maya I come into being in this particular form. " Therefore when Arjuna addresses Krishna as yogesvara it looks like a very consciously chosen word. " Since you are yogesvara, you can, after all, lend some of your powers to me so that I can see your glorious form. So if you you think it is possible, then, tatah, for my sake, please show me, darsaya, your own self, atmanam, which is avyayam aisvaram, the perennially eternal form of the Lord. " Even though the time-bound jagat is subject to dissolution, it comes back again. Therefore it is avyayam, eternal. Now that Arjuna has made this request, Krishna has to decide whether to grant it or not. He can refuse and change the subject. But he seems to see it as a good teaching opportunity - another method of revealing his cosmic form. So far he has been only speaking but-here is a chance to use a visual device. And he thought it would be good for Arjuna. When Arjuna said, in the first chapter, " I don't want to cause all these problems. I will be incurring sin. " he showed an inflated sense of his role in all of this. So Krishna perhaps thought this was a good occasion to demonstrate how there is only one purusa and everything " else " is prakrti. That one purusa is purusottama which happens to be atma. That is what the entire sastra is saying. There is no second thing. Arjuna's protests against engaging in battle thinking that he would incur sin, etc. are all going to be answered simply by this visual teaching. Bhagavan anticipates this and therefore decides to show him this form. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.