Guest guest Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 praNAms Hare Krishna Incidentally, today, I have received the below mail from Divine Life Society....I would like to see Sri Dennis prabhuji's comments on this. Hari Hari Hari Bol!!! // quote // SIVANANDA DAILY READING FOR 16 APRIL YOU HAVE FREE WILL Some ignorant people say: " Karma does everything. It is all destiny. If I am destined by my karma to be like this or like that, why then should I exert? It is my destiny only. " This is fatalism. This will bring inertia, stagnation and misery. This is perfect misunderstanding of the laws of karma. This is a fallacious argument. An intelligent man will certainly not put such a question. You have made your own destiny from within by your thoughts and actions. You have a free will to choose now. You have freedom in action. A rogue is not an eternal rogue. Put him in the company of a saint. He will change in no time. He will think and act now in a different way and will change his destiny. He will become saintly in character. Dacoit Ratnagar was changed into Sage Valmiki by the current of Rishi Narada. Jagai and Madai, two rogues of the first order, were changed by the current of Nityananda, disciple of Lord Gouranga. You will have to desire, to think, and act. You can change karma in any way you like. You can become a yogi or jnani by right desire, by right thinking and by right action. You can attain the position of Indra or Brahma by good karma. Man is not a helpless being. He has free will of his own. Man has power to choose between the alternatives which fate brings before him. In choosing between them he may either follow his tendencies produced by his past actions or struggle against them. The will of man is ever free. The arguments which are advanced by determinists in saying that human will is determined are not sound and tenable; they fall to the ground. Dear friends! Man is the master of his destiny. Wake up now from the deep slumber of ignorance. Never become a fatalist. Think rightly, Act rightly. Lead a virtuous life. Never hurt the feelings of others. Mould your character. Purify your mind. Concentrate. Thou art nitya mukta purusa (ever free spirit). Tat Twam Asi - Thou art That. The samskaras (habit-patterns) of virtuous actions are imbedded in the citta. They are also indestructible. They are real, valuable assets for you. They will prevent you from doing wrong actions. They will push you on to the goal. Selfless works will prepare the ground of antahkarana (the psyche) for the reception of the seed of jnana. The path of karma yoga eventually leads to the attainment of infinite bliss of the self. // unquote// . ,___ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 -Some important questions arise from the posting Extract Quote Some ignorant people say: " Karma does everything. It is all destiny. > If I am destined by my karma to be like this or like that, why then > Should I exert? It is my destiny only. " This is fatalism " Unquote Ignorant men not exposed to serious spiritual seeking do this argument. The main question in spiritual circles like'ADVAITIN' group is whether the so-called free will is really free will? Or only an apparent one. In common parlance nobody disputes one's freedom for action but do we have real freedom? Actions are preceded by thoughts. Do we have control over what thoughts you get or are they influenced by your DNA-the environment you were brought up, the conditioning you are subjected to like listening, hearing reading seeing etc. If these influence ones thoughts what is the scope of one's freedom? The crux is does one get thoughts or whether a thought is a reaction of the brain to some impulse it received. How one reacts to a thought is not definitely uniform in the case of all persons and it depends on the conditioning one has. As sri sadananda rightly puts the whole problem lies in believing that there is an individual doer. Many enlightened declared that there is no individual doer. So long as one believes that he is the doer it is obvious that he cannot pass responsibility anywhere. IT is common that all of us do our actions with absolute free will within the moral and legal framework. The crux is nobody has control over the results of actions Why similar actions by two result in two different ways –no explanation 100% belief that there is no individual doer, in spite of apparent freedom, may result in the following Let us see the advantages of this belief. If there is any apparent unpleasant situation one is facing from past actions – belief that he was the doer – makes one unhappy for past actions. On the other hand if some good turned out from past actions –belief that he was the doer- make one feel pride and ego builds. Contrarily if one really believes that there was no individual doer and what was free action was not really free action but prompted by a Higher force (it may not be correct to allude to it as just prarabda as in that past action also there was no individual doer) – neither unhappiness nor pride in both the situations mentioned above. It does not stop there. One will not hate others for wrong actions and tolerance increases. Probably such a stand made Christ comment `They know not what they are doing' Such a stand gives us strength to accept whatever result comes out of our actions. Is it not surrender? Ramana Sarma -- In advaitin , Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr wrote: > > > praNAms > Hare Krishna > > Incidentally, today, I have received the below mail from Divine Life > Society....I would like to see Sri Dennis prabhuji's comments on this. > > Hari Hari Hari Bol!!! > > // quote // > > > > > > > SIVANANDA DAILY READING FOR 16 APRIL > YOU HAVE FREE WILL > > Some ignorant people