Guest guest Posted September 27, 2007 Report Share Posted September 27, 2007 Hare krishna, Namaskarams, Part 2: Sat Darshan, Verse 5: " Your arguments as to whether the world is real or unreal, whether it is sentient or insentient, whether it is full of happiness or unhappiness, are useless, serving no purpose whatsoever. The state where the world is not seen, where the ego disintegrates completely and where there are no thoughts or vibrations, is most pleasing, fully satisfying and supremely blissful. " The ego, the primary offshoot of the Atman, is nothing but a wave or vibration of pure consciousness. From the ego, emanates the mind and the world. The mind expecting to get unalloyed happiness from the world, is sadly disappointed. It finds that any joy it derives from the world is quickly followed by misery. The ordinary man not recognizing this is in pursuit all his life of the ever –eluding joy from the external world. But a person, who has had the transcendental bhakthi experience, knows that real bliss is not outside, but within oneself. It is experienced in that state where the world is not experienced, when mind is free of thoughts and the ego which hankers after outside happiness itself is dead, disintegrated. This is the supreme state dear to all persons alike. Here the mind remains " avikalpa " thoughtless. The term " avikalpa " also means " without doubts " . Such a state is one and one alone. Duality can be only in the mental level where alone one can have doubts as to what is real and unreal When you transcend the mental level, there is nothing to see, no seer and no seeing. There is no subject- object relationship. This transcendental state is aptly called Sat-Chit-Ananda, Pure Being, Pure consciousness and Pure Bliss. But even this term is inadequate for describing what is indescribable. Without realizing this transcendental state, is it not utter folly to engage in seemingly learned discussions as to whether the world is real or unreal? Any system of philosophy which does not recognize this supreme spiritual path to truth is utterly useless. It can at best be a confusing intellectual drill. Baskaran. P.S. this post is not as an answer to any of the posts of the group but sent only as an interesting article for those who are interested to read it, just as I enjoyed reading it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.