Guest guest Posted February 11, 2009 Report Share Posted February 11, 2009 As an advaitin, a seeker is instructed to remove the wrong-superimpositions on his true-nature, one-by-one. With a discriminating intellect, the seeker is able to remove most of his wrong identifications. But when it comes to removing the identification with intellect, the seeker hits a brick-wall. Throughout his empirical-existence, he has identified with his intellect. It has always been there with him, that he can't imagine that there is an existence beyond his intellect. He is so attached to his intellect, that he would like to continue with that attachment even after his self-realization. Maybe the reason is that it is the inner-most of the instruments of empirical-knowledge, and that is where the notion of self exists. So we can't conceive of an existence beyond it. We forget that this intellect is as much jada as a dead-body or a piece of stone, without the Self that lights it up. We are so used to empirical-knowledge, that we are unable to see the light that lights up this empirical knowledge. In the metrical part of Upadesasahasri, Sankara in his own unassuming style, has explained the relation between Self and the intellect. For Sankara, advaita is kevala-advaita, where there is only one knower, the inner-most Self in all. There is no compromise, no degree of embodiment. Given below is the Chapter 7 of Upadesasahasri - metrical part. Chapter 7 - budhyArUdhaprakaranam 1. buddhyArUdham sadA sarvam drsyatE yatra tatra vA mayA tasmAt param brahma sarvajnas casmi sarvagah Everything located in the intellect is always seen by me always. Therefore, I am the supreme Brahman all-knowing and all-pervading. 2. yathAtmabuddhicAranam sAkshi tadvat paresvapi naivApodhum na vAdAtum sakyas tasmat paro hy aham Just as I am the Witness of the movements in my own intellect, so am I in other's . I can neither be rejected, nor accepted. Therefore, I am indeed the highest. 3. vikAritvam asuddhatvam bhautikatvam na cAtmanah asEsabuddhisAksitvAd buddhivac cAlpavedanA There is no change in Atman, nor impurity, nor materiality, and because It is the Witness of all intellects, there is no limitation of its knowledge, unlike the intellects. 4. manau prakAsyate yadvad raktAdyAkAratAtape mayi samdrsyate sarvam Atapeneva tan mayA Just as in the presence of sunlight, colors such as red etc. are manifested in a jewel, similarly, all objects are seen in the intellect in my presence. All things are illumined by Me, just like the sun-light. 5. buddhau drsyam bhaved buddhau satyAm nAsti viparyayE drastA yasmAt sadA drastA tasmAd dvaitam na vidyatE The object of knowledge in the intellect exists when the intellect exists; otherwise it does not exist. Since the Seer is always the seer (whether intellect exists or not), duality does not exist. 6. avivekAt parAbhAvam yathA buddhir avet tathA vivekAt to parAd anyah svayam cApi na vidyate Just as the intellect, due to absence of discriminating knowledge, holds that the highest Atman does not exist, just so, after discrimination, there is nothing other than the highest Brahman, not even the intellect itself. Regards, Raj. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.