Guest guest Posted February 17, 2008 Report Share Posted February 17, 2008 shabdapramANa in VP- 3 The primary meaning of a word is its literal meaning. The word 'cow' means the animal known by that name. According to advaita vedAnta, the word 'cow' means the species cow and not any particular cow. Some of the other schools such as nyAya, however hold that a word means only a particular entity and not the species. This is not accepted by advaita. When the word 'cow' is mentioned, we think of the cow in general and not of any particular cow. The species is known as 'jAti' and an individual of the species is known as 'vyakti'. When a person hears the word 'cow' it is the common characteristics of all cows that come to mind. When a cow is pointed out to a child and he is told that it is a cow it is the particular characteristics of a cow that he remembers and that is why he is able to recognize another cow which he sees elsewhere, even if it is of a different colour or size. Thus each word directly denotes the 'jAti' and only indirectly the particular 'vyakti' which is referred to. The uninitiated may think that all this discussion about whether a word denotes the species or an individual is mere hair-splitting without any practical utility. To them it must be pointed out that Shri Shankara has found this theory useful for refuting the contention of an opponent in his bhAshya on brahmasUtra 1.3.28. He says there, " Words are connected with the general characteristics and not with the individuals, for the individuals are infinite, and it is impossible to comprehend the relation of a word (with all of them) " . The primary meaning of a word is known as 'vAcyArtha'. It may happen that in a particular sentence the literal meaning of a word does not give rise to the intended sense of the sentence as a whole. In such cases the literal meaning of the word is discarded and an implied meaning is adopted. Such an implied meaning is known as 'lakshyArtha' and the implication is known as 'lakshaNa'. There are three kinds of implication. These are:-- 1. jahal-lakshaNa—exclusive implication. 2. ajahal-lakshaNa—inclusive implication. 3. jahad-ajahal-lakshaNa- quasi-implication or exclusive-inclusive implication. The third type of implication is used for explaining the meaning of the mahAvAkya " Tat tvam asi " . This will be explained later on. These three kinds of implication will now be explained. 1. Exclusive implication—In this the literal meaning of the word is discarded, but a connected meaning, which makes the sentence meaningful, is adopted. The classic example is the sentence: " There is a cowherds' colony on the (river) Ganga " . Obviously the colony cannot be in the water of the river. So the word 'Ganga' has to be understood as meaning 'bank of Ganga'. The use of this kind of implication is common in practice. For example, the city of Frankfurt in Germany is always referred to as 'Frankfurt am Main' which means 'Frankfurt on the (river) Main'. We have to understand this as 'the banks of the river'. When we say " India won the match " it does not mean the country as a whole, but the Indian team. S.N.Sastri Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.