Guest guest Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 Kanchi Mahaswamigal's Discourses on Advaitam KMDA – 9 (For KMDA - 8, see#44161) (This series started with #43779) Tamil original starts from http://www.kamakoti.org/tamil/part4kural301.htm Note: In these discourses, `the Acharya' refers to Adi Shankaracharya. The speaker is the Kanchi Mahaswamigal. Reduction of Mental distractions in ShAstra-Karma Let us take the ShAstra-karma known as pUjA. This is an action, in fact a series of several actions, no doubt. But in doing this, while in the act of doing pUjA, several thoughts do arise – like "I have now to do the Tulasi archanA", Note by VK: [archanA = formal offering of flowers to God repeating names of God in succession, each preceded by AuM and followed by namaH, the names being in the dative case] "I have now to do the archanA with the bilva leaves", "I have to light the lamp properly", "while doing circumambulation I should not trip over the pUjA vessels" and so on. Several thoughts do arise and one does the several actions which together constitute the pUjA, following each thought. Thus while bhakti is generally a thought process, when translating it into action it generates several thoughts. This is true of every action. Each of them does break up into several thoughts. Now let me come to the point to be noted here. Every action or karma is associated with a series of thought processes. But the point is, the mind, while being involved in this karma does not get into other thoughts which are unrelated to this karma. If you leave the mind to itself it will wander aimlessly over things totally unrelated to each other. This dissipation of the mind does not occur when you focus it into one action or karma. While doing that action it dwells on only those things which are related to the main karma. To this extent action itself disciplines the mind. Of course it may not be a complete discipline. But in some sense there is mostly a uni-directional restriction or piloting of the mind. When one is not doing any work but only sitting quietly or lying down, it is generally not possible to focus attention on one thought or only related thoughts. The mind simply runs amuck in all sorts of directions into mutually unrelated subjects and topics. On the other hand if one is engaged in a particular task, the mind stops with thoughts that are related only to that task on hand. Suppose you sit, saying `Let me do meditation on God'. The mind refuses to cooperate; in fact it takes you into most unwanted avenues. Many persons do come to me and cry over this common failing. If instead, one sits to do, say, a pUjA to some Divinity, there is a focussing of the thoughts. Even though the mind is prone to think of several things unrelated to the pUjA, the situation is not as haphazard or helter-skelter as what it was when you sat to meditate. It is not pUjA alone. Even when you sit for a game of cards, one's mind concentrates only on those things related to what one is playing. Children intently playing a game of cricket in the backyard would not even hear their mother calling them for a sitting at the dining table to have some eats which they like most. The ShAstra karma that our elders have chalked out for us do good to us in two essential ways. While other tasks very often anchor our minds to irrelevant or even wrong things, the ShAstra karmas draw our minds only into good and noble thoughts. This is number one. Number two is they draw us away from all bad thoughts. When one is intent on a certain action-work, Mind takes the back seat. Even then mind does benefit by this. As far as we can understand, when we are involved in a ShAstra-karma, whether it prompts us to think good thoughts or not, certainly it detracts us from entertaining bad thoughts and even more so, it restrains us from doing bad actions. This is the great advantage. Action (Work) and Meditation Let us take a simple action, namely the task of cleaning the temple premises and corridors. "He is the Lord of all the Universe; He pervades everything in the world; but out of our foolishness we don't understand His pervasion. It is for our benefit He manifests and stays here in the archA (vigrahA – icon) and this temple is therefore His living place. If we can keep this temple spic and span, our hearts also will be free of all dirt. And to boot, if all the residents of this community join in this task, then the community will be free of dirts like hate, envy and difference." This should be the attitude, coupled with gratitude, when we clean the temple. But the very act of dusting and cleaning may prevent us from getting absorbed in noble thoughts like this. For a total one-pointedness in such thoughts action does present some obstacle. There is no doubt about it. To a certain extent, maybe even to a large extent, work and action may organise