Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Gita Satsangh Chapter 15 Verses 16 & 17

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dandavat pranams to all!

 

Tatah padam tat parimaargitavyam

Yasmin gataa na nivartanti bhooyah;

Tameva chaadyam purusham prapadye

Yatah pravrittih prasritaa puraanee.

Then that goal should be sought after, whither having gone none returns again.

Seek refuge in that Primeval Purusha whence streamed forth the ancient activity

or energy. (BG 15.4)

 

Gita Satsangh Chapter 15 Verses 16 & 17

 

To listen to Swami Brahmanananda of the Chinmaya Mission

chanting this Chapter...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HbuMyixulQ & feature=related

 

To listen to Meena Mahadevan of KailashMusic

chanting this Chapter...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO-zznmflEk & feature=channel

 

Dwaavimau purushau loke ksharashchaakshara eva cha;

Ksharah sarvaani bhootaani kootastho'kshara uchyate.

16. Two Purushas there are in this world, the perishable and the imperishable.

All beings are the perishable, and the Kutastha is called the imperishable.

 

 

Sankara Bhashya

(Swami Gambiranda's Translation and Commentary)

 

16. There are these two persons in the world-the mutable and the immutable. The

mutable consists of all things; the one existing as Maya is called the

immutable.

 

There are imau, these; dvau, two-grouped separately; purusau, persons, so called

[Persons-so called only figuratively, since they are the limiting adjuncts of

the supreme Person.]; loke in the world; the ksarah, mutable-one group consists

of the perishable; the other person is the aksarah, immutable, opposite of the

former, the power of God called Maya, which is the seed of the origin of the

person called the mutable. That which is the receptacle of the impressions of

desires, actions, etc. of countless transmigrating creatures is called the

immutable person.

 

Who are those persons? The Lord Himself gives the answer: Ksarah, the mutable;

consists of sarvani, all; bhutani, things, i.e. the totality of all mutable

things. Kutasthah is the one existing as Maya: Kuta means a heap; kutasthah, is

that which exists like a heap. Or, kuta is maya, deception, falsehood,

crookedness, which are synonymous; that which exists in the diverse forms of

maya etc. is the kutasthah. It is ucyate, called; the aksarah, immutable,

because, owing to the countless seeds of worldly existence, it does not perish.

 

Swami Chinmayananda's Translation and Commentary

 

16. Two 'PURUSHAS' are there in this world, the Perishable and the Imperishable.

All beings are the Perishable and the 'KOOTASTHAH' is called the Imperishable.

Earlier, in Chapter XIII, we had an exhaustive discussion of the field-of-Matter

and the Knower-of-the field. The discussion we had so far in this chapter must

prove that the Sun, the warmth in the atmosphere, the earth, its potentialities,

the plant-kingdom, and man and his capacities --- all of them together

constituting the field-of-Matter, are nothing other than the Supreme Itself.

 

When the Infinite Consciousness becomes the light and heat of the Sun, the

fertility of the earth, the essence in the plant, the Consciousness in the

heart, the faculties of knowing and remembering, etc., they are all different

forms of Consciousness alone. Thus, the fact that the field-of-Matter is nothing

other than the Spirit Itself was already demonstrated. The only difference is

that the Spirit, when It has assumed the form of Matter, looks as though It is

subject to change and destruction. Thus the " realm of Matter " is indicated in

this stanza as the Perishable (Kshara) Purusha.

 

In the relative field of experience, when we talk with reference to the inert

and perishable world of Matter, the Spirit is indicated as the Conscious

Principle, which is Imperishable. With reference to one's wife alone is one

called a husband; when I have a son I will become a father. Similarly, with

reference to the perishable and the changing Matter-envelopments, the

Consciousness is indicated as the Imperishable and the Changeless. The body

changes; from childhood to youth, from youth to old age; the mind changes in its

quality of feelings and emotions; the intellect expressing differently with each

added knowledge and experience is ever in a state of change. But one is

constantly AWARE OF all these changes. This Consciousness which has been

constantly recognising and illumining all changes, at all levels, all through

the individual's life, is necessarily changeless. This Conscious Principle is

called Akshara only with reference to and as a contrast with the Perishable, the

(Kshara).

