A Perspective - 1

[Guest guest]

Namaste, all

 

<<<Therefore Mithyaatva darshanam of the prapanca does not mean rejection of the

prapanca as undesirable; it can be accepted as the vibhuti of the Lord and deal

as APPROPRIATELY. . . . .. >>>

Is the Lord itself not  Mithya in the ultimate analysis, including the One who

does all such analysis?

Is it not actually “Washing the baby with all care and attention and throwing

not only the washing water and the baby also?

Just a silly doubt.

Kind regards and Hari Om

 

R. S. Mani

 

 

Try the new India Homepage. http://in./trynew

 

 

[Guest guest]

Namaste Maniji:

 

Your statement could be acceptable if it comes along with specific

qualifications (caveats). Isvara (Lord) is not Mythia but our understanding

(knowledge) of Isvara is Mythia. Brahmaiva Sathyam implies that Nothing other

than the Brahman (Nirguna Brahman) exists. The Jiva and the Isvara both are not

separate entities and they are submerged within the Brahman. Their independent

existence separate from the Brahman is Mythia. The body, mind and intellect of

the Jiva, the act of creation and the creations are Mythia.

 

The act of washing the baby with all care and attention and throwing the washing

water and the baby is also Mythia,

 

Finally, your last statement, " Just a silly doubt, " is also Mythia!

 

With my warm regards,

 

Ram Chandran

 

advaitin , " R.S.MANI " <r_s_mani wrote:

>

>

>

> Namaste, all

> Â

> <<<Therefore Mithyaatva darshanam of the prapanca does not mean rejection of

the prapanca as undesirable; it can be accepted as the vibhuti of the Lord and

deal as APPROPRIATELY. . . . .. >>>

> Is the Lord itself not Mithya in the ultimate analysis, including the One

who does all such analysis?

> Is it not actually “Washing the baby with all care and attention and

throwing not only the washing water and the baby also?

> Just a silly doubt.

> Kind regards and Hari Om

>