Guest guest Posted October 4, 2009 Report Share Posted October 4, 2009 Dandavat pranams to all! Tatah padam tat parimaargitavyam Yasmin gataa na nivartanti bhooyah; Tameva chaadyam purusham prapadye Yatah pravrittih prasritaa puraanee. Then that goal should be sought after, whither having gone none returns again. Seek refuge in that Primeval Purusha whence streamed forth the ancient activity or energy. (BG 15.4) Gita Satsangh Chapter 15 Verses 16 & 17 To listen to Swami Brahmanananda of the Chinmaya Mission chanting this Chapter... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HbuMyixulQ & feature=related To listen to Meena Mahadevan of KailashMusic chanting this Chapter... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO-zznmflEk & feature=channel Dwaavimau purushau loke ksharashchaakshara eva cha; Ksharah sarvaani bhootaani kootastho'kshara uchyate. 16. Two Purushas there are in this world, the perishable and the imperishable. All beings are the perishable, and the Kutastha is called the imperishable. Sankara Bhashya (Swami Gambiranda's Translation and Commentary) 16. There are these two persons in the world-the mutable and the immutable. The mutable consists of all things; the one existing as Maya is called the immutable. There are imau, these; dvau, two-grouped separately; purusau, persons, so called [Persons-so called only figuratively, since they are the limiting adjuncts of the supreme Person.]; loke in the world; the ksarah, mutable-one group consists of the perishable; the other person is the aksarah, immutable, opposite of the former, the power of God called Maya, which is the seed of the origin of the person called the mutable. That which is the receptacle of the impressions of desires, actions, etc. of countless transmigrating creatures is called the immutable person. Who are those persons? The Lord Himself gives the answer: Ksarah, the mutable; consists of sarvani, all; bhutani, things, i.e. the totality of all mutable things. Kutasthah is the one existing as Maya: Kuta means a heap; kutasthah, is that which exists like a heap. Or, kuta is maya, deception, falsehood, crookedness, which are synonymous; that which exists in the diverse forms of maya etc. is the kutasthah. It is ucyate, called; the aksarah, immutable, because, owing to the countless seeds of worldly existence, it does not perish. Swami Chinmayananda's Translation and Commentary 16. Two 'PURUSHAS' are there in this world, the Perishable and the Imperishable. All beings are the Perishable and the 'KOOTASTHAH' is called the Imperishable. Earlier, in Chapter XIII, we had an exhaustive discussion of the field-of-Matter and the Knower-of-the field. The discussion we had so far in this chapter must prove that the Sun, the warmth in the atmosphere, the earth, its potentialities, the plant-kingdom, and man and his capacities --- all of them together constituting the field-of-Matter, are nothing other than the Supreme Itself. When the Infinite Consciousness becomes the light and heat of the Sun, the fertility of the earth, the essence in the plant, the Consciousness in the heart, the faculties of knowing and remembering, etc., they are all different forms of Consciousness alone. Thus, the fact that the field-of-Matter is nothing other than the Spirit Itself was already demonstrated. The only difference is that the Spirit, when It has assumed the form of Matter, looks as though It is subject to change and destruction. Thus the " realm of Matter " is indicated in this stanza as the Perishable (Kshara) Purusha. In the relative field of experience, when we talk with reference to the inert and perishable world of Matter, the Spirit is indicated as the Conscious Principle, which is Imperishable. With reference to one's wife alone is one called a husband; when I have a son I will become a father. Similarly, with reference to the perishable and the changing Matter-envelopments, the Consciousness is indicated as the Imperishable and the Changeless. The body changes; from childhood to youth, from youth to old age; the mind changes in its quality of feelings and emotions; the intellect expressing differently with each added knowledge and experience is ever in a state of change. But one is constantly AWARE OF all these changes. This Consciousness which has been constantly recognising and illumining all changes, at all levels, all through the individual's life, is necessarily changeless. This Conscious Principle is called Akshara only with reference to and as a contrast with the Perishable, the (Kshara). This Immutable and Imperishable principle of Life is the Self, common in all living creatures at all times. That this Self, in the midst of change remains changeless and that all changes can take place only in contact with it are both indicated by the metaphor suggested by the term used here, Kootashah. DISTINCT FROM THESE TWO --- THE PERISHABLE AND THE IMPERISHABLE --- UNTAINTED BY THE IMPERFECTIONS OF THESE TWO RELATIVE CONDITIONS, IS THE HIGHEST SPIRIT: Uttamah purushastwanyah paramaatmetyudaahritah; Yo lokatrayamaavishya bibhartyavyaya ishwarah. 