 

This Immutable and Imperishable principle of Life is the Self, common in all

living creatures at all times. That this Self, in the midst of change remains

changeless and that all changes can take place only in contact with it are both

indicated by the metaphor suggested by the term used here, Kootashah.

 

DISTINCT FROM THESE TWO --- THE PERISHABLE AND THE IMPERISHABLE --- UNTAINTED BY

THE IMPERFECTIONS OF THESE TWO RELATIVE CONDITIONS, IS THE HIGHEST SPIRIT:

 

Uttamah purushastwanyah paramaatmetyudaahritah;

Yo lokatrayamaavishya bibhartyavyaya ishwarah.

17. But distinct is the Supreme Purusha called the highest Self, the

indestructible Lord who, pervading the three worlds, sustains them.

 

Sankara Bhashya

(Swami Gambiranda's Translation and Commentary)

 

17. But different is the supreme Person who is spoken of as the transcendental

Self, who, permeating the three worlds, upholds (them), and is the imperishable

God.

 

Tu, but; anyah, different, entirely contrary in characteristics from these; is

the uttamah, supreme, most excellent; purusah, Person, who is different in

characteristics from these-the mutable and the immutable-, untouched by the

mutable and the immutable limiting adjuncts, and is by nature eternal, pure,

conscious and free; udahrtah, spoken of in the Upanisads; iti, as; the

paramatma, supreme Self; He is paramah, supreme, as compared with the selves

like body etc. created by ignorance, and is the atma, Self, the inmost

Consciousness of all beings. Hence He is the supreme Self. He Himself is being

specially described: yah, who, by dint of His own active power inhering in the

energy that is Maya; [Caitanya, consciousness, itself is the bala (energy); the

sakti (active power) therein is Maya. Through that He upholds.] avisya,

permeating; loka-trayam, the three worlds-called Bhuh (Earth), Bhuvah,

(Intermediate Space) and Svah (Heaven); bibharti, upholds (them) by merely being

present in His own nature. (And He) is the avyayah, imperishable; isvarah, God,

the Omniscient One called Narayana, who is the Lord by nature.

 

This name-the supreme Person-of God as described is well known. Showing that

the name is apt by virtue of its etymological significance, the Lord reveals

Himself saying, 'I am the unsurpassable God':

 

Swami Chinmayananda's Translation and Commentary

 

 

17. But distinct is the Supreme PURUSHA called the Highest Self, the

Indestructible Lord, who, pervading the three worlds (waking, dream and

deep-sleep) , sustains them.

 

But distinct from all these is the Highest Spirit spoken of as the Supreme Self.

With reference to my own children alone am I really a father. With reference to

my duty or status I may have yet another name. Similarly, the Imperishable is a

status and a dignity gained by the Spirit only with reference to the

field-of-the-perishables around and about It, through which It manifests as the

various expressions of Life. When my children have died, or I am dismissed from

my job, I am no more a father, nor can I any more claim my erstwhile official

dignity. But that does not mean that I am, in the absence of children or work,

an absolute zero, a total non-entity! No. I will exist as " the son of my

father, " or in my individual capacity, though devoid of all my special status

and dignity born out of my relationship with my profession, or with my children.

 

When the perishable (Kshara) is transcended, what remains is not Imperishable

(Akshara) but that which played as the 'Perishable-Purusha' as well as the

'Imperishable-Purusha.' This Pure Spirit (Purusha) is spoken of as the Supreme

Self, who 'PERVADES AND SUSTAINS THE THREE WORLDS': " World " in Sanskrit means

'realm of experience.' The three realms of experiences in which we eke out our

life's returns are the states of waking, dream, and deep-sleep. The same Self is

the illuminator of the experiences in all the above three

states-of-Consciousness.

