Guest guest Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Namaste all, In his commentary on Gita 4-34. Dr. S. Radhakrishnan writes the following sentence: Quote: Ultimately what is revealed in the scriptures (praNipAta-shravaNa), what is thought out by the mind (pariprashna - manana) and what is realized by the spirit through service and meditation (sevA - nididhyAsana) must agree. Unquote. My question is: Is this parallelism of 'praNipAta,pariprashna and sevA' with 'shravaNa, manana and nididhyAsana' close enough to Adi Sankara's teachings in his Bhashyas and prakaraNa-granthas? I hope this will not (Or will it?) raise a flood of so many challenging responses as my earlier question on 'nididhyAsana and Ramana's self-enquiry' raised. After my recovery from surgery I am resuming my Gita-class to neighbours here and I am in the midst of the fourth chapter now. That is how I stumbled into Dr.S.R.'s statement above. Thank you all in advance. PraNAms to all advaitins. profvk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 --- On Thu, 4/16/09, V. Krishnamurthy <profvk wrote: In his commentary on Gita 4-34. Dr. S. Radhakrishnan writes the following sentence: Quote: Ultimately what is revealed in the scriptures (praNipAta-shravaNa ), what is thought out by the mind (pariprashna - manana) and what is realized by the spirit through service and meditation (sevA - nididhyAsana) must agree. Unquote. My question is: Is this parallelism of 'praNipAta,paripras hna and sevA' with 'shravaNa, manana and nididhyAsana' close enough to Adi Sankara's teachings in his Bhashyas and prakaraNa-granthas? ---------- Prof. VK - PraNAms One can stretch ones imagination to indicate shravana, manana and nidhidhyaasana. To me, Krishna is emphasizing two aspects: 1. The need of a teacher for aadhyaatmic study 2. The attitude of the student who is seeking knowledge. Bhagavaan Raamaanuja emphasizes the prapatti or sharaNaagati or surrender aspect involved emphasizing the praNipaata and sevA. The second line emphasizes the attitude of the teacher or responsibility of the teacher. Hari Om! Sadananda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 PranAms Prof-ji As you well know this is what Shankara in his GitABhAshya has to say in relation to this verse. *** Because, sarvam, all; karma-akhilam, actions in their totality, without exception; O son of Prtha, parisamapyate, culminate, get merged (attain their consummation); jnane, in Knowledge, which is a means to Liberation.... In that case, by what means is this highly estimable Knowledge acquired? The answer is being given: Viddhi, know; tat, that, the process by which It is acquired; by approaching teachers pranipatena, through prostration, by lying fully streched on the ground with face downward, with prolonged salutation; pariprasnena, through inquiry, as to how bondage and Liberation come, and what are Knowledge and ignorance; and sevaya, through the service of the guru. (Know it) through these and other (disciplines) *** With due respect to Shri Radhakrishna-ji, I think these comparisons are really more than a stretch. PranipAta is prostration - you prostate indicating Sharanagati or Surrender ( - I have come to you because I find no other way). Pariprashna is acknowledging one's ignorance and framing the questions appropriately - who am I? what is samsara? etc as the Vivekachudamani or the Prasnopanisad etc indicate - indicating Shraddha (- I ask because I have complete shraddhA that you have the answers and can help me understand them as well). Only then, after Sharanagati and Shraddha, does shravanA actually begin - when the Guru starts to talk. The third aspect of this is Seva which indicates acquision of Shadsampatti - to develop a proper attitude in the mind, by service to the Guru, to build up shama dama and other such qualities, so that the knowledge that is being taught, may freely flow, unobstructed by one's Ego, and thereby actually soak ones intellect. Once there is Sharanagati Shraddha and Shad-Sampatti and there is a Guru, who is a Tattvadarshi, a Seer, then jnAnam is assured. Comparing sevA to nidhidhyasana is again incorrect. Here, in 4.34, sevayA is a preparatory step, Despite being a self-less spirit of service, there is definitely a ahankrta bhAva here, a doership notion is verymuch involved - this is very different from what is involved in nidhidhyasana - which is nothing but a contemplative abidance in one's Self. At least this is how I see it - hope this is not seen as a challenging response! Hari OM Shri Gurubhyoh namah Shyam --- On Thu, 4/16/09, V. Krishnamurthy <profvk wrote: V. Krishnamurthy <profvk PraNipAta, pariprashna and sevA - B.G.4 - 34 advaitin Thursday, April 16, 2009, 4:01 AM Namaste all, In his commentary on Gita 4-34. Dr. S. Radhakrishnan writes the following sentence: Quote: Ultimately what is revealed in the scriptures (praNipAta-shravaNa ), what is thought out by the mind (pariprashna - manana) and what is realized by the spirit through service and meditation (sevA - nididhyAsana) must agree. Unquote. My question is: Is this parallelism of 'praNipAta,paripras hna and sevA' with 'shravaNa, manana and nididhyAsana' close enough to Adi Sankara's teachings in his Bhashyas and prakaraNa-granthas? I hope this will not (Or will it?) raise a flood of so many challenging responses as my earlier question on 'nididhyAsana and Ramana's self-enquiry' raised. After my recovery from surgery I am resuming my Gita-class to neighbours here and I am in the midst of the fourth chapter now. That is how I stumbled into Dr.S.R.'s statement above. Thank you all in advance. PraNAms to all advaitins. profvk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Namaste, Sada-ji and Shyam-ji Yes, you are both right. I do not also agree with Dr. S.R. in his parallelism of NididhyAsana with Seva. PraNipAta is surrender -that is alright. pariprashna can be extended to come close to manana. This can be allowed. But Seva and nididhyAsana are apples and oranges. Anyway thank you for the prompt response. PraNAms to all advaitins. profvk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.