our thoughts but it will not help a complete one-pointedness in the thinking. Thought and action are already a two-fold process. "O.K. Swamiji, if it is so, then why take up work and action? Why not I sit for meditation quietly without doing any hands-on work and try to get the one-pointedness towards good thoughts?" Sit and try, my dear. Throw away that sweep and duster and sit. "Yes, Swamiji, I am seated" O.K. For some time sit still and meditate. …………………………….. (The Swamigal dramatises both sides of the conversation, and now keeps silent for a little time) How is meditation going on? Have I disturbed your meditation by asking questions? "No, Swami, no. You have not disturbed me. Nothing of the sort. It went off on its own. Even to say `went off' is wrong. From the very first, the thoughts did not converge. What to speak of `disturbance'? As soon as I sat and started, maybe for a moment or two, there was some peace in good thought. The mind was absorbed in God. Almost immediately the thought came: `Therefore Bhakti and meditation are superior to Karma. Yes, this is superior; karma is inferior'. I am telling you frankly. The thoughts got dissipated and went as far as to think: `Why is this Swami always talking about Karma? He ought to be talking about advaita'. The thought went on: `He even cites examples of Krishna paramAtmA and Adi Shankara and says they also said the same thing'. How can objective and practice be so much at variance?'. "And the thought continued: In theory they say Gandhism is the objective. But in practice they open more and more factories and keep on increasing the military budget. This led on to umpteen thoughts about politics. Who should be voted in at the next election? … thus the thought led on to even cursing the leader of the party not to our liking, to the extent that the thought wished he perished! Oh `what a pity! We wanted to clean the corridors of the temple, and then thinking that meditation is a better thing to do we sat here. But now in our own mind so much dirt has accumulated. The dusting and clearing work of the dirt in the temple is a nobler task. It may not regulate the thoughts along noble channels, but it certainly prevents the mind from distraction and dissipation into thousand unwanted directions. Enough is enough with this meditation. Let me go back to the task on hand. But I have boasted to the Swami that I will do meditation. It is really embarassing to go back to him and accept defeat …' That was the time, Swamiji, when you spoke up and called me. Maybe because of the merit of the fact that I came to clean the temple corridors, I am being enabled to tell you all this frankly!". Cleaning the corridors of the temple involves a score of other tasks – like procuring water, assembling different kinds and sizes of water containers, brooms, brushes, washing chemicals, attending to blocked waterways and so on. All these can block the noble thoughts arising in the mind. But inspite of that, until the maturity is attained for silent meditation – in fact that maturiy is itself a possible result of such unselfish service – until such time, it is better to be involved in the action of service-rather than sitting for meditation for which one is not spiritually ready. At worst such service will divert one very much from `bad' things. That itself is a great advantage, though not from the positive side; it is actually a benefit by reducing the negatives. But let it not be misunderstood that even an attempt at meditation should not be done. Not to try to divert the mind towards the noblest of tasks that it can do and to keep involved in action all the time does not befit a human being with a mind. Man is not born to be like that. He can as well be a machine in a factory. For achieving a certain perfection in meditation at some time in one's life, one surely has to start early even though with an immature mind. A weak frail person may do yogAsanAs to become strong and healthy. Of course the frailty of the individual will make it difficult for him to do the yogAsanas. But should he not make an effort? May be a start can be made for five minutes, which slowly and gradually should be aimed to be increased to ten, fifteen minutes and higher. That is how many have achieved success. The thought of Atman and effort at advaita thinking must begin for you all even now; that is why I am making all these lectures. In order that this thought may sprout and be stable I wish you all get the necessary purity of mind (chitta-shuddhi) and that is why I want you to do the ShAstra-karmas. That will give you the purity of mind and in the end, the noble thought-process and the meditation will all give place to a jnAna-experience. (To be continued in KMDA 10) PraNAms to all advaitins. PraNAms to Kanchi Maha Swamigal. profvk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.