Guest guest Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 Dandavat pranams to all! Gita Satsangh Chapter 14, concluding Verses 26 & 27 To listen to Swami Brahmanananda of the Chinmaya Mission chanting this Chapter... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jn3Hro5Ib4U & feature=channel_page To listen to Meena Mahadevan of KailashMusic chanting this Chapter... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9FyEwbZAOs Maam cha yo'vyabhichaarena bhaktiyogena sevate; Sa gunaan samateetyaitaan brahmabhooyaaya kalpate. 26. And he who serves Me with unswerving devotion, he, crossing beyond the qualities, is fit for becoming Brahman. Sankara Bhashya (Swami Gambiranda's Translation and Commentary) Now the Lord gives the reply to the question, 'And how does he transcend the qualties?' 26. And he who serves Me through the unswerving Yoga of Devotion, he, having gone beyond these qualities, qualifies for becoming Brahman. And he-be he a monk or a man of action (rites and duties)-, yah, who; sevate, serves; mam, Me, God, Narayana residing in the hearts of all beings; avyabhicarena, through the unswerving-that which never wavers-; bhakti-yogena, Yoga of Devotion-devotion [bhakti (devotion), supreme Love, through which one becomes united (with God) is yoga.] itself being the Yoga-; sah, he; samatitya, having transcended; etan, these; gunan, qualities as described; kalpate, qualifies, i.e. becomes fit; brahma-bhuyaya,-bhuyah is the same as bhavanam-, for becoming Brahman, for Liberation Swami Chinmayananda's Translation and Commentary 26. And he, serving Me with unswerving devotion, and crossing beyond the GUNAS, is fit to become BRAHMAN. Being a practical text-book of religion, the Geeta is never satisfied by giving mere philosophical discourses. Every discourse, after explaining a definite aspect of our philosophy, prescribes immediately a way of training by which the imperfect can aspire to be and ultimately achieve Perfection. HE WHO SERVES ME WITH UNSWERVING DEVOTION --- Love for God is called " devotion. " Our minds revel readily and with pleasure wherever there is love. Our entire nature is fed by our thoughts, and, as the thoughts, so the mind. To contemplate steadily upon the Infinite Nature of the Self is, ultimately, to become the Self, and thus end our limited, mortal ego. Contemplation upon the nature of the Lord in all sincerity and intensity cannot be maintained effectively at all times. As we are today, we are not capable of maintaining the mind in a state of meditation all the time. Therefore, Krishna, knowing this weakness of man, advises a practical method of maintaining this thought for a longer period of time through the process of dedicated service (seva). That all work, if intelligently undertaken in a spirit of dedication and service, can be readily converted into a worship, has already been explained in Chapter-III. This clearly and evidently shows that mere devotion to the Lord is not enough. The Gita Acharya expects his devotees to bring religion from the Pooja-rooms and temples to the fields of their every-day-life of activities and in all their contacts with others around. Such a practice of constant God-awareness and dedicated service removes the agitations of the mind and tunes up the inner instrument for a more efficient flight through meditation. Tamas and Rajas get more and more reduced, and thereby the proportion of Sattwa in the seeker's subtle constitution increases. And such a seeker " IS FIT TO BECOME BRAHMAN. " Such an individual who has gained a wealth of Sattwa in his inward composition will discover in himself a greater ability and poise during his meditation. The re-awakening to the consciousness of the Self cannot then be very far off. Here, it is said that the seeker is fit for becoming Brahman. To realise Brahman is to become Brahman, to realise the waker, is to become the waker. HOW CAN THE SAGE HIMSELF BE BRAHMAN? LISTEN: Brahmano hi pratishthaa'ham amritasyaavyayasya cha; Shaashwatasya cha dharmasya sukhasyaikaantikasya cha. 27. For I am the abode of Brahman, the immortal and the immutable, of everlasting Dharma and of absolute bliss Sankara Bhashya (Swami Gambiranda's Translation and Commentary) 27. For I am the Abode of Brahman-the indestructible and immutable, the eternal, the Dharma and absolute Bliss. Hi, for; aham, I, the inmost Self; am the pratistha brahmanah, Abode-that in which something abides is pratistha-of Brahman which is the supreme Self. Of Brahman of what kind? Amrtasya, of that which is indestructible; avyayasya, of that which is immutable; and sasvatasya, of that which is eternal; dharmasya, of that which is the Dharma, realizable through the Yoga of Jnana which is called dharma (virtue); and aikantikasya sukhasya, of that which is the absolute, unfailing Bliss by nature. Since the inmost Self is the abode of the supreme Self-which by nature is immortal etc.