17. But distinct is the Supreme Purusha called the highest Self, the indestructible Lord who, pervading the three worlds, sustains them. Sankara Bhashya (Swami Gambiranda's Translation and Commentary) 17. But different is the supreme Person who is spoken of as the transcendental Self, who, permeating the three worlds, upholds (them), and is the imperishable God. Tu, but; anyah, different, entirely contrary in characteristics from these; is the uttamah, supreme, most excellent; purusah, Person, who is different in characteristics from these-the mutable and the immutable-, untouched by the mutable and the immutable limiting adjuncts, and is by nature eternal, pure, conscious and free; udahrtah, spoken of in the Upanisads; iti, as; the paramatma, supreme Self; He is paramah, supreme, as compared with the selves like body etc. created by ignorance, and is the atma, Self, the inmost Consciousness of all beings. Hence He is the supreme Self. He Himself is being specially described: yah, who, by dint of His own active power inhering in the energy that is Maya; [Caitanya, consciousness, itself is the bala (energy); the sakti (active power) therein is Maya. Through that He upholds.] avisya, permeating; loka-trayam, the three worlds-called Bhuh (Earth), Bhuvah, (Intermediate Space) and Svah (Heaven); bibharti, upholds (them) by merely being present in His own nature. (And He) is the avyayah, imperishable; isvarah, God, the Omniscient One called Narayana, who is the Lord by nature. This name-the supreme Person-of God as described is well known. Showing that the name is apt by virtue of its etymological significance, the Lord reveals Himself saying, 'I am the unsurpassable God': Swami Chinmayananda's Translation and Commentary 17. But distinct is the Supreme PURUSHA called the Highest Self, the Indestructible Lord, who, pervading the three worlds (waking, dream and deep-sleep) , sustains them. But distinct from all these is the Highest Spirit spoken of as the Supreme Self. With reference to my own children alone am I really a father. With reference to my duty or status I may have yet another name. Similarly, the Imperishable is a status and a dignity gained by the Spirit only with reference to the field-of-the-perishables around and about It, through which It manifests as the various expressions of Life. When my children have died, or I am dismissed from my job, I am no more a father, nor can I any more claim my erstwhile official dignity. But that does not mean that I am, in the absence of children or work, an absolute zero, a total non-entity! No. I will exist as " the son of my father, " or in my individual capacity, though devoid of all my special status and dignity born out of my relationship with my profession, or with my children. When the perishable (Kshara) is transcended, what remains is not Imperishable (Akshara) but that which played as the 'Perishable-Purusha' as well as the 'Imperishable-Purusha.' This Pure Spirit (Purusha) is spoken of as the Supreme Self, who 'PERVADES AND SUSTAINS THE THREE WORLDS': " World " in Sanskrit means 'realm of experience.' The three realms of experiences in which we eke out our life's returns are the states of waking, dream, and deep-sleep. The same Self is the illuminator of the experiences in all the above three states-of-Consciousness. There are not three different types of Purushas; according to the limitations and conditions around It, the Spirit, appears different in Its manifestations. A pot is in a room; now the 'pot-space' is a lesser part of the 'room-space,' and the room-space is only a negligible portion of the 'total-space.' At the same time 'pot-space' minus the pot, if understood as " space, " is the same space as the infinite-space. Now, in the above example, pot-space and room-space are something other than the outer-space, in as much as, conditioned as they are, they have gathered unto themselves certain limitations, but the unconditioned 'pot-space' and the 'room-space' are nothing but the infinite-space; break the pot, pull down the walls, the space that was the 'pot-space' and the space that was the 'room-space' have both become one with the Infinite-space! The Infinite Consciousness is Itself the perishable-field in another form, and as the Knower-of-the-Field, the same Consciousness is the Imperishable Reality in the perishable conditionings, But when these conditionings are transcended, the same Self is experienced as the Supreme Self --- Paramatman. SHOWING THE ETYMOLOGY OF THE VERY TERM, PURUSHOTTAMA, THE LORD SHOWS HOW HE IS REALLY THE SUPREME: to be continued... Hare Krishna!