 

There are not three different types of Purushas; according to the limitations

and conditions around It, the Spirit, appears different in Its manifestations. A

pot is in a room; now the 'pot-space' is a lesser part of the 'room-space,' and

the room-space is only a negligible portion of the 'total-space.' At the same

time 'pot-space' minus the pot, if understood as " space, " is the same space as

the infinite-space. Now, in the above example, pot-space and room-space are

something other than the outer-space, in as much as, conditioned as they are,

they have gathered unto themselves certain limitations, but the unconditioned

'pot-space' and the 'room-space' are nothing but the infinite-space; break the

pot, pull down the walls, the space that was the 'pot-space' and the space that

was the 'room-space' have both become one with the Infinite-space!

 

The Infinite Consciousness is Itself the perishable-field in another form, and

as the Knower-of-the-Field, the same Consciousness is the Imperishable Reality

in the perishable conditionings, But when these conditionings are transcended,

the same Self is experienced as the Supreme Self --- Paramatman.

 

SHOWING THE ETYMOLOGY OF THE VERY TERM, PURUSHOTTAMA, THE LORD SHOWS HOW HE IS

REALLY THE SUPREME:

 

to be continued...

 

 

Hare Krishna!!!

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste Satsanghis:

 

For quite sometime, no one seems to participate in the Gita Satsangh. Those who

read the postings of Satsangh by Radheji are requested again to write how the

Satsangh benefits you in conducting your life. Also you can contribute with your

insights or insights that you have read from other commentaries. When we write

using our words and thoughts, we get the benefit of better understanding of what

we heard and read and that is the secret of a Satsangh. Our Paramguru

Sankaracharya says in Bhajagovindham the following with respect to Satsangh:

 

satsaN^gatve nissN^gatvaM nissaN^gatve nirmohatvam.h .

nirmohatve nishchalatattvaM nishchalatattve jiivanmuktiH – Verse 9

 

From the company of good and holy people, one develops a state of

non-attachment; from this comes freedom from delusion; this leads to a state of

tranquility of mind, which enables one to attain freedom.

 

Sri Sankara here gives us a ladder to climb up to the level of salvation. The

first step is satsangha: the company of holy people, saints, good men and women.

This is the basis of all further steps.

It is a well-known fact that good character is developed from the company of

good people and hence the sadhakas (seekers) desirous of God realization should

attempt to keep only the company of really

good people. Satsangha helps them know which is real and which is transitory;

which leads to God and which leads away. Equipped thus with true knowledge, the

aspirant slowly develops non-attachment to

things of the world.

 

Interestingly the following verses (16 and 17) focus on the subject matter of

what is real and what is transitory. I have provided some additional

explanations to get clarifications of my understanding.

 

For the purpose of discussions the following questions will be our focus:

 

Apara and Para Prakriti (Contribute your insights)

Ksara and Aksara (Distinguish these two important concepts)

Ksetra and Ksetrajna (Are they different? If so when and how the differences

melts away?)

Bhutani and Sarvani (who is bhutani and who is the Sarvani?)

Who is the Uttamapursha?

 

Though the commentaries presented by Swami Chinmayanandaji and Swami

Gambiranandaji provide the explanations we can all benefited more by our own

explanations with examples.

 

Dwaavimau purushau loke ksharashchaakshara eva cha;

Ksharah sarvaani bhootaani kootastho'kshara uchyate.

 

16. Two Purushas there are in this world, the perishable and the imperishable.

All beings are the perishable, and the Kutastha is called the imperishable.

 

The use of the two adjectives `Dvau' and `Imau' with `Purusau' is intended to

convey that the two categories mentioned in this verse under the names of

`Ksara' and `Aksara' form part of the three categories that are being discussed

in the present chapter. And the word `Purusau' refers to no other than the two

categories discussed under the names of the `Apara and `Para' Prakrtis in

Chapter 7 (verses 4-5), under the names of `Adhibhuta' and `Adhyatma' in Chapter

8 (verses 4 and 3), under the names of `Ksetra' and `Ksetrajna' in Chapter 13

(verse 1) and under the names of Asvattha' and `Jiva' in this (15) chapter. By

speaking of the one as `Ksara' and the other as `Aksara' the Lord seeks to

convey that the two are entirely different from each other (at the vyavaharika

level of reality).