-, therefore, through perfect Knowledge it (the former) is realized with certainty to be the supreme Self. This has been stated in, 'he qualifies for becoming Brahman'. The purport is this: Indeed, that power of God through which Brahman sets out, comes forth, for the purpose of favouring the devotees, etc., that power which is Brahman Itself, am I. For, a power and the possesser of that power are non-different. Or, brahman means the conditioned Brahman, since It (too,) is referred to by that word. 'Of that Brahman, I Myself, the unconditioned Brahman-and none else-am the Abode.' (The abode of Brahman) of what qualities? Of that which is immortal; of that which has the quality of deathlessness; of that which is immutable; so also, of that which is the eternal; which is the dharma having the characteristics of steadfastness in Knowledge; of that which is the absolute, unquestionably certain Bliss born of that (steadfastness);-'I am the Abode' is understood. Swami Chinmayananda's Translation and Commentary 27. For I am the Abode of BRAHMAN, the Immortal and the Immutable, of everlasting DHARMA and of Absolute Bliss. In describing the Yoga of Devotion and its ultimate goal, the Geeta has already indicated: (XII-8) " YOU SHALL NO DOUBT LIVE IN ME THEREAFTER " ; and the devotee, under the inspiration of his love, will forget himself as a separate individual, and his mind will merge with his point-of-contemplation, the Lord. In the previous stanza, we were told, " HE WHO SERVES ME WITH UNSWERVING YOGA-OF-DEVOTION " , will steadily transcend his identification with his Matter-envelopments. To the extent the ego dies, to that extent the experience of the Divine can manifest. To retire from waking is to enter the hall-of-sleep; and while one is dozing, one is walking further and further away from the realm-of-wakefulness and proportionately entering the peaceful abode-of-sleep. To leave completely one plane-of-Consciousness, is to enter entirely into another plane of Consciousness. The waker himself totally becomes the DREAMER and the DREAMER knows no waking-state. The DREAMER ends his dream when he either wakes up to the world or slides into the joys of peaceful slumber. There is no transaction across the frontiers of these distinct planes-of-Consciousness. FOR, I AM THE ABODE OF BRAHMAN --- The Self that vitalises the seeker's bosom is the Pure Consciousness, that is the same everywhere, " IMMORTAL and IMMUTABLE, ETERNAL and BLISSFUL. " To realise the Self within, is to realise the Infinite Self. To taste a piece of cake is to taste all cakes of all times and for all times, because the KNOWLEDGE OF the taste of cake is ever the same. In the realm of experience, if a meditator apprehends the Self in him, he at once experiences the Omnipresence of the Self. As long as a pot exists, the pot-space is seen distinct from the space around. Once the pot is broken, the pot-space itself becomes the unbounded space in the Universe; similarly, when life's false identifications with the body, mind and intellect are broken down --- in short, when the ego is dead, the Awareness of the Infinitude rises up to flood the bosom with THE ETERNAL DHARMA AND THE UNFAILING BLISS. Shri Shankara, in his extremely rational and analytical commentary, gives for this stanza three alternative interpretations, each one not contrary to the others, but each one elucidating more and more the philosophical contents of this verse. Shankara says " BRAHMAN IS PARAMATMAN, IMMORTAL AND INDESTRUCTIBLE. HE ABIDES IN ME WHO AM THE SELF (PRATYAG-ATMAN). THAT BEING THE SELF, ONE RECOGNISES, BY RIGHT KNOWLEDGE, THE IDENTITY OF THE SELF IN ONESELF AND THE SELF EVERYWHERE. " Shankara gives an alternative meaning to the verse: " IT IS THROUGH THE POWER (MAYA) INHERENT IN BRAHMAN, AS ISHWARA, THAT HE SHOWS GRACE TO HIS DEVOTEES. I AM THAT POWER IN MANIFESTATION, AND THEREFORE, BRAHMAN AM I. " Again, as another alternative interpretation, he suggests a third meaning which, as we said earlier, is not contrary to the former two suggestions, but, in fact, paints in greater detail, the beauty of the stanza and its contents. " BY BRAHMAN IS MEANT HERE THE 'CONDITIONED-BRAHMAN'; WHO ALONE CAN BE SPOKEN OF BY SUCH WORD AS 'BRAHMAN'... CONDITIONED-BRAHMAN ALONE CAN BE CONCEIVED OF IN THE FINITE INTELLECT, PERCEIVED BY THE MIND AND EXPRESSED THROUGH LANGUAGE AS A CONTRAST TO MATTER. Here the term Brahman only means Spirit as opposed in nature to inert Matter. Thus, Matter and Spirit, both factors conceived by the limited intellect, are limited and so finite objects of knowledge. But both are known by the Consciousness, the Supreme. Therefore " I, THE UNCONDITIONED AND THE UNUTTERABLE, AM THE ABODE OF THE CONDITIONED-BRAHMAN, WHO IS IMMORTAL AND INDESTRUCTIBLE. " The Illuminator is always different from the illumined. The " subject " is the knower, and the " object " is the known. Krishna, the Infinite, represents the Eternal Subject, and therefore, He is the Abode of all " objects, " including the concept of the Self which is the Spirit