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 Namaste Satsanghis: For quite sometime, no one seems to participate in the Gita Satsangh. Those who read the postings of Satsangh by Radheji are requested again to write how the Satsangh benefits you in conducting your life. Also you can contribute with your insights or insights that you have read from other commentaries. When we write using our words and thoughts, we get the benefit of better understanding of what we heard and read and that is the secret of a Satsangh. Our Paramguru Sankaracharya says in Bhajagovindham the following with respect to Satsangh: satsaN^gatve nissN^gatvaM nissaN^gatve nirmohatvam.h . nirmohatve nishchalatattvaM nishchalatattve jiivanmuktiH – Verse 9 From the company of good and holy people, one develops a state of non-attachment; from this comes freedom from delusion; this leads to a state of tranquility of mind, which enables one to attain freedom. Sri Sankara here gives us a ladder to climb up to the level of salvation. The first step is satsangha: the company of holy people, saints, good men and women. This is the basis of all further steps. It is a well-known fact that good character is developed from the company of good people and hence the sadhakas (seekers) desirous of God realization should attempt to keep only the company of really good people. Satsangha helps them know which is real and which is transitory; which leads to God and which leads away. Equipped thus with true knowledge, the aspirant slowly develops non-attachment to things of the world. Interestingly the following verses (16 and 17) focus on the subject matter of what is real and what is transitory. I have provided some additional explanations to get clarifications of my understanding. For the purpose of discussions the following questions will be our focus: Apara and Para Prakriti (Contribute your insights) Ksara and Aksara (Distinguish these two important concepts) Ksetra and Ksetrajna (Are they different? If so when and how the differences melts away?) Bhutani and Sarvani (who is bhutani and who is the Sarvani?) Who is the Uttamapursha? Though the commentaries presented by Swami Chinmayanandaji and Swami Gambiranandaji provide the explanations we can all benefited more by our own explanations with examples. Dwaavimau purushau loke ksharashchaakshara eva cha; Ksharah sarvaani bhootaani kootastho'kshara uchyate. 16. Two Purushas there are in this world, the perishable and the imperishable. All beings are the perishable, and the Kutastha is called the imperishable. The use of the two adjectives `Dvau' and `Imau' with `Purusau' is intended to convey that the two categories mentioned in this verse under the names of `Ksara' and `Aksara' form part of the three categories that are being discussed in the present chapter. And the word `Purusau' refers to no other than the two categories discussed under the names of the `Apara and `Para' Prakrtis in Chapter 7 (verses 4-5), under the names of `Adhibhuta' and `Adhyatma' in Chapter 8 (verses 4 and 3), under the names of `Ksetra' and `Ksetrajna' in Chapter 13 (verse 1) and under the names of Asvattha' and `Jiva' in this (15) chapter. By speaking of the one as `Ksara' and the other as `Aksara' the Lord seeks to convey that the two are entirely different from each other (at the vyavaharika level of reality). The word `Bhutani, in this verse denotes the three bodies of a Jiva, viz., the physical, the astral and the causal. It is these three types of bodies that have been referred to under the collective name of `Ksetra' in the opening verse of Chapter 13 and their constituent elements enumerated in verse 5 of the same chapter. The word `Bhutani', qualified by the adjective `Sarvani' would come to mean the entire world of matter. This world of matter is perishable and transient. This is what is borne out by such statements as `All these bodies have been spoken of as perishable' (2.l8) and `All perishable objects are Adhibhuta' (8.4). The word `Kutastha' denotes the Self dwelling in all bodies. The Self continues to be the same under all circumstances, it never changes; hence it is termed as `Kutastha' or immutable. And it is beyond decay, destruction or extinction; hence it is imperishable. Essentially, Lord Krishna wants us to understand the distinction between transient and transcendent. The discriminating intellect should pay attention to distinguish between temporary (perishable) and permanent (imperishable). Uttamah purushastwanyah paramaatmetyudaahritah; Yo lokatrayamaavishya bibhartyavyaya ishwarah. 17. But distinct is the Supreme Purusha called the highest Self, the indestructible Lord who, pervading the three worlds, sustains them. The `Uttama Purusa' mentioned in this verse is none other than the Parabrahman (Supreme Person) or God, who is eternal, pure, enlightened free, all-powerful, supremely compassionate and full of virtues. The use of the particle `Tu' and the adjective `Anyah' is intended to distinguish God from the `Ksara' and `Aksara' Purusas mentioned in the preceding verse (16). The intention is to show that the Supreme Person is distinct from and far superior to both. The implication is simple but powerful – Our understanding of the Parabrahman at the Paramarthika level is not how we perceive the Brahman through pairs of opposites (which do not exist!) at