Guest guest Posted September 18, 2007 Report Share Posted September 18, 2007 I am giving below two interesting Slokas from sanatsujAtIyam (in mahAbhAratam), chapter 2. The beauty of the Slokas is in the alliteration. The word 'vedam' has been used in the unusual sense of 'brahman'. The word 'vedyam' means 'what is knowable' and so it denotes the whole world of objects. The translation given below is based on the bhAshya of Sri Sankara. na vedAnAm veditA kaScidasti vedena vedam na vidur na vedyam | yo veda vedam sa ca veda vedyam yo veda vedyam na sa veda satyam ||42 42.The vedas cannot know brahman, since brahman, being pure consciousness, is not an object of knowledge. vedas are insentient and so neither brahman nor the world can be known through them. He who knows brahman knows the entire universe of objects, since, by knowing brahman everything is known. But he who knows only the universe of objects does not know brahman. yo veda vedAn sa ca veda vedyam na tam vidur vedavido na vedAh | tathApi vedena vidanti vedam ye brAhmaNA vedavido bhavanti ||43 43. He who knows the vedas knows only the universe of objects. Neither the vedas nor the knower of the vedas can know brahman, since brahman cannot be objectified. All the same, brAhmaNas (enlightened persons) who know how to understand the purport of the vedas know brahman through the vedas. S.N.Sastri Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2007 Report Share Posted September 18, 2007 --- " S.N. Sastri " <sn.sastri wrote: > 42.The vedas cannot know brahman, since brahman, > being pure consciousness, > is not an object of knowledge. vedas are insentient > and so neither brahman > nor the world can be known through them. He who > knows brahman knows the > entire universe of objects, since, by knowing > brahman everything is known. > But he who knows only the universe of objects does > not know brahman. > > 43. He who knows the vedas knows only the universe > of objects. Neither the > vedas nor the knower of the vedas can know brahman, > since brahman cannot be > objectified. All the same, brAhmaNas (enlightened > persons) who know how to > understand the purport of the vedas know brahman > through the vedas. > > S.N.Sastri Shastri gaaru - wonderful and thanks for the two beautiful slokas. I have to learn the slokas to remind me what is to be known that cannot be known! With PraNAms Sadananda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2007 Report Share Posted September 18, 2007 > > Shastri gaaru - wonderful and thanks for the two > beautiful slokas. I have to learn the slokas to > remind me what is to be known that cannot be known! > > With PraNAms > Sadananda > Namaste, While joining Sada-ji and congratulating Sastri-ji for recalling us the two beautiful shlokas from Sanatsujatiyam (along with its Shankara bhashya, a favourite text of mine), may I draw the attention of the readers to http://www.geocities.com/profvk/VK2/2601.html with the title: Four Gems from Sanatsujata on Vedas and Knowledge? PraNAms to all advaitins. PraNAms to Sanatsujatha Maharishi. profvk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2007 Report Share Posted September 18, 2007 Shastriji : Thank you so much for sharing the two beautiful slokas from SanatsjAtlyam with this group of seekers of Truth. Of the two , the second verse appeals to me more ! specially the following words : ( All the same, brAhmaNas (enlightened persons) who know how to understand the purport of the vedas know brahman through the vedas.) Very TRUE , is not it ? The Mundaka Upanishad also says, " For the sake of the knowledge of that (which is not made) one should approach with Samit(fuel) in his hand, a preceptor who is well-versed in scriptures and also established in Brahman " ( first mundaka , second khans , verse 12) So, we need a guru who is a shotriya as well as brahma nishta. Otherwise , we will only be debating what the three states are( using all the sharira and the koshas ) and will always be in 'awastai' ( difficult situation ) not knowing 'turiya' is not a state but Statelessness. Aum Shanti! Shanti! shantihi! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 19, 2007 Report Share Posted September 19, 2007 Namaskaram Shastriji, Could you please recommend a book that gives the translation of the Sanatsujatiyam in English. Chowkamba has one in Hindi. Sw. Dayanandaji' talks are available on MP3. With pranams Lakshmi Muthuswamy Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with FareChase. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.