that vitalises and gives a similitude of sentiency and appearance of activity to all the Matter-envelopments. The conditioned Brahman (sa-upadhika) rests upon the Consciousness that is aware of it, which is the Unconditioned (nir-upadhika) Brahman. In the following chapter (XV-16, 17 and 18) it will be explained as the three Atmans: Anatman, Jivatman and Paramatman. Hari Om Tat Sat Iti Srimad Bhagavadgeetaasoopanishatsu Brahmavidyaayaam Yogashaastre Sri Krishnaarjunasamvaade Gunatrayavibhaagayogo Naama Chaturdasho'dhyaayah Thus in the Upanishads of the glorious Bhagavad Gita, the science of the Eternal, the scripture of Yoga, the dialogue between Sri Krishna and Arjuna, ends the fourteenth discourse entitled: " The Yoga of the Division Of the Three Gunas " Hare Krishna!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Namaste Satsanghis, Thanks to Smt. Radhe-ji for conducting this satsangh! Here are a couple of points about these verses. advaitin , " Radhe " <shaantih wrote: maa.n cha yo.avyabhichaareNa bhaktiyogena sevate . sa guNaansamatiityaitaanbrahmabhuuyaaya kalpate .. 14.26.. And he who serves Me through the unswerving Yoga of Devotion, he, having gone beyond these qualities, qualifies for becoming Brahman. 14.26 This verse (14.26) has the only occurance of the word 'bhakti-yoga' in the entire Gita, if we consider the fact that neither the chapter names, nor the colophon are part of the original Mahabharatha text. It is very beautiful to see that concluding these verses, in the middle of what is considered to be a GYAna-shatkam, Lord Krishna uses the word 'bhakti-yoga', thereby implying that a parA-bhakta is a GYAni. Also, this conclusive statement in this verse by Lord Krishna about 'becoming brahman' also tallies with these verses of amaanitvaadi-guNa-s of chapter 13: mayi chaananyayogena bhaktiravyabhichaariNii . viviktadeshasevitvamaratirjanasa.nsadi .. 13.11.. And unwavering devotion to Me with single-minded concentration; inclination to repair into a clean place; lack of delight in a crowd of people; 13.11 adhyaatmaGYaananityatva.n tattvaGYaanaarthadarshanam.h . etajGYaanamiti proktamaGYaanaM yadato.anyathaa .. 13.12.. Steadfastness in the knowledge of the Self, contemplation on the Goal of the knowledge of Reality-this is spoken of as Knowledge. Ignorance is that which is other than this. 13.12 Note that Lord Krishna Himself says in 13.12 that the qualities described in chapter 13 is GYAna (etat-GYAnam)!!! This repeating theme of sAdhana-verses in gIta makes it a timeless teaching. As Sankara comments in a couple of places, " the natural characteristics of the realized should be cultivated with determination by ones who have not " . Also, these two sets of verses (in chapters 13 and 14) could be read in conjunction with the concluding verses of chapter 12. The marked similarity of verses in chapter 14 (which are said to describe a guNAtIta) with those in chapter 12 (with the refrain 'yo madbhaktaH sa me priyaH' describing a parA-bhakta) makes seekers like us wonder if all the differences between bhakti and GYAna are only limitations of the finite mind! praNAm-s to all Advaitins Ramakrishna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 Namaste Radheji and fellow Satsanghis: Radheji has now successfully complete the posting of chapter 14 and she has done a splendid job. Every Sunday, we had the opportunity to read two verses from this important chapter with meaning and with detailed commentary. The formating of the posting was very uniform and easy for reading and downloading for future reading. She deserves lots of our appreciation and I want to thank her on behalf of all the Satsanghis. As many of you already know that Krishna Janmastami will be on the 14th of August 2009 (Friday). Radheji will likely start posting verses from Chapter 15 on that day! Also she will continue to follow the current practice of posting 2 verses on every Sunday starting from 23rd of August 2009. Since we have come to end of the 14th Chapter, let me provide an overview. The fourteenth chapter deals with the three gunas and the transcendence of them, moksa. Introducing this chapter, Sankara notes that anything that is created is due to the connection between the ksetra and the ksetrajna. To show how this connection accounts for what we call the creation, Lord Krishna begins the fourteenth chapter. Sankara also takes an alternate way to address certain questions raised by the thirteenth chapter, particularly verse 21. There it was made clear that the ksetra and ksetrajna have the status of being the cause of creation. Sankara also wants us to know that this understanding differs from the views expressed by Sankhyas. For them there are many purusas, each one different from the other and detached from prakrti which independently creates the world. It has already been said that purusa, however, is not a remote because he always obtains in the prakrti. The apparent connection of purusa to the gunas comprising