the vyavaharika level. The words `Yo lokatrayam avisya bibharti' constitute a definition of the Supreme Person or Purusottama. In other words, the Supreme Person or Purusottama is no other than the all-supporting and all-pervading God who, having entered the whole universe, upholds the two categories `Ksara' and `Aksara' referred to under the common name of `Purusa', and maintains all living beings. Our understanding of the " Absolute " at the " relative level " differs from our experience at the Absolute level. I am hoping to see more discussions in Gita Satsangh. With my warm regards, Ram Chandran advaitin , " Radhe " <shaantihwrote Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 Namaste, Many thanks for this excellent series. Gita satsangh is something very close to my heart and I don't think you should feel nobody is participating. I am sure there are members like me who are interested in the posts. Sometimes the sheer force of intellect applied to some of the discussions in this forum can get quite intimidating. ----------------------- On the subject of Uttamma Purusha and the idea that the Supreme Person is distinct from and far superior to both Ksara and Aksara- Can we try to understand this in terms of the analogy of the potter? (or some other simple analogy) - Bhagwan is the instrumental, material, and auxillary cause. So He is the potter, the clay, and the wheel. When it is said that the Supreme Person is " distinct from and superior to " , how would that fit in the world of the potter? Is the Supreme Person a micro-manager? or it is only 'Nature' as set forth by Him that operates at a micro-level and He (It) does not concern Himself (Itself) with the daily running of this universe? Then what is His role? When 'mana-naatha is jagannaatha' and 'mad-aatma is sarvabhutaatma' how do we reconcile the idea that the Uttama Purusha is over and above " mad-aatma " ? I hope these questions are within the scope of the current thread. Warm regards, Veena. ------------------- Aum Namo Narayanaya. --- On Sat, 10/10/09, Ram <ramvchandran wrote: Ram <ramvchandran Re: Gita Satsangh Chapter 15 Verses 16 & 17 advaitin Saturday, October 10, 2009, 8:06 AM  Namaste Satsanghis: For quite sometime, no one seems to participate in the Gita Satsangh. Those who read the postings of Satsangh by Radheji are requested again to write how the Satsangh benefits you in conducting your life. Also you can contribute with your insights or insights that you have read from other commentaries. When we write using our words and thoughts, we get the benefit of better understanding of what we heard and read and that is the secret of a Satsangh. Our Paramguru Sankaracharya says in Bhajagovindham the following with respect to Satsangh: satsaN^gatve nissN^gatvaM nissaN^gatve nirmohatvam. h . nirmohatve nishchalatattvaM nishchalatattve jiivanmuktiH – Verse 9 From the company of good and holy people, one develops a state of non-attachment; from this comes freedom from delusion; this leads to a state of tranquility of mind, which enables one to attain freedom. Sri Sankara here gives us a ladder to climb up to the level of salvation. The first step is satsangha: the company of holy people, saints, good men and women. This is the basis of all further steps. It is a well-known fact that good character is developed from the company of good people and hence the sadhakas (seekers) desirous of God realization should attempt to keep only the company of really good people. Satsangha helps them know which is real and which is transitory; which leads to God and which leads away. Equipped thus with true knowledge, the aspirant slowly develops non-attachment to things of the world. Interestingly the following verses (16 and 17) focus on the subject matter of what is real and what is transitory. I have provided some additional explanations to get clarifications of my understanding. For the purpose of discussions the following questions will be our focus: Apara and Para Prakriti (Contribute your insights) Ksara and Aksara (Distinguish these two important concepts) Ksetra and Ksetrajna (Are they different? If so when and how the differences melts away?) Bhutani and Sarvani (who is bhutani and who is the Sarvani?) Who is the Uttamapursha? Though the commentaries presented by Swami Chinmayanandaji and Swami Gambiranandaji provide the explanations we can all benefited more by our own explanations with examples. Dwaavimau purushau loke ksharashchaakshara eva cha; Ksharah sarvaani bhootaani kootastho'kshara uchyate. 