 

The word `Bhutani, in this verse denotes the three bodies of a Jiva, viz., the

physical, the astral and the causal. It is these three types of bodies that have

been referred to under the collective name of `Ksetra' in the opening verse of

Chapter 13 and their constituent elements enumerated in verse 5 of the same

chapter. The word `Bhutani', qualified by the adjective `Sarvani' would come to

mean the entire world of matter. This world of matter is perishable and

transient. This is what is borne out by such statements as `All these bodies

have been spoken of as perishable' (2.l8) and `All perishable objects are

Adhibhuta' (8.4). The word `Kutastha' denotes the Self dwelling in all bodies.

The Self continues to be the same under all circumstances, it never changes;

hence it is termed as `Kutastha' or immutable. And it is beyond decay,

destruction or extinction; hence it is imperishable.

 

Essentially, Lord Krishna wants us to understand the distinction between

transient and transcendent. The discriminating intellect should pay attention to

distinguish between temporary (perishable) and permanent (imperishable).

 

Uttamah purushastwanyah paramaatmetyudaahritah;

Yo lokatrayamaavishya bibhartyavyaya ishwarah.

 

17. But distinct is the Supreme Purusha called the highest Self, the

indestructible Lord who, pervading the three worlds, sustains them.

 

 

The `Uttama Purusa' mentioned in this verse is none other than the Parabrahman

(Supreme Person) or God, who is eternal, pure, enlightened free, all-powerful,

supremely compassionate and full of virtues. The use of the particle `Tu' and

the adjective `Anyah' is intended to distinguish God from the `Ksara' and

`Aksara' Purusas mentioned in the preceding verse (16). The intention is to show

that the Supreme Person is distinct from and far superior to both. The

implication is simple but powerful – Our understanding of the Parabrahman at the

Paramarthika level is not how we perceive the Brahman through pairs of opposites

(which do not exist!) at the vyavaharika level. The words `Yo lokatrayam avisya

bibharti' constitute a definition of the Supreme Person or Purusottama. In other

words, the Supreme Person or Purusottama is no other than the all-supporting and

all-pervading God who, having entered the whole universe, upholds the two

categories `Ksara' and `Aksara' referred to under the common name of `Purusa',

and maintains all living beings. Our understanding of the " Absolute " at the

" relative level " differs from our experience at the Absolute level.

 

I am hoping to see more discussions in Gita Satsangh.

 

With my warm regards,

 

Ram Chandran

 

advaitin , " Radhe " <shaantihwrote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste,

Many thanks for this excellent series. Gita satsangh is something very close to

my heart and I don't think you should feel nobody is participating. I am sure

there are members like me who are interested in the posts. Sometimes the sheer

force of intellect applied to some of the discussions in this forum can get

quite intimidating.

 

-----------------------

On the subject of Uttamma Purusha and the idea that the Supreme Person is

distinct from and far superior to both Ksara and Aksara- Can we try to

understand this in terms of the analogy of the potter? (or some other simple

analogy) - Bhagwan is the instrumental, material, and auxillary cause. So He is

the potter, the clay, and the wheel. When it is said that the Supreme Person is

" distinct from and superior to " , how would that fit in the world of the potter?

Is the Supreme Person a micro-manager? or it is only 'Nature' as set forth by

Him that operates at a micro-level and He (It) does not concern Himself (Itself)

with the daily running of this universe? Then what is His role? When

'mana-naatha is jagannaatha' and 'mad-aatma is sarvabhutaatma' how do we

reconcile the idea that the Uttama Purusha is over and above " mad-aatma " ?

I hope these questions are within the scope of the current thread.

 

Warm regards,

Veena.

-------------------

 

Aum Namo Narayanaya.