prakrti, which is due to avidya, is the cause for all of samsara including various types of births. Here Sankara asks what are the gunas, how do they bind, how is one to be released from them, and what are the characteristics of the free person? These are the topics of the fourteenth chapter. Lord Krishna now clarifies the characteristics and qualities of one who has transcended the three gunas or modes of material nature. First He answers by what symptoms does one transcend them? One who is neither repulsed by what is unpleasant nor is attracted to that which is pleasant is prakasam or illuminated, filled with the light of spiritual wisdom which arises from sattva guna or the mode of goodness. Activity and endeavor arises from raja guna the mode of passion and inertia and stupor arise from the mode of ignorance. By the effects indicative of the three gunas all other qualities of them can be accordingly determined when they are visibly appearing and even as mental tendencies in the mind. So by this it can be seen that one who is free from aversion and attraction is able to transcend. Next Lord Krishna clarifies the question what is the behavior and conduct of one who has transcended the three gunas? One who is perfectly focused on the atma or immortal soul within is merely a witness to what transpires in the physical body. Such a one does not involve themselves anywhere in anything because they are unattached everything external and thus free from desire and repulsion which arise from passion and ignorance. Such a one does not deviate from their firm and steadfast establishment in the atma. Such a one is impervious to the desires for happiness and the disdain for unhappiness, accepting whatever comes equally and indifferently. They are free from bodily attachment and conceptions that the physical body has any connection with the atma. Thus they understand that they never engage in any actions. Such a one equally reacts to adversity and felicity alike considering them both to be the same similarly with a clod of earth, a precious jewel or a nugget of gold are just different manifestations of prakriti or the material substratum pervading physical existence. In the same spirit one is neutral when exposed to pleasant or unpleasant sense objects and is dhirah or wise, not deviating from discriminative knowledge even if by chance one is subjected to the effects of the three gunas due to circumstances. Such a one views censure and praise, honor and infamy, friend and foe as alike as well and is equal to all living entities because of being free from attachment to all actions and due to perceiving the atma within all beings. Here are some concluding points made by Swami Dayananda Saraswati: ============================ " This Brahman is amrtam, never dead (neither born!). Sankara says it is not subject to destruction. Though it does not get destroyed, perhaps it is changing all the time. As you recognize the same person though he continues to change over the years, perhaps it is the same with Brahman. No. Brahman is avyayam, it never undergoes any change. Satvatam means it is always there tomorrow, that is, in the future and nityam indicates there was not a time in the past when Brahman was not. And that timeless Brahman is the one who has all knowledge of dharma. Dharma also has another meaning - that which sustains everything. Sankara adds it is that which can be obtained through jnanayoga. Further, it is sukham. There is no object in the world called sukham and therefore sukham is an excellent choice of words here. Its very nature, svarupa, is sukham, that which is free from any sense of want or imperfection. Otherwise called purnam and therefore glossed by Sankara as that whose nature is fullness, anandarupam. Ekantikam means that which is never negated because it is satyam and therefore not subject to contradiction. Everything else is mere name and form, namarupa, which, being mithya, will change. Satyam will not. That Brahman, as described here, is to be understood as the nature of pratyagatma. This is the pratistha here. By being gunatha how can one be Brahman? Isvara is Brahman with the power of maya. I am that Brahman which enjoys this power, Saktih, that is also non-separate from Brahman, myself.. If Krishna is taken as Isvara, who is nothing but paramatma and sakti, between the power, Sakti, and the one who has the power, Saktiman, there is no difference. Therefore, this Isvara who has the power has its basis, pratistha, only in the atma . If Brahman is looked upon as the cause of the entire world, that Brahman has its pratistha in the atma alone. That is called brahma-bhavanam, the condition of being Brahman without the implication of any process of becoming. You cannot become Brahman because you are the very basis. pratistha, of Brahman. In the Bhagavadglta wherein the subject matter is brahmavidya and karmayoga, in the dialogue that took place between Krishna, the teacher and Arjuna, the