Guest guest Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 Pranaams to you Shyam Ji Thanks for your detailing Shyamji. I'd seek further elaboration w.r.t to my doubts. Also many thanks for using the right word – Mithya , in this context . Illusion is a colloquial usage. I am still learning not use words loosely . I am looking at Mithya also as `having no being of its own) The world as I see it stems from two aspects – My ignorance that has superimposed the names & forms and the `consequent ` error of Judgement . As far as I am concerned , this `relative frame of reference' that is ever changing . The Jagat doesn't continue to exist as it is at any time nor for anyone. Would that not make it Asat , strictly speaking . Also would request you to throw light on Acharya's sloka in Atma Bodha- `Svkale Sathyavath Bhathi , Prabodhe sathi Asat Bhaveth' – known as unreal on `waking ` Yes , my central point also is the Adhistaanam of names and forms confered on account of ignorance. If I undersatnd the clay in the pot , then this Mithya doesnt bother me.I would continue to use the pot , but will cling to the clay alone. Then , My frame of reference that existed itself is known by me to be Asat. Kindly clarify the above , even as I try to garner further insight from the blogspot Pranaams Hari Om Sri Gurubhyo Namah Krishnan advaitin , Shyam <shyam_md wrote: > > Namaskarams Shri Krishnan-ji The world is not " illusion " , it is mithyA - and mithya is not asat (false). I do not suffer because of names and forms - I suffer because I confer on them a reality that is separate from me, the adhishtanam Brahman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.