say: " Karma does everything. It is all destiny. > If I am destined by my karma to be like this or like that, why then > should I exert? It is my destiny only. " This is fatalism. This will > bring inertia, stagnation and misery. This is perfect > misunderstanding of the laws of karma. This is a fallacious argument. > An intelligent man will certainly not put such a question. You have > made your own destiny from within by your thoughts and actions. You > have a free will to choose now. You have freedom in action. A rogue > is not an eternal rogue. Put him in the company of a saint. He will > change in no time. He will think and act now in a different way and > will change his destiny. He will become saintly in character. Dacoit > Ratnagar was changed into Sage Valmiki by the current of Rishi > Narada. Jagai and Madai, two rogues of the first order, were changed > by the current of Nityananda, disciple of Lord Gouranga. You will > have to desire, to think, and act. You can change karma in any way > you like. You can become a yogi or jnani by right desire, by right > thinking and by right action. You can attain the position of Indra or > Brahma by good karma. Man is not a helpless being. He has free will > of his own. > > Man has power to choose between the alternatives which fate brings > before him. In choosing between them he may either follow his > tendencies produced by his past actions or struggle against them. The > will of man is ever free. The arguments which are advanced by > determinists in saying that human will is determined are not sound > and tenable; they fall to the ground. > > Dear friends! Man is the master of his destiny. Wake up now from the > deep slumber of ignorance. Never become a fatalist. Think rightly, > Act rightly. Lead a virtuous life. Never hurt the feelings of others. > Mould your character. Purify your mind. Concentrate. Thou art nitya > mukta purusa (ever free spirit). Tat Twam Asi - Thou art That. > > The samskaras (habit-patterns) of virtuous actions are imbedded in > the citta. They are also indestructible. They are real, valuable > assets for you. They will prevent you from doing wrong actions. They > will push you on to the goal. Selfless works will prepare the ground > of antahkarana (the psyche) for the reception of the seed of jnana. > The path of karma yoga eventually leads to the attainment of infinite > bliss of the self. > // unquote// > > > . > > > > ,___ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 Hello, The main question in spiritual circles like'ADVAITIN' group is whether the so-called free will is really free will? Or only an apparent one. In common parlance nobody disputes one's freedom for action but do we have real freedom? This is a constantly recurring question for me. I suspect that free will comes and goes and that I don't have nearly the degree of free will that I believe I have! The most nearly truthful thing that I can say at this point is that I have some degree of free will but certainly not complete free will! Free will/karma seem to be a pair of opposites and maybe neither makes sense in the absence of the other? Maybe the workable answer lies somewhere in the middle between free will//karma? If we had no free will whatsoever, then this debate couldn't even have arisen. If there is no karma whatsoever then maybe this debate wouldn't have arisen!...I don't know, opinions and thought of one guy! ______________________________\ ____ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile./;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2008 Report Share Posted April 16, 2008 Namaste, In this video clip from a satsang of Gururaj Ananda Yogi, he addresses the point of free will within the question he is made about the feeling of life as being problematic. I think some will enjoy listening to it. Raman On 15/4/08 07:49, " Steve Stoker " <otnac6 wrote: > > > > Hello, > > The main question in spiritual circles like'ADVAITIN' > group > is whether the so-called free will is really free > will? Or only an > apparent one. In common parlance nobody disputes one's > freedom for > action but do we have real freedom? > > This is a constantly recurring question for me. I > suspect that free will comes and goes and that I don't > have nearly the degree of free will that I believe I > have! The most nearly truthful thing that I can say at > this point is that I have some degree of free will but > certainly not complete free will! Free will/karma seem > to be a pair of opposites and maybe neither makes > sense in the absence of the other? Maybe the workable > answer lies somewhere in the middle between free > will//karma? > > If we had no free will whatsoever, then this debate > couldn't even have arisen. If there is no karma > whatsoever then maybe this debate wouldn't have > arisen!...I don't know, opinions and thought of one > guy! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2008 Report Share Posted April 16, 2008 > The main question in spiritual circles like'ADVAITIN' group > is whether the so-called free will is really free will? May be the question itself is not correct. The question confounds us as we are intuitively grounded to the principle of excluded middle. Mr. Aristotle served our needs diligently for last two thousand years (and continues to do so even now for our day to day functioning). However, his binary logic was trancended by Godel just as Newton was transecnded by Eienstein. Today, neither philosophers nor physicists consider binary logic an adequate tool to probe the finer mysteries of nature. We do not know if the question of free will is really beyond Aristotelian logic, but I would not be surprised if it comes out to be so. - praNAm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.