16. Two Purushas there are in this world, the perishable and the imperishable. All beings are the perishable, and the Kutastha is called the imperishable. The use of the two adjectives `Dvau' and `Imau' with `Purusau' is intended to convey that the two categories mentioned in this verse under the names of `Ksara' and `Aksara' form part of the three categories that are being discussed in the present chapter. And the word `Purusau' refers to no other than the two categories discussed under the names of the `Apara and `Para' Prakrtis in Chapter 7 (verses 4-5), under the names of `Adhibhuta' and `Adhyatma' in Chapter 8 (verses 4 and 3), under the names of `Ksetra' and `Ksetrajna' in Chapter 13 (verse 1) and under the names of Asvattha' and `Jiva' in this (15) chapter. By speaking of the one as `Ksara' and the other as `Aksara' the Lord seeks to convey that the two are entirely different from each other (at the vyavaharika level of reality). The word `Bhutani, in this verse denotes the three bodies of a Jiva, viz., the physical, the astral and the causal. It is these three types of bodies that have been referred to under the collective name of `Ksetra' in the opening verse of Chapter 13 and their constituent elements enumerated in verse 5 of the same chapter. The word `Bhutani', qualified by the adjective `Sarvani' would come to mean the entire world of matter. This world of matter is perishable and transient. This is what is borne out by such statements as `All these bodies have been spoken of as perishable' (2.l8) and `All perishable objects are Adhibhuta' (8.4). The word `Kutastha' denotes the Self dwelling in all bodies. The Self continues to be the same under all circumstances, it never changes; hence it is termed as `Kutastha' or immutable. And it is beyond decay, destruction or extinction; hence it is imperishable. Essentially, Lord Krishna wants us to understand the distinction between transient and transcendent. The discriminating intellect should pay attention to distinguish between temporary (perishable) and permanent (imperishable) . Uttamah purushastwanyah paramaatmetyudaahri tah; Yo lokatrayamaavishya bibhartyavyaya ishwarah. 17. But distinct is the Supreme Purusha called the highest Self, the indestructible Lord who, pervading the three worlds, sustains them. The `Uttama Purusa' mentioned in this verse is none other than the Parabrahman (Supreme Person) or God, who is eternal, pure, enlightened free, all-powerful, supremely compassionate and full of virtues. The use of the particle `Tu' and the adjective `Anyah' is intended to distinguish God from the `Ksara' and `Aksara' Purusas mentioned in the preceding verse (16). The intention is to show that the Supreme Person is distinct from and far superior to both. The implication is simple but powerful – Our understanding of the Parabrahman at the Paramarthika level is not how we perceive the Brahman through pairs of opposites (which do not exist!) at the vyavaharika level. The words `Yo lokatrayam avisya bibharti' constitute a definition of the Supreme Person or Purusottama. In other words, the Supreme Person or Purusottama is no other than the all-supporting and all-pervading God who, having entered the whole universe, upholds the two categories `Ksara' and `Aksara' referred to under the common name of `Purusa', and maintains all living beings. Our understanding of the " Absolute " at the " relative level " differs from our experience at the Absolute level. I am hoping to see more discussions in Gita Satsangh. With my warm regards, Ram Chandran advaitin@ s.com, " Radhe " <shaantih@.. .wrote Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 Namaste, Like the rope & snake explains a great principle simply one shall while using esoteric words attempt to explain them more mundanely. Though not as easy as said but may improve the chances of more participation. In a way it will also help the person using technical words to internalise & develop on those higher concepts. Regards Balagopal Add whatever you love to the India homepage. Try now! http://in./trynew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 Namaste Balagopalji: Your point is well taken. Also we the seekers should take some time to study and share our thoughts with the rest of the members. In the Satsangh setup, satsanghis contribute by focusing on one or two concepts and share their knowledge with the rest. This is a cooperative effort to eliminate our ignorance. I agree with you that all technical words (concepts and jargons) should be explained and get clarified through exchanges. Everyone takes few moments to study and share with the rest and that is the best way to spread the knowledge faster. We do have this ideal situation in the Cyber Satsangh on Bhagavad Gita. This Satsangh will be more beneficial with greater participation and contribution. Gita is a great stepping stone for understanding and practice spritual way of living. Since you brought this important thought, I am hoping that you will be able to contribute by explaining some estoeric words that appear in the postings. With my warm regards and Happy Deepavali to all, Ram Chandran advaitin , balagopal ramakrishnan <rbalpal wrote: > > Namaste, > > Like the rope & snake explains a great principle simply one shall while using esoteric words attempt to explain them more mundanely. Though not as easy as said but may improve the chances of more participation. In a way it will also help the person using technical words to internalise & develop on those higher concepts. > > Regards > > Balagopal > > > > > > > > > Add whatever you love to the India homepage. Try now! http://in./trynew > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 advaitin , balagopal ramakrishnan <rbalpal wrote: > > Namaste, > > Like the rope & snake explains a great principle simply one shall while using esoteric words attempt to explain them more mundanely. Though not as easy as said but may improve the chances of more participation. In a way it will also help the person using technical words to internalise & develop on those higher concepts. > > Regards > > Balagopal > > Rope is the language one speak,write,think, but it appears to be a snake since all visualization occurs only through language.Language produce images which we impose on real thing and perceive as such. For example A female is looked as a mother,sister,daughter,wife,and so on.This happens only due to inter relation of components of language.Language is three dimensional in its operation.A rope becomes dynamic because of its association.All these things to be inquired if one is really interested to know or understand what is. thank you sekhar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 Pranams The idea may perhaps be better understood by using the analogy of the dream. I see a dream. Two friends in this dream go on a hike. It starts raining. They rush into a hut they see along the way. They are glad to see an old man with a long beard in the hut. He is kind enough to give them food and water. They then sit to talk with him, and they talk about how fortunate they were to find his abode, whereupon he tells them - " listen, do you know something - the two of you, me, this hut, this forest, are all nothing but Brahman. And do you know who or what is Brahman? - That which is pervading the entire dream. " Now the two friends look very surprised - " with due respect dear sir, how can it be " - they claim! " You are doing the talking, we are listening, we just had warm rotis, our clothes were drenched in the rain - and all this was nothing but Brahman? who is this Brahman? He is both the efficient and material cause of that dream. He is the sleeper " I " As far as that dream Universe is concerned this " I " lent both satta - existence - and sfurti - consciousness - to the dream. The hill, the trees, the rain clouds, the rain, the water, the food, my friend, the old man, everything in and through was this " I " and this " I " alone. And yet, did " I " for a second become old to become the old man. Did a particle of " I " get wet in that rain? Did " I " develop both the two friends' hunger and again its lack of on eating the dream food which was again only " I " ? no. Now let us reverse the question - was the old man " I " > ? yes. were the two friends " I " ? yes. Once " I " resorbs the dream, and the old man, the friends, even that mountain, all are destroyed - will " I " still continue? Yes of course. So the dream friends and the " real " sleeper " I " are IN ESSENCE the same - yet " he " the dream " jiva " was as though created and " I " , the sleeper, am as though the Creator - the Vishwanatha for that dream vishwa. Each of the persons involved in the dream i.e. the dream jiva is the kshara purusha, that " I " strictly in relation to that dream-universe is the akshara " Purusha " . " I " pervade the dream, " I " am immanent in the dream, " I " transcend the dream, and yet " I " remain unsullied, unattached, pure, auspicious as the Uttama Purusha - Shivoham Shivoham. How did " I " , the uninvolved Uttama PurushA, " create " this dreamworld? Using His power called Maya. Where is Maya? Are there are two things - " I " and maya? No ..no..there is only one, thing, " I " . Maya is not a separate thing that " I " wields like a spectre, but is intrinsic to " I " ....... It is not possible to distill this power of " I " called Maya - you can perceive it by its effect - in having successfully given an appearance consisting of this universe of plurality that was perceived. When there was the dream " I " was, when there is no dream or rather when the next dream is in potential form, " I " still am. In fact " I " alone am. Now what prevents the dream people from recognizing their innate oneness with this " I " ? ignorance or avidya alone - which is what? Maya, the intrinsic power of " I " . Strictly speaking kshara purusha akshara purusha uttama purusha are all never really applicable to Brahman, the Purusha - He being One, without a second. These adjectives apply to Brahman only from the standpoint of the jiva, - the jiva regards himself as an entity with limited power - so he has to look to Brahman as all-powerful, he regards himself as being a mortal, kshara - so Brahman is Omniscient, akshara - he regards himself as being a karta-bhokta - so regards Brahman as a karma-phala-daata. And this Brahman, in relation to this jiva, is said to be " saguna " Brahman or Maya-sahitam Brahman. This does not mean there are two or three Purushas - or two types of Purushas - or two levels of Brahman - or two anything - this is precisely what advaita - Non-duality - is all about. So " madatma " or my " I " is the verisame " I " that pervades the entire Cosmos - sarvabhutatma - and minus me, i.e my ignorance, this " I " alone IS - nondual One. These terms are of relevance ONLY form the standpoint of the ignorant jiva who demands a cause, for a Duality that has no Reality to begin with. Hari OM Shri Gurubhyoh namah Shyam --- On Sat, 10/10/09, Veena Nair <veeus18 wrote: Veena Nair <veeus18 Re: Re: Gita Satsangh Chapter 15 Verses 16 & 17 advaitin Saturday, October 10, 2009, 11:04 AM ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- -------- On the subject of Uttamma Purusha and the idea that the Supreme Person is distinct from and far superior to both Ksara and Aksara- Can we try to understand this in terms of the analogy of the potter? (or some other simple analogy) - Bhagwan is the instrumental, material, and auxillary cause. So He is the potter, the clay, and the wheel. When it is said that the Supreme Person is " distinct from and superior to " , how would that fit in the world of the potter? Is the Supreme Person a micro-manager? or it is only 'Nature' as set forth by Him that operates at a micro-level and He (It) does not concern Himself (Itself) with the daily running of this universe? Then what is His role? When 'mana-naatha is jagannaatha' and 'mad-aatma is sarvabhutaatma' how do we reconcile the idea that the Uttama Purusha is over and above " mad-aatma " ? I hope these questions are within the scope of the current thread. Warm regards, Veena. ------------ ------- Aum Namo Narayanaya. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 - " All these things to be inquired if one is really interested to know or understand what is. " Very true Sekharji. When one delve deeper the enquiry becomes more exciting. Fortunately this group has enough minds who are willing to guide one thru. Hope we can best make of these opportunities. Regards Balagopal From cricket scores to your friends. Try the India Homepage! http://in./trynew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 Namaste Ramji, Let me be very candid - Unless one hasn't learned the scriptures as per the 'sampradaya' ( which I haven't) one will be risking confusion instead of clarity. Under these circumstances it will be better to be humble and modest and post asking for clarifications or post the subject as one has understood more mundanely. This way the learned members of our group will be able to set right the wrong understandings. Instead if one uses more of the technical language the whole posting will become crammed and disinterested both for the reader seeking more knowledge and the person who would have helped him willingily. The popular story of two persons visiting the great music teacher to learn music asks the master his fees for the same. One student tells him upfront that he doesn't know music though enjoys it the other says he 'knows' quite a bit. The master quotes say 5000/- to the student who is totally ignorant and 10000/- to the other. When asked why this more for the one who 'already knows' the master says that first he has to remove his half baked 'knowledge 'and then teach him. All said, I treat this group and the postings a blessing to keep moving ahead in life both materially and spiritually. Perfection is what one seeks through imperfections. As Bhagavan said in BG verse 2/40 - even a little of this will - " ....trAyate mahato bhayAt " . Wishing all in the group a very HAPPY DEEPAVALI. Regards Balagopal Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more. http://in.overview.mail./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 Namaste Shyamji, thanks for the beautiful explanation of the concept of Purusha. This also reminded me of Ramana Maharishi's instruction that self-realization or moksha is not a destination out there and we are not to think in terms of 'undertaking' a journey. We are already 'that' and we need to awaken to it [probably from Day-by-day with Bhagavan - though I could be wrong]. It is because all duality exists from the standpoint of the jiva alone; when we wake up to this fact we have arrived. At the level of the mind, these explanations are appealing/convincing; the real challenge is to be able to assimilate these into one's life. Warm regards, and many thanks to Radheji for seeing us through this chapter. Veena. --- On Sun, 10/11/09, Shyam <shyam_md wrote: Shyam <shyam_md Re: Re: Gita Satsangh Chapter 15 Verses 16 & 17 advaitin Sunday, October 11, 2009, 4:07 PM So " madatma " or my " I " is the verisame " I " that pervades the entire Cosmos - sarvabhutatma - and minus me, i.e my ignorance, this " I " alone IS - nondual One. These terms are of relevance ONLY form the standpoint of the ignorant jiva who demands a cause, for a Duality that has no Reality to begin with. Hari OM Shri Gurubhyoh namah Shyam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.