student this is the fourteenth chapter the subject of which is the division of three gunas, gunatrayavibhagayoga. " ======================== With my warm regards, Ram Chandran advaitin , " Radhe " <shaantih wrote: > > Dandavat pranams to all! > > Gita Satsangh Chapter 14, concluding Verses 26 & 27 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2009 Report Share Posted August 7, 2009 Namaste: Recently, we had an interesting discussion led by Subbuji to find some common ground between advaita (Sankara), Dvaita (Madhava) and Vistadavaita (Ramanuja). We just completed this important chapter on the nature of the Jiva by investigating the qualities measured through Gunas. One can raise the questions – " How does the three systems of philosophies treat this chapter from the philosophical point of view? Can we find some common ground? The satsanghis are quite familiar with Sankara's advaita philosophy which considers the Brahman as " Nirguna " where as the other two philosophies treats the Brahman as " Saguna " or " Sarvaguna. " It is also true that in advaita the description of the Gunas – Sattvik, Rajastik and Tamasik is appropriate only with respect to Vyvaharika (relative) level of reality. At the Paramarthika level, the jiva transcends these qualities and become the Nirguna Brahman. In both Dvaita and Visistadvaita philosophies the question of two realities (Vyavaharika and Paramarthika) do not exist. We have already discussed in greater detail on the advaitic position with respect to transcending the `Gunas. " For both Dvaita and Visistadvaita, transcending the Gunas can be achieved only with the Grace of Vishnu (Saguna Brahman – the All Powerful Supreme Soul). Jivas are always at the mercy of the Supreme Lord and consequently those who practice " unconditional single-minded Devotion to the Lord " will be blessed with " Purushothama Qualities " as described through verses 24, 25 and 26. Madhava further clarifies with the following additional observations: The illumination that may be established in others is neither desired nor detested by one who has transcended the influence of the three gunas. But sometimes it has been seen that illumined beings seem to again succumb to subtle desires by the subtle influence of raja guna and tama guna. This can be perceived by anger or bewilderment; but as they are always in communion with the Supreme Lord within their hearts even if they appear deluded they will still always seek the association of the Supreme Lord Krishna alone. Even in the absence of happiness or the darkest adversity the devotees of the Supreme Lord remain balanced and are ever equipoised. They are never disturbed because of lack of wealth, the death of dear ones, harassment by those who are inimical, bewilderment or fright. In all situations there is never any decrease in their devotion if anything here is an increase in devotion because the devotee is humbly reflecting how the Supreme Lord is only allowing the minimum reaction to past reactions. The word nengate means unwavering. The word udasinavat means indifferent to the influences of three gunas both subtle and gross. Those who completely relinquish all activities opposed to dharma or eternal righteousness which is not pleasing to the Supreme Lord and His devotees will undoubtedly attain Him. The words sarvarambha means abandonment of all endeavors unrelated to the Supreme Lord Krishna. Being impassive does not mean being unconcerned or uncommitted it means being only dedicated to the essential principles of bhakti or exclusive loving devotion to the Supreme Lord Krishna. Ramanuja's commentary of Verse #26 on transcendence of gunas: The state of transcendence of Gunas is not attained merely by reflecting on the difference between the Prakrti and the self as declared in the text such as, 'When the seer beholds no agent of action other than the Gunas, then he transcends the Gunas, for it is liable then to be sublated by contrary subtle impressions (Vasanas) which have continued from beginningless time. He who, with unswerving Bhakti Yoga, namely, one-pointed Bhakti Yoga, serves Me of true-resolve, supremely compassionate and the ocean of parental affection for supplicants --- such a man crosses over the Gunas of Sattva etc., which are otherwise invincible. He becomes worthy for brahmabhuya, the state of brahman i.e., he becomes qualified for the state of brahman. The meaning is that he attains the self as It really is, immortal and immutable. The one common ground that I see is all the three acharyas clearly state that the " transcendence of gunas " is achievable. With my warm regards, Ram Chandran Here is a brief outline of Dvaita's position with respect to the nature of Jivas: " There are three categories of jivas viz. Sattvika, rajasa, and tamasa. These distinctions are found in their nature, behaviour, food, speech activities and even the purpose of their functions. Gita gives these in detail. Gita gives the main features of good and