Guest guest Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Dennis-ji wrote: I think we eventually have to concede that we will never have a totally satisfactory explanation for empirical reality. And this is inevitable, given that the (absolute) fact of the matter is that there is not even a world now, let alone ‘before humans arrived’. All there ever has been and will be is name and form of the non-dual brahman. |||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Namaste Dennis-ji, The statement in question was - " The blue print for the creation of the dream world come from the vaasanaas of the individual and blue print for the creation of the waking world comes from the samashTi vaasanaas of the all jiivas put together. " (Sada-ji) This statement is very much anchored in the relative domain of waking and dreaming. What have the patterns and tendencies of the human mind have to do with the Periodic Table for instance? Our personal interactions are based on those manifestations of mind. They cant really be responsible for the make-up of the physical world. When we move to the absolute domain your answer makes ‘ajativada’ sense but the statement that I question was not about that. We need to be accurate or beginners will be led astray. Best Wishes, Michael. -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Dear Michael-ji, My point is that, since the world itself is not actually real, we can never have any ultimately ‘real’ explanations for anything that appears to happen there. Explanations from the scriptures are interim only until the final understanding dawns. Until that time, since we are following the path of advaita, the best that we can do is to follow that interim, scriptural teaching. And, as far as I am aware, the statements that Sada-ji made are perfectly in accord with this. Best wishes, Dennis advaitin [advaitin ] On Behalf Of ombhurbhuva Tuesday, March 31, 2009 12:18 AM advaitin Waking and Dream States << This statement is very much anchored in the relative domain of waking and dreaming. What have the patterns and tendencies of the human mind have to do with the Periodic Table for instance? Our personal interactions are based on those manifestations of mind. They cant really be responsible for the make-up of the physical world. When we move to the absolute domain your answer makes ‘ajativada’ sense but the statement that I question was not about that. We need to be accurate or beginners will be led astray. >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 H.N.Sreenivasa Murthy Pranams to all advaitin , kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada wrote: " Only when one compares the two states, say in the waking state, then the dream state appears to have a lower degree of reality, in relation to the waking state. Similarly when one transcends to the highest state, paaramaarthika, both waking and dream states are sublimated as unreal. " Dear Sri Sadananda, I request you kindly to reveal how the stated statement is a fact and please show how one could transcend to the highest state, paramarthika, so that both waking and dream states are sublimated as unreal. This wii help a lot of mumukshus to reach the goal. The guidane and from your end in this direction is a must and I trust that your guidance in the light of your svAnuBava will be gratefully remembered by genuine seekers in ths advaitin group who are not aware of the methodology . This can be done at your earliest convenience. With warm and respectful regards, Sreenivasa Murthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.