Guest guest Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 The mahAbhArata is one of the greatest epics in the world. At the beginning of the work the author, sage VyAsa, claims with confidence: " What is here may also be found elsewhere, but what is not here will not be found anywhere else " . The mahAbhArata is full of accounts of battles in which kinsmen kill one another and of many deceitful practices indulged in by them. Because of all this a belief has grown that if this book is read in a home it will lead to strife within the family. That there is no basis for any such fear is evident from what Anandavardhana, one of the greatest names in Sanskrit poetics, says about this epic in his work on poetics known as DhvanyAloka. This is what he says:-- " In the mahAbhArata, which combines both the elements of instruction and poetry in one, it will be seen that its conclusion in a note of despair consequent on the miserable deaths of VRshNis as well as pANDavas, as constructed by the great sage, reveals his primary intention of preaching the moral of renunciation through his work and throws light upon the fact that he intended final emancipation as the foremost of human values and Peace as the most predominant sentiment in the whole work. The description of the exploits of the pANDavas is meant to produce a sense of renunciation; renunciation, in its turn, is the very basic instrument of final emancipation; and final emancipation has itself been shown in the Bhagavadgita and other works to be a sure means towards the attainment of the Supreme Reality. In the Introductory chapter the sage says:-- 'Herein, forsooth, will be glorified Lord Vasudeva too, the Eternal'. Hence we are justified in saying that the purport implied by the sage by the above sentence in the Introductory chapter is the perishable nature of everything with the single exception of the supreme Lord and that the mahAbhArata as a whole is intended by him to convey the highest human value, namely, final emancipation, when the work is regarded as a scripture, and to delineate the sentiment of Quietude (shAnta rasa)—whose nature is of heightened tranquility and happiness at the cessation of desire--- as the predominant sentiment in the work when it is regarded as a poem " . Thus the real purport of this epic is to convey the means to liberation. In fact this is the purport of all our epics and purANas and not only of the upanishads. Without knowing this, some people look down upon the purANas as meant only for illiterate villagers and uneducated old women. They do not realize that from the point of view of real knowledge, para vidya, the most brilliant scientist or economist or scholar in any field is as ignorant as the illiterate villager, if not more. Sri Sankara addresses people as 'mUDha' in his Bhaja govindam. This word does not mean 'fool' or 'one deficient in intelligence'. It is derived from the verbal root 'muh' which means 'to be deluded'. Every one who looks upon the world as a reality is deluded from the point of view of advaita, however intelligent and however brilliant he may be in his chosen field. That is why Sri Sankara addresses every one as 'mUDha'. Only the enlightened is not a mUDha in this sense. S.N.Sastri Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2007 Report Share Posted December 11, 2007 advaitin , " S.N. Sastri " <sn.sastri wrote: > > The mahAbhArata is one of the greatest epics in the world. At the beginning > of the work the author, sage VyAsa, claims with confidence: " What is here > may also be found elsewhere, but what is not here will not be found anywhere > else " . Sri Shastriji, thanks for this topic. My childhood introduction to this epic came from Amar Chitra katha, Rajaji's english book and on hearing it from elders. Recently I read Cho's tamil work (my reading in Tamil is not fast/good but his writing was simple and the interest was there.) More recently, I read Kamala Subramaniam's English translation multiple times; would recommend this or Rajaji's version to English speakers new to this epic. The stories and characters are so intensely human, one feels that the central outline was real history, perhaps glamourized with epic flavour. It is also stunning to see how the kshatriyas adhered to the sense of honour, etc.; that almost seems surreal but one is caught with the spirit of dharma pervading the epic. For me, the concept of Dharma is central; its importance is stressed throughout even as the human dilemma in adhering to dharma is highlighted throughout. Duruyodana knew right from wrong and yet was propelled to wrong. Karna knew death was certain by fighting for his friend; yet he had to do only that. There are so many chilling incidents in the war, like the abhimanya killing, bhoorisvaras killing by Satyaki, the lying to Drona in the war-middle and his execution by his disciple Dhrishtadyumna, and before the war, the episodes of Draupadi's torment with the five brothers/husbands silently watching ! Like Rama's acceptance of Dasaratha's boon and its consequence, Bheema inspite of all frustration never broke his elder brother's decisions. The whole epic is a mind-boggling lesson. You have raised the more subtle point that even while the human side of dharma,etc is stressed, the epic's real intent is to guide through such to the ultimate goal of moksha. This is something one (like myself) can easily forget and worth remembering. Hope others share their views on the epic as well. thollmelukaalkizhu > > The mahAbhArata is full of accounts of battles in which kinsmen kill one > another and of many deceitful practices indulged in by them. Because of all > this a belief has grown that if this book is read in a home it will lead to > strife within the family. That there is no basis for any such fear is > evident from what Anandavardhana, one of the greatest names in Sanskrit > poetics, says about this epic in his work on poetics known as DhvanyAloka. > This is what he says:-- > > " In the mahAbhArata, which combines both the elements of instruction and > poetry in one, it will be seen that its conclusion in a note of despair > consequent on the miserable deaths of VRshNis as well as pANDavas, as > constructed by the great sage, reveals his primary intention of preaching > the moral of renunciation through his work and throws light upon the fact > that he intended final emancipation as the foremost of human values and > Peace as the most predominant sentiment in the whole work. The description > of the exploits of the pANDavas is meant to produce a sense of renunciation; > renunciation, in its turn, is the very basic instrument of final > emancipation; and final emancipation has itself been shown in the > Bhagavadgita and other works to be a sure means towards the attainment of > the Supreme Reality. In the Introductory chapter the sage says:-- > > 'Herein, forsooth, will be glorified > > Lord Vasudeva too, the Eternal'. > > Hence we are justified in saying that the purport implied by the sage > by the above sentence in the Introductory chapter is the perishable nature > of everything with the single exception of the supreme Lord and that the > mahAbhArata as a whole is intended by him to convey the highest human value, > namely, final emancipation, when the work is regarded as a scripture, and to > delineate the sentiment of Quietude (shAnta rasa)—whose nature is of > heightened tranquility and happiness at the cessation of desire--- as the > predominant sentiment in the work when it is regarded as a poem " . > > Thus the real purport of this epic is to convey the means to liberation. In > fact this is the purport of all our epics and purANas and not only of the > upanishads. Without knowing this, some people look down upon the purANas as > meant only for illiterate villagers and uneducated old women. They do not > realize that from the point of view of real knowledge, para vidya, the most > brilliant scientist or economist or scholar in any field is as ignorant as > the illiterate villager, if not more. Sri Sankara addresses people as > 'mUDha' in his Bhaja govindam. This word does not mean 'fool' or 'one > deficient in intelligence'. It is derived from the verbal root 'muh' which > means 'to be deluded'. Every one who looks upon the world as a reality is > deluded from the point of view of advaita, however intelligent and however > brilliant he may be in his chosen field. That is why Sri Sankara addresses > every one as 'mUDha'. Only the enlightened is not a mUDha in this sense. > > S.N.Sastri > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.