evil tendencies in the form of Asuri sampat and Daivi sampat and also Sattvika, rajasa, tamasa grouping in all aspects of life. Jivas are distinct from God not only during samsara stage but even after liberation. The jivas are different from each other also both during samsara and liberation. These are different from achetana objects. Thus a five-fold distinction is the corner stone of Gita metaphysics. These are: the difference between jiva and jiva, jada and jada, jiva and jada, Jiva and paramatma, and jada and paramatma. The entire metaphysics of Gita pre-supposes these distinctions. Good many observations of Gita bring out the distinction between God and jivas, plurality of jivas, and the other distinctions mentioned above. We may notice a few of them:, asochyan anva sochah' (II-11) `natveva aham jatu nasam' (II-12)` Punarjanma napnuvanti mahatmarah' (XVIII-61)' `gacchanti amudhah (XV-5). In all these the plural employed clearly shows the difference among jivas both during Samsara and liberation. Gita verses that bring out the supremacy of God are already pointed out while describing the nature of God. We may notice a few more here that bring out the distinction between God and jivas. `Tani aham veda Sarvani na tvam vettha' (IV-5) `Na artavaptam avaptavyain' ( III-22 ) `mat prasadat tariysati' `mattah sarvam pravartate' (X-8) `aham adirhi devanam' (X•2) `aham bijapradah pita' ( XIV-27 ) and so on. These clearly show the supremacy of God and the distinction of jivas from him. All these cannot be brushed aside merely as vyavaharika positions. These are addressed to a spiritually progressed soul and therefore cannot depict a false position. " Source: " Essentials of GitaBhashya and Gitatatparya " by Prof. Panduranga, Bangalore University. advaitin , " Ram Chandran " <ramvchandran wrote: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 Dear fellow satsanghis... I would like to take this moment to thank those who are providing their insights into the Holy Geeta postings, to supplement the commentaries we are studying as well as to redirect us to focus upon them once more. As I reread some of the postings, some thoughts come to my own limited mind. At the beginning of this chapter, Shri Ramji asked us to consider the ways in which our understanding of the gunas impacts upon our everyday life and how we deal with others in our sphere of activities...call it all mithya if you will... but it is still there on some empirical level of reality :-) I am reminded that what we think and how we approach the world is very much an influence upon which of the gunas will predominate in our everyday behavior and this is where the teachings of the Gita can provide us with a dharmic framework in which to operate in light rather than darkness of spirit. What we eat and why is also a contributing factor to that balance in favor of sattvic tendencies. Whether we know how to direct ourselves toward the light is also an important contributing factor, which includes not only the way we think towards the world around us, but how we temper our own behavior through sangha, meditation, reading of the scriptures and yoga or some form of physical activity which honors the body in a way grounded in nourishment rather than abuse. For myself, singing and listening to bhajans always helps keep me in balance. Does being sattvic mean being without emotions, reacting to nothing which happens around us and to us? Perhaps we should focus on maintaining a balance in our attitude such that we let go of our own fleeting behaviors as much as we try to balance them. Whether we focus on feelings of anger or sadness or desire or happiness or contentment, or instead try to let them all flow through us knowing that we are but the witness to these moments is the true test of our " balance " of the gunas operating upon our existence. How do the gunas assert an influence upon the personality? Is it one's zodiac sign that determines the personality, grounded in one's karmic account? If so, does that mean someone like me, born with so many planets in Leo, is doomed to roar her way through this life? Thank God my sun sign is in Virgo to provide the much needed balance!!! So what to do? Shri Ramji wisely pointed out that we can spend our time dissecting these influences and from whence they came, or we can spend our time trying to attain a certain balance of peace with them, working with the clay we were given and molding it the best we can to conform to an attitude of sattva both towards our own actions and the actions of others. May we all be gentle with ourselves in those efforts. As pointed out so beautifully by Shri Ramakrishnaji in his recent post, Lord Krishna reminds us yet again in this chapter, that devoted service to Him is the path and the goal. Maam cha yo'vyabhichaarena bhaktiyogena sevate; Sa gunaan samateetyaitaan brahmabhooyaaya kalpate. 