 

--- On Sat, 10/10/09, Ram <ramvchandran wrote:

 

Ram <ramvchandran

Re: Gita Satsangh Chapter 15 Verses 16 & 17

advaitin

Saturday, October 10, 2009, 8:06 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Namaste Satsanghis:

 

 

 

For quite sometime, no one seems to participate in the Gita Satsangh. Those who

read the postings of Satsangh by Radheji are requested again to write how the

Satsangh benefits you in conducting your life. Also you can contribute with your

insights or insights that you have read from other commentaries. When we write

using our words and thoughts, we get the benefit of better understanding of what

we heard and read and that is the secret of a Satsangh. Our Paramguru

Sankaracharya says in Bhajagovindham the following with respect to Satsangh:

 

 

 

satsaN^gatve nissN^gatvaM nissaN^gatve nirmohatvam. h .

 

nirmohatve nishchalatattvaM nishchalatattve jiivanmuktiH – Verse 9

 

 

 

From the company of good and holy people, one develops a state of

non-attachment; from this comes freedom from delusion; this leads to a state of

tranquility of mind, which enables one to attain freedom.

 

 

 

Sri Sankara here gives us a ladder to climb up to the level of salvation. The

first step is satsangha: the company of holy people, saints, good men and women.

This is the basis of all further steps.

 

It is a well-known fact that good character is developed from the company of

good people and hence the sadhakas (seekers) desirous of God realization should

attempt to keep only the company of really

 

good people. Satsangha helps them know which is real and which is transitory;

which leads to God and which leads away. Equipped thus with true knowledge, the

aspirant slowly develops non-attachment to

 

things of the world.

 

 

 

Interestingly the following verses (16 and 17) focus on the subject matter of

what is real and what is transitory. I have provided some additional

explanations to get clarifications of my understanding.

 

 

 

For the purpose of discussions the following questions will be our focus:

 

 

 

Apara and Para Prakriti (Contribute your insights)

 

Ksara and Aksara (Distinguish these two important concepts)

 

Ksetra and Ksetrajna (Are they different? If so when and how the differences

melts away?)

 

Bhutani and Sarvani (who is bhutani and who is the Sarvani?)

 

Who is the Uttamapursha?

 

 

 

Though the commentaries presented by Swami Chinmayanandaji and Swami

Gambiranandaji provide the explanations we can all benefited more by our own

explanations with examples.

 

 

 

Dwaavimau purushau loke ksharashchaakshara eva cha;

 

Ksharah sarvaani bhootaani kootastho'kshara uchyate.

 

 

 

16. Two Purushas there are in this world, the perishable and the imperishable.

All beings are the perishable, and the Kutastha is called the imperishable.

 

 

 

The use of the two adjectives `Dvau' and `Imau' with `Purusau' is intended to

convey that the two categories mentioned in this verse under the names of

`Ksara' and `Aksara' form part of the three categories that are being discussed

in the present chapter. And the word `Purusau' refers to no other than the two

categories discussed under the names of the `Apara and `Para' Prakrtis in

Chapter 7 (verses 4-5), under the names of `Adhibhuta' and `Adhyatma' in Chapter

8 (verses 4 and 3), under the names of `Ksetra' and `Ksetrajna' in Chapter 13

(verse 1) and under the names of Asvattha' and `Jiva' in this (15) chapter. By

speaking of the one as `Ksara' and the other as `Aksara' the Lord seeks to

convey that the two are entirely different from each other (at the vyavaharika

level of reality).

 

 

 

The word `Bhutani, in this verse denotes the three bodies of a Jiva, viz., the

physical, the astral and the causal. It is these three types of bodies that have

been referred to under the collective name of `Ksetra' in the opening verse of

Chapter 13 and their constituent elements enumerated in verse 5 of the same

chapter. The word `Bhutani', qualified by the adjective `Sarvani' would come to

mean the entire world of matter. This world of matter is perishable and

transient. This is what is borne out by such statements as `All these bodies

have been spoken of as perishable' (2.l8) and `All perishable objects are

Adhibhuta' (8.4). The word `Kutastha' denotes the Self dwelling in all bodies.

The Self continues to be the same under all circumstances, it never changes;

hence it is termed as `Kutastha' or immutable. And it is beyond decay,

destruction or extinction; hence it is imperishable.

 

 

 

Essentially, Lord Krishna wants us to understand the distinction between

transient and transcendent. The discriminating intellect should pay attention to

distinguish between temporary (perishable) and permanent (imperishable) .

