Guest guest Posted April 14, 2008 Report Share Posted April 14, 2008 praNAms Sri Sadananda prabhuji Hare Krishna Sri Sada prabhuji: The witnessing consciousness, upahita caitanya, still will be witnessing the operation of the BMI but does not get identified as I am this. That is what jnaana implies, right? bhaskar : You are absolutely right that jnAni does not have the identification with BMI (upAdhi-s)...but if we say, chaitanya is upahita (circumscribed ) by upAdhi-s here then it is again leads to old position i.e. jIva bhAva is it not?? Here pot space realizes that there is in reality no pot space as such at all at any point of time...is it not?? In this state, how can it be possible to have *upahita chaitanya* in the form of witness?? And one more question, whether this upahita chaitanya would be the witness of operations of its own BMI or is it witness of operations of vividhOpAdhi?? or in other words, pot space, after realization that it is mahAkAsha is the witness of ONLY pot upAdhi?? if yes, then its individuality (pot space) is not lost & it is appropriate to say it is ONLY upahita chaitanya (space circumscribed by pot)... Thanks onceagain for your kind clarification prabhuji... Hari Hari Hari Bol!!! bhaskar Jnaani, in principle, does not have any praarabda, but the upaadhis continue because of praarabda. Others may say that jnaani is there because of prArabda. Since he has no identification other than for transactional purposes, he does not own it, to say that he has prArabda. I must say this is true even for ajnaani too. But he unnecessarily claims as I am the doer and therefore tries to own the actions that do not really belong to him! That is what is implied in adhyaasa. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2008 Report Share Posted April 14, 2008 brahma vAdinaH katham iti chEth? tasya tAdAthmya lakshaNa saMbandOpapathEH {Brahma suthara bhasya 2.2.38} this verse I read it " Vedantha Prabhodha " of Swamy ParamAnanda bharathi {kannada version, page43 and second para} praNAms Sri Sastri prabhuji Hare Krishna Thanks for the reference...Since I am a Kannadiga (the only language which I can speak, write & understand without any problem :-)) I hope, it wont be any problem for me to grasp Swamiji's contention here...I've that book, shall look at that particular reference...I've read some of the topics in that very book...dont you think swamiji's observation on avasthA traya vivEka is partial from the waking state??? Hari Hari Hari Bol!!! bhaskar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 Dear Sir, The many posts on this topic by Sadananda, sn sastry, Bhaskar, Dennis, Durga and others are very illuminating. Reading these posts is itself a satsangh. It gives one great humility which is a prerequisite for any spiritual progress. It would be very good if we can take points on which we can progress. Discussing states of a Realised person may not make much sense as that can be done sensibly only when we are at or near that state, when of course no more discussions are needed. All our Dharma sastras propel us to use our free will to follow Dharma and progress on the path to self realisation. So it is obvious that everyone has free will- probably constrained by his prarabda karma. The idea is that how hard can we push ahead in spite of our prarabda karma. If we can use more free will in a positive direction the better it is. Regarding group effect, it may be that if we jointly do some common sin (like a council of government ministers indulging in corruption) then may be in later lives we will face common disasters at the same time. The storage of these karmic impressions is likely to be in our pranamaya kosa as per some yogic literature. As the same pranamaya kosa is present in our next birth along with mano maya and vignanamaya kosas (only with a new body-annamaya kosa), our life is guided by these past karmas.(it is a self existing autonomous control system!). Hari Om V.Muralidharan Did you know? You can CHAT without downloading messenger. Go to http://in.messenger./webmessengerpromo.php/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 --- " S.N. Sastri " <sn.sastri wrote: > Beautifully and precisely put. Sastriji - saashTanga praNAms. Encouraging comments comming from you are worth the million. Hari Om! Sadananda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2008 Report Share Posted April 17, 2008 Dear Friends, In the context of the free will discussion, our Sunder-ji's article on karma may be of interest. 2007/07/03/the-hindu-doctrine-of-karma-by-dr-sunder-hattan gadi/ Namaste and love to all Harsha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 From : H.N.Sreenivasa Murthy Pranams to all the members. Dear members, I would like to draw the kind attention of the members to the first line of the mantra 1-1 of Kena Upanishad which reads as follows: kEna iShitaM patati prEShitaM manaH || " The disciple asked: Om. By whose will directed does the mind proceed to its object? " In the above mantra the meaning of the words " kEna iShitaM " and " prEShitam " are very important. The answer is given in the mantra 2-2 of the same upanishad. Sri Shankara's commentary for the above two mantras will put an end to all the speculative discussions on this subject of FREE WILL. I request the members to study the two mantras as well as the commentary of Sri Shankara on the mantras. With warm and respectful regards, Sreenivasa Murthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.