26. And he who serves Me with unswerving devotion, he, crossing beyond the qualities, is fit for becoming Brahman. I also add the short article below authored by Swami Tejomayananda of the Chinmaya Mission, which was posted on another list and which addresses how nourishment of the sattvic vision within colors the way we view the world... Shri Krishna Sharanam mama!!! In His Service, Radhe --\ ------------- Unconditional Love Is the Ultimate Vision by Swami Tejomayananda Life is a series of perceptions and responses to the external world. Our response depends upon our vision and understanding of life and our value system. In the Bhagavad-Gita, Krishna differentiates between the type of vision that leads to happiness and freedom and the kind that leads to bondage. The noblest or sattvic vision of life is one by which we see the one indestructible reality in all beings irrespective of their names, qualities, and characteristics. However, the world viewed through our senses appears totally different; no two objects are identical. How is it possible to see the one Truth or the oneness of all beings? The mediocre or rajasic vision is one by which we see all things and beings as different from each other. When your attention is focused on differences and numerous dissimilarities are detected, it moulds your attitude towards other religions, cultures and countries in a negative way. A vision of oneness brings about integration and a vision of differences creates more and more divisions. We see it happening all the time in our families and with people. It begins gradually as a simple difference of opinion between husband and wife, two friends or two communities. Two brothers clash for a greater share in the property forgetting that they belong to the same family. Once the vision of oneness is lost, differences are perceived which create conflicts generating more and more likes and dislikes. Such a person neither lives in peace and joy nor does he allow others to do so. A tamasic vision is a low kind of vision in which the person gets fanatically and exclusively attached to just one or some things, persons, experiences or ideologies. This little finite attachment is taken for the 'whole'. Some people are crazy and greedy over money, while others are fanatical about power or pleasures in life. When people give exclusive importance to just one of the many things of this world, even though they appear to be successful in that particular field, their total life is miserable because everything else is neglected. A person with a tamasic vision can never live in peace and happiness. The life of a person with a sattvic vision is predominated by just one emotion; the emotion of pure love. However, most people neither know what love is nor understand the meaning of it. Love is a very different thing. Just take the example of our body. Even though I see the many parts in the body, I have the vision - " In all these parts there is one Truth, that is myself. I am present everywhere in all of them. " Therefore, we have equal love for every part of the body. There is no favouritism. We don't say, " I will only look after my head when it is unwell, but if something happens to my foot, that's not my problem! " A vision of oneness is a readiness to serve all and it creates an attitude of forgiveness - kshama. When we hate someone, we actually hate ourselves, because that someone else is really not different from us. All bodies are made of five elements; hence the material cause of all is the same. At the same time, there is the same life force that enlivens me as well as others. Where is the difference? Therefore, who is hurting whom? Just imagine the state of a person whose heart is filled with love, compassion, forgiveness and kindness. What will be the state of his mind? Will he not be totally happy and free? (Swami Tejomayananda) Chinmaya Mission. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2009 Report Share Posted August 24, 2009 Namaste... I thought the article I just posted at this link has a direct relationship to our discussion of the three gunas and the importance of nurturing sattvic qualities, " We need to challenge our age old habits and tradition if they are in direct contrast to the principles of non-violence and dharma laid down by Sri Krishna in Gita. " call-of-the-conch-introduction --\ ----- As pointed out so beautifully by Shri Ramakrishnaji in his recent post, Lord Krishna reminds us yet again in this chapter, that devoted service to Him is the path and the goal. Maam cha yo'vyabhichaarena bhaktiyogena sevate; Sa gunaan samateetyaitaan brahmabhooyaaya kalpate. 26. And he who serves Me with unswerving devotion, he, crossing beyond the qualities, is fit for becoming Brahman. I also add the short article below authored by Swami Tejomayananda of the Chinmaya Mission, which was posted on another list and which addresses how nourishment of the sattvic vision within colors the way we view the world... Shri Krishna Sharanam mama!!! In His Service, Radhe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.