 

 

 

Uttamah purushastwanyah paramaatmetyudaahri tah;

 

Yo lokatrayamaavishya bibhartyavyaya ishwarah.

 

 

 

17. But distinct is the Supreme Purusha called the highest Self, the

indestructible Lord who, pervading the three worlds, sustains them.

 

 

 

The `Uttama Purusa' mentioned in this verse is none other than the Parabrahman

(Supreme Person) or God, who is eternal, pure, enlightened free, all-powerful,

supremely compassionate and full of virtues. The use of the particle `Tu' and

the adjective `Anyah' is intended to distinguish God from the `Ksara' and

`Aksara' Purusas mentioned in the preceding verse (16). The intention is to show

that the Supreme Person is distinct from and far superior to both. The

implication is simple but powerful – Our understanding of the Parabrahman at

the Paramarthika level is not how we perceive the Brahman through pairs of

opposites (which do not exist!) at the vyavaharika level. The words `Yo

lokatrayam avisya bibharti' constitute a definition of the Supreme Person or

Purusottama. In other words, the Supreme Person or Purusottama is no other than

the all-supporting and all-pervading God who, having entered the whole universe,

upholds the two categories `Ksara' and

`Aksara' referred to under the common name of `Purusa', and maintains all

living beings. Our understanding of the " Absolute " at the " relative level "

differs from our experience at the Absolute level.

 

 

 

I am hoping to see more discussions in Gita Satsangh.

 

 

 

With my warm regards,

 

 

 

Ram Chandran

 

 

 

advaitin@ s.com, " Radhe " <shaantih@.. .wrote

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste,

 

Like the rope & snake explains a great principle simply one shall while using

esoteric words  attempt to explain them more mundanely. Though not as easy as

said but may improve the chances of more participation. In a way it will also

help the person using technical words to internalise & develop on those higher

concepts.

 

Regards

 

Balagopal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Add whatever you love to the India homepage. Try now!

http://in./trynew

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste Balagopalji:

 

Your point is well taken. Also we the seekers should take some time to study and

share our thoughts with the rest of the members. In the Satsangh setup,

satsanghis contribute by focusing on one or two concepts and share their

knowledge with the rest. This is a cooperative effort to eliminate our

ignorance. I agree with you that all technical words (concepts and jargons)

should be explained and get clarified through exchanges. Everyone takes few

moments to study and share with the rest and that is the best way to spread the

knowledge faster. We do have this ideal situation in the Cyber Satsangh on

Bhagavad Gita. This Satsangh will be more beneficial with greater participation

and contribution. Gita is a great stepping stone for understanding and practice

spritual way of living.

 

Since you brought this important thought, I am hoping that you will be able to

contribute by explaining some estoeric words that appear in the postings.

 

With my warm regards and Happy Deepavali to all,

 

Ram Chandran

 

 

advaitin , balagopal ramakrishnan <rbalpal wrote:

>

> Namaste,

>  

> Like the rope & snake explains a great principle simply one shall while using

esoteric words  attempt to explain them more mundanely. Though not as easy as

said but may improve the chances of more participation. In a way it will also

help the person using technical words to internalise & develop on those higher

concepts.

>  

> Regards

>  

> Balagopal

>  

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Add whatever you love to the India homepage. Try now!

http://in./trynew

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

advaitin , balagopal ramakrishnan <rbalpal wrote:

>

> Namaste,

>  

> Like the rope & snake explains a great principle simply one shall while using

esoteric words  attempt to explain them more mundanely. Though not as easy as

said but may improve the chances of more participation. In a way it will also

help the person using technical words to internalise & develop on those higher

concepts.

>  

> Regards

>  

> Balagopal

>  

> Rope is the language one speak,write,think, but it appears to be a snake

since all visualization occurs only through language.Language produce images

which we impose on real thing and perceive as such.

For example A female is looked as a mother,sister,daughter,wife,and so on.This

happens only due to inter relation of components of language.Language is three

dimensional in its operation.A rope becomes dynamic because of its

association.All these things to be inquired if one is really interested to know

or understand what is.

 

thank you

sekhar

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pranams

 

The idea may perhaps be better understood by using the analogy of the dream.

 

I see a dream. Two friends in this dream go on a hike. It starts raining. They

rush into a hut they see along the way. They are glad to see an old man with a

long beard in the hut. He is kind enough to give them food and water. They then

sit to talk with him, and they talk about how fortunate they were to find his

abode, whereupon he tells them - " listen, do you know something - the two of

you, me, this hut, this forest, are all nothing but Brahman. And do you know who

or what is Brahman? - That which is pervading the entire dream. " Now the two

friends look very surprised - " with due respect dear sir, how can it be " - they

claim! " You are doing the talking, we are listening, we just had warm rotis, our

clothes were drenched in the rain - and all this was nothing but Brahman? who is

this Brahman?

 

He is both the efficient and material cause of that dream.

He is the sleeper " I "

 

As far as that dream Universe is concerned this " I " lent both satta - existence

- and sfurti - consciousness - to the dream. The hill, the trees, the rain

clouds, the rain, the water, the food, my friend, the old man, everything in and

through was this " I " and this " I " alone.

 

And yet, did " I " for a second become old to become the old man. Did a particle

of " I " get wet in that rain? Did " I " develop both the two friends' hunger and

again its lack of on eating the dream food which was again only " I " ? no.

 

Now let us reverse the question - was the old man " I " > ? yes. were the two

friends " I " ? yes. Once " I " resorbs the dream, and the old man, the friends, even

that mountain, all are destroyed - will " I " still continue? Yes of course.

 

So the dream friends and the " real " sleeper " I " are IN ESSENCE the same - yet

" he " the dream " jiva " was as though created and " I " , the sleeper, am as though

the Creator - the Vishwanatha for that dream vishwa. Each of the persons

involved in the dream i.e. the dream jiva is the kshara purusha, that " I "

strictly in relation to that dream-universe is the akshara " Purusha " .

 

" I " pervade the dream, " I " am immanent in the dream, " I " transcend the dream,

and yet " I " remain unsullied, unattached, pure, auspicious as the Uttama Purusha

- Shivoham Shivoham.

 

How did " I " , the uninvolved Uttama PurushA, " create " this dreamworld? Using His

power called Maya.

 

Where is Maya? Are there are two things - " I " and maya?

 

No ..no..there is only one, thing, " I " . Maya is not a separate thing that " I "

wields like a spectre, but is intrinsic to " I " ....... It is not possible to

distill this power of " I " called Maya - you can perceive it by its effect - in

having successfully given an appearance consisting of this universe of plurality

that was perceived.

 

When there was the dream " I " was, when there is no dream or rather when the next

dream is in potential form, " I " still am. In fact " I " alone am.

 

Now what prevents the dream people from recognizing their innate oneness with

this " I " ? ignorance or avidya alone - which is what? Maya, the intrinsic power

of " I " .

 

Strictly speaking kshara purusha akshara purusha uttama purusha are all never

really applicable to Brahman, the Purusha - He being One, without a second.

These adjectives apply to Brahman only from the standpoint of the jiva, - the

jiva regards himself as an entity with limited power - so he has to look to

Brahman as all-powerful, he regards himself as being a mortal, kshara - so

Brahman is Omniscient, akshara - he regards himself as being a karta-bhokta - so

regards Brahman as a karma-phala-daata. And this Brahman, in relation to this

jiva, is said to be " saguna " Brahman or Maya-sahitam Brahman.

 

This does not mean there are two or three Purushas - or two types of Purushas -

or two levels of Brahman - or two anything - this is precisely what advaita -

Non-duality - is all about.

 

So " madatma " or my " I " is the verisame " I " that pervades the entire Cosmos -

sarvabhutatma - and minus me, i.e my ignorance, this " I " alone IS - nondual One.

 

These terms are of relevance ONLY form the standpoint of the ignorant jiva who

demands a cause, for a Duality that has no Reality to begin with.

 

Hari OM

Shri Gurubhyoh namah

Shyam

 

--- On Sat, 10/10/09, Veena Nair <veeus18 wrote:

 

 

Veena Nair <veeus18

Re: Re: Gita Satsangh Chapter 15 Verses 16 & 17

advaitin

Saturday, October 10, 2009, 11:04 AM

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------

On the subject of Uttamma Purusha and the idea that the Supreme Person is

distinct from and far superior to both Ksara and Aksara- Can we try to

understand this in terms of the analogy of the potter? (or some other simple

analogy) - Bhagwan is the instrumental, material, and auxillary cause. So He is

the potter, the clay, and the wheel. When it is said that the Supreme Person is

" distinct from and superior to " , how would that fit in the world of the potter?

Is the Supreme Person a micro-manager? or it is only 'Nature' as set forth by

Him that operates at a micro-level and He (It) does not concern Himself (Itself)

with the daily running of this universe? Then what is His role? When

'mana-naatha is jagannaatha' and 'mad-aatma is sarvabhutaatma' how do we

reconcile the idea that the Uttama Purusha is over and above " mad-aatma " ?

I hope these questions are within the scope of the current thread.

 

Warm regards,

Veena.

------------ -------

 

Aum Namo Narayanaya.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- " All these things to be inquired if one is really interested to know or

understand what is. "

 

Very true Sekharji. When one delve deeper the enquiry becomes more exciting.

Fortunately this group has enough minds who are willing to guide one thru. Hope

we can best make of these opportunities.

 

Regards

 

Balagopal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From cricket scores to your friends. Try the India Homepage!

http://in./trynew

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste Ramji,

 

Let me be very candid - Unless one hasn't learned the scriptures as per the

'sampradaya' ( which I haven't) one will be risking confusion instead of

clarity. Under these circumstances it will be better to be humble and modest and

post asking for clarifications or post the subject as one has understood more

mundanely. This way the learned members of our group will be able to set right

the wrong understandings. Instead if one uses more of the technical language the

whole posting will become crammed and disinterested both for the reader seeking

more knowledge and the person who would have helped him willingily.

 

The popular story of two persons visiting the great music teacher to learn music

asks the master his fees for the same. One student tells him upfront that he

doesn't know music though enjoys it the other says he 'knows' quite a bit. The

master quotes say 5000/- to the student who is totally ignorant and  10000/- to

the other. When asked why this more for the one who 'already knows' the master

says that first he has to remove his half baked 'knowledge 'and then teach

him.  

 

All said, I treat this group and the postings a blessing to keep moving ahead in

life both materially and spiritually.

 

Perfection is what one seeks through imperfections. As Bhagavan said in BG verse

2/40 -  even a little of this will - " ....trAyate mahato bhayAt " .

 

Wishing all in the group a very HAPPY DEEPAVALI.

 

Regards

 

Balagopal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more.

http://in.overview.mail./

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste Shyamji, thanks for the beautiful explanation of the concept of Purusha.

This also reminded me of Ramana Maharishi's instruction that self-realization or

moksha is not a destination out there and we are not to think in terms of

'undertaking' a journey. We are already 'that' and we need to awaken to it

[probably from Day-by-day with Bhagavan - though I could be wrong]. It is

because all duality exists from the standpoint of the jiva alone; when we wake

up to this fact we have arrived.

 

At the level of the mind, these explanations are appealing/convincing; the real

challenge is to be able to assimilate these into one's life.

 

Warm regards,

and many thanks to Radheji for seeing us through this chapter.

 

Veena.

 

--- On Sun, 10/11/09, Shyam <shyam_md wrote:

 

Shyam <shyam_md

Re: Re: Gita Satsangh Chapter 15 Verses 16 & 17

advaitin

Sunday, October 11, 2009, 4:07 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So " madatma " or my " I " is the verisame " I " that pervades the entire Cosmos -

sarvabhutatma - and minus me, i.e my ignorance, this " I " alone IS - nondual One.

 

 

 

These terms are of relevance ONLY form the standpoint of the ignorant jiva who

demands a cause, for a Duality that has no Reality to begin with.

 

 

 

Hari OM

 

Shri Gurubhyoh namah

 

Shyam

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...